Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

“I Feel Like A Total Fraud”: Person Gets Hired For A High-Paying Job After Using AI During Interview
“I Feel Like A Total Fraud”: Person Gets Hired For A High-Paying Job After Using AI During Interview
1.7K

“I Feel Like A Total Fraud”: Person Gets Hired For A High-Paying Job After Using AI During Interview

43

ADVERTISEMENT

ChatGPT is an artificial-intelligence-driven language bot that people can have human-like conversations with. It can even prepare an itinerary for your next trip and set up a workout plan.

Or, as was the case with Redditor u/JoJolion, help you land a job.

In a post on r/antiwork, they explained how the chatbot came in handy during a remote interview after they realized that they might’ve complimented themselves a bit too much on their CV.

RELATED:

    This job hunter oversold themselves a bit on their CV

    Image credits: LinkedIn Sales Solutions (not the actual photo)

    So they used ChatGPT to help them during a remote interview with one of their potential employers

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Airam Dato-on (not the actual photo)

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    The original poster (OP) detailed the situation a bit further after receiving some questions

    Image source: JoJolion_

    Although it delivered this time, we still can’t trust ChatGPT one hundred percent of the time

    Image credits: Emiliano Vittoriosi (not the actual photo)

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Relying on ChatGPT for high-stakes tasks remains somewhat of a gamble. “As a computer scientist, I often field complaints that reveal a common misconception about large language models like ChatGPT and its older brethren GPT3 and GPT2: that they are some kind of ‘super Googles,’ or digital versions of a reference librarian, looking up answers to questions from some infinitely large library of facts, or smooshing together pastiches of stories and characters. They don’t do any of that – at least, they were not explicitly designed to,” Research Associate Professor of Computer Science at the University of Southern California, Jonathan May, wrote.

    “A language model like ChatGPT, which is more formally known as a ‘generative pre-trained transformer’ (that’s what the G, P, and T stand for), takes in the current conversation, forms a probability for all of the words in its vocabulary given that conversation, and then chooses one of them as the likely next word. Then it does that again, and again, and again, until it stops,” May explained.

    So it doesn’t have facts, per se; it just knows what word should come next. “Put another way, ChatGPT doesn’t try to write sentences that are true. But it does try to write sentences that are plausible.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    However, the future of the technology looks bright

    Image credits: Israel Andrade (not the actual photo)

    Still, the use of this technology is seeping deeper and deeper into our everyday lives. According to some estimates, over 100 million people used ChatGPT in January alone.

    And a poll from the social network Fishbowl, which focuses on workplace trends and employee perspectives, found that 27 percent of professionals have already fired it up to get some help with work-related tasks.

    Bill Gates published a detailed post on what he thinks the future of generative AI systems holds, including their use cases, benefits, and risks, and said that, “Although humans are still better than GPT at a lot of things, there are many jobs where these capabilities are not used much.”

    He said that jobs in sales and document-handling require decision-making but not the ability to learn continuously and that AI can be trained using data sets to “empower people to do this work more efficiently.” So maybe it can also help them get these positions?

    And this story has received plenty of reactions

    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Rokas Laurinavičius

    Rokas Laurinavičius

    Writer, Senior Writer

    Read more »

    Rokas is a writer at Bored Panda with a BA in Communication. After working for a sculptor, he fell in love with visual storytelling and enjoys covering everything from TV shows (any Sopranos fans out there?) to photography. Throughout his years in Bored Panda, over 300 million people have read the posts he's written, which is probably more than he could count to.

    Read less »
    Rokas Laurinavičius

    Rokas Laurinavičius

    Writer, Senior Writer

    Rokas is a writer at Bored Panda with a BA in Communication. After working for a sculptor, he fell in love with visual storytelling and enjoys covering everything from TV shows (any Sopranos fans out there?) to photography. Throughout his years in Bored Panda, over 300 million people have read the posts he's written, which is probably more than he could count to.

    Kotryna Br

    Kotryna Br

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    Kotryna is a Photo Editor at Bored Panda with a BA in Graphic Design. Before Bored Panda, she worked as a freelance graphic designer and illiustrator. When not editing, she enjoys working with clay, drawing, playing board games and drinking good tea.

    Read less »

    Kotryna Br

    Kotryna Br

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Kotryna is a Photo Editor at Bored Panda with a BA in Graphic Design. Before Bored Panda, she worked as a freelance graphic designer and illiustrator. When not editing, she enjoys working with clay, drawing, playing board games and drinking good tea.

    What do you think ?
    Tucker Cahooter
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Hopefully interviewers are sitting up and taking notice of the potential for AI to be abused in this way. Maybe they need to make sure that the final interview is always face to face in an office

    LK
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The reason this person feels like a fraud is because that is exactly what they are. They are a fraud. Oh, and the financial regulators would like a word with the bank regarding trustworthness and probity in your recruitment procedures.

    Jonny S
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You should do the decent thing and not start this new job. Let someone who has worked hard to achieve the standard get it rather than someone who has just paid for an AI subscription get the job. You are an example of what is wrong with AI & society.

    Aqsa Azam
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Mindblowing how people are okay with it. All I am seeing is red.

    DeVille
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I get how they didn’t see them type, but how didn’t they see them read the answers, and hear they were reading? Very few people don’t sound like they’re reading aloud when they’re reading something for the first time. So they just read them out loud, naturally, without moving their eyes? And most importantly, did they not check references? Being a bank I’d highly doubt they wouldn’t have checked, they’re very security conscious for obvious reasons, even for non money handling roles. I call fake.

    Anyone-for-tea?
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don’t understand how they didn’t hear them type? I don’t press hard on a keyboard, but even so there is a rhythmic tapping sound whilst you type.

    Load More Replies...
    Zophra
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    As a teacher who has done a lot of virtual meetings, classes, etc. over Covid, I do not understand how this person could maintain eye contact without suddenly cutting away to read the response of the Chat GPT, or silence the sound of their typing while the question was being asked, or stall until the answer appeared with the program. As I am suspicious of many of these stories, does anyone know if this is really realistically possible?

    ί𝔫CίŦᵃт𝐔𝐬
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I believe this is going to be the norm. As a college teacher, AI is going to be replacing working and thinking in my students very soon, if it hasn't already. If they're going to cheat their way through school, they won't have any choice but to cheat their way through interviews and jobs, and the amount of competent people doing anything will face a sharp decline. Now go watch "Idiocracy."

    Jessica Bertram
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    100% This. Also university instructor. Seeing red right now, and mourning the death of academic rigor.

    Load More Replies...
    Tams21
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Inventive dishonesty is still dishonesty. OP is not just cheating the company but also the person who'd have gotten the job had they been honest. What an ah!

    Sonja
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Everyone needs to learn how to fit in into a new job and I doubt OP'd gotten through with outright lies. I've been on the other side of the table in such interviews and I can confidently tell that a person who's that resourceful and quick in typing and reading is far more qualified to fit in quickly than someone who might have the slightly embellished qualifications but took years ro get them and can't improvise on the spot with every resources they have on hand. I'm pretty sure they've checked references and the basics panned out. Embellishment on the qualifications is normal and to be expected. And then, every job is different. Different programs to use, different processes to learn, heck, even if the company uses the same programs than the last one there's no guarantee that it'll work the same way and is used the same way (looking at you, Salesforce!). As long as OP is a good and steady worker they'll pick up what's needed and no one will be any wiser a few months later.

    Amelia Bee
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Why am I not surprised r/antiwork is in support of a guy committing fraud. THE JOB IS AT A BANK. He's handling other people's finances and doesn't have a clue what he's doing! He also deprived a qualified person of a job.

    Mora Chilis
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    People who interview well aren't always the best employees. Interviewing is a skill. Sometimes people who panic in interviews can be the best employees. An interview is a moment in time. Obviously, using a program to answer well on the spot is not a good idea. Either he will quickly learn or he will be let go.

    Papa Patata
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    People get crappier by the day, all of this encouragement for someone who is probably taking the spot if someone actually qualified. People are so weird. It takes one sheep to jump on the train and the rest follow.

    Damira Balent
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Don't worry, if this is some higher profile job, where you'll need to make some decisions, you won't last long anyway 😄 It quickly filters out who has the knowledge and who is just winging it. At least your future colleagues will figure you out very soon.

    RandomlyRan Cannabis
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I literally know hundreds of people who's careers started by fudging what they knew. My best friend's mom went to work for a company right out of high school and lied about honors math so they put her in accounting. Her sister graduated HS the next year and went to college to be a CPA. She ended up in the same department working under my friend's mom, her sister, 6 years later. This is not a new tactic to get a job.

    Gonbei Nanashino
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don’t know, man. This guy sounds just too honest in a strange way I can’t articulate. This sounds like written by AI to make look less of cheater then he is.

    LuckyTanuki
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Man this whole thing between the original post and the comments reads like it's the "Anti-work" subreddit. Like why would you endorse this kind of behavior, I'm all for not liking most companies and employers but at the same time this doesn't just affect the company it affects people. Think about the people who are currently working in that same position, they are hiring to fill a slot to take some of the workload off of them, then here this person comes into a roll they aren't experienced in, wasting time for everyone else there. They need to get that person set up, train them, get them familiar with the job, that takes time. Then when they find out the person isn't qualified at all to be doing the job and lied, they fire them and then all that time spent by the coworkers training then went to waste. That's incredibly selfish because it's not just "oh it's a business and they don't care about you and they will just replace you anyway" it's affecting the other normal people at that job

    Annie Steele
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Decline the job and maybe next time you look for a job, try being honest!

    ---
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It depends on what questions they used the ai for. Maybe it one of those questions where you have to say you are the biggest extrovert, you like teamwork, you're always organised, bank work is your passion since 7 yrs old, you manage 108 hobbies daily and you don't go to work for money, but because you like doing it. If OP has the education and experience needed to work in a bank, they just lied the same way everyone else does, but just used better tools

    A_Stevens
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'd like to think employers are wise to lies in any form nowadays. I recently got a new job in a large and reputable company. After accepting the offer I was taken through their security where every morsel of information I provided on my CV and during interview was scrutinised. I had to provide scanned copies of every type of supporting documentation and references for everything going back to being a young teenager (I'm 30 now!). The only thing they didn't ask for was my birth certificate! I remember thinking: I'm glad I didn't lie about anything because I would've been found out in a hot second!

    Bernát Bonda
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Employers want solutions, and don't really care if it is your own, or You saw it online (if it's legal)

    Rachel Ainsworth
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The hiring managers may have had a good idea what their previous jobs entailed but chosen to hire this person because they went to the effort to provide good answers. Willing and able to learn independently is a capability that is often more important than experience.

    Al LeFeusch
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Eh, we all fake it till we make it. Good on you. Just do a good job now that you've got it.

    Zephyr343
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    What would bother me is if he gets fired after 6 months, puts that on his resume as a job, then a future employer calls up his former one that he lied to, what would they say? He could be screwing him in the long run

    I just work here
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Usually employers can't say much more then yes, he worked here for 6 months..

    Load More Replies...
    Gamgam
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think it's basically a wash. OP used technology to level up quickly- how many times has technology screwed over the worker? Plenty. Time it went the other way. Also to those saying she screwed over someone who "deserved" the job, you don't know what the criteria were. Maybe they hired her not because of her chatgpt answers but because she was a great match for their culture. Also so many unqualified people get hired in place of actual qualified people that this scenario really is no different. If she can end up doing the job then none of this matters anyway. If she can't then the "qualified" person will get hired anyway.

    JJ Damron
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That's the issue with the workforce, a lot of people are careless about qualifications. Do you feel the same way about people who provide medical services or perform car repairs or electricians, bridge builders, and carpenters? Are those people okay to fake their qualifications as well? Are you really okay with not knowing that the person coming towards you or your children with a hypodermic needle is truly qualified and if the experience they list on their resume is genuine?

    Load More Replies...
    Irreverent 1
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Get the job, . Figure out how to do it as you go. Are you worth what they are paying you? IDGAF how you got here but welder, brain surgeon, copywriter, HR, tool and die, chef, nurse, plumber, electrician? Can you do that job? If you didn't lie about qualifications or credentials why should you not use every tool at your disposal to ace an interview?

    ί𝔫CίŦᵃт𝐔𝐬
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    They did lie. They said so. They also relied more and more on the AI to answer questions they had no idea how to answer. This person is an idiot, and I wish them the absolute worst luck.

    Load More Replies...
    I just work here
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm going to be honest, that is bleeping brilliant! For someone like me who freezes up under pressure, that would be a game changer.

    Maggie Hood
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Usually I would be mad but work sucks and you gotta do what you gotta do to make money in this world. Worst case scenario you just get fired. Not really a big deal in my eyes. There's a lot of people who embellish and stretch the truth on resumes. It doesn't matter that much as long as you do your job and make that money. It's just a job, and they don't value you at all and will drop you the second they want to, possibly with no warning. So no, I wouldn't feel bad about lying to an employer, because who cares about hurting a corporations feelings. Fake it till you f*****g make it.

    Death Metal Kitty
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    For those that are really getting really pissed off about this use of AI... that's unfortunately how the world works. In the early 2000s, if you could google faster and better than everyone else, you could get a job with a consulting firm that paid you to Google answers. And today, everyone googles. Back in the 2000s, people were getting jumped up saying that Google won't replace subject matter experts. It hasn't, but for base level knowledge, Google takes you pretty far. AI is the technological equvilent of Google in the 2000s. You can hate on it all you want, but it won't change the fact that the world is shifting again.

    AffenpinscherMom
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think it's genius. Work smarter, not harder.

    Exotic Butters
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Rut Ro. Stay away from banking if you don't know what you're doing.

    DN X
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I luv when a boss aka so called republican gets stuck!

    Loanni Kerris
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    ChatGPT was the reason probably in the first place you got the interview. You are simply using the same tool. There is nothing to feel bad about that. The technology is available for everyone, not just the big boys. Feeling bad about it could negatively affect your performance, so don't. You have the same rights as the recruiters.

    Tucker Cahooter
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Hopefully interviewers are sitting up and taking notice of the potential for AI to be abused in this way. Maybe they need to make sure that the final interview is always face to face in an office

    LK
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The reason this person feels like a fraud is because that is exactly what they are. They are a fraud. Oh, and the financial regulators would like a word with the bank regarding trustworthness and probity in your recruitment procedures.

    Jonny S
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You should do the decent thing and not start this new job. Let someone who has worked hard to achieve the standard get it rather than someone who has just paid for an AI subscription get the job. You are an example of what is wrong with AI & society.

    Aqsa Azam
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Mindblowing how people are okay with it. All I am seeing is red.

    DeVille
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I get how they didn’t see them type, but how didn’t they see them read the answers, and hear they were reading? Very few people don’t sound like they’re reading aloud when they’re reading something for the first time. So they just read them out loud, naturally, without moving their eyes? And most importantly, did they not check references? Being a bank I’d highly doubt they wouldn’t have checked, they’re very security conscious for obvious reasons, even for non money handling roles. I call fake.

    Anyone-for-tea?
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don’t understand how they didn’t hear them type? I don’t press hard on a keyboard, but even so there is a rhythmic tapping sound whilst you type.

    Load More Replies...
    Zophra
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    As a teacher who has done a lot of virtual meetings, classes, etc. over Covid, I do not understand how this person could maintain eye contact without suddenly cutting away to read the response of the Chat GPT, or silence the sound of their typing while the question was being asked, or stall until the answer appeared with the program. As I am suspicious of many of these stories, does anyone know if this is really realistically possible?

    ί𝔫CίŦᵃт𝐔𝐬
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I believe this is going to be the norm. As a college teacher, AI is going to be replacing working and thinking in my students very soon, if it hasn't already. If they're going to cheat their way through school, they won't have any choice but to cheat their way through interviews and jobs, and the amount of competent people doing anything will face a sharp decline. Now go watch "Idiocracy."

    Jessica Bertram
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    100% This. Also university instructor. Seeing red right now, and mourning the death of academic rigor.

    Load More Replies...
    Tams21
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Inventive dishonesty is still dishonesty. OP is not just cheating the company but also the person who'd have gotten the job had they been honest. What an ah!

    Sonja
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Everyone needs to learn how to fit in into a new job and I doubt OP'd gotten through with outright lies. I've been on the other side of the table in such interviews and I can confidently tell that a person who's that resourceful and quick in typing and reading is far more qualified to fit in quickly than someone who might have the slightly embellished qualifications but took years ro get them and can't improvise on the spot with every resources they have on hand. I'm pretty sure they've checked references and the basics panned out. Embellishment on the qualifications is normal and to be expected. And then, every job is different. Different programs to use, different processes to learn, heck, even if the company uses the same programs than the last one there's no guarantee that it'll work the same way and is used the same way (looking at you, Salesforce!). As long as OP is a good and steady worker they'll pick up what's needed and no one will be any wiser a few months later.

    Amelia Bee
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Why am I not surprised r/antiwork is in support of a guy committing fraud. THE JOB IS AT A BANK. He's handling other people's finances and doesn't have a clue what he's doing! He also deprived a qualified person of a job.

    Mora Chilis
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    People who interview well aren't always the best employees. Interviewing is a skill. Sometimes people who panic in interviews can be the best employees. An interview is a moment in time. Obviously, using a program to answer well on the spot is not a good idea. Either he will quickly learn or he will be let go.

    Papa Patata
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    People get crappier by the day, all of this encouragement for someone who is probably taking the spot if someone actually qualified. People are so weird. It takes one sheep to jump on the train and the rest follow.

    Damira Balent
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Don't worry, if this is some higher profile job, where you'll need to make some decisions, you won't last long anyway 😄 It quickly filters out who has the knowledge and who is just winging it. At least your future colleagues will figure you out very soon.

    RandomlyRan Cannabis
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I literally know hundreds of people who's careers started by fudging what they knew. My best friend's mom went to work for a company right out of high school and lied about honors math so they put her in accounting. Her sister graduated HS the next year and went to college to be a CPA. She ended up in the same department working under my friend's mom, her sister, 6 years later. This is not a new tactic to get a job.

    Gonbei Nanashino
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don’t know, man. This guy sounds just too honest in a strange way I can’t articulate. This sounds like written by AI to make look less of cheater then he is.

    LuckyTanuki
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Man this whole thing between the original post and the comments reads like it's the "Anti-work" subreddit. Like why would you endorse this kind of behavior, I'm all for not liking most companies and employers but at the same time this doesn't just affect the company it affects people. Think about the people who are currently working in that same position, they are hiring to fill a slot to take some of the workload off of them, then here this person comes into a roll they aren't experienced in, wasting time for everyone else there. They need to get that person set up, train them, get them familiar with the job, that takes time. Then when they find out the person isn't qualified at all to be doing the job and lied, they fire them and then all that time spent by the coworkers training then went to waste. That's incredibly selfish because it's not just "oh it's a business and they don't care about you and they will just replace you anyway" it's affecting the other normal people at that job

    Annie Steele
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Decline the job and maybe next time you look for a job, try being honest!

    ---
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It depends on what questions they used the ai for. Maybe it one of those questions where you have to say you are the biggest extrovert, you like teamwork, you're always organised, bank work is your passion since 7 yrs old, you manage 108 hobbies daily and you don't go to work for money, but because you like doing it. If OP has the education and experience needed to work in a bank, they just lied the same way everyone else does, but just used better tools

    A_Stevens
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'd like to think employers are wise to lies in any form nowadays. I recently got a new job in a large and reputable company. After accepting the offer I was taken through their security where every morsel of information I provided on my CV and during interview was scrutinised. I had to provide scanned copies of every type of supporting documentation and references for everything going back to being a young teenager (I'm 30 now!). The only thing they didn't ask for was my birth certificate! I remember thinking: I'm glad I didn't lie about anything because I would've been found out in a hot second!

    Bernát Bonda
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Employers want solutions, and don't really care if it is your own, or You saw it online (if it's legal)

    Rachel Ainsworth
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The hiring managers may have had a good idea what their previous jobs entailed but chosen to hire this person because they went to the effort to provide good answers. Willing and able to learn independently is a capability that is often more important than experience.

    Al LeFeusch
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Eh, we all fake it till we make it. Good on you. Just do a good job now that you've got it.

    Zephyr343
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    What would bother me is if he gets fired after 6 months, puts that on his resume as a job, then a future employer calls up his former one that he lied to, what would they say? He could be screwing him in the long run

    I just work here
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Usually employers can't say much more then yes, he worked here for 6 months..

    Load More Replies...
    Gamgam
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think it's basically a wash. OP used technology to level up quickly- how many times has technology screwed over the worker? Plenty. Time it went the other way. Also to those saying she screwed over someone who "deserved" the job, you don't know what the criteria were. Maybe they hired her not because of her chatgpt answers but because she was a great match for their culture. Also so many unqualified people get hired in place of actual qualified people that this scenario really is no different. If she can end up doing the job then none of this matters anyway. If she can't then the "qualified" person will get hired anyway.

    JJ Damron
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That's the issue with the workforce, a lot of people are careless about qualifications. Do you feel the same way about people who provide medical services or perform car repairs or electricians, bridge builders, and carpenters? Are those people okay to fake their qualifications as well? Are you really okay with not knowing that the person coming towards you or your children with a hypodermic needle is truly qualified and if the experience they list on their resume is genuine?

    Load More Replies...
    Irreverent 1
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Get the job, . Figure out how to do it as you go. Are you worth what they are paying you? IDGAF how you got here but welder, brain surgeon, copywriter, HR, tool and die, chef, nurse, plumber, electrician? Can you do that job? If you didn't lie about qualifications or credentials why should you not use every tool at your disposal to ace an interview?

    ί𝔫CίŦᵃт𝐔𝐬
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    They did lie. They said so. They also relied more and more on the AI to answer questions they had no idea how to answer. This person is an idiot, and I wish them the absolute worst luck.

    Load More Replies...
    I just work here
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm going to be honest, that is bleeping brilliant! For someone like me who freezes up under pressure, that would be a game changer.

    Maggie Hood
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Usually I would be mad but work sucks and you gotta do what you gotta do to make money in this world. Worst case scenario you just get fired. Not really a big deal in my eyes. There's a lot of people who embellish and stretch the truth on resumes. It doesn't matter that much as long as you do your job and make that money. It's just a job, and they don't value you at all and will drop you the second they want to, possibly with no warning. So no, I wouldn't feel bad about lying to an employer, because who cares about hurting a corporations feelings. Fake it till you f*****g make it.

    Death Metal Kitty
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    For those that are really getting really pissed off about this use of AI... that's unfortunately how the world works. In the early 2000s, if you could google faster and better than everyone else, you could get a job with a consulting firm that paid you to Google answers. And today, everyone googles. Back in the 2000s, people were getting jumped up saying that Google won't replace subject matter experts. It hasn't, but for base level knowledge, Google takes you pretty far. AI is the technological equvilent of Google in the 2000s. You can hate on it all you want, but it won't change the fact that the world is shifting again.

    AffenpinscherMom
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think it's genius. Work smarter, not harder.

    Exotic Butters
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Rut Ro. Stay away from banking if you don't know what you're doing.

    DN X
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I luv when a boss aka so called republican gets stuck!

    Loanni Kerris
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    ChatGPT was the reason probably in the first place you got the interview. You are simply using the same tool. There is nothing to feel bad about that. The technology is available for everyone, not just the big boys. Feeling bad about it could negatively affect your performance, so don't. You have the same rights as the recruiters.

    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT