Actor Danny Masterson has been sentenced to a term of 30 years to life in prison for raping two women.
Celebrated for his portrayal in the hit TV show That ’70s Show, Masterson received his prison sentence following a hearing in Los Angeles Superior Court on Thursday.
During the proceedings, Judge Charlaine F. Olmedo attentively considered the testimonies of the women he sexually assaulted over two decades ago, during the peak of his career.
“When you raped me, you stole from me,” one of the accusers, identified as N. Trout, said in a statement that was read aloud in the courtroom, while the 47-year-old actor, who has been in custody since May, sat in his suit without showing any visible reaction. “That’s what rape is, a theft of the spirit.”
After years of mistrials, ‘That ’70s Show’ star Danny Masterson has been sentenced to 30 years to life behind bars for raping two women
Image credits: Myung J. Chun/Getty Images
The second woman, identified as Jen B., who was also a victim of rape by Masterson in 2003, stated that Masterson “has not shown an ounce of remorse for the pain he caused”.
Jen B., who initially sought permission from the church to report the assault, received a written response from the church’s international chief justice that referenced a 1965 policy letter. This response raised concerns for her as it suggested she could face ostracization from her family and friends if she reported a fellow Scientologist to the police. Nevertheless, she chose to report the rape in 2004.
Prosecutors contended that Masterson had utilized his prominent status within the Church of Scientology to evade responsibility and accountability.
After being charged with three counts of rape dating back to 2001-2003, in June 2020, the 47-year-old was found guilty of two counts of forcible rape
Image credits: Red Carpet Report
In May, Masterson was convicted of sexually assaulting two women at his residence in the Hollywood Hills during the early 2000s. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on a charge that accused the actor of raping a third woman.
The jury also heard testimony that Masterson had given drugs to his victims before committing the assaults.
This mixed verdict came after a previous trial in November where the jury failed to reach a decision on all three charges, leading to a mistrial. During the retrial this spring, which spanned over a month, Masterson was ultimately found guilty of two counts of rape involving force or fear.
As the judge pronounced the maximum allowable sentence – 30 years to life in prison – Masterson’s wife, Bijou Phillips, was seen breaking down in tears. His siblings, The Walking Dead actor Alanna Masterson, Malcolm In the Middle star Christopher Masterson, and actor Jordan Masterson, were all seated together.
According to court documents, Masterson had given drugs to his victims before committing the assaults in his home in the Hollywood Hills
Image credits: IMDb
“Though we have great respect for the jury, and for our system of justice, sometimes they get it wrong — and that’s what happened here,” Shawn Holley, Masterson’s attorney, conveyed to reporters outside the courtroom.
Ms. Holley expressed her profound disappointment with the sentence and highlighted that a team of lawyers had thoroughly examined the case, identifying “a number of significant evidentiary and constitutional issues” that they plan to use in appeals in the future.
At the time of the assaults, Masterson and all three of his accusers were affiliated with the Church of Scientology. Some of the women mentioned that it took them years to muster the courage to come forward because Church of Scientology representatives discouraged them from reporting the rapes to law enforcement.
“Since the week I came forward to police, I have been terrorized, harassed and had my privacy invaded daily by the cult of Scientology for almost seven years now,” one of the victims claimed.
“Los Angeles will no longer be a hunting ground for Hollywood elite who feel entitled to prey on women,” the LA district attorney said after the trial
Image credits: Lucy Nicholson – Pool/Getty Images
However, the Church itself has maintained that there is no valid reason to link Scientology to the case. “The church has no policy prohibiting or discouraging members from reporting criminal conduct of anyone – Scientologists or not – to law enforcement,” Scientology representatives said in a statement, adding that the “testimony and descriptions of Scientology beliefs” during the trial were “uniformly false”.
According to court documents, it was revealed that Scientology officials informed one of the survivors that she would risk losing her membership within the community unless she agreed to sign a non-disclosure agreement and accepted a payment of $400,000. This information was disclosed by prosecutors during the legal proceedings.
“Justice was finally served today,” George Gascón, the Los Angeles district attorney, told The New York Times reporters after the proceedings, adding that he hopes that “Los Angeles will no longer be a hunting ground for Hollywood elite who feel entitled to prey on women.”
At the sentencing, Leah Remini — a former Scientologist, who is Hollywood’s most prominent critic of the church — released a statement on social media that quickly went viral.
“Sitting in court today with the women who survived Danny Masterson’s predation was a surreal experience,” Remini tweeted. “I am relieved that this dangerous rapist will be off the streets and unable to violently assault and rape women with the help of Scientology, a multi-billion-dollar criminal organization with tax-exempt status.”
According to the victims, Masterson used his prominent status within the Church of Scientology to get away with his crimes
Image credits: evdropkick
“I don’t have to carry around your shame around with me. Now, you have to carry it. You have to sit in a cell and carry it,” one of the victims said in the courtroom, according to Variety.
“Your emptiness and your cowardice will be your true legacy. You are pathetic, disturbed and extremely violent. The world is safer with you behind bars.”
Speaking about the sensitive matter with Esquire earlier this year, That ’70s Show co-star Ashton Kutcher, conveyed his hope for Masterson’s innocence. “I don’t want him to elude the law, but I wish for the truth to show he’s innocent.”
Ashton openly admitted his inability to make a judgment regarding his co-star’s guilt, stating, “I can’t know… I’m not the judge, the jury, the DA, the victim, or the accused. I’m in no position to comment. I genuinely don’t know.”
Masterson will be eligible for parole in 20 years – by the time he will be in his late 60s – as confirmed by the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office.
People online applauded the jury and the judge for delivering the appropriate verdict
Yet those who fund the cult are still box office sweethearts. I’ve never seen a Mission Impossible Film, nor the new Top Gun. I am all for separating the art from the artist, but when you’re directly funding this büllshït, I cannot in good conscience contribute even a penny that might make it into your pocket. No movie is that important for me to see.
Load More Replies...No. Penal Code 799(b)(1) indicates that the California rape statute of limitations doesn't exist.
Load More Replies...I'd like to see EVERY convicted rapist get 30. something like 2% of actual criminal séxüal assaults receive a guilty verdict, and many of those receive token sentences. Let's stop re-traumatizing victims by questioning their claims' legitimacy. It takes guts and a will of steel to subject oneself to the kind of scrutiny women endure on the stand.
Ok I’m going to sound like a windbag but since you’re a bloody math proof I feel like I have to enlighten you before you fill those kids with anymore misinformation. I know TLDR. First off math is an absolute statistics are not. In fact statistics are to math what Down’s syndrome is to average people. Sure they exist but we don’t rely on them for anything of substance. I would think a bloody math prof would understand that but sure we’ll use statistics why not. Where were your statistical numbers of sexual assault 20 years ago vs now? The me too has opened a lot of doors for women with more coming forward today than when I was a kid. So the statistics have changed or what you actually meant was the probability. If statistics are the down syndrome of math, then probability is the equivalent of a living vegetable. Where will the statistics be in another 20 years? Changed. Where are you more likely to get assaulted? Baghdad, Manhattan or a small little town where I live?
Load More Replies...In law similarly to the burden of proof, there is also the burden of probability and that seems to be what all these historical R cases are convicted under. I.e there are lots of car thefts in an area and the culprit is caught red handed and sent to prison for a while, the car thefts stop, then the person is released and returns to the area and the car thefts start again in exactly the same way it’s highly likely the burden of probability will be used to convict the second lot of thefts, some legal systems do not allow earlier crimes a person has been convicted of to be mentioned in a new trial for other crimes but some do. Probability is perhaps us humans default mindset when we are debating guilt or innocence in that if a person is being tried for one crime we are more likely to give that person the benefit of the doubt
That's a good sentence for once.. a lot the time rich white men get hardly any time and no doubt there are many more victims yet to come forward
As much as I appreciate this kind of behavior being harshly punished...30 years? As someone said on social networks, you get far less for killing someone while driving like crazy. Making incoherent punishments doesn't' serve justice well, IMO
Yet those who fund the cult are still box office sweethearts. I’ve never seen a Mission Impossible Film, nor the new Top Gun. I am all for separating the art from the artist, but when you’re directly funding this büllshït, I cannot in good conscience contribute even a penny that might make it into your pocket. No movie is that important for me to see.
Load More Replies...No. Penal Code 799(b)(1) indicates that the California rape statute of limitations doesn't exist.
Load More Replies...I'd like to see EVERY convicted rapist get 30. something like 2% of actual criminal séxüal assaults receive a guilty verdict, and many of those receive token sentences. Let's stop re-traumatizing victims by questioning their claims' legitimacy. It takes guts and a will of steel to subject oneself to the kind of scrutiny women endure on the stand.
Ok I’m going to sound like a windbag but since you’re a bloody math proof I feel like I have to enlighten you before you fill those kids with anymore misinformation. I know TLDR. First off math is an absolute statistics are not. In fact statistics are to math what Down’s syndrome is to average people. Sure they exist but we don’t rely on them for anything of substance. I would think a bloody math prof would understand that but sure we’ll use statistics why not. Where were your statistical numbers of sexual assault 20 years ago vs now? The me too has opened a lot of doors for women with more coming forward today than when I was a kid. So the statistics have changed or what you actually meant was the probability. If statistics are the down syndrome of math, then probability is the equivalent of a living vegetable. Where will the statistics be in another 20 years? Changed. Where are you more likely to get assaulted? Baghdad, Manhattan or a small little town where I live?
Load More Replies...In law similarly to the burden of proof, there is also the burden of probability and that seems to be what all these historical R cases are convicted under. I.e there are lots of car thefts in an area and the culprit is caught red handed and sent to prison for a while, the car thefts stop, then the person is released and returns to the area and the car thefts start again in exactly the same way it’s highly likely the burden of probability will be used to convict the second lot of thefts, some legal systems do not allow earlier crimes a person has been convicted of to be mentioned in a new trial for other crimes but some do. Probability is perhaps us humans default mindset when we are debating guilt or innocence in that if a person is being tried for one crime we are more likely to give that person the benefit of the doubt
That's a good sentence for once.. a lot the time rich white men get hardly any time and no doubt there are many more victims yet to come forward
As much as I appreciate this kind of behavior being harshly punished...30 years? As someone said on social networks, you get far less for killing someone while driving like crazy. Making incoherent punishments doesn't' serve justice well, IMO
























29
47