What If They Never Broke Up? I Use A.I. To See What The Kids Of Famous Couples Would Have Looked Like (New 19 Pics)
I think most of us have noticed that celebrity breakups happen all the time, so it's hardly mind-blowing when you hear another famous couple has called it quits. Still, some famous couples seem like they'll defy the odds—and it's truly shocking when those pairs don't make it, even years after the breakup, and fans are always trying to get over these unfortunate splits.
This time around, I'm back with the second part of edits showing how the kids of famous couples would have looked if they'd never broken up. The first part seemed to go down very well and was even featured across many different platforms besides Bored Panda.
So settle in and prepare to wistfully remember the relationships and see the kids that could have been. Of course, don’t forget to let us know which of the following edits you think would be the most accurate!
More info: Instagram
This post may include affiliate links.
Joaquin Phoenix And Liv Tyler
Ryan Gosling And Sandra Bullock
Cameron Diaz And Justin Timberlake
Jennifer Lopez And Ben Affleck
Jennifer Lawrence And Nicholas Hoult
Mila Kunis And Macauley Culkin
Chris Evans And Jessica Biel
Katy Perry And Russell Brand
Taylor Swift And Conor Kennedy
Kirsten Dunst And Jake Gyllenhaal
Demi Lovato And Joe Jonas
Matt Damon And Winona Ryder
Hilary Duff And Joel Madden
Ashton Kutcher And January Jones
Tom Cruise And Penelope Cruz
Ryan Reynolds And Alanis Morissette
Madonna And Warren Beatty
Lisa Marie Presley And Michael Jackson
Kim Kardashian And Nick Cannon
I'm not a genetics expert but I don't this this is how it works. The children might as well be born not conventionally attractive
Yeah the a.i. That was used isn’t a genetics expert either.
Load More Replies...I think using photoshop to make up kids for celebrities is CREEPY AF. Huge cringe.
Just one question: why does a "happily ever after" have to include a child? It's really not necessary (edit: cause some people get offended for no reason, my comment was for the initial title that now has changed! It didn't say "i wanted to see how these people would be with a child" it said how it would be if they lived happily ever after! Well, there are many happily ever after stories that don't include kids and that was my comment about)
I'm not a genetics expert but I don't this this is how it works. The children might as well be born not conventionally attractive
Yeah the a.i. That was used isn’t a genetics expert either.
Load More Replies...I think using photoshop to make up kids for celebrities is CREEPY AF. Huge cringe.
Just one question: why does a "happily ever after" have to include a child? It's really not necessary (edit: cause some people get offended for no reason, my comment was for the initial title that now has changed! It didn't say "i wanted to see how these people would be with a child" it said how it would be if they lived happily ever after! Well, there are many happily ever after stories that don't include kids and that was my comment about)
