Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Māori Artist Community Condemns White Woman’s ‘Entitlement’
Māori Artist Community Condemns White Woman’s ‘Entitlement’
111

Māori Artist Community Condemns White Woman’s ‘Entitlement’

Interview With Expert

27

ADVERTISEMENT

A white-presenting woman from New Zealand claimed that she was barred from exhibiting her painting at an exhibition presenting Māori artists, because she isn’t part of the indigenous community. A video showing her painting – a portrait of a Māori woman – faced significant backlash, with many people denouncing her apparent entitlement.

Highlights
  • A white-presenting New Zealand woman claimed her artwork was rejected from an exhibit of Māori artists because she isn't part of the indigenous community.
  • The rejection sparked backlash on TikTok, with many accusing the artist and her daughter of entitlement and cultural appropriation.
  • Critics argued that white people do not need to occupy every space and that Hazel Hunt’s painting was not genuine Māori art.

Earlier this month, a woman who goes by Ivana Gardner took to her TikTok page to defend her mom, painter Hazel Hunt, whom she claimed had been rejected by an art gallery, “because she’s not Māori.”

Although the original video has since been deleted, TikToker Lydia Tuaiti stitched Ivana’s clip, which showcased Hazel standing in front of her portrait of a Māori woman.

In the video, Ivana could be heard behind the camera saying: “She looks more beautiful in the painting than she does in real life,” to which Hazel could be heard replying: “She does.”

BP Daily - Your Source for Unbiased Reporting

    A white-presenting woman from New Zealand claimed that she was barred from exhibiting her painting 

    Image credits: artist_hazelhunt

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The original video amassed millions of views and hundreds of comments attempting to explain that “white people do not need to occupy every single space,” before it was finally removed from TikTok.

    In response, Lydia, who clarified that she is a non-Māori parent to Māori children, agreed with the criticism, highlighting Hazel’s sense of “entitlement”.

    “She had a Māori woman, but she wasn’t a Māori artist, you didn’t meet the criteria,” Lydia said, before noting how “yucky” it was for the mother and daughter to say that the portrait looked better than the real woman who was the subject of Hazel’s painting.

    Image credits: artist_hazelhunt

    “And the painting is actually eurocentrified beauty standard,” Lydia added. She then admitted: “My personal opinion is I wouldn’t want the energy that came with that art piece in my house for my kids.” 

    While Ivana deleted prior videos related to her mom’s controversial painting, Hazel has shared her portrait of the Māori woman multiple times on her Instagram, drawing further backlash.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The Auckland-based painter seemingly first introduced the portrait in 2022, and was already facing some heat, as anInstagram user called her art an “embarrassment.”

    It was an exhibition presenting Māori artists’ work

    Image credits: artist_hazelhunt

    After she shared the portrait againin 2023, another person wrote that it was “cringe”. In March 2024, Hazel stirred a slew of negative feedback again on Instagram, as a viewer penned: “First of all, pronounce Māori properly before you appropriate our culture for monetary benefit.

    “Secondly, she does not look more beautiful in the painting, her features have been colonised by your eyes and paint brushes. Just stick to what you know sis!”

    A separate individual chimed in: “Can’t even say Māori and want to profit off painting our culture, how cringe.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: artist_hazelhunt

    ADVERTISEMENT

    According to Krystal Warren, a senior lecturer at Massey University, incidents where white-identifying individuals appropriate spaces curated for marginalized communities, such Māori people in New Zealand, often occur.

    “Yes, [it happens a lot],” she told Bored Panda in an email. [It’s a] symptom of settler colonialism.

    Māori settled in New Zealand from East Polynesia from the eleventh century onwards, Minority Rights Group explains. 

    The artist was barred because she’s not part of the indigenous community

    Image credits: artist_hazelhunt

    As Europeans settled in New Zealand in the 19th century, Māori, as individuals and communities, were the subject of racism and discrimination, according to Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand.

    The intolerance of most white people was based less on an assumption of genetic superiority than of cultural superiority, the Encyclopedia states.

    As per the Encyclopedia, the conversion of Māori to Christianity, the usurping of their resources (notably land for farming by settlers) and the growing dominance of the institutions of the New Zealand state were based on beliefs about the superiority of European civilization.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: artist_hazelhunt

    ADVERTISEMENT

    This was also based on the perceived backwardness of Māori culture. Moreover, Māori schooling was based on the assumption that Māori were capable of becoming westernized as “honorary whites.”

    Professor Warren pointed to a similar controversy that unfolded with an exhibition of Dutch-New Zealand artist Theo Schoon in 2019, which set off a debate about the place of racially problematic work in public spaces. 

    “Presenting Schoon’s work now involves facing up to a series of issues,” Skinner and Aaron Lister, who curated the exhibition, wrote in a catalog.

    TikToker Lydia agreed with criticism highlighting the painter’s sense of “entitlement”

    @ifoundlydia theres alot you could unpack but this is why its important to support Māori artist if you are buying Māori art specifically. We are wanting to create safe spaces for our kids and art inheriently brings energy into their space. #tewikiotereomaori#maoritiktok#nzartist#nzfyp#greenscreenvideo#nzmum♬ original sound – Lydia Tuaiti

    They continued: “The most urgent is his appropriation of Māori art. The colonialist — at times, patently racist — ideas underpinning his project are difficult to see past from a contemporary perspective. 

    “There are legitimate questions as to whether such work should be given time and space now and if an exhibition such as this necessarily endorses or excuses such attitudes. 

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “Māori art certainly did not need or ask for Schoon to be its savior — this was a delusional and potentially harmful position to adopt.”

    Bored Panda has contacted Hazel for comment.

    “I feel like she could just submit it to a different gallery,” a TikTok user responded

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook
    Andréa Oldereide

    Andréa Oldereide

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    I’m a journalist who works as Bored Panda’s News Team's Senior Writer. The news team produces stories focused on pop culture. Whenever I get the opportunity and the time, I investigate and produce my own exclusive stories, where I get to explore a wider range of topics. Some examples include: “Doberman Tobias the viral medical service dog” and “The lawyer who brought rare uterine cancer that affects 9/11 victims to light”. You've got a tip? email me: andrea.o@boredpanda.com

    Read less »
    Andréa Oldereide

    Andréa Oldereide

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    I’m a journalist who works as Bored Panda’s News Team's Senior Writer. The news team produces stories focused on pop culture. Whenever I get the opportunity and the time, I investigate and produce my own exclusive stories, where I get to explore a wider range of topics. Some examples include: “Doberman Tobias the viral medical service dog” and “The lawyer who brought rare uterine cancer that affects 9/11 victims to light”. You've got a tip? email me: andrea.o@boredpanda.com

    What do you think ?
    Red Skye
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If the gallery made it clear they wanted indigenous ARTISTS, then the NON-INDIGENIOUS artist has no place trying to enter their art space, even if it said they wanted Maori art that still IMPLIES they want art by Maori's, not just ART depicting Maori's, the same thing applies in other area's if they say they want native art most people comprehend they want art BY natives, not OF Natives.

    SkippityBoppityBoo
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    There's so much I want to say about this but the comment - "“She looks more beautiful in the painting than she does in real life,” to which Hazel could be heard replying: “She does.”"... THIS???????? So Hazel Hunt decided to Westernise the woman in the portrait by giving her a slimmer nose, a more elongated face and more? Look Missus White Woman... Stay In Your Lane. Stop with Cultural Appropriation. Stop with your "White Entitlement"... Stop with your "Westernised Concept of" Beauty""... Just Full On STOP. You got rejected and Rightly So.

    rullyman
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It is kinda messed up to say "she looks more beautiful in the painting that in real life". That's a real historical figure, and you've changed her face. Yes, historical paintings in the European art style are designed to "enhance" the portrait sitter, but she is essentially saying that the original woman is not as beautiful. Not as beautiful to who's eye? The white painter's eye.

    LonelyLittleLeafSheep
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm an artist and I love many styles of indigenous art from many different countries, but I would never appropriate their art for my gain. It's horrifically inappropriate and disrespectful. Shame on her.

    Anna Drever
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    As a kiwi I agree the art, as beautiful as it was, does not belong in a Maori artist exhibition. There’ll be plenty of other galleries who will be happy to display it. Take the artwork there.

    Insomniac
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    OMG the FB comment section on this is an absolute racist cesspool. Like, nauseating. "Reverse racism." "Art is for everyone." "What about White rappers and Black country singers?" Vomitous. So disrespectful. "Look, I made her pretty by making her White..." there is no way to make that okay.

    Josie Harris
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Here is a painting of my great great grandmother Hannah Friedlich painted in 1878. She was a Prussian Jewish immigrant to NZ. 280378892_...372aae.jpg 280378892_10160186752704400_9174708550547090140_n-66f750d372aae.jpg

    Sue Hotu
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    if she was trying to copy the original painting she failed does not look anything like it.

    Insomniac
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I looked up Maori traditional dress and iconography. The changes she made to the tattoo and garments are not accurate to actual traditional Maori designs. She just looked at some pictures and painted her own spin on them, not even thinking about the meanings behind any of it. It's not even Maori art.

    Load More Replies...
    James Sumner-Goodwin
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    They look almost identical, the painting of her looked pretty Maori to me. I didn't see a "colonised" looking Maori woman in that painting. She got rejected from the gallery - isn't that the "win" or "victory" here? I only came down this far to see how nutty the comments would be.. expectations met.

    Insomniac
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    How much do you know about Maori iconography? Because the artist doesn't know squat, and neither do you if you think it looks "pretty Maori." If you look at the photo, you see she changed the tattoo. If you research a bit about Maori traditional clothing and their iconography, you will see that she didn't even get those correct. The jewelery and clothing the woman in the painting is wearing are not authentic. She didn't get the symbols right or anything. It's a cheap knockoff, the artist's vague guess at what a Maori woman could look like without actually researching anything. No wonder people are annoyed. There is no standard by which this can be considered Maori art except that the artist wanted it to be, so yes it's a win and a victory that the artist wasn't allowed in the exhibition, and it's even more of a victory that she's promised to never paint anything Maori again. Not that she ever did to begin with. She just pretended.

    Load More Replies...
    Judy Takács
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If the show requirements were Maori artists only, then she was cheating by entering her painting. If the show was Maori-inspired art, then she was welcome to enter and submit to the judges acceptance or rejection. This painting is not good. Its competent amateur. It is also derivative, using historical photo reference that she did not take herself. There are many good reasons to reject it well beyond her cultural background identity. And yes, white people…like myself…do not need to occupy every.single.space in the art world or any other world. Follow the rules, be respectful and pay attention when you've been told you've stepped over a line you should not have crossed. You don't know until you know, but when you know…you know better. Maya Angelou.

    Insomniac
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Did you notice how the painting did not accurately portray Maori iconography and clothing? It's not Maori art by any standard, because the symbols are wrong. I like your phrasing of Maori-inspired art. That's the kindest way to put it. I've been calling it a cheap knockoff or bad amateur cosplay.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    Red Skye
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If the gallery made it clear they wanted indigenous ARTISTS, then the NON-INDIGENIOUS artist has no place trying to enter their art space, even if it said they wanted Maori art that still IMPLIES they want art by Maori's, not just ART depicting Maori's, the same thing applies in other area's if they say they want native art most people comprehend they want art BY natives, not OF Natives.

    SkippityBoppityBoo
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    There's so much I want to say about this but the comment - "“She looks more beautiful in the painting than she does in real life,” to which Hazel could be heard replying: “She does.”"... THIS???????? So Hazel Hunt decided to Westernise the woman in the portrait by giving her a slimmer nose, a more elongated face and more? Look Missus White Woman... Stay In Your Lane. Stop with Cultural Appropriation. Stop with your "White Entitlement"... Stop with your "Westernised Concept of" Beauty""... Just Full On STOP. You got rejected and Rightly So.

    rullyman
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It is kinda messed up to say "she looks more beautiful in the painting that in real life". That's a real historical figure, and you've changed her face. Yes, historical paintings in the European art style are designed to "enhance" the portrait sitter, but she is essentially saying that the original woman is not as beautiful. Not as beautiful to who's eye? The white painter's eye.

    LonelyLittleLeafSheep
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm an artist and I love many styles of indigenous art from many different countries, but I would never appropriate their art for my gain. It's horrifically inappropriate and disrespectful. Shame on her.

    Anna Drever
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    As a kiwi I agree the art, as beautiful as it was, does not belong in a Maori artist exhibition. There’ll be plenty of other galleries who will be happy to display it. Take the artwork there.

    Insomniac
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    OMG the FB comment section on this is an absolute racist cesspool. Like, nauseating. "Reverse racism." "Art is for everyone." "What about White rappers and Black country singers?" Vomitous. So disrespectful. "Look, I made her pretty by making her White..." there is no way to make that okay.

    Josie Harris
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Here is a painting of my great great grandmother Hannah Friedlich painted in 1878. She was a Prussian Jewish immigrant to NZ. 280378892_...372aae.jpg 280378892_10160186752704400_9174708550547090140_n-66f750d372aae.jpg

    Sue Hotu
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    if she was trying to copy the original painting she failed does not look anything like it.

    Insomniac
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I looked up Maori traditional dress and iconography. The changes she made to the tattoo and garments are not accurate to actual traditional Maori designs. She just looked at some pictures and painted her own spin on them, not even thinking about the meanings behind any of it. It's not even Maori art.

    Load More Replies...
    James Sumner-Goodwin
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    They look almost identical, the painting of her looked pretty Maori to me. I didn't see a "colonised" looking Maori woman in that painting. She got rejected from the gallery - isn't that the "win" or "victory" here? I only came down this far to see how nutty the comments would be.. expectations met.

    Insomniac
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    How much do you know about Maori iconography? Because the artist doesn't know squat, and neither do you if you think it looks "pretty Maori." If you look at the photo, you see she changed the tattoo. If you research a bit about Maori traditional clothing and their iconography, you will see that she didn't even get those correct. The jewelery and clothing the woman in the painting is wearing are not authentic. She didn't get the symbols right or anything. It's a cheap knockoff, the artist's vague guess at what a Maori woman could look like without actually researching anything. No wonder people are annoyed. There is no standard by which this can be considered Maori art except that the artist wanted it to be, so yes it's a win and a victory that the artist wasn't allowed in the exhibition, and it's even more of a victory that she's promised to never paint anything Maori again. Not that she ever did to begin with. She just pretended.

    Load More Replies...
    Judy Takács
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If the show requirements were Maori artists only, then she was cheating by entering her painting. If the show was Maori-inspired art, then she was welcome to enter and submit to the judges acceptance or rejection. This painting is not good. Its competent amateur. It is also derivative, using historical photo reference that she did not take herself. There are many good reasons to reject it well beyond her cultural background identity. And yes, white people…like myself…do not need to occupy every.single.space in the art world or any other world. Follow the rules, be respectful and pay attention when you've been told you've stepped over a line you should not have crossed. You don't know until you know, but when you know…you know better. Maya Angelou.

    Insomniac
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Did you notice how the painting did not accurately portray Maori iconography and clothing? It's not Maori art by any standard, because the symbols are wrong. I like your phrasing of Maori-inspired art. That's the kindest way to put it. I've been calling it a cheap knockoff or bad amateur cosplay.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT