“In 2022 I Learned Hundreds Of Useful Concepts That Improved My Understanding Of The World. Here Are The 10 Best”
Interview With AuthorMany of us are constantly searching for pearls of wisdom that might help us make sense of the world and improve our lives. Even if just a little. However, great insights aren’t found exclusively in dusty and arcane tomes, in a shadowy nook of some ancient library. You can find powerful concepts on social media, too. You just need to know who to follow.
For instance, writer Gurwinder Bhogal, aka @G_S_Bhogal, recently went viral after sharing 10 of the most useful concepts that he learned last year that improved his understanding of the world. You’ll find them below.
We reached out to Gurwinder with a few questions about standing out with one's writing and what other concepts nearly made it into his viral thread, and he was kind enough to answer them. Read on for the insights he shared with Bored Panda.
When you’re done reading through this article, you can take a peek at Bored Panda’s earlier feature of Gurwinder’s ideas right over here. Meanwhile, if you found the writer’s ideas as fascinating as we did, consider following him on Twitter and Substack.
Gurwinder is a popular writer who shares incredibly interesting ideas and concepts with his followers

This post may include affiliate links.
Against stupidity the very gods Themselves contend in vain. - Friedrich Schiller
“This boy is Ignorance. This girl is Want. Beware them both, and all of their degree, but most of all beware this boy, for on his brow I see that written which is Doom, unless the writing be erased.” — Charles Dickens, A Christmas Carol.
This clearly explains how despots like Hitler and Trump rode to positions of power
Bored Panda was curious how Gurwinder decided on his top 10 concepts, as well as what other ideas nearly made it into his list.
"I decided the concepts based on what I found most memorable, as this seemed to be a good indicator of notability," he told us.
"There were many others that were close to getting into the top 10, such as Audience Capture, Twyman's Law, and the Paradox of Unanimity," the writer said.
But if you view yourself in the 2nd person (I/we are not amused), you see the rest of the world as peasants.
Sure but if you view yourself in the fourth person, you're like, who tf is that guy, and you end up in a blood bath
Load More Replies...So speaking of yourself in the third person is logical and not crazy then.
All 4 Paws agrees. She thinks it is perfectly natural
Load More Replies...One lesson from psychology/psychiatry. Never refer to yourself as “you”. For example, telling yourself “You really need to get your act together”. It should really be “I need to get my act together”. It makes it personal, not like you are referring to another person.
Been there (several times) done that and failed. Yet, many is a time I offered sage advice to others who did not heed my advice. I got to sit back with that all knowing look of "I told you."
It can be incredibly easy for your voice to get lost among the noise on social media. We were interested to get Gurwinder's take on how writers can stand out from the crowd on Twitter and Substack, as well as what keeps him passionate about writing and teaching others.
"Write what you most want to write about rather than what you think other people want to read. This is because, if you're passionate about something, you can make even the most boring subject interesting, but if you're chasing popular trends, you'll be doing the same thing as millions of other writers, while struggling to maintain the interest to consistently create compelling content," he explained that writers ought to be honest with themselves and ignore the crowd. Do what you're passionate about, not what you hope will make you popular.
"Writing is as much about teaching myself as teaching others. It's not just that I learn while researching topics to write about, it's that the very act of expressing myself in words teaches me things about myself that I didn't know. I therefore see writing as a form of personal growth," he told Bored Panda.
Cunningham's Law states "the best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer." The concept is named after Ward Cunningham, the inventor of wiki software
By ask advice of unknown people with varying degrees of stupidity who don't know you or the situation clearly. On relationship advice I read most often "red flags, leave the relationship, get a divorce, walk away, etc." There are very unhappy people out in cyber land who want to give the worst advice possible, just because they can.
Yep. I posted on reddit about using a certain type of shampoo in a certain way, and half the people who responded called me wrong and insane. The same thing happened when I said I cook chicken for my son.
Bored Panda also got in touch with Ariane Sherine, a comedy writer, Twitter blogger, and the author of 'The How of Happy.' We had a chat with her about writing persuasively and grabbing readers' attention on social media. She also shared her advice to help improve people's lives in the Digital Age (spoiler warning, stay away from screens as much as you can!).
"Try and offer fresh, original content that’s entertaining," she explained what writers can do to stand out from the crowd on Twitter.
"If it’s informative too, so much the better. People are looking to laugh and be surprised. They’re also looking for wisdom they can use in their daily lives," Ariane told us.
trump is evidence for the affirmative here, all he does is spout unending stupid s**t!
Sounds like trump and the "maggo"'. They are loud and their talking points are repeated over and over while barely constructing a proper sentence. " Listening to his "speeches" would have been comical if he wasn't our leader for 4 years.
That maxim kind of runs up against the principle that it is "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt"
Well here's my alternate theory: leadership is created so others can take a rest from the babbler :^)
*** MASSIVE SPOILER ALERT *** - This is the message underpinning Frank Herbert's DUNE. People are SO bad at picking leaders that people who read that book nearly always fail to understand that the villain of the story is Paul. Go find a Herbert interview. His own words. Paul is the villain. You fall for the Baron as the baddie because he's portrayed in cartoonish villain colors, but it's Paul.
Meanwhile, we wanted to get Ariane's opinion on how people can improve their lives and be happier, here and now. The author of 'The How of Happy' shared some great insights on what everyone ought to focus on first and foremost.
"Spend as much of your life as possible away from screens. We weren’t designed to stare at them—especially not constantly," she told Bored Panda.
"If this is only a few waking hours a day, as it is for me as I write and program music, then make sure you spend those hours being active, ideally outdoors in the fresh air. See friends, clean and tidy your home, exercise and live at least some of your life offline!"
Ariane added that taking positive action in the direction of your goals "can improve life almost instantly."
I think it should be more clearly taught at a young age -- "The Ends Do Not Justify The Means". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ex: This means police should not plant evidence on someone they, "know is a criminal" to remove them . . . from society, if they can't do it legally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current US Politics by Republicans is an example of, "Noble Cause Corruption". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ex: Doing what they absolutely know is wrong (doing what they wouldn't tolerate in others) to benefit . . . . . . themselves ... (1) Mitch McConnell packing the Supreme Court. (2) Trump and Eastman claiming the . . . . . Vice President can select the next US President instead of just reading the election results. . . . . . . . . . . . ---> As the OP stated, this is, "immoral treatment of others".
And this is why most religions do not work, in my opinion! Major failing is teaching people they are morally superior to someone else if they believe in this specific "God".
"If it serves the Faith, then it must be the truth!" - medieval Christian slogan
Michael Scott : It just seems awfully mean. But sometimes, the ends justify the mean.
No, never. This is one of the primary underlying all-encompassing truths of our very existence. The end never justifies the means. (Is that a reference to The Office?)
Load More Replies...I'm a person of faith, but holy cow (sorry couldn't help it 😜) the atrocities throughout history done in the name of moral superiority. Even the tiniest ones make my eyes roll so hard it hurts. Like sorry no, I'm not going to boycott some company because they vow to treat everyone with respect even if they don't believe like I do. Like wtf, we're gatekeeping decency now? Or fighting over what holy book translation is correct. They act like refusing to study multiple resources is a flex. Some religious folks wear ignorance like a badge of honor and I feel like the ones that do this also tend to be the ones to make their political affiliations a religious experience. It's bananas.
Load More Replies...Add to this: Intentions do not trump end results. Looking at you, Hitler. Looking at you, Trump.
So ignorant. Instead of including Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Kim Jung, Baby Doc, Venezuela….you put Trump. Lmao
Load More Replies...Gurwinder has been tweeting interesting ideas about life since joining the social media platform in November 2014. Since then, he’s amassed over 113.7k followers.
His recent thread, featuring the top 10 concepts that he’d learned in 2022, got a ton of attention from other internet users. The writer’s thread was viewed 1.9 million times and got 10.7k likes.
Moreover, he shared the same concepts on his Substack page, along with the links to all of the relevant sources, explaining each concept in a bit more depth. It’s informative. It’s entertaining. And it’s making us feel like we’ve got a more firm grip on human psychology and what reality is like in the 2020s.
I read that the human body's cells are completely renewed in 8 years, meaning we are literally new matter. The only exception is brain cells. We wouldn't have any memories if they switched out. From this we can deduct that humans are nothing but our memories.
Interesting and I've heard that too but the gut and skin is replaced every few months. Liver can take 3 years to fully recycle, bones even longer at around ten years. The brain only recycles about 1% of it's cells every year and many cells in the heart are with you from birth until death and then some. For anyone curious memories aren't stored in the cells, they are stored in the hippocampus, amygdala and neo cortex. Interestingly the hippocampus is one of the parts of your brain that recycles the most often shedding and replacing cells. For anyone wondering how something like pain in the bones can last decades if the cells are replaced - it's not the cells causing pain but rather the blueprint the cells are working from. You can imagine when youre born the blueprints are pristine and over the years they keep rebuilding from the same blue prints as coffee stains build up, it frays around the edges and kids get at it with crayons. They begin building your body back a little wrong.
Load More Replies...Word of the day. Shared it with a coworker, we had a good chuckle.
Load More Replies...Because what we've done NOW affects what we have done BEFORE. Bill Coshy was a great comedian, but how many people have bought tickets to his new show?
And yet we're prepared to give full life sentences to 16 year olds without a second thought out of some uncivilised notion of "revenge". It's barbaric.
Let's talk context. If you are talking about a crime, sorry, actions and consequences.
Load More Replies...Some of you Pandas might have heard about a few of these concepts before. How you use all of that information is up to you. For some, it’s just something cool to share with their friends. For others, it’s a fresh new perspective that might change their approach to life.
For example, Gurwinder’s point about surrogate activities, artificial struggles, and why we have Twitter culture wars is utterly fascinating. It’s something that many of us probably realized independently, but it’s great to see it spelled out succinctly: “The mind wants peace, but needs conflict.”
The writer notes on his Substack page that there’s no shortage of information, however, there is “a shortage of information about how to consume information, and how to act on it.”
He explains the problem: “Without this meta-knowledge, all the data in the world is of little use, because it'll be distorted by your biases, reshaped to fit your existing beliefs, and misapplied to rationalize your basest behaviors.”
Is this why I'm still in my pajamas, drinking my third cup of coffee and reading Bored Panda instead of working?
Load More Replies...But there are healthy and unhealthy conflicts. Productive and non-productive struggles.
Before you scoff at it, here’s an article from NWU: “According to the late sociologist Lewis Coser, human beings can’t develop their own identity unless they’re in conflict with another group that they make different from themselves. But some of this conflict can be nonviolent. Sporting competitions are a way for human beings to channel this and develop their identities.“ https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/psychology-behind-conflict-harnessed-for-good
Load More Replies...This is basically my Real Housewives theory. All their needs are met. All their wants are met. They have no struggles and nothing to do, so they create interpersonal drama.
Ya gotta release your thoughts somewhere. Better to post something you feel needs to be said and be done with it. Then you put down your phone and get moving.
That’s why the writer does what he does. He tackles these concepts, biases, and issues with life in the Digital Age in a very easy-to-understand way, in order to make the world a better place.
“I have seen the causes and the effects. As a former web developer, I understand how tech companies use information to manipulate people online. And having spent years stalking and studying one of the deadliest terrorist groups in the West, I have witnessed first-hand how dangerous delusions spread from mind to mind,” he explains his motivation for blogging.
“Bringing these two strands of experience together, this blog is my attempt to describe the myriad ways in which technology and psychology conspire to fool us, and to explore how we can withstand the covert assault on our senses.”
Individuals do this too. Managers avoid teaching the people they supervise relevant skills, so they can remain one step above them on the hierarchy. The problem is, their bosses have the same mentality, and this weakens the whole system. (Example: Russian Military).
That is far too prevalent. Better to teach what was learned while learning new skills so we can all climb together.
Load More Replies...Yes! Veritasium has an excellent video about this "why we can't have nice things" if I remember correctly
Load More Replies...The Drug Enforcement Agency, for another. Created far more problems than it ever solved, and it's completely self-perpetuating.
