Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

The Explosive Reason King Charles Branded Harry And Meghan “Private Citizens” Comes To Light
King Charles and Harry, both in black tie, smiling. King Charles looks ahead, Harry smiles brightly. Private citizens.

The Explosive Reason King Charles Branded Harry And Meghan “Private Citizens” Comes To Light

-39

ADVERTISEMENT

The rift between Buckingham Palace and the Sussexes worsened this week after a recent statement from King Charles III.

Days after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle returned to the UK to stay long-term, the monarch sent a guidance letter saying that the two are to be considered “private citizens” regarding their public engagements.

Highlights
  • After Harry and Meghan’s return to the UK, King Charles wrote a letter, calling them “private citizens.”
  • The label allegedly didn't sit well with the Sussexes, who weren’t told about it in advance.
  • An insider has now revealed why Charles felt the need to write the letter.

Harry has reportedly taken issue with the label, as well as not being consulted in advance about the letter’s content.

Now, an insider has shed light on the reason Charles felt it necessary to write the letter and brand his son and daughter-in-law as such.

“With them moving back to the UK, it’s been confusing,” the source said.

RELATED:

    King Charles reportedly wrote the letter to iron out any “confusion” about Harry and Meghan’s return

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Samir Hussein/WireImage

    When Harry and Meghan split from the Royal Family, they stopped being working royals, lost their HRH titles, and became ineligible for public funding under the conditions of the Sandringham Summit.

    But since their return to the UK on August 26 and subsequent reports of house-hunting for a permanent residence in the Cotswolds, many have wondered whether the previous agreement still stood and if Harry and Meghan would resume representing the family.

    Jonathan Brady-Pool/Getty Images

    The letter, dated September 7 and penned by Lord Chamberlain Richard Benyon on the King’s behalf, clearly stated that this would not be the case.

    “It follows that there is no change to the current status of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex,” the letter read.

    “The charitable work of the Duke and Duchess is a personal matter for them both and undertaken in their private capacity. In short, their position is akin to private citizens with commercial and charitable interests.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    meghan

    Explaining the intention behind the letter, a source told US Weekly magazine on September 10 that the King meant to squash any rumors of Harry’s potential return to Buckingham Palace.

    “Per an agreement when they left working royal status, everything they wanted to do that was public-facing with certain patronages was to be approved by the palace so they would not be confused as official working royals,” the insider said.

    “Charles wrote a letter to clarify they are not working royals and they are considered private citizens so there is no confusion,” the source added. “The king just wanted the public and press not to be confused. They can’t be one foot in and one foot out.”

    The Sussexes got no chance to review the letter that was allegedly Prince William’s idea

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Samir Hussein/WireImage

    A second source told US Weekly that Harry and Meghan’s “plan was always to come back to the UK as non-working royals.”

    The day after the letter was released, a spokesperson for the Sussexes told the British media that the two “were a little surprised not to have been told about this in advance.”

    A source told The Telegraph that Harry took offense over his father calling him and his wife “private citizens” and preferred the term “public figures” instead. He also expected an acknowledgment that, on a personal level, they remained members of the Royal Family.

    magicrules24

    Moreover, the letter reached their office merely an hour before it was made public.

    Their staff never got the chance to “clarify one or two points” they had issues with since they could not reach Harry in time, who was reportedly busy in a meeting at Tower Bridge Studios, a London filming and podcast establishment.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Buckingham Palace sources told The Telegraph that there was no need to consult the Sussexes as the letter had “nothing controversial or new” and only reaffirmed their existing status.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images

    Although the letter came from King Charles’ office, a source told journalist Rob Shuter that it was Prince William’s idea.

    “William had had enough of the confusion,” the insider said. “Lord Lieutenancies were asking how Harry and Meghan should be treated. William’s answer was brutally simple: nothing has changed. They are out.”

    Prince Harry’s private engagements are already being affected by King Charles’ letter, according to a source

    ADVERTISEMENT

    meghan

    No matter what the Royal Family labels Harry and Meghan, it does little to change public perception, a source close to the Sussexes told People magazine amid the letter controversy.

    “They are public figures,” the insider said. “Members of the public know who they are. The idea that they can live a normal, ‘private’ life is sadly not realistic.”

    Those close to the couple also argued that if Harry and Meghan were private individuals, a formal letter of guidance would not have been necessary in the first place.

    meghan

    Meanwhile, Harry is gearing up for multiple public engagements in September, according to The Telegraph, but Meghan will not be accompanying him much in the coming months.

    “He has his work, and she has hers, which is not so public-facing,” one friend said. “It will be rare to see her or to see them together.”

    Harry will go to a WellChild program supporting seriously ill children, launch the Inspire educational initiative, attend the inaugural Invictus Spirit Awards, and take part in other engagements related to the 2027 Invictus Games.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jonathan Brady-Pool/Getty Images

    Founded by Harry in 2014, the international multi-sport event supports wounded, injured, and sick service personnel and veterans through sport and recovery.

    After Charles’ letter, Uganda pulled out of the Invictus Games, with the country’s military chief, General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, declaring support for the monarch and dismissing any “Harry-Meghan nonsense.”

    A source close to Harry told People magazine, “They made it very clear that the reason they pulled out was a direct result of perceived guidance from the Lord Chamberlain. This was an unintended or intended consequence of the letter — and that was always going to happen. Hence the wish not to rush it out.”

    “Since when does the King need his prodigal son’s approval?” one angry reader commented

    ADVERTISEMENT

    DramaQueenMoni

    lizgarn55891698

    TheAnchoress

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Mikey43263284

    ADVERTISEMENT

    rollinger

    burningmTo

    Eleanor37635475

    ADVERTISEMENT

    whatevs11

    ADVERTISEMENT

    CiciTee1

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook
    Anwesha Nag

    Anwesha Nag

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    Anwesha Nag is a seasoned digital journalist with nearly a decade's experience in covering sports, lifestyle, and entertainment. Her work has previously been published on Sportskeeda, FanSided, and PFSN, and featured on Google News and Discover. She is also a reader, a caffeine enthusiast, a cat parent, and a nerd, who is obsessed with the power of words and storytelling.

    Read less »
    Anwesha Nag

    Anwesha Nag

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Anwesha Nag is a seasoned digital journalist with nearly a decade's experience in covering sports, lifestyle, and entertainment. Her work has previously been published on Sportskeeda, FanSided, and PFSN, and featured on Google News and Discover. She is also a reader, a caffeine enthusiast, a cat parent, and a nerd, who is obsessed with the power of words and storytelling.

    What do you think ?
    Janissary35680
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 day ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Exactly. The "explosive reasons" turns out to be a damp squib. Moving on...

    Load More Replies...
    Mavis
    Community Member
    1 day ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    “They are public figures,” the insider said. “Members of the public know who they are. The idea that they can live a normal, ‘private’ life is sadly not realistic.” TOUGH CHEESE. They opted out of the benefits of being royal. The king's letter declaring them "private citizens" is merely confirming that they will not be sponging off the public purse. Well done Charles.

    Spencers slave no more
    Community Member
    1 day ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    My thoughts exactly! They wanted to be private citizens, that's exactly what Charles reiterated.

    Load More Replies...
    T'Mar of Vulcan
    Community Member
    1 day ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm not a huge fan of Charles, but it seems like he's trying to be a good king in amongst all his son's shenanigans while navigating medical problems. He doesn't need this in his life.

    Saj
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 day ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Harry was inevitably going to incinerate his bridges as soon as that woman entered the picture. He is a weak man, she is a scheming, fame and money seeking wench. Ultimately it boils down to "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" 🤷🏻‍♀️. Respect to the King for not allowing them to get a foot hold back in the Royal household after thing turned to 💩 in the USA.

    Julie S
    Community Member
    Premium
    20 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You can't be a public figure and want privacy at the same time.

    Spittnimage
    Community Member
    11 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Harry and Meghan: But, but, but...we won't get taxpayer paid security if we're private citizens!

    JuJu Bean
    Community Member
    17 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    FFS! Can we just be decent human beings & stop with the hate. These people don't affect your lives. Just ignore them. We don't need articles like this that just feed the animosity.

    Scott Rackley
    Community Member
    8 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Biggest fumble ever, Harry chose tail over a life of ease. Doesn't he owe like a boatload of money to some lawyers?

    John Ullmann
    Community Member
    19 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Just to clear up the idea of their proper place in the symbolic lineage, which is all that remains of an Absolute King like Henry VIII, I would always call them Prince Harry and Lady Meghan rather than be insolent. The idea that Charles must again renounce his fatherhood as well as his grandson as a potential heir to the throne "of color" on a call from the Lord Chamberlain is laughable. It conveys the mockery of the Royal Household over familial pride. The Household is in ridicule. They are perhaps the only ones who have been confused by their own white racist purity. If it weren't so tragic and needlessly degrading to the Throne, it would be the stuff of a Peter Sellers-style satire. It is almost as if the Household is telling a grandfather he must renounce any offer of organ transplants from his red-haired son. Now the Household brings Prince William into the drama spoiling his cachet. We see you all from across the pond. We know who you are actually.

    PJB II
    Community Member
    11 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    For an institution that is based on lineage, hereditary lines, and "family", it appears to me the royals are just a bunch of elitists, even to their own. Harry is the direct descendant of the monarch, and as such, shouldn't be subjected to this internal BS from his brother, and ESPECIALLY not from his father. I used to have great admiration for William, and the task ahead of him, given the hand he has been dealt , but if what they're indicating is true, he appears to me to be just another stiff shirt azz whole royal, that when it doesn't go HIS way, he lashes out. He's forever connected to his younger sibling, so he's best to do the right thing and welcome him, and his family, his ENTIRE family, back into the fold and and the Brits say, "get on with it".

    Sue
    Community Member
    12 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    All this ado about Harry and Megjan when Charles shouldn't even be king after cheating on his wife. I guess things haven't changed since the medieval days

    Roberta Surprenant
    Community Member
    13 hours ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    What a sad, pitifully vindictive, family the Windsors are. Not surprised if Wills pushed for it, he knows his grandchildren probably won't have a throne. The brits have other/better tourist attractions than the "royal" zoo, er, family.

    Janissary35680
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 day ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Exactly. The "explosive reasons" turns out to be a damp squib. Moving on...

    Load More Replies...
    Mavis
    Community Member
    1 day ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    “They are public figures,” the insider said. “Members of the public know who they are. The idea that they can live a normal, ‘private’ life is sadly not realistic.” TOUGH CHEESE. They opted out of the benefits of being royal. The king's letter declaring them "private citizens" is merely confirming that they will not be sponging off the public purse. Well done Charles.

    Spencers slave no more
    Community Member
    1 day ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    My thoughts exactly! They wanted to be private citizens, that's exactly what Charles reiterated.

    Load More Replies...
    ADVERTISEMENT
    T'Mar of Vulcan
    Community Member
    1 day ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm not a huge fan of Charles, but it seems like he's trying to be a good king in amongst all his son's shenanigans while navigating medical problems. He doesn't need this in his life.

    Saj
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 day ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Harry was inevitably going to incinerate his bridges as soon as that woman entered the picture. He is a weak man, she is a scheming, fame and money seeking wench. Ultimately it boils down to "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" 🤷🏻‍♀️. Respect to the King for not allowing them to get a foot hold back in the Royal household after thing turned to 💩 in the USA.

    Julie S
    Community Member
    Premium
    20 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You can't be a public figure and want privacy at the same time.

    Spittnimage
    Community Member
    11 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Harry and Meghan: But, but, but...we won't get taxpayer paid security if we're private citizens!

    JuJu Bean
    Community Member
    17 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    FFS! Can we just be decent human beings & stop with the hate. These people don't affect your lives. Just ignore them. We don't need articles like this that just feed the animosity.

    Scott Rackley
    Community Member
    8 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Biggest fumble ever, Harry chose tail over a life of ease. Doesn't he owe like a boatload of money to some lawyers?

    John Ullmann
    Community Member
    19 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Just to clear up the idea of their proper place in the symbolic lineage, which is all that remains of an Absolute King like Henry VIII, I would always call them Prince Harry and Lady Meghan rather than be insolent. The idea that Charles must again renounce his fatherhood as well as his grandson as a potential heir to the throne "of color" on a call from the Lord Chamberlain is laughable. It conveys the mockery of the Royal Household over familial pride. The Household is in ridicule. They are perhaps the only ones who have been confused by their own white racist purity. If it weren't so tragic and needlessly degrading to the Throne, it would be the stuff of a Peter Sellers-style satire. It is almost as if the Household is telling a grandfather he must renounce any offer of organ transplants from his red-haired son. Now the Household brings Prince William into the drama spoiling his cachet. We see you all from across the pond. We know who you are actually.

    PJB II
    Community Member
    11 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    For an institution that is based on lineage, hereditary lines, and "family", it appears to me the royals are just a bunch of elitists, even to their own. Harry is the direct descendant of the monarch, and as such, shouldn't be subjected to this internal BS from his brother, and ESPECIALLY not from his father. I used to have great admiration for William, and the task ahead of him, given the hand he has been dealt , but if what they're indicating is true, he appears to me to be just another stiff shirt azz whole royal, that when it doesn't go HIS way, he lashes out. He's forever connected to his younger sibling, so he's best to do the right thing and welcome him, and his family, his ENTIRE family, back into the fold and and the Brits say, "get on with it".

    Sue
    Community Member
    12 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    All this ado about Harry and Megjan when Charles shouldn't even be king after cheating on his wife. I guess things haven't changed since the medieval days

    Roberta Surprenant
    Community Member
    13 hours ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    What a sad, pitifully vindictive, family the Windsors are. Not surprised if Wills pushed for it, he knows his grandchildren probably won't have a throne. The brits have other/better tourist attractions than the "royal" zoo, er, family.

    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT