JK Rowling Back In The Spotlight After Slamming Toddler’s School Suspension For “Transphobia”
J.K. Rowling lashed out over the suspension of a British toddler from a nursery for allegedly being transphobic or homophobic.
The Harry Potter author, often deemed as transphobic by some online groups, claimed the punishment doled out to the child was “totalitarian insanity.”
Her sentiments came after newly released UK government data showed that dozens of young children were disciplined or suspended for similar reasons.
- J.K. Rowling shared her fiery reaction to a news about a British toddler.
- The toddler was reportedly suspended from a nursery for allegedly being transphobic or homophobic.
- The punishment was “totalitarian insanity,” the author said.
- Rowling has turned into a controversial figure, often accused of making transphobic comments online.
J.K. Rowling lashed out over news of a British toddler being suspended from a nursery for allegedly being transphobic or homophobic
Image credits: Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency
Details about the children’s suspension were released by the Department for Education (DfE), which showed that the child, aged either three or four, was suspended from a state school in the 2022-23 academic year for “abuse against s*xual orientation and gender identity.”
Further details such as the school’s name were not disclosed.
Image credits: oksix/stock.adobe.com (Not the actual photo)
DfE statistics revealed that 94 students were suspended or permanently excluded from state primary schools for transphobia and homophobia from 2022-23.
Of these 94 students, 10 of them were from year one and three were from year two, where the maximum age of a child is seven.
The data revealed that one of them was also a child of nursery age.
The British author said it was “totalitarian insanity” that the children were facing punishment
Image credits: jk_rowling
Rowling shared an article covering the data and said anyone supporting such punishment for small children was a “dangerous zealot.”
“This is totalitarian insanity,” wrote the British author on social media.
“If you think small children should be punished for being able to recognise s*x, you are a dangerous zealot who should be nowhere near kids or in any position of authority over them,” she added.
DfE data revealed the number of students across all state primary schools, suspended or expelled for homophobic or transphobic behavior, went from 164 in 2021-22 to 178 in 2022-23.
Image credits: jk_rowling
Rowling’s tweet sparked mixed opinions online.
“Children can be nasty to other children, and it should be addressed and punished so they don’t turn out to be bad people. Why is this a big deal?” one asked.
“The truth is, I also had transphobic beliefs as a child. It’s common and often fades with time. It’s not the children’s fault,” another wrote.
Over the years, Rowling has turned into a controversial figure after repeatedly voicing her opinions against transgender rights.
Back in 2020, the Hogwarts architect sparked outrage for an op-ed piece talking about “people who menstruate”—a gender-inclusive term used to refer to individuals who experience menstruation, including cisgender women, transgender men, non-binary people, and intersex individuals who have periods.
“‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?” Rowling tweeted at the time.
Rowling has turned into a controversial figure, often accused of making transphobic comments online
Image credits: Karollyne Videira Hubert/Unsplash (Not the actual photo)
Many commented on her post, with one saying, “So what you’re saying is that all human who menstruate are women and those who don’t are not? We live in a time where people fight hard to change narrow terms to be more including. Why do you fight against this? Why is it so important to you to hold on to your outdated believes?”
Another wrote, “I used to love your books, now I’m just so disappointed in you. Your unapologetic ignorance is vile and deeply hurtful.”
Image credits: Getty Images/Unsplash (Not the actual photo)
“To the trans and non-binary youth having a hard time because they found out one of their favorite authors created an entire fictional universe but doesn’t have space for them, I feel you. But you are real and valid. I love you more than Harry, Hermione, Neville and Ron combined,” another wrote.
Despite receiving a lot of backlash, Rowling was resolute in her opinion and reiterated her stance in subsequent tweets.
“I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of s*x removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth,” the author said in another tweet.
The author previously suggested she wouldn’t forgive Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson for their support of the transgender movement
Image credits: jk_rowling
Last year, she suggested she wasn’t ready to forgive Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson for their support of “a movement intent on eroding women’s hard-won rights.”
After she shared a post on transitioning children, an X user commented, “Just waiting for Dan and Emma to give you a very public apology … safe in the knowledge that you will forgive them.”
Rowling replied to the comment and said, “Not safe, I’m afraid.”
“Celebs who cosied up to a movement intent on eroding women’s hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatised detransitioners and vulnerable women reliant on single s*x spaces,” continued the multi-millionaire author.
Child star Daniel Radcliffe responded to her scathing remarks during a May interview with The Atlantic.
“It makes me really sad, ultimately, because I do look at the person that I met, the times that we met, and the books that she wrote and the world that she created, and all of that is to me so deeply empathic,” said the Tony Award nominee.
Netizens had mixed opinions about the news
Image credits: webmasterdave
Image credits: JuwayriyyahAlam
Image credits: hiraa_says
Image credits: LemonGF
Image credits: _Deiseach_
Image credits: Christo09468962
Image credits: sally_hines
Image credits: trishaposner
Image credits: Qhummous
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
Whether I do or not believe in what she says, a TODDLER should NOT be kicked out of anywhere for anything. There are other ways to teach and reach them. My 18 month old only knows boys and girls that’s all he ever sees, maybe that’s all this toddler child ever sees.
I wonder if it's not more of a case of children picking up things from bigoted parents. At that age I would guess they have heard their parents bad mouthing or calling a teacher or other parent various things, and not really understanding repeated it in school. Possibly expulsion comes at the point where a parent backs the things the child said and the relationship with the school breaks down completely
Load More Replies...The situation sounds really weird even from the school’s pov. From my experience working with 6-8 children, concepts such as gender identity are easily explained and accepted, and easily some of the fastest resolved? "Miss, Robin says he's not a boy but he is one" "Oh really? Who are we talking about?" "Robin." "Then I think Robin probably knows best. Do you think your friend Mia knows you more than you do yourself? The same goes for Robin." Far easier to handle than kids trying to poke each other’s eyes out.
As I pointed out in another reply, this is the Daily Mail and Rowling talking s**t. Schools can record multiple reasons for a suspension, so all this means is that in 178 (or whatever it is) suspensions (out of tens of thousands), homophobic or transphobic abuse was *one* of the reasons recorded. Primary kids are more than 200x more likely to be suspended for persistent disruptive behaviour (or to put it another way, in 1 in 200 such disruptive kids also made a habit of calling everyone f****t, that would account for every single one of these cases). Plus almost half of suspensions are for 1 day or less; this isn't the Spanish I*********n.
Load More Replies...Look if the Daily Heil (Daiy Mail) says something that sounds like "insane wokism" you can bet your inner organs that it was in some important way quite different. And Rowling jumps on anything that lets her run her hate campaign against trans people and support for them. That lady has a serious issue and it has nothing to do with who she hates.
Whether I do or not believe in what she says, a TODDLER should NOT be kicked out of anywhere for anything. There are other ways to teach and reach them. My 18 month old only knows boys and girls that’s all he ever sees, maybe that’s all this toddler child ever sees.
I wonder if it's not more of a case of children picking up things from bigoted parents. At that age I would guess they have heard their parents bad mouthing or calling a teacher or other parent various things, and not really understanding repeated it in school. Possibly expulsion comes at the point where a parent backs the things the child said and the relationship with the school breaks down completely
Load More Replies...The situation sounds really weird even from the school’s pov. From my experience working with 6-8 children, concepts such as gender identity are easily explained and accepted, and easily some of the fastest resolved? "Miss, Robin says he's not a boy but he is one" "Oh really? Who are we talking about?" "Robin." "Then I think Robin probably knows best. Do you think your friend Mia knows you more than you do yourself? The same goes for Robin." Far easier to handle than kids trying to poke each other’s eyes out.
As I pointed out in another reply, this is the Daily Mail and Rowling talking s**t. Schools can record multiple reasons for a suspension, so all this means is that in 178 (or whatever it is) suspensions (out of tens of thousands), homophobic or transphobic abuse was *one* of the reasons recorded. Primary kids are more than 200x more likely to be suspended for persistent disruptive behaviour (or to put it another way, in 1 in 200 such disruptive kids also made a habit of calling everyone f****t, that would account for every single one of these cases). Plus almost half of suspensions are for 1 day or less; this isn't the Spanish I*********n.
Load More Replies...Look if the Daily Heil (Daiy Mail) says something that sounds like "insane wokism" you can bet your inner organs that it was in some important way quite different. And Rowling jumps on anything that lets her run her hate campaign against trans people and support for them. That lady has a serious issue and it has nothing to do with who she hates.

















0
25