Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

“A Disaster Waiting To Happen”: 5-Year-Old Breaks 3,500-Year-Old Bronze Age Jar At A Museum
“A Disaster Waiting To Happen”: 5-Year-Old Breaks 3,500-Year-Old Bronze Age Jar At A Museum
568

“A Disaster Waiting To Happen”: 5-Year-Old Breaks 3,500-Year-Old Bronze Age Jar At A Museum

33

ADVERTISEMENT

A 3,500-year-old jar was completely shattered by a five-year-old visitor at a museum in Haifa in the Middle East. Footage of the incident has gone viral on social media, leaving people baffled while debating who’s to blame. According to many, such precious artifacts benefit from stronger protection than a single piece of glass.

Highlights
  • A 3,500-year-old jar was shattered by a five-year-old at Haifa's Hecht Museum, sparking debate over blame and artifact protection.
  • Social media footage of the incident went viral, igniting discussions about museum security measures for precious artifacts.
  • Critics argued that artifacts like the broken Bronze Age jar need better protection than just a single piece of glass.
  • A similar incident in Kansas involved a $132,000 bill after a child broke a sculpture, highlighting issues with artifact security.

In a viral photograph, the historical jar, which is claimed to date from the Bronze Age, can be seen lying cracked and destroyed in its open glass exhibit at the Hecht Museum.

The stunning image was shared on the “Kids Are F*****g Stupid” Reddit community, prompting both amusement and outrage, as a Redditor commented: “They should build a new casing around it and preserve it. 

“Clay pot 1500 BC, broken by 5-year-old boy 2024 AD.”

RELATED:

    A 3,500-year-old jar was completely shattered by a five-year-old visitor at a museum in Haifa in the Middle East

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Michał Parzuchowski/Unsplash (Not the actual photo)

    A user wrote: “I can see the child’s parents freaking out and explaining how old the artifact was, and the child just not comprehending what 3500 even means. Like ‘is that more than 5?’”

    “This is the kid’s fault, the parent’s fault, and the museum‘s fault,” a person argued. “The kid shouldn’t touch things in a museum, the parents should have made sure he didn’t and the museum should have put that sh*t behind glass.”

    “On the other hand, if it didn’t break, I would never have known of the existence of that particular vase, so who cares. (The museum, I guess, but not me.)”

    A netizen quipped: “This is how adventure movies start.”

    Image credits: Hecht Museum, University of Haifa

    Someone else noted: “That’s going to be one expensive bill.”

    A separate individual chimed in: “Museums should be child-proof safe. Like the way it’s displayed was a disaster waiting to happen anyways.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    A similar incident occurred six years ago when parents in Kansas, USA, were issued a $132,000 bill after their five-year-old son knocked over an art sculpture that was on display at a community center.

    Surveillance video captured the little boy reaching for the sculpture, called Aphrodite di Kansas City, on display in the lobby of the Tomahawk Ridge Community Center in Overland Park, Kansas, when it toppled over, ABC News reported in 2018.

    Footage of the incident has gone viral on social media, leaving people baffled while debating who’s to blame

    Image credits: nitayp02/Reddit

    A few days later, the family received an eye-watering bill from the city of Overland Park’s insurance company, saying that the piece had been damaged beyond repair.

    “You’re responsible for the supervision of a minor child… your failure to monitor could be considered negligent,” the insurance letter read in part.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “I was surprised, absolutely, more so offended to be called negligent,” the boy’s mother, Sarah Goodman, told ABC News at the time. “They were treating this like a crime scene.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The sculpture’s artist, Bill Lyons, told ABC News it took him about two years to create the piece, and it was listed for sale at $132,000. He examined the piece himself, he said, and he concluded it could not be repaired.

    Image credits: Daka/Pexels (Not the actual photo)

    “It’s beyond my capabilities and desires to rebuild it,” he said at the time.

    City officials reportedly revealed that the piece was not “permanently attached,” but it was secured to the pedestal with clips and it was “not an interactive piece.”

    “We’ve had other pieces there [and] we’ve not had problems,” a city spokesperson, Sean Reilly, told the American broadcaster. “We’ve not had this situation… we’ve not had kids climb on our pieces.”

    Sarah argued at the time that the sculpture should have been better secured. She also disputed the city’s claim that her child wasn’t being supervised. 

    ADVERTISEMENT

    According to many, such precious artifacts benefit from stronger protection than a single piece of glass

    Image credits: The Budget Savvy Travelers

    The mom further claimed that she and her husband were out of the frame of the surveillance camera, saying their goodbyes during a wedding reception they were leaving when the incident occurred.

    “No one would ever expect that to come into a place that kids are invited and have to worry about a $132,000 piece of art falling on their child,” Sarah said. “Because he didn’t maliciously break that. It fell on him. It was not secure, it was not safe — at all.”

    Historically, in cases where artwork or precious artifacts have been damaged, even in a case where a child was lifted over a barrier, no action has been taken to recover the cost of the damage from the third party, DAS Law Solicitors explains.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The gallery/museum has simply claimed from their insurers to cover the cost of any repairs required, the legal service states.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Hecht Museum, University of Haifa

    According to the legal experts, museums and galleries generally display pieces of art and artifacts that are loaned to them by a third party, including other countries.  

    Under the principle of bailment, the establishment has a duty of care over items belonging to a third party. Galleries and museums, therefore, should ensure that pieces are reasonably protected, for example, by roping off areas or installing protective barriers. 

    Such measures may even be a condition of any insurance policy. In order for a gallery or museum to be sued for any damage caused to items in its care, a third party would have to establish that the museum had failed in its duty of care and had in some way been negligent, DAS Law says.

    Bored Panda has contacted the Hecht Museum for comment.

    “Children been breaking pots since the beginning of pots,” a reader shared

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Andréa Oldereide

    Andréa Oldereide

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    I’m a journalist who works as Bored Panda’s News Team's Senior Writer. The news team produces stories focused on pop culture. Whenever I get the opportunity and the time, I investigate and produce my own exclusive stories, where I get to explore a wider range of topics. Some examples include: “Doberman Tobias the viral medical service dog” and “The lawyer who brought rare uterine cancer that affects 9/11 victims to light”. You've got a tip? email me: andrea.o@boredpanda.com

    Read less »
    Andréa Oldereide

    Andréa Oldereide

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    I’m a journalist who works as Bored Panda’s News Team's Senior Writer. The news team produces stories focused on pop culture. Whenever I get the opportunity and the time, I investigate and produce my own exclusive stories, where I get to explore a wider range of topics. Some examples include: “Doberman Tobias the viral medical service dog” and “The lawyer who brought rare uterine cancer that affects 9/11 victims to light”. You've got a tip? email me: andrea.o@boredpanda.com

    What do you think ?
    Aline
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If your child is not old enough to behave in a museum, don't take them to a museum! Most items and art are not behind glass (two decades of working in museums) there's nearly always a children's area now, one parent can go look while the other watches kids then swap, or even better, go to an age appropriate place like a park.

    Doctor Strange
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Anyone blaming the museum is an AH. Parents are responsible for the behavior of their children. Period. If they aren't old enough to behave appropriately, they don't belong in that setting. It doesn't matter that they were 'just out of frame'. Were you watching your kid? No? Then you were being negligent. Did you bring a kid into a museum that wasn't capable of behaving? Yes? Then you are responsible.

    Charlotte
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Not to mention, it was behind glass. The kid didn't just actually brush it with his sleeve

    Load More Replies...
    Morko the Ork
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I can’t believe it. Your child breaks something … and the responsible is the one whose item was broken,. Not the child, not the parents, not the adults that took them to the museum, but the museum. Idiocracy has arrived, Where is president Camacho?

    Richard Z
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Just a little thought experiment for you. What if the pot was placed in the middle of a high-traffic area, unsecured? Would it still be the responsibility of someone who broke it, whether it's a child or an adult?

    Load More Replies...
    sturmwesen
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If the kid touched it it's the parents fault . You know, that you are not supposed to touch stuff in museums.

    Daniela Lavanza
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Sorry if I sound disrespectful but my first thought about this all is DON'T bring such young kids to museums. They are too young to understand History. Do it when they are old enough to understand and to get they must be careful with the items they'll see. Yes, the artifacts could have been protected better in case of accidents, but this was not an accident. It's not someone who tripped unwillingly, it was caused by a kid who shouldn't be there at all.

    That Persistent Lint
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    "They are too young"... nah, this kid was. Probably went unwillingly. I have always loved to go to museums with my parents and sisters. Anthropological, Natural sciences, history, Paleo, art ... we remember them all and treasure the memories we built to this day. But my parent didn't ignored us...they were right there sharing the experience with us.

    Load More Replies...
    Scott Rackley
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Who would think that parents would instruct their children to behave properly in a f*****g museum? This not parenting thing is getting out of hand. If my mother said, "don't touch anything in here" I'd put my hands in my pockets.

    Alexandra
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Apparently children are no longer taught to look with their eyes and not their hands. The museum is not responsible for the parent's poor parenting.

    Spencer's slave no longer
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    My kids knew this and now my grandkids know this: "Your eyes are in your head, not your hands".

    Load More Replies...
    Charlotte
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The jar was behind glass. How do you knock something over that is behind glass? By hitting the glass hard enough to flex it, or repeatedly so that the thing on the other side rocks over. This wasn't a simple sleeve brush Where were the parents?

    Gayl Belfor
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You break it you bought it. Time to stop blaming everyone else

    quentariel
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The museum could and should have protected the artifact better. But that doesn't remove the fault from the parents in the least. If a kid isn't able to understand the value of the artifacts, how to respect others or how to behave in a place like that, they shouldn't be brought there. Or then parents shouldn't let them out of their sight even for a second.

    Verena
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It was behind glass. This should be enough protection in a museum.

    Load More Replies...
    Gayl Belfor
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You break it, you bought it. Time to stop blaming everyone else.

    Schnitzel
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I see these things all day long in our store! Parents come in with their brats and let them do whatever they want. Hang on clothing racks like a monkey? Check. Run around the store while crawling UNDER the cabinets? Check. Throwing clothes on the floor? Check. One time I told a parent: I hope you are aware of, and understand, that if YOUR child gets one of these clothing racks with heavy leather jackets on the head, I won't be calling the ambulance because this is the third time I am telling you NICELY, to tell your child to stop. Got a blank stare in return.

    Id row
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    With how badly parents are entitled and raising little entitled monsters lately, I find it hard to believe these places even allow children anymore. What is a 5 y/o going to do in a place filled with priceless relics? Appreciate their historical significance? No, they're going to break sh*t and the parents are going to be like kids will be kids ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Nikole
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well I did as a five year old, but I also knew not to touch things and be respectful.

    Load More Replies...
    Dragons Exist
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    How, in any way, could it be anyone's fault except for the kid? Them being a kid doesn't excuse what they did, they still destroyed history.

    Susy Hammond
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    When the children were littles (5+), any place we visited like an antique store or a department store display, "hands in pockets and elbows in". And as caretakers our eyes were on the kids all the time. Never took kids under 5 years old unless in a stroller or a backpack.However, priceless artefacts need better security: behind a barrier, a security guard.

    Rob D
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Unpopular, unfair, impractical opinion, as I sit two rows up in an airplane from a petulant toddler (literally the type that just randomly angry shrieks at full volume): children shouldn't be brought in public. (Obviously I'm totally joking but holy s**t this little guy is loud).

    Rod
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    So often I see young patents with young children on trans-Atlantic flights where they act as if everyone else loves their kids crying, kicking seats, throwing food on the floor. Airlines should charge double for kids under 7.

    Load More Replies...
    Flint Yvonne
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I see all over the place about the museum and how they should of done this or that. Place blame where it's belonged. On the parents. You teach your children not to touch things. I hope they get a really big bill for the item they broke.

    XVS Sixfifty
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If a 5-year old came into my home and broke something, I'd blame whomever was supposed to be watching him at the time.

    DRinLBK
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    From the look of the stand it's situated on, it took some real force to knock the vase over. So, it was more than just "touched," thus, the child was obviously not being supervised as it should have been.

    Danni
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    As a parent to a five year old, I do believe this is mostly the parent's fault. I say mostly, as there is a problem with the fact that many museums do offer areas where you may interact with objects and that's very confusing to children. So sometimes, no matter how diligent the parents are at explaining that you don't touch, and watching over, curiosity takes over. Still I have three young kids, I've seen how enamored they get in a museum and I never let any of them out of my sight or reach for a second because I know that when a kid is excited about something they want to touch. I do think you should definitely take young kids to museums. They might not understand everything, but they do learn a lot. And ask many questions they would never think of in a different learning situation. Just prepare them for the experience.

    Fellfromthemoon
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    And, please, bring them out of the museum, when they are tired or overwhelmed.

    Load More Replies...
    Aline
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    They should hand the story at the entrance where other patrons are deciding if a museum is the same as a playground.

    Linda Mcnally
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If your child is not housebroke do not take them to the China shop. And the parents should be grown up enough to take the responsibility of their misbehaving children. They weren't there to go to the museum if they were really at a wedding reception

    SummerTime
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    My parents loved museums when I was a kid. It was beat into me and my sibling to not touch a single thing. (Not actually beat). We were the most behaved little kids you would see in public.

    StumblingThroughLife
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't blame the Museums, and parents should pay attention to their kids, definitely, but no surprise that peeps touch things they shouldn't (and not just kids). Maybe all precious items in museums/ Art Galleries should be behind security glass, even if it's not a regular incident. In London, we have The Household Cavalry (a union of the two most senior regiments in the British Army; The Life Guards and The Blues & Royals - Kings (Horse) Guards), and tourists (adults) grab the reins of their horses/touching them, while the guards are on Sentry Duty, and even touching the Guards (You can see them on YT, too) - even people aren't safe from grabby hands. So, yeah, touching what/who you shouldn't is a big thing, and I doubt that will change, so go for glass protection, museums (not so easy for the guards, though, sadly). It's not worth the loss.

    StumblingThroughLife
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    PS: We went to a (UK) Industrial Machines Museum a few weeks ago, and the amount of parents who sat there watching as their kids (I'm talking 8yr+) climbed all over the (old) exhibits, was shocking. The fact that encasing every single treasure is prob the only way to stop people's lack of respect is pretty sad.

    Load More Replies...
    Kathy Kennedy
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Generations of children have been taught " if it's not yours, don't touch it " and " looking doesn't involve your hands". Kids aren't going to learn responsibility for things, their own or others, unless they're taught and sorry, there seem to be quite a few parents these days that don't care enough to impart this important piece of human respect.

    Joey
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think they should give this to those people who repair broken items with gold (Kintsugi if im correct). as wiki states; highlighting cracks and repairs as events in the life of an object, rather than allowing its service to end at the time of its damage or breakage

    John Borders
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I've been to the J Paul Getty museum in Los Angeles & they have numerous pots on display that have been recreated from multi thousand year old fragments. While the repair of this pot is beyond someone with a tube of krazy glue, it is quite possible with Mr Getty's experts.

    Itai Reggev
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Why does the article uses the term "a museum in the middle east" but avoids saying it is in Israel?

    M & T Anderson
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    As kids we were taught to keep our hands together behind our backs. 65 years later I still do it.

    Lena Bontempi
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Just imagine a cat at that museum... perfect playground!! Sorry seriously if you ask me the museum need more security of the pieces and parents needs to teach their kid a little about going to a museum. The kid is not at fault.

    Learner Panda
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This is 80% down to the museum, 15% the parents and 5% the child. BUT, honestly? What did the museum expect? It's not as if this is the first time this has happened.

    Rod
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    So tired of parents who are just bad parents. Putting their desires ahead of their child and other patrons. You think for one moment that child wanted to be in a museum? But mom and/or dad WANTED to go to the museum, so who cares if the child hates the experience. Every time I travel I see parents dragging their infants to places having zero interest to the child, where the child acts up, and everyone else has to tolerate the results. Museum should sue the entitled parents for a million dollars.

    ohlordylordy
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Too bad Walmart didn't own the museum, that vase would have been safely locked up like the razors and electric toothbrushes. You can be sure that if it was a new iphone, both the parent and the museum would have not let the kid anywhere near it.

    Brent Amador
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If you bring a child (under 12) to a museum or a baby to a movie theater, you’re a piece of s**t. And if your reasoning is “we couldn’t find a sitter”. Well then, you don’t get to go to the museum/ movies. That’s how that works. You obviously can’t keep an eye on YOUR kids. It drives me batshit crazy when parents are at restaurants/ grocery stores and the kids are just running around screaming, bumping into me or my wife. It’s like the parent are like “YOU people watch them. I need a break”

    Nikole
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Under 12?? Well I’m glad you weren’t one of my parents.

    Load More Replies...
    aubergine10003
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This article was really confusing as ultimately, it was more about the 2018 incident instead of the more recent one...

    Anarchy_in_our_Souls
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Phew, lucky it wasn't new. 😁👍

    pep Ito
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The really important fragile pieces are always behind a crystal. Just go to the major museums of the world.

    Aline
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If your child is not old enough to behave in a museum, don't take them to a museum! Most items and art are not behind glass (two decades of working in museums) there's nearly always a children's area now, one parent can go look while the other watches kids then swap, or even better, go to an age appropriate place like a park.

    Doctor Strange
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Anyone blaming the museum is an AH. Parents are responsible for the behavior of their children. Period. If they aren't old enough to behave appropriately, they don't belong in that setting. It doesn't matter that they were 'just out of frame'. Were you watching your kid? No? Then you were being negligent. Did you bring a kid into a museum that wasn't capable of behaving? Yes? Then you are responsible.

    Charlotte
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Not to mention, it was behind glass. The kid didn't just actually brush it with his sleeve

    Load More Replies...
    Morko the Ork
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I can’t believe it. Your child breaks something … and the responsible is the one whose item was broken,. Not the child, not the parents, not the adults that took them to the museum, but the museum. Idiocracy has arrived, Where is president Camacho?

    Richard Z
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Just a little thought experiment for you. What if the pot was placed in the middle of a high-traffic area, unsecured? Would it still be the responsibility of someone who broke it, whether it's a child or an adult?

    Load More Replies...
    sturmwesen
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If the kid touched it it's the parents fault . You know, that you are not supposed to touch stuff in museums.

    Daniela Lavanza
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Sorry if I sound disrespectful but my first thought about this all is DON'T bring such young kids to museums. They are too young to understand History. Do it when they are old enough to understand and to get they must be careful with the items they'll see. Yes, the artifacts could have been protected better in case of accidents, but this was not an accident. It's not someone who tripped unwillingly, it was caused by a kid who shouldn't be there at all.

    That Persistent Lint
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    "They are too young"... nah, this kid was. Probably went unwillingly. I have always loved to go to museums with my parents and sisters. Anthropological, Natural sciences, history, Paleo, art ... we remember them all and treasure the memories we built to this day. But my parent didn't ignored us...they were right there sharing the experience with us.

    Load More Replies...
    Scott Rackley
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Who would think that parents would instruct their children to behave properly in a f*****g museum? This not parenting thing is getting out of hand. If my mother said, "don't touch anything in here" I'd put my hands in my pockets.

    Alexandra
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Apparently children are no longer taught to look with their eyes and not their hands. The museum is not responsible for the parent's poor parenting.

    Spencer's slave no longer
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    My kids knew this and now my grandkids know this: "Your eyes are in your head, not your hands".

    Load More Replies...
    Charlotte
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The jar was behind glass. How do you knock something over that is behind glass? By hitting the glass hard enough to flex it, or repeatedly so that the thing on the other side rocks over. This wasn't a simple sleeve brush Where were the parents?

    Gayl Belfor
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You break it you bought it. Time to stop blaming everyone else

    quentariel
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The museum could and should have protected the artifact better. But that doesn't remove the fault from the parents in the least. If a kid isn't able to understand the value of the artifacts, how to respect others or how to behave in a place like that, they shouldn't be brought there. Or then parents shouldn't let them out of their sight even for a second.

    Verena
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It was behind glass. This should be enough protection in a museum.

    Load More Replies...
    Gayl Belfor
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You break it, you bought it. Time to stop blaming everyone else.

    Schnitzel
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I see these things all day long in our store! Parents come in with their brats and let them do whatever they want. Hang on clothing racks like a monkey? Check. Run around the store while crawling UNDER the cabinets? Check. Throwing clothes on the floor? Check. One time I told a parent: I hope you are aware of, and understand, that if YOUR child gets one of these clothing racks with heavy leather jackets on the head, I won't be calling the ambulance because this is the third time I am telling you NICELY, to tell your child to stop. Got a blank stare in return.

    Id row
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    With how badly parents are entitled and raising little entitled monsters lately, I find it hard to believe these places even allow children anymore. What is a 5 y/o going to do in a place filled with priceless relics? Appreciate their historical significance? No, they're going to break sh*t and the parents are going to be like kids will be kids ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Nikole
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well I did as a five year old, but I also knew not to touch things and be respectful.

    Load More Replies...
    Dragons Exist
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    How, in any way, could it be anyone's fault except for the kid? Them being a kid doesn't excuse what they did, they still destroyed history.

    Susy Hammond
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    When the children were littles (5+), any place we visited like an antique store or a department store display, "hands in pockets and elbows in". And as caretakers our eyes were on the kids all the time. Never took kids under 5 years old unless in a stroller or a backpack.However, priceless artefacts need better security: behind a barrier, a security guard.

    Rob D
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Unpopular, unfair, impractical opinion, as I sit two rows up in an airplane from a petulant toddler (literally the type that just randomly angry shrieks at full volume): children shouldn't be brought in public. (Obviously I'm totally joking but holy s**t this little guy is loud).

    Rod
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    So often I see young patents with young children on trans-Atlantic flights where they act as if everyone else loves their kids crying, kicking seats, throwing food on the floor. Airlines should charge double for kids under 7.

    Load More Replies...
    Flint Yvonne
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I see all over the place about the museum and how they should of done this or that. Place blame where it's belonged. On the parents. You teach your children not to touch things. I hope they get a really big bill for the item they broke.

    XVS Sixfifty
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If a 5-year old came into my home and broke something, I'd blame whomever was supposed to be watching him at the time.

    DRinLBK
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    From the look of the stand it's situated on, it took some real force to knock the vase over. So, it was more than just "touched," thus, the child was obviously not being supervised as it should have been.

    Danni
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    As a parent to a five year old, I do believe this is mostly the parent's fault. I say mostly, as there is a problem with the fact that many museums do offer areas where you may interact with objects and that's very confusing to children. So sometimes, no matter how diligent the parents are at explaining that you don't touch, and watching over, curiosity takes over. Still I have three young kids, I've seen how enamored they get in a museum and I never let any of them out of my sight or reach for a second because I know that when a kid is excited about something they want to touch. I do think you should definitely take young kids to museums. They might not understand everything, but they do learn a lot. And ask many questions they would never think of in a different learning situation. Just prepare them for the experience.

    Fellfromthemoon
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    And, please, bring them out of the museum, when they are tired or overwhelmed.

    Load More Replies...
    Aline
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    They should hand the story at the entrance where other patrons are deciding if a museum is the same as a playground.

    Linda Mcnally
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If your child is not housebroke do not take them to the China shop. And the parents should be grown up enough to take the responsibility of their misbehaving children. They weren't there to go to the museum if they were really at a wedding reception

    SummerTime
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    My parents loved museums when I was a kid. It was beat into me and my sibling to not touch a single thing. (Not actually beat). We were the most behaved little kids you would see in public.

    StumblingThroughLife
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't blame the Museums, and parents should pay attention to their kids, definitely, but no surprise that peeps touch things they shouldn't (and not just kids). Maybe all precious items in museums/ Art Galleries should be behind security glass, even if it's not a regular incident. In London, we have The Household Cavalry (a union of the two most senior regiments in the British Army; The Life Guards and The Blues & Royals - Kings (Horse) Guards), and tourists (adults) grab the reins of their horses/touching them, while the guards are on Sentry Duty, and even touching the Guards (You can see them on YT, too) - even people aren't safe from grabby hands. So, yeah, touching what/who you shouldn't is a big thing, and I doubt that will change, so go for glass protection, museums (not so easy for the guards, though, sadly). It's not worth the loss.

    StumblingThroughLife
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    PS: We went to a (UK) Industrial Machines Museum a few weeks ago, and the amount of parents who sat there watching as their kids (I'm talking 8yr+) climbed all over the (old) exhibits, was shocking. The fact that encasing every single treasure is prob the only way to stop people's lack of respect is pretty sad.

    Load More Replies...
    Kathy Kennedy
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Generations of children have been taught " if it's not yours, don't touch it " and " looking doesn't involve your hands". Kids aren't going to learn responsibility for things, their own or others, unless they're taught and sorry, there seem to be quite a few parents these days that don't care enough to impart this important piece of human respect.

    Joey
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think they should give this to those people who repair broken items with gold (Kintsugi if im correct). as wiki states; highlighting cracks and repairs as events in the life of an object, rather than allowing its service to end at the time of its damage or breakage

    John Borders
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I've been to the J Paul Getty museum in Los Angeles & they have numerous pots on display that have been recreated from multi thousand year old fragments. While the repair of this pot is beyond someone with a tube of krazy glue, it is quite possible with Mr Getty's experts.

    Itai Reggev
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Why does the article uses the term "a museum in the middle east" but avoids saying it is in Israel?

    M & T Anderson
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    As kids we were taught to keep our hands together behind our backs. 65 years later I still do it.

    Lena Bontempi
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Just imagine a cat at that museum... perfect playground!! Sorry seriously if you ask me the museum need more security of the pieces and parents needs to teach their kid a little about going to a museum. The kid is not at fault.

    Learner Panda
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This is 80% down to the museum, 15% the parents and 5% the child. BUT, honestly? What did the museum expect? It's not as if this is the first time this has happened.

    Rod
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    So tired of parents who are just bad parents. Putting their desires ahead of their child and other patrons. You think for one moment that child wanted to be in a museum? But mom and/or dad WANTED to go to the museum, so who cares if the child hates the experience. Every time I travel I see parents dragging their infants to places having zero interest to the child, where the child acts up, and everyone else has to tolerate the results. Museum should sue the entitled parents for a million dollars.

    ohlordylordy
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Too bad Walmart didn't own the museum, that vase would have been safely locked up like the razors and electric toothbrushes. You can be sure that if it was a new iphone, both the parent and the museum would have not let the kid anywhere near it.

    Brent Amador
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If you bring a child (under 12) to a museum or a baby to a movie theater, you’re a piece of s**t. And if your reasoning is “we couldn’t find a sitter”. Well then, you don’t get to go to the museum/ movies. That’s how that works. You obviously can’t keep an eye on YOUR kids. It drives me batshit crazy when parents are at restaurants/ grocery stores and the kids are just running around screaming, bumping into me or my wife. It’s like the parent are like “YOU people watch them. I need a break”

    Nikole
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Under 12?? Well I’m glad you weren’t one of my parents.

    Load More Replies...
    aubergine10003
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This article was really confusing as ultimately, it was more about the 2018 incident instead of the more recent one...

    Anarchy_in_our_Souls
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Phew, lucky it wasn't new. 😁👍

    pep Ito
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The really important fragile pieces are always behind a crystal. Just go to the major museums of the world.

    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT