Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

“Total Hollywood BS”: Gladiator 2 Is Historically Inaccurate, Historian Says
“Total Hollywood BS”: Gladiator 2 Is Historically Inaccurate, Historian Says
79

“Total Hollywood BS”: Gladiator 2 Is Historically Inaccurate, Historian Says

13

ADVERTISEMENT

Gladiator IIhasn’t been released yet, but its trailer is already giving historians much to talk about. Dr. Shadi Bartsch, a classics professor who has written several books on ancient Rome, bluntly described the Ridley Scott-directed film as “total Hollywood bullsh*t.”

The sequel to the Oscar-winning epic is set two decades after the first film and starsPaul Mescal as Lucius, the grandson of Rome’s former emperor Marcus Aurelius and the son of Lucilla and Maximus.

Highlights
  • A historian called Gladiator II "total Hollywood bullsh*t" for its historical inaccuracies.
  • The Ridley Scott-directed film shows a flooded Colosseum with sharks, which is inaccurate, said Dr. Shadi Bartsch.
  • Moreover, Romans never drank tea in cafes or read newspapers as shown in the film.

Lucius is forced to fight as a gladiator after Roman soldiers led by General Marcus Acacius (Pedro Pascal) invade Numidia. The former heir to the Roman Empire receives help from Macrinus (Denzel Washington), a former slave who mentors Lucius and keeps a stable of gladiators.

RELATED:

    Image credits: Paramount Pictures

    ADVERTISEMENT

    In one scene from the film’s first trailer, the Colosseum is shown flooded and filled with sharks. According to Bartsch, a University of Chicago professor with degrees from Princeton, Harvard, and UC Berkeley, this portrayal is historically inaccurate.

    “I don’t think Romans knew what a shark was,” Bartsch toldThe Hollywood Reporter, noting thatancient Romansdid fill the arena with water for naval battles.

    Image credits: Paramount Pictures

    A separate scene shows rhinos charging into the Colosseum, which is partially inaccurate.

    Martial, a Roman poet born in Hispania (modern Spain), “wrote a poem in 80 A.D. about a rhinoceros tossing a bull up to the sky,” Bartsch explained.

    However, while the rhinoceros in the film has two horns, the one in Martial’s poem has a single horn. Additionally, unlike in the film, there is no evidence that gladiators actually rode such animals.

    Though the Romans did fill the Colosseum with water for naval battles, they did not throw sharks in, as depicted in the movie trailer

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Paramount Pictures

    Image credits: Paramount Pictures

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Bartsch pointed out another anachronistic scene, where a Roman noble drinks tea in a café while reading a newspaper—1,200 years before the invention of the printing press.

    “They did have daily news — Acta Diurna — but it was carved and placed at certain locations,” the author andhistorian described.

    “You had to go to it; you couldn’t hold it at a cafe. Also, they didn’t have cafes!”

    The Acta Diurna (also called Acta Populi, or Acta Publica), said to date from before 59 B.C.E., recorded official business and matters of public interest, serving as a type of daily gazette, as perBritannica. The term Acta, when used by itself, generally designated an emperor’s official enactments.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Contrary to what is depicted in the film, the Romans did not have cafés

    Image credits: Paramount Pictures

    Image credits: Paramount Pictures

    The film is scheduled for release on November 15 in the UK and November 22 in the US

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Ridley Scott was previously questioned byhistorians for the depiction of Napoleon in his 2023 film about the French military leader and emperor. One critic, Patrice Gueniffey, a Napoleon biographer, attacked the film in Le Point magazine as a “very anti-French and very pro-British” rewrite of history.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Responding to the criticism from French historians, the British directordeclared that “the French don’t even like themselves.”

    In an interview withThe Times, the 86-year-old added, “When I have issues with historians, I ask: ‘Excuse me, mate, were you there? No? Well, shut the f*** up then.'”

    Bored Panda has contacted Ridley Scott’s representatives for comment.

    People didn’t seem to mind that not every scene in the film was historically accurate, saying, “It’s not a documentary”

    Image credits: buckleupjazz

    Image credits: OurMovieGuide

    Image credits: EricsElectrons

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: tydriscoll7

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: DGen_Media

    Image credits: woodygwatts

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook
    Marina Urman

    Marina Urman

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    Read more »

    With a degree in social science and a love for culture, I approach entertainment journalism at Bored Panda with a research-driven mindset. I write about celebrity news, Hollywood highlights, and viral stories that spark curiosity worldwide. My work has reached millions of readers and is recognized for balancing accuracy with an engaging voice. I believe that pop culture isn’t just entertainment, it reflects the social conversations shaping our time.

    Read less »
    Marina Urman

    Marina Urman

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    With a degree in social science and a love for culture, I approach entertainment journalism at Bored Panda with a research-driven mindset. I write about celebrity news, Hollywood highlights, and viral stories that spark curiosity worldwide. My work has reached millions of readers and is recognized for balancing accuracy with an engaging voice. I believe that pop culture isn’t just entertainment, it reflects the social conversations shaping our time.

    What do you think ?
    Mike Crow
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Really? I don’t believe it!!! When has Hollywood ever got a historical movie wrong? lol

    Ursula S.
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Unfortunately, there are people who believe everything they see in a movie.

