Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Guy Never Permitted Grandparents To Babysit His Kid, Asks For Help After Divorce But They Refuse
Guy Never Permitted Grandparents To Babysit His Kid, Asks For Help After Divorce But They Refuse
1.1K

Guy Never Permitted Grandparents To Babysit His Kid, Asks For Help After Divorce But They Refuse

63

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s common knowledge that a kid should never be exposed to the stresses of adult quarrels – however, sadly, there are instances when you simply can’t help it. 

Take this Redditor, for instance; they have a granddaughter who’s not biologically theirs and a son who never trusted them to watch her before he finally got divorced and started needing some help! 

More info: Reddit

RELATED:

    Son and daughter-in-law never allowed the OP near their grandkid

    Image credits: Caleb Oquendo (not the actual photo)

    The couple didn’t “trust” them, despite the fact that they’d raised 4 kids

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Juan Pablo Serrano Arenas (not the actual photo)

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image source: u/FaithlessnessWild215

    AITA for refusing to babysit my grandchild due to her not being my biological grandkid?” – this internet user took to one of Reddit’s most judgmental communities to ask its members if they’re indeed a jerk for refusing to babysit their son’s kid whom he never let them watch prior to his divorce. The post managed to garner over 14K upvotes as well as 2.9K comments discussing the situation. 

    You know what they say, “Family is the glue that holds us together through thick and thin”! It’s the ultimate support system that unconditionally loves and accepts you despite literally anything; you get a sense of belonging and a full piggy bank of sweet memories you’re bound to cherish forever.

    Sadly though, life is a cruel thing, and it just so happens that not everybody gets to have a positive experience with their loved ones.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    There are a gazillion and one things that can destroy family bonds – however, as one of the subreddit’s members pointed out – you can’t just burn bridges and then wonder why you can’t cross them!

    We can’t know for sure why the OP’s son and his now ex-partner were so against them seeing their grandchild; perhaps they did have some valid reasons, or it was pulled out of thin air – whatever it is that drove them to this decision, the majority of us, if not all, can agree that it’s highly unfair on the author of the post, especially considering how they didn’t even see the girl on Christmas.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Judging by how the man started to ask for help with baby duty once he’d split up with his spouse, there’s a possibility that maybe it was the woman who played a part in the idea, as it’s very confusing why a person who raised four kids was practically banned from developing any sort of bond with their – not biological, but still – granddaughter.

    There’s no happy ending to this story as of yet – however, the OP did manage to stand up for themselves, and in my humble opinion, I believe that it’s already good enough.

    The guy then got divorced and started needing some help with childcare

    Image credits: Josh Willink (not the actual photo)

    To get a broader perspective on the matter, Bored Panda decided to reach out to a couple of experts. Our first interviewee is Hannah, a rainbow-loving mom of 8-year-old twins from Surrey and blogger at Hannah and the Twiglets. We asked Hannah whether she thinks that the original poster handled the situation well, and if not, what they could have done differently: “I think in this instance, the issue is actually not so much about the child not being the poster’s biological grandchild, but the fact that the poster was not trusted to babysit the child in the past. I can understand that the poster may feel resentful, as it appears that the family are using her when it suits them, despite nothing having changed about her home environment (which they had previously said was unsuitable). However, if it really is about the child not being her biological relative, then she is absolutely being unreasonable. The child is very much a part of the family and being treated differently could have devastating effects on the child’s self-esteem and mental health.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    We also pondered if the woman had any advice for those who might be going through a similar situation with their family: “If a child is part of a family, they should be treated as such, whether they are related by biology or not. There are many, many ways to be a family, and being biologically related is just one of them.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    However, his parent shut him down and reminded him that he had long made it clear that they weren’t good enough

    Image credits: Carlos Torres (not the actual photo)

    BP then posed similar questions to our second interviewee, Abby, who provides millennial women with a space where they can find helpful information to make their everyday lives easier while they start and grow their families, and also got some noteworthy insights: “In my opinion, she handled it as well as she possibly could have. She communicated to her son how she felt and why she felt that way. However, we’re not clear on the tone in which she communicated – perhaps her tone in speaking to him about it would have made a difference in how he received it.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    I’d advise anyone in a similar situation to focus on the relationship they have with their own child, as a strong relationship between you and your child will affect how you treat and view the people in their lives whom they also love. I’d also advise them to be honest and clear in communicating how they feel but to speak the truth in love so that it will be well-received.

    I’d love the readers to know that in all family situations, speaking from a place of love is always the best way to communicate. Empathy is also a great place to put yourself in before you start difficult conversations with your family members.”

    So, now that we’ve got some interesting commentary, what is your take on the story?

    Fellow online community members shared their thoughts and opinions

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Darja Zinina

    Darja Zinina

    Writer, Community member

    Read more »

    Darja is a Content Creator at Bored Panda. She studied at the University of Westminster, where she got her Bachelor's degree in Contemporary Media Practice. She loves photography, foreign music and re-watching Forrest Gump.

    Read less »
    Darja Zinina

    Darja Zinina

    Writer, Community member

    Darja is a Content Creator at Bored Panda. She studied at the University of Westminster, where she got her Bachelor's degree in Contemporary Media Practice. She loves photography, foreign music and re-watching Forrest Gump.

    What do you think ?
    Melissa Neubauer
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Mostly feel bad for the child. The parents set her up for rejection

    Ray Arani
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'd recommend inviting son and granddaughter over together to cultivate a relationship. The kid is four now, so dropping her off with strangers is probably going to be a bad idea anyway. Say, "I will not babysit. But I'd love to get to know her and develop a relationship with her, so feel free to come over with her for visits. Maybe in the future I'll change my mind, but right now I'm definitely not open to being childcare."

    Gardener of Weeden
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    And after op develops a bond with the child, you can be sure son will have no problem ripping her away.

    Load More Replies...
    Adam Belaire
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Initially thought he would be slightly AH but after reading, completely NTA. Horses aside, they said they don't trust OP to watch the kid meaning even at their house they don't trust them, so stick with that. If someone said they didn't trust me as a driver and then asked for a ride, sorry you don't feel comfortable so I can't drive you.

    Ken Beattie
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    As someone else pointed out, I wonder if some of that is because of his ex. Bearing in mind he grew up there you'd assume he'd have no problems with it (unless he had a ton of accidents as a kid). So it's entirely possible the reason he wasn't leaving the kid with the grandparents originally was his wife vetoing it (and him supporting her decision). Seems like a heart to heart about that would be the first thing they should do. See what he says.

    Load More Replies...
    The Starsong Princess
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I guess you showed him! But now your relationship with your son is in tatters and you’ll never have a relationship with this grandkid. Is that the win you want?

    Rahul Pawa
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Reminds me of the phrase "would you rather be right or happy?"

    Load More Replies...
    MR
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    All the NTA miss the most important point: the reason she gave is disgusting. The ETA nailed. She made it about not being biologically related and now how she was treated previously. That makes her TA. And they got divorced. While he was likely spineless about it, you'd better believe she likely had something more to do with them not being allowed to babysit than he did. Suck it up and develop a relationship with your grandchild before it's too late.

    Beck
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I feel like there is more to the story..she keeps referring to his daughter as "the kid."

    Load More Replies...
    Sea Squirrel
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This isn't about babysitting. She just uses the request for revenge. Her son hurt her feelings in the past and now she slams back by saying his daughter isn't even her biological granddaughter. That's wrong in many ways. If it was about babysitting she simply could've said she didn't want to do it, without explaining why. Because watching your grandchildren isn't your responsibility or obligation. It's a choice. You can just say no without hurting others.

    Becky Samuel
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    There's no point trying to be rational here. Boredpanda readers seem to be rabidly anti-family and anti-child and will turn on anyone who doesn't go along with that.

    Load More Replies...
    Brainmas
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    ESH, for the same reason as the commenter on the original post. Don't punish the child.

    Alexandra
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Don't punish the child? This is a consequence of the father's actions in the past, so the father punishes the child, not the grandfather. I think it's a good idea to start cultivating a relationship with the grandchild, but it should be abundantly clear that the grandfather doesn't owe the father anything. The father put an end to that himself.

    Load More Replies...
    Isa's left eye
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'd go with ESH on this one. Yes, he had no obligation to look after his grandkid, but to say that it was because the kid wasn't biologically related to him was just cruel and I'm sure untrue.

    Dre Mosley
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Feel bad for the kid.

    YetAnotherSarah
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    She of course should do what makes her comfortable, but it sounds like he already got rid of the real problem, the ex-wife. This is a chance to rebuild their relationship and get a grandbaby in the deal. I would absolutely jump at the chance, personally. I don't even care if he seems to be in it for the wrong reason (free childcare).

    Load More Comments
    Melissa Neubauer
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Mostly feel bad for the child. The parents set her up for rejection

    Ray Arani
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'd recommend inviting son and granddaughter over together to cultivate a relationship. The kid is four now, so dropping her off with strangers is probably going to be a bad idea anyway. Say, "I will not babysit. But I'd love to get to know her and develop a relationship with her, so feel free to come over with her for visits. Maybe in the future I'll change my mind, but right now I'm definitely not open to being childcare."

    Gardener of Weeden
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    And after op develops a bond with the child, you can be sure son will have no problem ripping her away.

    Load More Replies...
    Adam Belaire
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Initially thought he would be slightly AH but after reading, completely NTA. Horses aside, they said they don't trust OP to watch the kid meaning even at their house they don't trust them, so stick with that. If someone said they didn't trust me as a driver and then asked for a ride, sorry you don't feel comfortable so I can't drive you.

    Ken Beattie
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    As someone else pointed out, I wonder if some of that is because of his ex. Bearing in mind he grew up there you'd assume he'd have no problems with it (unless he had a ton of accidents as a kid). So it's entirely possible the reason he wasn't leaving the kid with the grandparents originally was his wife vetoing it (and him supporting her decision). Seems like a heart to heart about that would be the first thing they should do. See what he says.

    Load More Replies...
    The Starsong Princess
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I guess you showed him! But now your relationship with your son is in tatters and you’ll never have a relationship with this grandkid. Is that the win you want?

    Rahul Pawa
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Reminds me of the phrase "would you rather be right or happy?"

    Load More Replies...
    MR
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    All the NTA miss the most important point: the reason she gave is disgusting. The ETA nailed. She made it about not being biologically related and now how she was treated previously. That makes her TA. And they got divorced. While he was likely spineless about it, you'd better believe she likely had something more to do with them not being allowed to babysit than he did. Suck it up and develop a relationship with your grandchild before it's too late.

    Beck
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I feel like there is more to the story..she keeps referring to his daughter as "the kid."

    Load More Replies...
    Sea Squirrel
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This isn't about babysitting. She just uses the request for revenge. Her son hurt her feelings in the past and now she slams back by saying his daughter isn't even her biological granddaughter. That's wrong in many ways. If it was about babysitting she simply could've said she didn't want to do it, without explaining why. Because watching your grandchildren isn't your responsibility or obligation. It's a choice. You can just say no without hurting others.

    Becky Samuel
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    There's no point trying to be rational here. Boredpanda readers seem to be rabidly anti-family and anti-child and will turn on anyone who doesn't go along with that.

    Load More Replies...
    Brainmas
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    ESH, for the same reason as the commenter on the original post. Don't punish the child.

    Alexandra
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Don't punish the child? This is a consequence of the father's actions in the past, so the father punishes the child, not the grandfather. I think it's a good idea to start cultivating a relationship with the grandchild, but it should be abundantly clear that the grandfather doesn't owe the father anything. The father put an end to that himself.

    Load More Replies...
    Isa's left eye
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'd go with ESH on this one. Yes, he had no obligation to look after his grandkid, but to say that it was because the kid wasn't biologically related to him was just cruel and I'm sure untrue.

    Dre Mosley
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Feel bad for the kid.

    YetAnotherSarah
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    She of course should do what makes her comfortable, but it sounds like he already got rid of the real problem, the ex-wife. This is a chance to rebuild their relationship and get a grandbaby in the deal. I would absolutely jump at the chance, personally. I don't even care if he seems to be in it for the wrong reason (free childcare).

    Load More Comments
    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT