15Kviews
I Turned Famous Works Of Art Into Real Characters Using Ai, Here’s The Result (16 Pics)
I’m not sure how I became passionate about using neural networks to generate crazy AI art. Probably after I first fed AI pictures of my cat, my grandmother, and my eternal crush Pedro Pascal to see how they would look in the neon-disco style. And I liked it.
Long story short, this time I decided to give AI something worthwhile, something that had become forever silent. I put world-famous statues and paintings (and one Sphinx) into games, the sci-fi multiverse, and Tinder with the help of a generative AI tool to breathe life into them. I grabbed pictures of these objects I found on Google and asked AI to imagine them as action characters. Welcome to the alternate world of GTA pink skies and Cyberpunk 2077.
More info: hey.reface.ai
This post may include affiliate links.
The Birth Of Venus On Tinder
Why make her so skinny? She has rounded features in the painting, and sloping shoulders.
Girl With A Pearl Earring In Cyberpunk 2077
The Mona Lisa On Tinder
The Statue Of Liberty On Tinder
All I have to say is that I'm really sorry for that)
Venus De Milo In A Disney Story. Literally
Venus De Melleo In Gta
The Mona Lisa In Gta
While a different personality is occupying the re-representation, it could almost be the real person
David Of Michelangelo In Gta
The Sphinx In A Disney Story
this is literal bottom of the barrel content. ai "art" that looks good is already bad enough as it is, being unethical and all to artists that have gotten their works stolen without permission nor knowledge to train these bots to mash together their images into "new" images. this is just bad
To the OP, I get it that you are trying out a new medium, and giving it a test run. I think that's cool. When you are announcing that you are referencing other work, though, I think you might need to stick closer to the original in terms of facial features. All your renditions are much thinner than the originals. This major weight shifting is unnecessary and distracting.
this is literal bottom of the barrel content. ai "art" that looks good is already bad enough as it is, being unethical and all to artists that have gotten their works stolen without permission nor knowledge to train these bots to mash together their images into "new" images. this is just bad
To the OP, I get it that you are trying out a new medium, and giving it a test run. I think that's cool. When you are announcing that you are referencing other work, though, I think you might need to stick closer to the original in terms of facial features. All your renditions are much thinner than the originals. This major weight shifting is unnecessary and distracting.