    Vinnie
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The worst case I know of: a Supreme Court judge cited an action series as legal research. Antonin Scalia used the series 24 to justify torture. "Jack Bauer saved Los Angeles". 🙄

    Load More Replies...
    Ece Cenker
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Newspaper was too much imo. Newspapyrus or newsparchment maybe...

    Luis Hernandez Dauajare
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yeah, who would have thought that a sequel to a movie where a general turned gladiator kills an Roman emperor, directed by the same person who literally told a historian to shut up if he was not there when questioned about the accuracy of another movie would possibly be historically inaccurate?

    Rose the Cook
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Part of the fun of watching historical films is finding the inaccuracies.

    Vinnie
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I sometimes do research afterwards the get a more accurate story.

    Load More Replies...
    CG
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Some historical accuracy is important, but not being 100% historically accurate in favour of spectacle is something that happens in movies quite often. It would be one thing if it was a historical biopic of a famous warrior, or celebrity, but Gladiator is intended as being more of a spectacle rather than a history lesson. The Gladiator series isn't the first, and it certainly won't be the last.

    Heir of Durin
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Nobody’s watching this movie for historical accuracy. We’re in it for Pedro Pascal.

    Borderline Panda
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It's a movie. A source of entertainment, not a history lesson.

    Fred L.
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm sorry, was there any doubt about that from the very second it was announced? Ridley Scott makes entertaining history movies, which is generally great, but his care about accuracy has gone out the window a long time ago.

    Josh Hart
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    So f’n What Braveheart fir instance and the first Gladiator… more AI BS articles?

    Mildly Annoyed Penguin
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    And in other breaking news; water is wet.

    Jules
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    TBF I don't watch these films for the historical accuracy. Am I not educated by them? Maybe I'm not. Am I not entertained? Hell yes!!

    Scott Rackley
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I can hear the whoosh of this going above this guys head. No s**t, Sherlock.

    Surly Scot
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Ridley Scott, always a grouch. Good filmmaker, but a grouch.

    Caroline Nagel
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The 'where you there?'-argument is the silliest argument one could use for historical events. It shows how little you care about FACTS. What is so wrong showing the historical facts, why do directors ALWAYS have to change history? Facts are facts, stick to them.

    Pyla
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Bridling rhinos. Riiiight.

    UpupaEpops
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Not gonna lie. I'd pay to see someone try.

    Load More Replies...
    reuben kift
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Please tell me this guy is being sarcastic. The first one was also historically inaccurate. Commodus fought in the Colosseum, but couldn't be harmed by other combatants. Maximus Decimus Meridius didn't exist. I could go on, but there is no way this guy is taking the movie this seriously.

    Mike Crow
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Really? I don’t believe it!!! When has Hollywood ever got a historical movie wrong? lol

    Ursula S.
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Unfortunately, there are people who believe everything they see in a movie.

    Vinnie
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The worst case I know of: a Supreme Court judge cited an action series as legal research. Antonin Scalia used the series 24 to justify torture. "Jack Bauer saved Los Angeles". 🙄

    Load More Replies...
    Ece Cenker
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Newspaper was too much imo. Newspapyrus or newsparchment maybe...

    Luis Hernandez Dauajare
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yeah, who would have thought that a sequel to a movie where a general turned gladiator kills an Roman emperor, directed by the same person who literally told a historian to shut up if he was not there when questioned about the accuracy of another movie would possibly be historically inaccurate?

    Rose the Cook
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Part of the fun of watching historical films is finding the inaccuracies.

    Vinnie
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I sometimes do research afterwards the get a more accurate story.

    Load More Replies...
    CG
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Some historical accuracy is important, but not being 100% historically accurate in favour of spectacle is something that happens in movies quite often. It would be one thing if it was a historical biopic of a famous warrior, or celebrity, but Gladiator is intended as being more of a spectacle rather than a history lesson. The Gladiator series isn't the first, and it certainly won't be the last.

    Heir of Durin
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Nobody’s watching this movie for historical accuracy. We’re in it for Pedro Pascal.

    Borderline Panda
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It's a movie. A source of entertainment, not a history lesson.

    Fred L.
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm sorry, was there any doubt about that from the very second it was announced? Ridley Scott makes entertaining history movies, which is generally great, but his care about accuracy has gone out the window a long time ago.

    Josh Hart
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    So f’n What Braveheart fir instance and the first Gladiator… more AI BS articles?

    Mildly Annoyed Penguin
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    And in other breaking news; water is wet.

    Jules
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    TBF I don't watch these films for the historical accuracy. Am I not educated by them? Maybe I'm not. Am I not entertained? Hell yes!!

    Scott Rackley
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I can hear the whoosh of this going above this guys head. No s**t, Sherlock.

    Surly Scot
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Ridley Scott, always a grouch. Good filmmaker, but a grouch.

    Caroline Nagel
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The 'where you there?'-argument is the silliest argument one could use for historical events. It shows how little you care about FACTS. What is so wrong showing the historical facts, why do directors ALWAYS have to change history? Facts are facts, stick to them.

    Pyla
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Bridling rhinos. Riiiight.

    UpupaEpops
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Not gonna lie. I'd pay to see someone try.

    Load More Replies...
    reuben kift
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Please tell me this guy is being sarcastic. The first one was also historically inaccurate. Commodus fought in the Colosseum, but couldn't be harmed by other combatants. Maximus Decimus Meridius didn't exist. I could go on, but there is no way this guy is taking the movie this seriously.

    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT