Woman Wants To Keep The Rest Of Inheritance For Herself, Husband Makes Her Doubt Her Decision
Interview With ExpertWe can’t take our belongings to the afterlife, but we can decide who receives them after we pass away.
However, when Mumsnet user MamaByTheOcean began dividing her late father’s estate among all the intended beneficiaries, she ran into a problem. The woman started to feel that her own portion was shrinking too much.
She didn’t want to disrespect her dad’s last wishes, but the idea of not receiving what she believed was her fair share didn’t appeal to her either. So, she turned to the internet for advice on how to handle the situation.
After her father had passed away, this woman didn’t even have time to grieve
Image credits: demopicture / Envato (not the actual photo)
Since taking care of her late dad’s estate demanded so much effort
Image credits: YuriArcursPeopleimages / Envato (not the actual photo)
Image credits: MamaByTheOcean
We rarely talk about it, but inheritance comes with a myriad of challenges
First and foremost, after a family member’s passing, New York City-based grief therapist Natalie Greenberg advises people to grant themselves some grace before diving into financial matters.
“Each family has a unique relationship to money (how finances were dealt with, changes in financial situations, emotions tied to money, etc), so it’s understandable that a lot of emotions will arise while grieving, and even more while making big financial decisions,” she told Bored Panda.
Greenberg, who has over a decade of experience in helping people navigate loss, said, “To even ask this question demonstrates the person is being considerate and measured in a logistically complex and emotional situation.”
Britain, where the author of the post appears to be from, is entering the so-called golden age of inheritance, as the trillions accumulated by the postwar Baby Boomers begin trickling down to their children and grandchildren in what’s been dubbed the great wealth transfer.
At some point this year, £100bn ($133bn) – or more than half the annual budget of the National Health Service (NHS) – could be changing hands every year, according to an analysis commissioned by estate administrators the Kings Court Trust. By 2047, they estimate, that number could more than triple.
Around £5.5tn ($7.3tn) in total could flow down through families over the next 30 years, both in conventional legacies and increasingly in living gifts, which don’t attract inheritance tax if the donor survives for seven years after handing them over.
Image credits: Image by Freepik (not the actual photo)
The sums involved in the great wealth transfer are so h**h partly because the Boomers make up so much of the population – roughly a fifth.
As The Guardian’s columnist Gaby Hinsliff points out, it’s always been perfectly normal for older people to be richer than younger ones, having had a lifetime to accumulate property, pensions, and savings. But what has happened to those assets over a generation is unusual. House prices tripled in real terms between 1980 and 2020, and even a council house bought through Margaret Thatcher’s right to buy can be worth seven figures in some London areas.
One in four pensioner households is now worth over £1m on paper, even if they’re not cash-rich. Now, this windfall is heading down to the next generation – or to some of them – and the partitions are expected to cause tension. More money, more problems, as they say.
When the Joseph Rowntree Foundation conducted research into attitudes toward legacies back in 2005, it found two-thirds of those potentially wealthy enough to leave something weren’t worried about organizing their finances to do so and just wanted to enjoy the fruits of their labor.
Because of this, many of their children are now finding themselves in similar positions as the woman behind the post.
“It makes sense to feel torn if the surviving relative has different opinions and priorities than indicated in the will,” therapist Natalie Greenberg added. “Perhaps there is a way to honor your loved one with their preferences while balancing the current needs of the family. Unfortunately, it is very common for families to have disagreements or even falling outs over a loved one’s will.”
People who read what the woman was going through didn’t want her to give up more than she should
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Maybe order them some pizzas .... OP is nuts, if she is giving away any money. And her husband is even more nuts suggesting doing so. Unless, he is making 7 figures a year, and are in a joint account.
Load More Replies...If you're the executor of a notarised will, you have to carry out the wishes, including all the bequests. You don't have to give anything to people who aren't named, but they will have to give money to the charities.
There's no time limit. Put the money to work while figuring it out.
It's not OP's responsibility to fill in the financial gaps left by her father. His will is to dispose of *his* assets, not hers.
It does seem like she's doing things a little out of order (paying out dad's siblings before the funeral was fully paid does suggest she got ahead of probate/grant of letters) but I'm not sure whether she technically filling the financial gaps. *If* the house has already been transferred into her name, that would explain her funding utilities, but £250 sounds a bit much if no one is living there - she should be able to get an empty property exemption on council tax unless it has dragged on too long, and I'd expect heating & water bills would be limited to not much more than standing charge (a little extra during showings and minor tidy ups) unless they've been spending lot of time getting the property ready to sell out. But there is an order executors should follow, which sets out the priority order for paying out. And hubby's suggestions are odd.
Load More Replies...You know,... I've seen some pretty ugly parts of inheritance issues on a personal level. People are not even celebrating nor genuinely thinking of their late loved ones. Just the money and who gets what, but saying "this is what they would have wanted us to have." I would hope to at least not have to worry about settling estates, debts and hope the funeral costs are covered by the inheritance or insurance. I don't make much money, myself, so I feel for the OP in all this. Her aunts and uncles have been exceptionally selfish and reckless. They didn't deserve getting $60k. But this is a time when you really start seeing your relatives for who they are.
That the siblings have already squandered what they were given, us everything you need to know about their character. Give NO MORE MONEY TO ANYONE or any cause. The very best modern aphorism I have found is: "Don't set yourself on fire to keep someone else warm". Look to you and your own family's future.
If OP was doing all the work to settle the estate, she should be fairly compensated *for* that work. The sibs already got 60K each.
Maybe order them some pizzas .... OP is nuts, if she is giving away any money. And her husband is even more nuts suggesting doing so. Unless, he is making 7 figures a year, and are in a joint account.
Load More Replies...If you're the executor of a notarised will, you have to carry out the wishes, including all the bequests. You don't have to give anything to people who aren't named, but they will have to give money to the charities.
There's no time limit. Put the money to work while figuring it out.
It's not OP's responsibility to fill in the financial gaps left by her father. His will is to dispose of *his* assets, not hers.
It does seem like she's doing things a little out of order (paying out dad's siblings before the funeral was fully paid does suggest she got ahead of probate/grant of letters) but I'm not sure whether she technically filling the financial gaps. *If* the house has already been transferred into her name, that would explain her funding utilities, but £250 sounds a bit much if no one is living there - she should be able to get an empty property exemption on council tax unless it has dragged on too long, and I'd expect heating & water bills would be limited to not much more than standing charge (a little extra during showings and minor tidy ups) unless they've been spending lot of time getting the property ready to sell out. But there is an order executors should follow, which sets out the priority order for paying out. And hubby's suggestions are odd.
Load More Replies...You know,... I've seen some pretty ugly parts of inheritance issues on a personal level. People are not even celebrating nor genuinely thinking of their late loved ones. Just the money and who gets what, but saying "this is what they would have wanted us to have." I would hope to at least not have to worry about settling estates, debts and hope the funeral costs are covered by the inheritance or insurance. I don't make much money, myself, so I feel for the OP in all this. Her aunts and uncles have been exceptionally selfish and reckless. They didn't deserve getting $60k. But this is a time when you really start seeing your relatives for who they are.
That the siblings have already squandered what they were given, us everything you need to know about their character. Give NO MORE MONEY TO ANYONE or any cause. The very best modern aphorism I have found is: "Don't set yourself on fire to keep someone else warm". Look to you and your own family's future.
If OP was doing all the work to settle the estate, she should be fairly compensated *for* that work. The sibs already got 60K each.





























40
20