The conversation revolving around a woman’s pubic hair may be an uncomfortable topic for some but at the end of the day it’s just a biological reality — and it seems that the “bush” is back.
Social media has done a lot of bad for people, there’s no doubt of that. But in 2025, more and more women are making their voice heard. They’re taking something that’s always been controversial and shutting down any conversations around it.
- The "bush" is having a cultural comeback in 2025.
- A viral TikTok sparked conversations by promoting the 'full bush in a bikini' look.
- Social pressure on pubic hair has shifted, and people are now embracing a more natural style.
It was almost seen as a cultural moment when a recent viral TikTok featured the artist Sujindah repeating the phrase “full bush in a bikini” — advocating exactly what it sounds like. And it seemed like a shift when Maison Margiela sent women down the runway of the brand’s Spring 2024 couture show, highlighting their pubes.
“Bush,” and the conversations that surround it, are back!
Image credits: Freepik
Additionally for this year, Skims included a heart-shaped cutout in their undergarments, sparking even more discourse around something that’s been polarized for so long.
Has ‘bush’ made a complete comeback? Perhaps not entirely, seeing as there is still a negative stigma around it. But embracing the existence of pubic hair is an essential part to embracing femininity… and what better to celebrate that than on International Women’s Day?
A timeline was created by Bustle to take a deeper look at how pubes have been seen by society as the years passed.
Everyone in Ancient Egypt were in on the “bush-free lifestyle.” A few hieroglyphics and works of art definitely showed women with darker triangles around their private areas, but it wasn’t rare for ladies to use tools such as shells, stones, bronze knives, pumice, etc. to remove all traces of body hair.
Image credits: Axelle/Bauer-Griffin/Getty
This continued on into the Roman Empire, as seen with a lot of the clean-sculpted statues we see in museums. During this time, it was seen as rather uncivilized to have pubic hair. Those who were wealthy would use flints, pumice stones, or tweezers to get rid of any bush.
But things may have taken a little bit of a turn in The Middle Ages. In The Miller’s Tale, Chaucer referenced a woman who was “bearded around her hole,” although artwork still showed a hairless pubic area.
A few scholars have speculated that this was in large amounts due to the hygiene of the era. The Dark Ages weren’t exactly medically advanced, and pubic hair meant that pubic lice — which was apparently quite common — could be an issue.
Thousands of years ago, it was common practice to use painful tools for women to get rid of pubic hair
Image credits: Samir Hussein / Getty
View this post on Instagram
In the 1800s, the depiction of pubic hair on a woman was still seen as fairly erotic, but there were two paintings that challenged this narrative.
Goya’s piece La Maja Desnuda showed a reclining woman with barely visible strands of hair and while it was a controversial piece of work during its time, it’s been cited as the earliest piece of Western artwork to depict a nude woman’s pubic hairs.
In 1866, Gustave Courbet decided to ignore all the discourse on these double standards with his work L’origine du Monde, showcasing an up-close and personal view of a hairy bush. At first, it wasn’t allowed to be displayed as it sparked so much backlash, but now it sits proudly at the Musée d’Orsay — another sign of our progress.
Image credits: Jason LaVeris / Getty
Fast forward to the 1970s, and sexual freedom was all the craze. Norwegian model Liv Lindeland became the first person to feature a visible ‘tuft’ of pubic hair in Playboy, which pushed the boundaries of what was considered inappropriate.
Just a year later and discussions revolving around one’s sexuality began to circulate, and books with detailed illustrations were passed around.
As we entered the 2000s, the shift in perception was very noticeable.
Brazilian waxes were introduced to the conversation, especially after a now-iconic episode of Sex and the City. In 2013, Cameron Diaz wrote an entire section in her book The Body Book, challenging the practice of removing body hair. These trends, she claimed, were bound to change.
Now, freedom in one’s choice to express themselves is much more diverse
Image credits: Frazer Harrison / Getty
Image credits: Freepik
And four years later, Emma Watson would hop on that same train.
Gushing about Fur’s $52 pubic hair oil, she endorsed, “I’ll use that anywhere from the ends of my hair to my eyebrows to my pubic hair.”
And now, the 2020s. The COVID-19 lockdown was a wake-up call for all of us, forcing a break in our wax or laser hair removal appointments. And it turns out, this led to more of an opportunity to embrace natural body hair.
Image credits: prostooleh / Getty
Stacie Harding, the associate manager of field training at European Wax Center told The Guardian, “In the past decade, pubic hairstyle trends in the body-waxing industry have evolved. While the full Brazilian style remains popular, there’s been a shift in embracing a more natural look.”
These trends and outlooks will constantly fluctuate, and, for better or for worse, so will society’s view of women. One thing remains certain, though — what a lady does with her body will never be anyone’s business but her own.
Showing off one’s “bush” was still heavily debated among the comments
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
Can we stop caring what celebrities do or don’t do? They aren’t like you and I and by no means is their behavior, especially at these big events, is not typical. When it comes to pubic hair, do what you like, not what random weirdos on the internet or celebrities say you should do.
Meh. I'm not super hairy and like my bush. I don't show it on public television. No other thoughts.
When I was a child I thought it was called "public hair". I could not figure out why it was called "public" when nobody could see it.
Well, turns out you were just way ahead it seems given the pictures...
Load More Replies...Small point: the phrasing in this article makes it seem like only women in ancient Egypt and ancient Rome removed their pubic hair, but the men did too.
Doesnt it say more about the audience that they care so much about other peoples bush or no-bush? I get that people have preferences but you arent forced to look if people dont press it in your face (metaphorical speaking)
Except celebrities (and I use that term loosely), keep forcing it on us by showing up nearly nekkid to all these awards shows, which then blows up all over mainstream and social media, making it very hard to avoid if you try to keep up with the daily news.
Load More Replies...Let's not talk about bushes. However since we are, let me say, men should follow the same gardening trends.
BP must be getting real bored. They usually ban four letter words and bush is four letters.
And yet every time we think that’s occurred, along comes Kanye and his wife to prove us wrong 😑
Load More Replies...It's not up to me what a woman does, but I do like some fur. Gives me something to run my fingers through in more playful moments. I think it's sexxy too.
How about we keep our opinions to ourselves? Whether you choose to remove, keep it natural, show or not show, it's just that...a choice. Why should anyone be able able to tell you what to do with your own body?
Idk what kind of bush you have or don’t have, but it’s disgusting and unsanitary to let your pubes hang out for the world to see. Why do people need to advertise what’s going on downstairs?
Pubes or not, I’m tired of these “pick me” celebrities going to awards shows in see-through dresses. I’m no prude, but there’s a giant Sharpie marker line between classy and trashy.
Load More Replies...All I see with these people is "I'm famous and need attention - look at my f***y!!!"
All this talk about womens pubic region grooming seems kind of sexist to me. Why do we care so much and why don't we have the same concern over mens nether regions?
It IS sexist-and that's precisely the point. We DON'T have the same concern about what men do with theirs because it's just another way of controlling women.
Load More Replies...Have never understood why women or men have shaved their c****h. How about you wear clothes or bathing suits that are wide enough to cover instead of having your a*s or b***s hanging out.
There is this fairy tale of a young woman who had to meet the king, not coming by foot, not riding or sitting. She has to bring a gift that isn't a gift and has to be dressed, but not dressed, nor be naked. She comes on skies, with a dove as gift (that flies away/home) and wears a fishnet. These celebrities dresses always remind me of that tale. Because in my humble opinion, if I can clearly see your underwear, or the places it should have been, and you are not on a beach, near a pool or in your own private place, you are not properly dressed.
Put some d**n clothes that cover your c****h and b***s. Have some self respect and class and not walk around like hookers!
Always a compromise between you and your regular guest. Just like everything else with your regular guest . Other than that it is just s*x workers selling it . clickbait.
The only time I care to see a person naked is when I'm the one getting them that way. Grooming choices are all your own. This whole celebrity culture of who wore what, by whom, and why is out of hand. Maybe Gillette will take a dive, and frankly I don't care. What does bother me is that little girls see thus and think it's a good way to get attention. S*x and sexuality aren't bad at all. Foisting it upon kids as a former of leverage is.
Here's an idea: stop writing drivel like this and let people do what they like with their own bodies. You don't like it? Don't look.
I'm a man so my perspective doesn't mean much but I never really cared either way. As a cisgender straight male if a woman is attractive she's attractive hair or not, hair anywhere or not. I always found it weird for men to be turned off by armpit hair or a bald head. I swear I am not virtue signaling lol. At the end of the day people shouldn't be judged by whatever they choose to do with their own body. Least of all for something as natural as having hair where hair naturally grows...not that judging people for having hair in unusual spots is okay either. Just let people be is what I'm saying.
How about we agree that when you dress up I can’t tell at a glance whether you are bush or bush free? I’d like to be left out of the entire conversation. Thx.
I mean, I'm not gonna judge, but I thought "Everything Zen" was kinda catchy
The trend was started for p**n. You could show penatration better. I prefer Bush trimmed or natural. But ladies it should be your choice.
Women should never alter themselves to appear attractive to deviants who, in reality, want preadolescent girls. But, I guess they're protecting some child somewhere from being abused by those same deviants.
Just came here to see what ----- posted this. How clueless can one be about what we come to BP for? I wish I didn't feel the need to comment when M or B posts something clueless, but it's a bit like a car crash - you just feel compelled (in this case to comment and downvote - not to read!)
Can we stop caring what celebrities do or don’t do? They aren’t like you and I and by no means is their behavior, especially at these big events, is not typical. When it comes to pubic hair, do what you like, not what random weirdos on the internet or celebrities say you should do.
Meh. I'm not super hairy and like my bush. I don't show it on public television. No other thoughts.
When I was a child I thought it was called "public hair". I could not figure out why it was called "public" when nobody could see it.
Well, turns out you were just way ahead it seems given the pictures...
Load More Replies...Small point: the phrasing in this article makes it seem like only women in ancient Egypt and ancient Rome removed their pubic hair, but the men did too.
Doesnt it say more about the audience that they care so much about other peoples bush or no-bush? I get that people have preferences but you arent forced to look if people dont press it in your face (metaphorical speaking)
Except celebrities (and I use that term loosely), keep forcing it on us by showing up nearly nekkid to all these awards shows, which then blows up all over mainstream and social media, making it very hard to avoid if you try to keep up with the daily news.
Load More Replies...Let's not talk about bushes. However since we are, let me say, men should follow the same gardening trends.
BP must be getting real bored. They usually ban four letter words and bush is four letters.
And yet every time we think that’s occurred, along comes Kanye and his wife to prove us wrong 😑
Load More Replies...It's not up to me what a woman does, but I do like some fur. Gives me something to run my fingers through in more playful moments. I think it's sexxy too.
How about we keep our opinions to ourselves? Whether you choose to remove, keep it natural, show or not show, it's just that...a choice. Why should anyone be able able to tell you what to do with your own body?
Idk what kind of bush you have or don’t have, but it’s disgusting and unsanitary to let your pubes hang out for the world to see. Why do people need to advertise what’s going on downstairs?
Pubes or not, I’m tired of these “pick me” celebrities going to awards shows in see-through dresses. I’m no prude, but there’s a giant Sharpie marker line between classy and trashy.
Load More Replies...All I see with these people is "I'm famous and need attention - look at my f***y!!!"
All this talk about womens pubic region grooming seems kind of sexist to me. Why do we care so much and why don't we have the same concern over mens nether regions?
It IS sexist-and that's precisely the point. We DON'T have the same concern about what men do with theirs because it's just another way of controlling women.
Load More Replies...Have never understood why women or men have shaved their c****h. How about you wear clothes or bathing suits that are wide enough to cover instead of having your a*s or b***s hanging out.
There is this fairy tale of a young woman who had to meet the king, not coming by foot, not riding or sitting. She has to bring a gift that isn't a gift and has to be dressed, but not dressed, nor be naked. She comes on skies, with a dove as gift (that flies away/home) and wears a fishnet. These celebrities dresses always remind me of that tale. Because in my humble opinion, if I can clearly see your underwear, or the places it should have been, and you are not on a beach, near a pool or in your own private place, you are not properly dressed.
Put some d**n clothes that cover your c****h and b***s. Have some self respect and class and not walk around like hookers!
Always a compromise between you and your regular guest. Just like everything else with your regular guest . Other than that it is just s*x workers selling it . clickbait.
The only time I care to see a person naked is when I'm the one getting them that way. Grooming choices are all your own. This whole celebrity culture of who wore what, by whom, and why is out of hand. Maybe Gillette will take a dive, and frankly I don't care. What does bother me is that little girls see thus and think it's a good way to get attention. S*x and sexuality aren't bad at all. Foisting it upon kids as a former of leverage is.
Here's an idea: stop writing drivel like this and let people do what they like with their own bodies. You don't like it? Don't look.
I'm a man so my perspective doesn't mean much but I never really cared either way. As a cisgender straight male if a woman is attractive she's attractive hair or not, hair anywhere or not. I always found it weird for men to be turned off by armpit hair or a bald head. I swear I am not virtue signaling lol. At the end of the day people shouldn't be judged by whatever they choose to do with their own body. Least of all for something as natural as having hair where hair naturally grows...not that judging people for having hair in unusual spots is okay either. Just let people be is what I'm saying.
How about we agree that when you dress up I can’t tell at a glance whether you are bush or bush free? I’d like to be left out of the entire conversation. Thx.
I mean, I'm not gonna judge, but I thought "Everything Zen" was kinda catchy
The trend was started for p**n. You could show penatration better. I prefer Bush trimmed or natural. But ladies it should be your choice.
Women should never alter themselves to appear attractive to deviants who, in reality, want preadolescent girls. But, I guess they're protecting some child somewhere from being abused by those same deviants.
Just came here to see what ----- posted this. How clueless can one be about what we come to BP for? I wish I didn't feel the need to comment when M or B posts something clueless, but it's a bit like a car crash - you just feel compelled (in this case to comment and downvote - not to read!)























-159
89