I've always suspected but never been able to prove that this is especially true in medicine. It's more profitable to treat chronic conditions than it would be to cure them, so funding is directed away from researching cures or preventions to things like cancer or diabetes and toward treating the results of those conditions. There are researchers actively looking for cures and preventions, but they're not the one getting masses of funding and support.
It's only cured if a person of power gets the disease. But 100% spot on. Why give away the cash cow when you can milk it for years?
Load More Replies...Will you people please stop downvoting comments you disagree with into oblivion! It gets people banned, and it removes the Reply option so we can't properly discuss anymore.
Lyndon Johnson and General Westmorland to keep the Vietnam war going.
It makes perfect sense that we see this. We're dealing with human beings here, who would wish to preserve their livelihood. There's nothing particularly "good" about it, and it can act in a way counter to our progress and ability to thrive, but let's not be surprised that it exists.
A bit twisted, but in other words it is better to have organizations *for* Social Justice rather than organizations to *end* Social Injustice.
I have no idea if this is really true. A lawyer I once met told me that he went to Mexico for reasonably priced meds for his diabetes. A doctor there told him that there IS a cure for diabetes, it's just really long, involved, requires a DNA relative to donate a few things, etc. I asked why we didn't have this and he answered "because the diabetes industry (really used that term) employs way too many people"
Just because someone told you that someone he met told you a thing, doesn't make it true.
Load More Replies...If 'race baiting' means what I think it means, neither can Republicans. What do you mean?
Load More Replies...We’ve noted before on Bored Panda just how important media literacy is in this day and age. We need to be aware of things like the idea that the more often we hear something, the more plausible we think it is. However, repetition doesn’t mean that something is necessarily true. It’s how misinformation and propaganda can spread.
To counter that, you need to be able to differentiate between trusted and disreputable sources of information. No sources will get everything 100% right, but that doesn’t mean that all outlets are equal. Prioritize sources that do investigative journalism instead of repeating what others write. Check if the story is copyrighted, whether it’s dated, what the author’s track record is like, and if the information seems plausible. If something feels iffy, try to do a bit of background research before resharing the story on social media.
This has historically been known as arguing from authority. It is a logical fallacy. We just don't teach logic anymore. It is one of the problems with our university system. Going to university MAY make you more knowledgeable. It is not a guarantee of being wise or right.
That's why liberal arts colleges are so highly regarded. There is a difference between being educated and being trained.
Load More Replies...Den Ver's Law -- The more Bvllshit a subject is, the more likely Gibson's Law is to be true. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . In the field of Physics, which is more true, DenVer's Law, or, Gibson's Law? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . For example, can you find a PhD expert who will say that as an object leaves the Earth's surface the force of gravity upon it becomes stronger (just as the pull of a spring or rubber band increases as it is being stretched farther from its original position), and that is why objects fall back to the ground.
Nope. Coz the average guy has an idea that going farther from the Earth's surface causes that gravitational force to weaken, and knows the same thanks to experimenting as a kid with a magnet and a magnetic material of less or equal weight than the magnet. Those who remember the actual reason, know it's called the'inverse square law'.
Load More Replies...I agree that there are "equal and opposite degrees", but wholly disagree with the application of this one. Distilling debates into "right and wrong" fails to acknowledge the fact that situations are rarely one-sided and multiple viewpoints are necessary to seeing the whole picture. Also, being educated doesn't make someone "more skilled at being wrong". It makes them more skilled and less likely to be wrong, but doesn't eliminate the possibility completely. When someone of authority makes a human error, it is more noteworthy and has the potential to do more damage
My Dr says I need heart surgery. Now I know he is skill at being wrong & im not getting that surgery. Thanks for the great advice
I'm so sorry your fate was decided in a courtroom. Does your MD have a PhD?
Load More Replies...Not true. Having a PhD gives you the upper hand at having more knowledge of a subject than someone with a GED. It's the person asking the questions who needs to be the general with a strategy.
You are free to pick for yourself what you choose to read. I definitely learn from the articles I read, since most of them are science or current event related. You can skip over the Kardashians, no one is forcing you to read that claptrap.
I realize I'm throwing myself under the bus here, but I'm not sure I buy that anyone here on panda is a person highly dedicated to the pursuit of wisdom and knowledge and who avoids pablum and nonsense...
Load More Replies...Not if you seek out knowledge. I read pieces on archeology, geology, epidemiology, and so much more, and it is so wonderful to be able to find so much information easily. My favorite thing about the internet is that we are getting data about social animal behaviors that are hard to replicate in studies, that are observable in legions of animal videos. Particularly cats, because they are notoriously cagey about being studied; we now know that they're just as loyal and emotional as dogs, they just operate differently in showing it.
But Noise Bottlenecks are NOT true on BoredPanda! ... Besides the internet, the same is true of Television. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Even in 1986 Stephanie Speck knew to tell No. 5, "You lose IQ points the longer you watch. There have been actual studies". (Short Circuit).
We watch a lot of easily digestible things, but we watch just as many documentaries, mostly historical. There's a lot of education in our screens!
Load More Replies...Eh, I'd hope most of us know what we're looking at on here. There's a lot of knowledge to be found online, and a lot of distracting fluff. While this site mostly falls into the latter category, it's inspired me to go down some interesting rabbit holes and learn a thing or two
No, I definitely feel dumber after time spent on the interwebs. Course, I’ve read books before so I have a comparison.
It is absolutely essential to be aware of how (dis)reputable a source is, considering how quickly information spread on the internet, whether it’s true or not.
The concepts that the writer blogged about are absolutely interesting. There’s no doubt about it. But they probably won’t drastically change your life if you first don’t have the basics all sorted out.
What is your diet like? Are you eating well? How much movement are you getting every day? Do you get enough sunlight? What is your social and romantic life like? Do you purposefully take time off from using tech? Are you making good financial decisions and do you have a creative outlet to supplement your career? These are the fundamentals that you should consider working on while you’re learning about all the interesting concepts that awesome writers bring up on social media.
Which of the concepts that Gurwinder shared blew your minds the most, dear Pandas? Which of these ideas were you aware of before? Are you going to change how you live your life after reading this Twitter thread? Tell us all about it in the comments! We’d love to hear from you.
Here's how some internet users reacted to the writer's informative thread











Aiden Wilson Tozer Quote: "Of all forms of deception self-deception is the most deadly, and of all deceived persons the self-deceived are the least likely to discover the fraud. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Experiments demolish self-deception. This is why scientists (not technicians, or, naturalists whose work is based on memorization) like the surprise of having their hypothesis proved wrong -- otherwise experimentation would be boring and tedious if it always proved what was already known. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Science has made this the best time to be a human and demolishing self deception is why Science is so powerful and why it should be a strong voice when it comes to determining policy.
my two favorites are the Peter principle where In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence and the Dunning-Kruger effect whereby people with low ability, expertise, or experience regarding a certain type of task or area of knowledge tend to overestimate their ability or knowledge
And vice versa! A lot of BS goes unopposed because the people who know it isn't true can't exactly tell you why, and decide to shut up.
Load More Replies...How about Cole's Axiom: The sum of intelligence on the planet is a constant. The population is growing.
Aiden Wilson Tozer Quote: "Of all forms of deception self-deception is the most deadly, and of all deceived persons the self-deceived are the least likely to discover the fraud. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Experiments demolish self-deception. This is why scientists (not technicians, or, naturalists whose work is based on memorization) like the surprise of having their hypothesis proved wrong -- otherwise experimentation would be boring and tedious if it always proved what was already known. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Science has made this the best time to be a human and demolishing self deception is why Science is so powerful and why it should be a strong voice when it comes to determining policy.
my two favorites are the Peter principle where In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence and the Dunning-Kruger effect whereby people with low ability, expertise, or experience regarding a certain type of task or area of knowledge tend to overestimate their ability or knowledge
And vice versa! A lot of BS goes unopposed because the people who know it isn't true can't exactly tell you why, and decide to shut up.
Load More Replies...How about Cole's Axiom: The sum of intelligence on the planet is a constant. The population is growing.
