Artist Compares Her Illustrations To Show What Two Years Of Practice Can Do

Guys, chill. It's an extra o. You knew exactly what I meant.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

To not too.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

...to use proper spelling and grammar!

It's not necessarily that people are picking favorites, it's just something that they like or don't like. At least that's how it is for me. And truer words have never been spoken about my ability to draw anything, let alone anything as amazing as what she's drawn!! Also, I haven't read each comment super closely, but the ones for Pocahontas, I think they were critiquing rather than pointing out what they think is bad.

Same.

Same it just looks more like her from the movie

Same.

Me too! I dont see the progress in this like in others.

These later drawings may not be done using the same medium. For some of her work, she is using Speedpaint software with an Wacom Intuos drawing pad for input. I've looked into those for myself and the lower end drawing pads do not have the sensitivity of the more expensive ones. She may not be able to get the precision and variance that she normally would with freehand airbrushed acrylic. Personally, I prefer her other work altogether, but then when it comes to art, I lean toward naturalism.

It doesn't need to look like the original. That's the point of looking at style differences.

Yea I think she is going for realistic

the point is for it to be more realistic... -,- and copying original art doesn't make you better....

I think the point of these is for us to see how her style has improved

Yeah but that means it’s not stylised or personal

If you're going to comment on other peoples creativity at least learn the names of the characters.

Wait...how?

I disagree. The only missing characteristic i find is the jawbones. Our new Belle has a slimmer face and therefore a different Face form. You can see the slim ja, but original Belle had more prominent features. But the drawing here is a different style as well - so you cant really say to an artist to just copy people. >.> By the way.

not really

My bad thought you were talking about the movie actress lol.

Not quite. The actress in that movie did an amazing job almost exactly to a tee. She also resembled Belle fairly well in the looks department too.

Yeah she worked hard on BOTH OF THEM so at least acknowledge that

same

I think I like the 2016 one as well.

its supposed to be realistic, NOT a cartoon.

Okay yes but maybe not everyone is trying to make their art look exactly like the cartoons. I think that she wants to show her progress of how she can really make the later pictures jump off the page more.

I agree. The 2016 drawings are easier to recognise as Disney Princesses because they look like more the drawing style of the original movies. But also the 2018 drawings are good. :)

Human anatomy has nothing to do with it, both are realistic enough to be real poses. And how about you let the artist draw however she wants to. It’s good to have a unique style and not have it look exactly like the movie. The 2018 picture has plenty of personality, you just need to stop looking at the negatives In order to see it.

Because that ain't even Yasmine in the first place.

its Jasmine. not yasmine. and yes, it does look more like her, disney gave her more white features which is stupid the point is to be realistic images and i dont see the point in knocking someone down whos been working on improving for years.

yasmine? Never heard of her but I've heard of Jasmine