Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
A new report has revealed the last words exchanged between Air India Flight 171’s pilots moments before their aircraft crashed into a residential area of Ahmedabad in India.
The media has been fraught with speculation about human error in the month following this decade’s d*adliest air disaster that claimed the lives of 260 people on board and the ground.
Highlights
- The new report sheds light on final cockpit conversation before tragic Air India crash
- The revelation raises fresh questions about the month-old aviation disaster
- Experts weigh in as theories around engine failure continue to swirl
A favored theory was that the passenger jet, built by Boeing—which suffered a rash of embarrassing and fatal technical failures—had lost power in both its engines simultaneously.
RELATED:
A fifteen-page report has revealed the pilot’s last conversation
Image credits: AntJKernich/11AEXIT
India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) report, published on July 12—exactly a month after the disaster—has since strengthened the loss-of-power theory.
The 15-page document containing images of devastation claims one pilot was heard asking the other why he “cut off” the aircraft’s fuel supply, to which his colleague claimed he did not.
The revelation drew attention to the aircraft’s fuel cutoff switches, which, when toggled, deprive the aircraft’s engines of fuel, causing them to stall.
Image credits: TheGemsofX
They are described as “highly reliable” and designed to not flip accidentally.
The switches blamed for the accident cannot be toggled accidentally
An unnamed Canadian expert speaking to the BBC on July 12 confirmed as much when they said:
“It would be almost impossible to pull both switches with a single movement of one hand, and this makes accidental deployment unlikely.”
Image credits: iAtulKrishan1
“You can’t bump them [causing them to] move,” U.S. aviation expert John Cox confirmed.
Another aviation guru, Anthony Brickhouse, summed up the resulting conundrum by asking, “Did [the cutoff switches] move on their own, or did they move because of the pilots?”
“And if they were moved because of a pilot, why?”
Immediately after, a pilot was heard saying, “Thrust not achieved… falling”
Regarding the Air India B787 AI171 crash report, the fuel control cutoff switch requires manual physical activation by the pilots and locks securely in either the “run” or “cutoff” position. It cannot move independently. Even if one fuel control switch was moved, both switches… pic.twitter.com/wS4As5AlxY
— Fahad Naim (@Fahadnaimb) July 12, 2025
The AAIB report said that immediately after the exchange about the fuel cutoff, one of the pilots was heard saying: “Thrust not achieved… falling… Mayday! Mayday! Mayday!”
As a nod to the AAIB’s assertions, it emerged shortly after the crash on June 12 outside Ahmedabad airport in India’s western state of Gujarat, that ground control had received a distress call.
Image credits: OfficialJoel4
“The ATCO enquired about the call sign. ATCO did not get any response but observed the aircraft crashing outside the airport boundary and activated the emergency response,” the report elaborated.
The switches were off for 10 seconds before reengaging
From the AAIB’s perspective, “the aircraft achieved the maximum recorded airspeed of 180 Knots IAS at about 08:08:42 UTC.
Image credits: OfficialJoel4
“Immediately thereafter, the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec.
It went on to say that the fuel cutoffs reengaged after 10 seconds, starting with Engine 1, and followed by Engine 2, four seconds after:
“As per the EAFR, the Engine 1 fuel cutoff switch transitioned from CUTOFF to RUN at about 08:08:52 UTC. The APU Inlet Door began opening at about 08:08:54 UTC, consistent with the APU Auto Start logic.
Image credits: TheGemsofX
“Thereafter at 08:08:56 UTC the Engine 2 fuel cutoff switch also transitions from CUTOFF to RUN.”
The jet was carrying 54 tons of kerosene, which would have lasted it to London
The preliminary report concluded that: “The investigation is continuing and the investigation team will review and examine additional evidence, records and information that is being sought from the stakeholders.”
Image credits: SophieRainForum
The fuel deprived from the jet’s engines ignited when the aircraft crashed, and videos depict a towering incandescent plume reaching skywards seconds after the passenger liner disappeared from view.
According to the AAIB report, Flight 171‘s 54 tons of kerosene would have lasted 10 hours and 4,253 miles to London.
The internet thinks that report has simply elevated the confusion surrounding the crash
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
What do you think ?
Tabitha 4 months ago
Investigators will go into the background of each pilot, to see if there were any issues that might make one of them s******l. If there were money issues, they may have tried to hide their s*****e as a plane crash after taking out a very expensive insurance policy for their family to have something after they’re gone. It may sound like a very far out theory, but it has happened in the past. The saddest part are all the innocent people they take with them, who had no issues and had everything in the world to live for.
Sapna Sarfare 4 months ago
The senior pilot was very experienced and same goes for the other one.. highly unlikely they did anything.. there is another angle to it. A turkish firm had ground work.. recently due to the war, the firm was dismissed.. that's another angle
Load More Replies...
Correspondence EU 4 months ago
im not approving of what happened but i think hes not going to say: ``because i wanted to.`` he replied with `` i didnt `` , to keep the suspense.
elton cultice 4 months ago
It is a FACT that the fuel cutoff switches cannot move accidentally or by any other means than pilot manipulation
Tabitha 4 months ago
Investigators will go into the background of each pilot, to see if there were any issues that might make one of them s******l. If there were money issues, they may have tried to hide their s*****e as a plane crash after taking out a very expensive insurance policy for their family to have something after they’re gone. It may sound like a very far out theory, but it has happened in the past. The saddest part are all the innocent people they take with them, who had no issues and had everything in the world to live for.
Sapna Sarfare 4 months ago
The senior pilot was very experienced and same goes for the other one.. highly unlikely they did anything.. there is another angle to it. A turkish firm had ground work.. recently due to the war, the firm was dismissed.. that's another angle
Load More Replies... Correspondence EU 4 months ago
im not approving of what happened but i think hes not going to say: ``because i wanted to.`` he replied with `` i didnt `` , to keep the suspense.
elton cultice 4 months ago
It is a FACT that the fuel cutoff switches cannot move accidentally or by any other means than pilot manipulation
Related on Bored Panda
25
10