45 Times Companies Gave The Most Ridiculous Explanations For Their Mistakes
Interview With Expert
Facing the truth and being responsible for your actions, no matter how unpleasant, is the mature thing to do. But that’s easier said than done. Especially when talk turns to business! Many companies and managers have a hard time being honest about what’s going on because they have a vested interest in staying profitable.
The r/AskReddit online community had a field day, calling out various companies that gave thoroughly ridiculous explanations for why something was happening. It’s perfect proof of why corporate communication has to be empathetic, not just robotic attempts to spin the truth. Scroll down to see just how ludicrously some businesses tried to protect their interests.
We wanted to learn about proper business communication, so we reached out to Matt Johnson, Ph.D., a marketing psychology speaker and the host of the human nature blog. He explained why transparency is paramount and shed some light on one of the best campaigns ever, aimed at repairing a company's tattered reputation. You'll find Bored Panda's interview with the expert below.
This post may include affiliate links.
"We reduce the performance of your older iPhone to keep it from crashing." Sorry, Android doesn't do this and this type of thing hasn't been a problem for over 10 years. It WAS an issue with some of the earliest smartphones, but not since 2012 or so. Apple just does it to try to get you to upgrade or pay for a battery replacement.
Edit: gotta love the Apple sheep down voting me for speaking the truth.
I've NEVER had an Apple. ALWAYS Android. Most people have iPhone because "Omg! Everyone else does!"
According to marketing psychology speaker Johnson, how a company approaches communication about problems will depend on the business itself, as well as how serious the issue is.
"If it's a safety issue with the product, there are regulatory and liability concerns, and so almost certainly in these cases the company needs to come clean, do a recall, and formally apologize," he explained to Bored Panda via email.
"In less severe cases, when the product is merely faulty and not dangerous, it's still a best practice to take responsibility and apologize. The brand’s reputation is contingent on the quality of their products, and if they are consistently delivering a poor experience, this won’t be sustainable for the brand in the long term," Johnson said.
Samsung destroyed my fridge while working on it. They agreed to replace it, and then told me they couldn’t replace my fridge they destroyed, because “they didn’t have any.”
They’re literally the manufacturer.
I filed a claims in small claims court and won and made them pay. It was ridiculously easy.
McDonald’s and the coffee burn victim, claiming she only did it for the money. She didn’t - she was horribly burned by coffee kept far too hot that McD’s had been warned about repeatedly in the past and they still refused to fix.
This lady still gets run through the mud from the uneducated/willful morons on the internet from time to time. Look this up on Google "stella mcdonald's hot coffee lawsuit burn pictures" then if you have an iron stomach, turn off the blurred pictures. It's.... ***AWFUL***
"It will force the company into a position where it is competing based purely on price and on the advertising effectiveness, which is typically a losing proposition. All in all, the default should be to take ownership, repair the product, and to be transparent to the consumer."
Luckily for brands, consumers tend to be "surprisingly forgiving" when they're transparent about their failures. "Three things should be in place in order to pull this off," Johnson walked us through the process.
"First, the brand needs to have some degree of existing trust with their consumers. Secondly, the brand needs to be transparent and take ownership of its product’s failings. And lastly, they need to make the product genuinely better. When these three things are in place, consumers can be very forgiving which helps to restore the company’s reputation."
“We are experiencing higher than usual call volumes”.
Texas' energy grid couldn't keep up with the winter storm a few years back because of wind mills somehow.
The one where Ted Cruz went to Cancujn while people in his state died due to the incompetence and greed of TX government and their donors? Yeah that's horrible.
Their electrical grid is completely decoupled from the rest of the United States. They couldn't import more power, even if they wanted to, because of that very dumb idea.
And remember that that very dumb decision was taken for the explicit purpose of being untouchable by Federal regulations.
Load More Replies...
This is true. Texas privatized their grid, selling things we voters all asked them to provide to a private company. The private company built it as cheaply as possible for the most amount of money (ie. Capitalism). When the system was pressured they didn't have enough windmills to make up for their profit first approach.
They didn’t build turbines that could withstand extreme weather, and then tried to claim such turbines don’t exist. It was such a stupid lie, considering how many there are in the areas of the world that experience for more extreme winters. If they can work in Antarctica, they can work just fine in Texas. Plus, the majority of the loss of power came from failures in natural gas and coal, not windmills (which handled only 20% of the power in the state). The idiots also tried to blame The Green New Deal, which hadn’t even passed, much less been put into effect. The conservative leaders epically failed, and twisted themselves into knots trying to blame “the liberal agenda.”
Load More Replies...
And the one shot used to try and blame the wind turbines needing to be de-iced was actually from a storm in Sweden from 2015. And they still haven't winterised their infrastructure... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Texas_power_crisis#:~:text=At%20the%20peak%2C%20over%205,a%20more%20typical%20%2425%2FMWh.
The American power grid is divided into three sections. East, West and Texas. Texas has chosen to isolate itself from the rest of the USA grid. There are interconnects that can transfer power from one grid to the other but Texas has chosen to limit these. This is the reason Texas keeps running out of power. The electrical capacity exists but there's only so many megawatts that can be pushed through those interconnects. Short version, it's their own fault. BTW I used to work for PG&E.
Texas does have interconnections to the Eastern US grid and the Mexican grid, but they weren't enough to sustain the Texan grid. Funny thing is: if Texas went big on wind and solar power, it would be earning lots of money exporting cheaply generated electricity elsewhere. But of course Texas's politicians must ensure that they please their fossil fuel industry paymasters.
Load More Replies... And they somehow forgot to mention all of the conventional power plants that failed too.
The conventional power plants made up the majority of the failure. And, the turbines failed because they didn’t bother building the ones that could handle extreme weather. They still deny climate change and were insistent that Texas would never need to prepare for extremely harsh winters. They did it to themselves and then tried to blame everyone else.
Load More Replies...
"We aren't ready for this kind of winter weather." "But you can handle summer right?" "We aren't ready for this kind of summer weather."
Who ever came up with the idea that utilities should be privatized should be shot... in Rodblox
Yup. I remember that week - this was back when we still lived in an Austin suburb before moving out of state at the end of 2022 for various reasons. It was a complete and total shitshow. Texas deserves to implode for that kind of b******t. And Ted Cruz is a complete and utter c**t. I don't know why Texans insist on re-electing this asshat every time.
It's still not fixed and they are already sending out warnings that we could have another freeze with major power grid problems/failures
My heart is still breaking for the family that lost all three of their children. Literally froze to death.
Load More Replies...
Don't forget the part where Texas power providers were warned for multiple years about various forms of power generation needing winterizing in a way that can handle ice/freezing rain/snow, and all of them doing nothing. And Texas proudly passing laws to de-regulate them (political speak for remove regulations that make companies pay more to make what they're doing safe. I'm sure there are ridiculous regulations out there, but "Make sure that thing works during winter" would not be one of them).
Texas is an unregulated state for electric utilities. They are not required by any regulators to keep the grid in good working order. Additionally they are not part of a grid outside of Texas. This means that power can't be re-routed during emergencies like the storm a few years back when their grid couldn't handle the load.
Yep. Had absolutely nothing to do with diverting funds away from fortifying essential infrastructure!
And then these idiots around me voted the bastards back into office.
Texas energy grid sucks because Texas is a wholly-owned subsidiary of oil and gas companies that won't join the rest of the U.S. grid to avoid Federal laws.
And they lost solar panels to hail. Wow, did we forget the best power is nuclear or fossil fuels??
Haha windmills. It wasn't at all due to the fact that they continue to refuse to join the nationally connected grid every other contiguous state is a part of. Pure Texan ignorance. Sorry cow-poke, we could have helped you but unfortunately it turns out that you're right, everything is bigger in Texas, and in this case it was your arrogance and failure.
A decade (10 long years) after the first nasty freeze! All the expert advice on how to weatherize the grid and prevent a repeat was ignored by the corrupt Republicans that voters here keep rewarding with office. Independence is one thing, but sacrificing people's lives for your holier-than-thou chutzpah should be a prison offense. Ted Cruz paid for his Mexican holiday with money he got from the fossil fuel industry. You know, the folks he made sure didn't have to spend an money to insure their natural gas pipelines supplying the power plants didn't freeze.
Americans need to take a look at how Norway, Sweden and Finland cope with extreme weather. It's eye opening. Now on the other hand WE in the UK come to a standstill in one inch of snow! Ridiculous! The schools actually close! They ski to school in the above countries and Canada. Get a grip people (literally lol) we are terrible for this and we don't have much snowfall here, so you'd think they'd be prepared! No
The part that gets me is I was in Texas in February of 2011 when Dallas froze and had ice for days. They did rolling "short blackouts" in residential areas that lasted hours, and accidentally shut power to local train transit, stranding people for hours. They knew their power grid was insufficient for *years* before their incompetence hurt so many.
Ted Cruz blamed the wind turbines, but the biggest problem was natural gas power plants not being constructed to standards able to tolerate cold weather. And that was because of the failure of Texas state regulator, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), to maintain adequate standards. In other words, it was down to a combination of relying on cheap fossil fuels and withdrawing from Federal oversight. Don't blame privatization and don't blame wind turbines. Blame the Texas politicians who set up the Texas state electricity regulator ERCOT and tell it what to do.Texas has no shortage of engineers who could have ensured none of the problems happened, but the politicians want ERCOT to deliver the cheapest possible electricity bills, ensuring that the Texas electricity supply system remains fragile due to underinvestment. Texas's politicians don't care about the huge monetary costs and deaths which happen every time Texas suffers widespread power outages.
The wind farms were not winterized! My husband works on them -the solar farms worked fine & started charging a fortune because #capitalism
South-Africa's energy grid can not keep up with daily use, for the last 10 years we have no electricity for hours in a day! Imagine sometimes 10 hours a day
You have my sympathy. South Africa's essentially a rich country and there's no excuse for that sort of problem - except, of course, even thousands of miles away in Europe we hear about the corruption of ZA politicians and how they're mostly interested in lining their own pockets (and those of their close friends and family) rather than running the country properly.
Load More Replies...
Woke? It was the state of Texas wanting to not adhere to federal regulations (kinda the opposite of woke) that kept them from being connected to the national grid. Which meant that when they ran out of their own power producing options they could draw from that national grid and any of its surplus. It’s kinda the literal opposite of EPA wokeness.
Load More Replies...
I used to drive for Schneider National Carriers. My husband and I hit from behind by another semi. Schneider deflected it back to us saying that if we wouldn't have stopped for a shower 10 hours previously we would not have been there to get hit in I -40
According to the marketing psychology speaker, one of the best examples of this was done by Domino's Pizza, over a decade ago. It's a prime example of how honesty, when mixed with grit and creativity, can yield great results.
"In 2011, Domino’s Pizza did the unthinkable: They came out and said that they’re pizza is terrible. They listened to consumer complaints, ran focus groups, and all the signs pointed to the same conclusions. And Domino’s said: you know what, you’re right," Johnson shared with Bored Panda.
"They ran a campaign admitting that their pizza isn’t what it should be, that they’d be making changes, and that in the future, their pizza would be better. And they did. Fast forward thirteen years later, and Domino’s is a beloved brand, who’s pizza is adored by their customers. They leveraged their trust with their consumers, admitted fault, and made the right changes. And in the end, their business greatly improved."
You can find more of Johnson's insights and posts on his marketing and human nature blogs.
Tucker Carlson being sued as part of Fox News and his lawyers stating that what he says “cannot reasonably be interpreted as facts.”
Many companies are notorious for calling their customers stupid when they're sued for something. For example, when Subway was sued for undersized sandwiches, Subway argued that "Footlong" was just a trademark and there was no reason for anyone to think that it meant that the sandwich was 12 inches long.
SpaceX offered to build a submarine to rescue people in a cave. They drew a design and everything. Had a whole plan. A guy said no thanks so Elon Musk called him a child molester.
As I remember it the submarine wouldn't even had worked or fitted in the space to get those kids. And also it was an emergency situation, a _drawn_ design isn't much help, you need something that can be used immediately. You know, because it's an emergency. Like a diver that called Musk out for the unhelpful idea.
Reputation is everything in the business world. If your customers know that they can trust you, they’ll stay loyal. Trust, however, is a pretty ephemeral thing. A lot of different factors contribute to it. For instance, you need to think about the quality of your product and services, how your employees treat your customers, as well as how ethically you do business.
To put it bluntly, putting products and services aside for a moment, customers value companies that have clear values, act in a moral way, and are transparent about what they do. Businesses are like people: those who are trustworthy and respectable become true leaders. Meanwhile, shady behavior and avoiding responsibility will get called out. Consumers and employees alike hate it when someone’s trying to pull the wool over their eyes.
When a company runs into trouble, the first instinct is (quite naturally) to focus on survival. If something unethical happens, many businesses try to avoid the issue and present a counter-narrative. Their goal is to protect their reputation and profits.
Lululemon's founder, when confronted about the threadbare, see-through quality of his yoga pants claimed that it was women that were "bigger" shouldn't use them because their thighs rub together, damaging the fabrics.
Nope, you just sell crappy, overpriced pants.
Lululemon is a joke. I've never worn a pair, nor have the inclination to buy. Way pricey for the crappy quality.
"The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs, who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being you should have a right to water. That’s an extreme solution. The other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other, and like any other foodstuff it should have a market value" - Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, former CEO of Nestle.
This is why I don't eat KitKats, Hot Pockets, or Tombstone pizza anymore.
"we need everyone back in the office buildings now because the 3 years of working from home didn't actually succeed and everyone has to be back in the office for the work to get done. It has nothing to do with needing all the workers to resume spending their money on all the stuff they didn't have to for 3 years."
I think it has more to do with companies that have long-term leases on their office buildings. They don't want to be spending money on empty space
However, this can backfire to a pretty big extent. If someone knows what really happened, they can blow the whistle and spill the beans for the whole world to know. When you get caught lying, it’s even worse.
In an ideal world, every business, boss, and middle manager would be open, honest, and transparent about any and all issues, both with their employees, as well as their customers. However, in reality, companies are constantly competing for people’s money and attention. So showing any signs of weakness, when your opponents probably won’t do the same, would be ludicrous.
It all comes down to the fundamental values upon which a company is built. Founders and managers who fully embrace transparency and empathy are going to tackle any issues that arise very differently than someone who always puts profit first… at any moral cost. Just to be clear, there's nothing wrong with being profitable. But it has to be balanced with ethics, a sense of purpose, and proper motivation for workers.
Comcast changed its name to xfinity because Comcast was well regarded as the worst customer service on the planet and you couldn’t search their name without it pulling up page after page of customer stories about how bad they were.
They didn’t fix their customer service they just changed the name of the company as if it would reset their reputation and it on some level worked.
They illegally charged us for services that we NEVER agreed to! We read the entire contract, and it wasn't listed in there. We should have gone to a small claims court. Jerks.
Optus recently blamed a outage that affected the whole of Australia on a 3rd party. This "third" party was their parent company
[China’s birth rate crisis is so intense that Nestlé is closing a baby formula plant due to dwindling demand](https://fortune.com/europe/2023/10/20/nestle-baby-formula-plant-ireland-close/)
Nestle: Demand in China is too low so we're closing a factory in Ireland and moving production... to China.
I mean, I get that we all think John Q. Public is too dumb to analyze anything these days, but this is a blatant PR lie and Orwellian doublespeak.
One can't expect anything else from Nestle. When the fat girl boycotts her favorite comfort foods for over a year (no slipups, either!) it's a bad company.
Obviously, employees want to get a fair wage, have plenty of room for growth, and only ever deal with supportive bosses. That won’t always be the case. It becomes necessary to screen businesses for their work culture ahead of time before you’re in too deep. So before you think of applying for a position at some huge conglomerate, do some research. Read up on what their workplace culture is like, see if they’ve ever been embroiled in some deeply troubling scandals.
Forbes suggests checking whether a company’s online presence is “professional and legitimate.” That means looking at their website, how they respond to customer inquiries and criticism on social media, and what (former) employees have to say on job sites like Glassdoor and LinkedIn. It’s definitely a red flag if you spot examples of awful customer service.
If a business has tons of negative reviews online, something is probably amiss. However, just like you shouldn’t blindly trust any corpo PR dribble, you should take any reviews with a few grains of salt. Actually, scrap that, pass the whole salt shaker!
April 20, 2010 [the Big Horizon Oil Spill](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill)
An estimated 4.9 MMbbl (210,000,000 US gal; 780,000 m3) of deep water oil spilled into the Gulf of Mexico. It’s considered the largest marine oil spill in petroleum history.
On May 4, of the same year, they were awarded the [Safety Prize](https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Blotter/louisiana-oil-spill-feds-gave-safety-prize-transoceans/story?id=10528236) for their outstanding performance *in 2008*.
So, basically , the feds claimed they deserved the prize because in 2008 they did such a good job and their only accident was the 2010 oil spill. Never mind that it was so huge that in 2019 there was still oil floating around the Mexican Gulf from that very same spill.
If there were actual, real world consequences for the people in charge, and who make the decisions, less of this BS would occur. I'm talking old school consequences, none of this hand slapping, tiny fine, c**p. Physical punishments. Televised.
That time the airline beat up the customer and the CEO blamed the customer.
The Dr was from my area (at the time. I've since moved) He was trying to get home to do legitimate surgery on an elderly patient in dire need. The Dr had a ticket, was seated quietly awaiting take off. The airline tried to bump him so a flight attendant could use his seat as a "jump seat" to the next airport. The Dr said no. The Dr was beaten and drug off the airline by the airport police. All of it was recorded by various passengers. It was *very* violent and unnecessary. The Dr mercifully settled with the airline because he just wanted to get back to his everyday life doing legitimate surgeon work for elderly patients. Edit: flight attendant was off duty and "jumping" from one airport to another. My fault for being imprecise. ✌🏻
Lululemon: Our pants that keep ripping at the seam are fine, you're just too fat for them.
It’s vital to filter which reviews give an accurate representation of reality and which ones are written by someone who is extremely disgruntled about e.g. being fired (perhaps for poor performance or other issues). A good rule of thumb is that the more emotional a review is, the more biased it is. The truth isn’t black and white, it’s often nuanced. Sure, any company might make some mistakes. But it doesn’t mean that these businesses fail in every single regard.
You won’t ever find a ‘perfect’ company, but you can come across businesses that admit to having made mistakes and then work to correct them. If you ever have any doubts, as a prospective worker or a potential customer, get in touch with the business and ask some questions about their culture and values.
Thalidomide, which was a popular over the counter drug in the 60s, caused thousands of children to be born with severe birth defects as it was never properly tested before being released and was marked as safe for pregnancy.
They fought for years to not pay out and said every reported case was due to nuclear fallout and botched home abortions.
Thalidomide, or Distaval, as it was marketed in the UK, was originally a sedative and flu treatment. It was when it started being prescribed for morning sickness that it caused problems because no testing or research had been carried out on pregnant animals.
Tesla's Full Self Driving is *always* only waiting on regulators to approve it.
Really it's s**t software that doesn't work.
To be fair, so far not a single self driving software works in regular traffic and it's unlikely it ever will. There are too many variables and they barely were able to write a software to reliably open a common door. So far as of today, they are unable to write software that is able to actually understand facts and act out of true knowledge. AI software only works on exactly what it's programmed to to and to rudimentary extrapolate from data without being able to realize when their extrapolation is wrong. There is a difference between possessing data and understanding the data. Software doesn't truly understand what it has. You can tell it, when x do y. But it can't ever understand why. It you program the explanation why into it, it can repeat it, but still doesn't understand.
I online ordered my groceries to be delivered. Eighty-eight items, fruit, milk, meat.
The groceries appeared on my doorstep, I went out to get them. Then I said "I expected more than th.... Hey, where is the milk? Where is the meat?"
So I go online, and the official explanation was that 57 out of 88 items were "unavailable".
Nope. I guessed what had happened. The shopper had gotten like a third of the way done, and then stopped for whatever reason. Oh, and "WatTheHell. I'll deliver what I have."
But I called and asked about it anyway.
The response was in a "Idunno" voice. "Well, maybe that many items *were* unavailable."
No way. The day that big store is out of milk, that will be a story on the town's evening news.
I have a friend who regularly used the WM delivery service (pick up at curb) who got banned from using it. Why? Too many returns. Returns mind you of expired food and moldy etc produce which shouldn't have even been in the store let alone picked and delivered. But somehow that's HER fault.
My property manager tried to get me to sign a contract saying I wouldn't sue for anything I'd ever reported in the past, admitting that I was always late on rent (literally never have been), and that I agreed to pay 63$ to sign the contract.
The judge was not impressed with his explanation that the 63$ was for "special" fees because he had to write and print that farce.
Powerball
"We've listened to what people want, and that's higher jackpots!"
The only way to do that is to increase the price or make it harder to win so the total goes up. Powerball did BOTH! from $1 to $2, a 100% increase, followed by extending the numbers to choose from. Doubling the cost and making it exponentially harder to win.
They duped everyone, and the only people who understand have taken statistics in college. It's the fleecing of the ignorant.
“It's the fleecing of the ignorant“ - describes any and all lotteries
Amys Baking Company after going nuts on facebook. They claimed they were hacked and were now working with the FBI to find out who was behind it
"We work better when we're all in the office together..."
Nope! I like the colleague I share an office with, but she constantly tells me about her toxic relationship, horrible MIL etc. At home it is so much more quiet
Cadbury trying out a campaign saying they didn't shrink the size of their product. You just got bigger! :D
Was anybody stupid enough to believe them? As far as I know, food marked for retail sale has to have the volume/weight in pretty much every country.
Even though someone posted something entirely anti-Semitic and our CEO said it was "the truth" it is being misreported that he himself is anti-Semitic.
“It’s not my opinion! I just happen to… agree… with… it. Um.”
Not really a "company" per se but there was that time the Australian census site crashed on census night and the government blamed it on a targeted DDOS attack (also known as the entire population of Australia trying to access the same site at the same time).
Why is there always one idjit that has to keep making ridiculous comments that others have to cover up with another comment? I don’t know, but here we are.
I quit a job after the entire company was being forced to sign away our rights to ever sue the company. (This was after they were getting sued for not paying their employees accurately).
The topper was that if we elected not to sign, we would be forfeiting ALL BONUSES until we did sign.
I quit within a couple weeks and told my boss directly that a leading factor in why I was leaving.
He left shortly after too.
“You’re holding it wrong!”
- Apple with the iPhone 4.
I remember that. They claimed that poor reception was from users holding it in such a way that their hands blocked the antenna.
I had a flight booked with Delta from New York to Canada. I got an email a week before the flight was scheduled saying it was cancelled. No reason was given. I called the airline and the agent told me it was cancelled due to weather. A week beforehand. So I said to the agent, wow, you guys are really putting a LOT of faith in the meteorologists! Anyway I found out later that they cancelled the route and didn’t bother to tell customers or employees apparently…
Probably the recent failure of the entire mobile phone network by Optus, the second largest provider in Australia. Many businesses lost money because their payment systems were down. The technicians at Optus were locked out of systems because they were on the Optus networks. The CEO just resigned over it.
The reason given for the failure was an upgrade being made by a "subcontractor."
The "subcontractor" was Singtel in Singapore who owns Optus.
I worked doing tech support in South Florida. After 9/11 our company changed the raise policy from quarterly to annually, dropped the top pay from $22 down to 15 and canceled the free laptop program. They claimed the cut backs were necessary due to 9/11 affecting our business.
I have worked at my company for 6 years, been promoted 4 times and got 5 performance based raises. I make less than when I started. We bought unregulated capitalism and it's been delivered.
This literally just happened yesterday. Disney released a new trading card game through a company called Ravensburger. A new set went on sale on their website yesterday morning, and the company once again didn't prepare for the amount of traffic, so it crashed their queue system. Ravensburger then blamed it on a ddos attack instead of admitting they weren't ready to handle the amount of traffic.
Ravensburger makes some really great quality games and puzzles tho, so I’m not even mad at them. “Rivers, Roads and Rails” is a classic kids game.
Pier 1 was blaming their employees for not upselling/getting enough credit cards before they went bankrupt.
I could buy the same blanket at home goods cheaper than my discount at Pier 1!
Its true though, it's the employees job to have terrible lives so execs have the best lives.
Venezuelan power company (destroyed by poor management, cronyism and corruption) blamed outages on an iguala getting on the cable 😂
Worked for a company that 3 divisions. Electrical construction (where I worked), armature, and maintenance.
Every year, the company would set projections, if income was kept in the black, and accidents to a minimum, every employee in each branch got a sizeable Christmas bonus check.
Ten or so years before I came on, one of the c-suites figured if they could keep that bonus... they got to keep the money. Just make up a reason the bonuses didn't go out.
So the armature department got a letter saying "sorry, electrical went waaay over budget. Blame those a******s." While maintenance got a letter blaming armature, and electrical got aimed at maintenance.
The departments were fairly independent, so thinking appeared to be that they'd all turn on each other, and C's would pocket or "reinvest" what should have been bonuses (they knew something was fishy because that same year the CEO bought a nearly 1 million dollar boat, while the CFO could suddenly afford a 300k car)
What they forgot, however, was that construction workers gossip worse than hair stylists with a vendetta. So they all knew something shifty was up.
So next year, there were 20+ reported accidents. But no one knew who/where/how/what. So after about 4 years of being shady, the company just canceled the bonus program all together.
[Air Canada 624 landing in Halifax](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Canada_Flight_624). For a while their press releases stated that it was a "hard landing". The fact that 24 people were injured, engines separated from the wings, and the plane was written off didn't seem to figure into it.
QANTAS our national airline in Australia. They were booking ghost flights, flights they never intended providing. Taking bookings from people even after the flights had been cancelle total fraud, idea was to provide cheap flights then so people wouldn't book flights with other airlines, then cancel them.
When called out on it Qantas said it's customers understood that they weren't booking a flight at a specific time to go to a specific destination but just booking and paying for a ticket.
Optus a major phone and internet provider here, whole system completely crashed, no phone internet, could not even make emergency calls. No explanation from Optus when service would resume no explanation on cause of failure.
Optus did say they had details on their website which people could access, but Optus customers could not of course as the internet and phone services were down.
An accident has occurred at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant as one of the reactors was damaged
Enron.
No its all just a simple mistake.
Feudalism: You have 2 cows. Your lord takes some of the milk. Fascism: You have 2 cows. The government takes both, hires you to take care of them & sells you the milk. Communism: You have 2 cows. You must take care of them, but the government takes all the milk. Capitalism: You have 2 cows. You sell 1 & buy a bull. Your herd multiplies, & the economy grows. You sell them & retire on the income. Enron Capitalism: You have 2 cows. You sell 3 of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then execute a debt-equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all 4 cows back, with a tax exemption for 5 cows. The milk rights of the 6 cows are transferred through an intermediary to a Cayman Island company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The Enron annual report says the company owns 8 cows, with an option on 1 more
Claiming I was incompetent and firing me when they had me doing a job with barely Any training and the training I did get was for a job I wasn’t doing.
When they really just over staffed themselves and didn’t want to pay the sign on bonus
My old job loves to pull c**p like that. They would drop a trainee on me with no warning, gives us no where near enough time to go through it, then get mad at me when the new kid messed up 😡
When Rockstar decided to remove about 200 vehicles from GTA Online and claimed it was to improve the user experience... that's gotta be somewhere up in the top 100, at least?
Pokemon saying they cut the national dex so they could focus on animations and balance, then continued to use the same models and animations while bringing back all of the most overpowered pokemon.
This is catering to popularity, which is how companies make money.
The common factor is the rich don't go to jail, the rich pay fines which they view as the cost of doing business.
Why we need percentage fines. Park in a handicapped space = 5% of your full net worth.
Load More Replies... I downloaded Cash App for a specific purchase. I linked my bank debit card, and made the payment (to a reputable company). It was immediately flagged as an unusual transaction, and Cash App refused to send the money. I spent an hour on their "help" desk. I wanted to know how a first transaction could be labeled unusual, as there was nothing with which to compare it. They couldn't tell me, and flat out refused to send my query to the next tier. Guess what app I uninstalled. Just guess.
The only third-party app I use is PayPal. Usually, I just use my regular banking app.
Load More Replies...
When local government wastes money on frivolous projects, wasting millions and millions and then blame national government.
Regional health (SD, US)--partnered up with the Mayo clinic and changed their name to "monument health" in the hopes the general public would forget how shítty they are. Spent MILLIONS of dollars on that rather than focusing on customer service or helping folks who don't have insurance. Welcome to the US.
When there was a huge fire at a chemical plant in the Netherlands 11 years ago, the city's emergency website and emergency phones were unreachable, because they couldn't handle that much traffic. The mayor responded on the news by saying that it's unnecessary to "raise everything to the capacity that you're only gonna need at peak moments". The news reporter: "Yeah, but with these kind of disasters?" The mayor: "Yeah, but how rarely do disasters happen?" Dude.... the emergency website doesn't need a lot of capacity because it only needs that capacity in emergencies? Seriously?
I bought a pair of fakefur lined shoes from an online shop. There was something wrong with the right shoe, so I wrote the shop and asked what I should do. They simply sent me another pair, and they were allright. Guess where I bought my winter boots.
After 2 years of negotiations and striking, the provincial government I work for agreed to pay its workers a living increase from when the actions started. Unfortunately that was in 2019 before living expenses tripled. We were already 5 years behind a living wage increase. To make it worse, after they agreed and papers were signed it took them another year and a half to finally pay us. I wonder why so many of us work multiple jobs now 🤔
"Please be patient with us during the Labor Shortage." There's no labor shortage. There's a lack of people willing to put up with your c**p at the money you're offering. Stop treating people poorly, pay them more, or do both, and you'll have more applications than you know what to do with.
And just so we're clear: the "de-risking" initiatives pursued by the US & UK (Rachel Reeves' "Securonomics" [sic]) involve giving private companies unlimited amounts of government funds in the hope they will magically "fix" the climate crisis. Fucking ridiculous.
The common factor is the rich don't go to jail, the rich pay fines which they view as the cost of doing business.
Why we need percentage fines. Park in a handicapped space = 5% of your full net worth.
Load More Replies... I downloaded Cash App for a specific purchase. I linked my bank debit card, and made the payment (to a reputable company). It was immediately flagged as an unusual transaction, and Cash App refused to send the money. I spent an hour on their "help" desk. I wanted to know how a first transaction could be labeled unusual, as there was nothing with which to compare it. They couldn't tell me, and flat out refused to send my query to the next tier. Guess what app I uninstalled. Just guess.
The only third-party app I use is PayPal. Usually, I just use my regular banking app.
Load More Replies... When local government wastes money on frivolous projects, wasting millions and millions and then blame national government.
Regional health (SD, US)--partnered up with the Mayo clinic and changed their name to "monument health" in the hopes the general public would forget how shítty they are. Spent MILLIONS of dollars on that rather than focusing on customer service or helping folks who don't have insurance. Welcome to the US.
When there was a huge fire at a chemical plant in the Netherlands 11 years ago, the city's emergency website and emergency phones were unreachable, because they couldn't handle that much traffic. The mayor responded on the news by saying that it's unnecessary to "raise everything to the capacity that you're only gonna need at peak moments". The news reporter: "Yeah, but with these kind of disasters?" The mayor: "Yeah, but how rarely do disasters happen?" Dude.... the emergency website doesn't need a lot of capacity because it only needs that capacity in emergencies? Seriously?
I bought a pair of fakefur lined shoes from an online shop. There was something wrong with the right shoe, so I wrote the shop and asked what I should do. They simply sent me another pair, and they were allright. Guess where I bought my winter boots.
After 2 years of negotiations and striking, the provincial government I work for agreed to pay its workers a living increase from when the actions started. Unfortunately that was in 2019 before living expenses tripled. We were already 5 years behind a living wage increase. To make it worse, after they agreed and papers were signed it took them another year and a half to finally pay us. I wonder why so many of us work multiple jobs now 🤔
"Please be patient with us during the Labor Shortage." There's no labor shortage. There's a lack of people willing to put up with your c**p at the money you're offering. Stop treating people poorly, pay them more, or do both, and you'll have more applications than you know what to do with.
And just so we're clear: the "de-risking" initiatives pursued by the US & UK (Rachel Reeves' "Securonomics" [sic]) involve giving private companies unlimited amounts of government funds in the hope they will magically "fix" the climate crisis. Fucking ridiculous.
