Mom Thinks A Sorry Text Will Be Enough To Compensate For Babysitter’s Ruined Laptop
Being a nanny or a babysitter is no easy job. Today, many parents desperately need someone to help them take care of their kids. Still, when it comes to childcare workers in general, the turnover rate in the U.S. is staggeringly high – 65% higher than turnover in the median occupation.
It’s mostly due to low wages, but working conditions have something to do with it too. Take this 23-year-old babysitter: she decided to call it quits after the demon child she was looking after intentionally ruined her $1,000 laptop by smashing it and then dumping water on it for good measure. After the parents only sent her a text saying “Sorry,” she started wondering: should she demand reimbursement?
A babysitter had her laptop destroyed by a 7-year-old and wondered if she should ask the parents to pay for it
Image credits: Ahmed / Unsplash (not the actual photo)
Her story sparked a discussion about whether it was her own fault or if the parents were liable for the damage
Image credits: joshua_resnick / Envato Elements (not the actual photo)
Image credits: pvproductions / Freepik (not the actual photo)
Image credits: Feisty_Bag289
Image credits: Kaboompics / Pexels (not the actual photo)
Parents are usually liable for the damage their kids do to other people’s property
Accidents happen, especially when kids are involved. If you’ve ever been around small children, you know that even the most well-behaved angels can paint the walls with markers and smash a vase when they’re not supervised.
In most babysitting or nanny job scenarios, some property of the family gets destroyed or damaged while the babysitter is on the job. Then, if they can prove it, the family can sue the babysitter or nanny for negligence and get reimbursed for the damages.
Professional nannies or those who babysit often can also take out liability insurance to protect themselves in case the child gets injured or any property of the family is destroyed. According to Kid Sit, only 8.45% of babysitters have liability insurance.
But in cases like this one, when the babysitting agreement (there probably even wasn’t one) is super off the books, it becomes trickier. In this case, the nanny is virtually just an individual whose personal property was damaged by the children. So, would the parents be liable in these circumstances?
According to Nolo, in most states in the U.S., parents are on the hook for the damage their kids do to other people’s stuff. It varies by state, but parents are usually responsible for the misdeeds of their kids from when they’re born until the age of 18 or 21.
Granted, there are exceptions. In New York, for example, parents are responsible for their kids’ misdemeanors between the ages of 10 and 18. In Maine, it’s from 7 to 17 years old.
If a kid breaks something that belongs to the other person while in his own home, homeowner’s or renter’s insurance might cover it. But only in cases when the kid acts unintentionally.
“If your child acted intentionally to hurt someone or cause property damage, your homeowners’/renters’ insurance won’t cover any losses resulting from those actions,” David Goguen, J.D., writes for Nolo.
Image credits: freepik / Freepik (not the actual photo)
Making empty threats is a dangerous parenting strategy
Many commenters also called out the parents for using empty threats as a parenting technique. The babysitter did it when she threatened to pour water on the kid’s Nintendo Switch, but, as we can probably tell from the outcome, it wasn’t a successful strategy to deter him from messing with her laptop.
People in the comments dragged the dad for suggesting such a thing: “Empty threats do not work and only make things worse because the kid realises you’re never going to actually do anything,” u/sunbakedbear wrote.
Even if most experts agree, one in four parents still rely on empty threats as a parenting strategy. As the pediatrician at the University of Michigan Health C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital Susan Woolford, M.D., explains, “[they] undermine trust and credibility and aren’t usually effective. Positive reinforcement and consistent discipline are more likely to shape long term behavior.”
Dr. Hansa Bhargava who worked as a pediatrician at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, told CNN that empty threats diminish the parent’s authority in the child’s eyes. In fact, as they grow up and start having important life questions, they might look for answers elsewhere.
“If you are not consistent and don’t follow through, they won’t listen, and they won’t be as welcome when you do follow through,” Dr. Bhargava says. “Consistency is key.”
Most of the commenters sided with the babysitter: “It’s actually appalling that they didn’t immediately offer
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
I wish this was a Judge Judy case. She would really tear a strip off the defendants
If they don't replace it, take them to small claims - she's a lawyer, she'll get her a*s handed to her.
It wouldn't be unreasonable to ask them to pay for it, and a decent person would pay for it. I'd argue they should have even offered to pay for it. That' not the same as them actually paying for it, but it is completely reasonable to ask them to pay for it.
No. Their kid, their responsibility. That kid did this deliberately. It's their lookout.
Load More Replies...So sick and tired of bratty children who get away with doing awful things. Parents are really to blame, though. It IS possible to raise a child who respects other people’s boundaries. My parents did it—twice! If I was that sitter, I’d take the parents to small claims court. And I’d use word-of-mouth to make sure they could never get a sitter again.
It very much is possible ,it’s how I was raised n how I raised my kids ! lovely kind kids ,that like me respect other but take no shite , doesn’t actually take much tell does it 🤷♀️
Load More Replies...Yet another parent who fails to recognise the brief of "parents need to actually parent". And this is coming from a parent - if my kid did this the repercussions would be huge (for him). I would also be mortified. And I don't think it matters how much the Mother earns, whatever it is it's more than a twenty-something babysitter and regardless the parents should buy OP a new laptop.
Your choice ,but kids are only as lovely as the parents !! These parents like most USA parents don’t discipline their kids at all !, then blame the world for their shite kids !, if mine had ever don’t this well ,nicely but firmly they would have been told straight UNACCEPTABLE!! Decisions and consequences!, and I’d have been gutted n lid for the laptop end off !, ( not that I ever left my kids with other people , that’s my job no one else’s simple ,
Load More Replies...I would tell those parents they need to pay for the replacement and if they don't I will take them to court and I will make sure to tell everyone in town what an impossible brat their son is, so they can't find babysitters in future.
I don't get why this is even a question! Of course they have to replace it!!
People voting for "No, it was the child's fault". Who tf do you think is responsible for the demon spawn?
Why not both? (the parents AND the child)
Load More Replies...Erm am I the only one that has picked up on 7m high chair ? 5 f potty ? ffs what kinda parents have these brats got !, .and empty threats op DONT WORK !! Follow thru ,ie when my kids now 21-24 got to age where I said ok please tidy your rooms around 8 ish yrs old ,n I got nothing done , I would then say ok last chance please tidy you rooms ,today if you don’t , ill go in tomorrow and I,ll black bag it !, and throw it away !, they didn’t n yes I did !! However first time I hid it all ,n made them think id thrown it away . Ok I had tantrums 😂n yup I laughed,as did their father . I then said ok so have you learned if I ask you to clean your rooms and you don’t what happens , ? yup so I said ok this time you can have it back BUT you must put it away deal , yup deal , fast forward to 14 again asked didn’t this time I black bagged it and yup I ligit threw it away !! never had to ask again !, FOLLOW THRU , these parents MUST pay for that laptop ! and work on teaching their bloody brat that
It sounds like the mother only has a nodding acquaintance with consequences too, let's hope that's about to change.
Load More Replies...Wtf. The child intentionally broke the laptop - of course they're liable for it! If he smashed a neighbors window, they would have to pay for it. And whether they're well of or not has nothing to do with it! And BTW. "Making empty threats" only teaches the kids that there will be no consequences, not scared them into submission. If anything, you make real threats and follow through with them ;)
Mama needs to get her head out of her a*s and discipline her brat. He needs to be disciplined, take his video games and other things away. If he takes it before the punishment is over do what he did to t he laptop. If that doesn't work tear his a*s up 1 time.
I cannot understand why this is not immediately taken care of. Your child destroys something, it is up to you to replace it, no ifs, ands or buts.
I will say that all the people saying that she should get a new/better laptop out this are wrong. She is entitled, by law, to be made whole-not better. She gets the value (likely depreciated) of the laptop that was destroyed. If someone wrecks your car the insurance company doesn’t pay for a brand new model of that car, they pay the value of the car as it was before the accident.
I wish this was a Judge Judy case. She would really tear a strip off the defendants
If they don't replace it, take them to small claims - she's a lawyer, she'll get her a*s handed to her.
It wouldn't be unreasonable to ask them to pay for it, and a decent person would pay for it. I'd argue they should have even offered to pay for it. That' not the same as them actually paying for it, but it is completely reasonable to ask them to pay for it.
No. Their kid, their responsibility. That kid did this deliberately. It's their lookout.
Load More Replies...So sick and tired of bratty children who get away with doing awful things. Parents are really to blame, though. It IS possible to raise a child who respects other people’s boundaries. My parents did it—twice! If I was that sitter, I’d take the parents to small claims court. And I’d use word-of-mouth to make sure they could never get a sitter again.
It very much is possible ,it’s how I was raised n how I raised my kids ! lovely kind kids ,that like me respect other but take no shite , doesn’t actually take much tell does it 🤷♀️
Load More Replies...Yet another parent who fails to recognise the brief of "parents need to actually parent". And this is coming from a parent - if my kid did this the repercussions would be huge (for him). I would also be mortified. And I don't think it matters how much the Mother earns, whatever it is it's more than a twenty-something babysitter and regardless the parents should buy OP a new laptop.
Your choice ,but kids are only as lovely as the parents !! These parents like most USA parents don’t discipline their kids at all !, then blame the world for their shite kids !, if mine had ever don’t this well ,nicely but firmly they would have been told straight UNACCEPTABLE!! Decisions and consequences!, and I’d have been gutted n lid for the laptop end off !, ( not that I ever left my kids with other people , that’s my job no one else’s simple ,
Load More Replies...I would tell those parents they need to pay for the replacement and if they don't I will take them to court and I will make sure to tell everyone in town what an impossible brat their son is, so they can't find babysitters in future.
I don't get why this is even a question! Of course they have to replace it!!
People voting for "No, it was the child's fault". Who tf do you think is responsible for the demon spawn?
Why not both? (the parents AND the child)
Load More Replies...Erm am I the only one that has picked up on 7m high chair ? 5 f potty ? ffs what kinda parents have these brats got !, .and empty threats op DONT WORK !! Follow thru ,ie when my kids now 21-24 got to age where I said ok please tidy your rooms around 8 ish yrs old ,n I got nothing done , I would then say ok last chance please tidy you rooms ,today if you don’t , ill go in tomorrow and I,ll black bag it !, and throw it away !, they didn’t n yes I did !! However first time I hid it all ,n made them think id thrown it away . Ok I had tantrums 😂n yup I laughed,as did their father . I then said ok so have you learned if I ask you to clean your rooms and you don’t what happens , ? yup so I said ok this time you can have it back BUT you must put it away deal , yup deal , fast forward to 14 again asked didn’t this time I black bagged it and yup I ligit threw it away !! never had to ask again !, FOLLOW THRU , these parents MUST pay for that laptop ! and work on teaching their bloody brat that
It sounds like the mother only has a nodding acquaintance with consequences too, let's hope that's about to change.
Load More Replies...Wtf. The child intentionally broke the laptop - of course they're liable for it! If he smashed a neighbors window, they would have to pay for it. And whether they're well of or not has nothing to do with it! And BTW. "Making empty threats" only teaches the kids that there will be no consequences, not scared them into submission. If anything, you make real threats and follow through with them ;)
Mama needs to get her head out of her a*s and discipline her brat. He needs to be disciplined, take his video games and other things away. If he takes it before the punishment is over do what he did to t he laptop. If that doesn't work tear his a*s up 1 time.
I cannot understand why this is not immediately taken care of. Your child destroys something, it is up to you to replace it, no ifs, ands or buts.
I will say that all the people saying that she should get a new/better laptop out this are wrong. She is entitled, by law, to be made whole-not better. She gets the value (likely depreciated) of the laptop that was destroyed. If someone wrecks your car the insurance company doesn’t pay for a brand new model of that car, they pay the value of the car as it was before the accident.





































44
32