Family Responsible For Bride’s “Irretrievable” Brain Damage Walks Free: “What A Great System”
A family based in the UK, who was originally put behind bars for leaving an arranged marriage bride in a horrendous and “vegetative” state, has been released from jail.
Ambreen Fatima Sheikh was only 30 years old when she suffered “irretrievable” brain damage due to an anti-diabetic drug and was doused in a corrosive substance.
- A family who was jailed for leaving an arranged marriage bride in a "vegetative state" has been freed.
- The court found the original case against the family to have had 'evidential difficulties.'
- The bride in question, Ambreen was subjected to abuse and "torture."
- Although Ambreen is alive, she was left with irreversible brain damage.
When she was first admitted to the hospital back on August 1, 2015, doctors believed the now 39-year-old had no chance of surviving — but she began to breathe herself when her ventilator was turned off.
Later on, all eyes immediately turned to Ambreen’s family members as suspects of the abuse.
A family responsible for a woman’s “irretrievable” brain damage has been released from jail
Image credits: West Yorkshire News / Simon Ashton
Her husband Asgar Sheikh, 31, father-in-law Khalid Skeikh, 55, and mother-in-law Shabnam Sheikh, were jailed last year for 23 years.
Sister-in-law Shagufa, 29, was given a suspended sentence.
They were all found guilty of causing or allowing a vulnerable adult to suffer serious physical injury following a trial, but have now been freed following a conviction that was denied by the Court of Appeal.
Image credits: West Yorkshire News / Simon Ashton
As reported by The Sun, the judges at Leeds Crown Court found the original case “riddled with evidential difficulties.”
This is a far cry from the opinions of the public, who demanded the family’s sentences be longer when they were first accused back in 2024.
“That is not Justice!” one user demanded last year. “That poor woman is suffering a life sentence. Absolutely disgusting! The hardest thing in this is it was her husband, her family who she should have been loved & protected by not tortured.”
Ambreen’s family members were accused back in 2024
Image credits: Tom The Photographer / Unsplash (Not the actual photo)
“Can’t even bear to think what that poor lady has endured and still going through,” someone emphasized. “There needs to be tougher sentencing. They will be out in less time to enjoy the rest of their lives. Its [sic] disgusting really.”
A third wrote, “Absolutely shocking and disgusting sentence for what this poor beautiful innocent woman has been through at the hands of her family who are supposed to love and care for her.
Image credits: West Yorkshire Police
“They should all rot in jail! This is heartbreaking.”
“What kind of example are our justice system setting with this disgraceful sentence!” a user asked. “It happens far too often, where young ladies are being brought to this country and being made to live a ‘dogs life’ at the hands of her new family!!!”
The court heard that Ambreen was a “happy-go-lucky” young woman when she arrived in the UK from Pakistan in 2014, there to fulfill an arranged marriage.
However, things soon turned sour when her new family in the town of Huddersfield claimed she had “not lived up to expectations” as a wife and should be sent back to her country, subjecting her to verbal and physical abuse.
The justice system was brought to light after netizens suspected the initial sentence was nowhere near long enough
Image credits: West Yorkshire Police
In July, two police officers did a welfare check on Ambreen after her extended family voiced their concerns. But authorities only reported the woman being “fit and well” — a statement that held little weight to the judge when Ambreen spoke little English and her father-in-law had been present, as per Daily Mail.
Prosecutors additionally suggested that there was a “pattern of violence” behind closed doors, as seen by the severe burns left on the 30-year-old’s lower back, bottom, and right ear, while being “tricked or forced” to take glimepiride — a medication prescribed to Shabnam and known for its extremely dangerous effects, even in small doses.
Image credits: Manchest Erevening News
Ambreen was left alone for three days after being “tortured” before the ambulance was called, the court heard. Nurses also noted her appearance was “malnourished” and “unkempt” since she had no control of her bladder before she fell unconscious and began vomiting.
Although her family dialed 999 eventually, they still lied about what exactly happened to her.
“You would all have been aware of her pain and distress,” said the judge. “It’s just not realistic to conclude that you did not all know of Ambreen’s predicament and her desperate need for emergency medical care.
Authorities enacted a welfare check, but reported Ambreen looked “fit and well”
Image credits: Jamie Street / Unsplash (Not the actual photo)
Image credits: Nik / Unsplash (Not the actual photo)
“You all also knew why she was in that condition.”
Though it is possible that Ambreen may live for decades more, according to Daily Mail, she will never recover and will eventually die due to the inflicted damages. She is completely unaware of her surroundings and is being fed through a tube.
Ambreen’s family was labeled as “disgusting, sick people” by commenters
Explore more of these tags
I have to face enough of this s**t on every other platform. I do not come to BP to be reminded of what a bloody mess the UK is fast becoming...
You think it was "better" before? WTF, with all the guys from the Reform party abusing women and nothing happens to them? Tories partying during Covid? Who exactly went to jail for all the Grenfell deaths? And that's just things I've witnessed since I've moved here.
Load More Replies...What, like in the USA where regularly innocent people are killed for crimes they didn't commit? Especially people who are not white? Like that? F**k that s**t.
Load More Replies...I don't care who you are or where you're from, if you do this to anyone else, an actual human being? The whole damn book should be thrown at you. Go rot in jail. For Life.
Jail seems like too good a sentence compared to what she’s forced to live for the rest of her life. Bring back the firing squad
Load More Replies...The poor woman is brain dead. Take out the feeding tube, give her the last chance for peace her soul can know.
Agreed, and give her some comfort measures. How sad this case is.
Load More Replies...So, for those curious, the 'evidential difficulties' mentioned come from how the UK court system works. There's a couple things that this points to, but the two main factors here are lack of supporting witness testimony, and a victim's unwillingness... or inability to testify, making it difficult to prove a case beyond a reasonable doubt. It basically means that the police or prosecution cannot build a strong enough case to move forward with the criminal proceedings due to issues with the available evidence. That doesn't mean there won't be justice, but just that more investigation must take place. It's not unlike how in the US, a person could have charges dismissed for a crime, and later if new evidence surfaces, be charged and tried for the crime the charges were dismissed from, at a later date.
If one moves to another nation, though one can keep ones own cultural practices, if that culture includes beating up and trying to kill your daughter in law, maybe you should be removed from that nation. For not "meeting expectations". I guess they thought they bought her. They did believe that, that she wasn't a person in her own right. The UK doesn't believe women are bought as brides. I say this as an immigrant.
No, they should be punished severely. I don’t care what part of the world people like this are from, they shouldn’t be freed, even to be deported so they can hurt ANYONE else
Load More Replies...In the UK, The Human Rights Act states that a person is innocent until proven guilty. In court, the prosecution has the burden of proving guilt, with the accused having no burden to prove innocence. Also, it must be proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of the offence; if reasonable doubt exists, then the accused must be acquitted. Whilst some people don't like this, it helps to prevent innocent people from being convicted. However, due to the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt, some people who have committed serious crimes have walked away from court.
What all the complainers don't understand is that courts don't laugh and slap such criminals on the back. The courts follow certain security protocols that are in place in order to prevent the legal system of being abused - often these safety measures are put in because of things we learned of fascist govenrments and how they operated. Think of it like speed limits. Yes, YOU know the street and are a good driver and dont' need them, but we have learned that they are necessary, even if sometimes they're a hindrance.
I don't think these people should be walking around free among law abiding people.
I need more context. Why were they released? This doesn't make any sense. Did the police fabricate evidence or something like that, or was it that some form was misplaced?
I have to face enough of this s**t on every other platform. I do not come to BP to be reminded of what a bloody mess the UK is fast becoming...
You think it was "better" before? WTF, with all the guys from the Reform party abusing women and nothing happens to them? Tories partying during Covid? Who exactly went to jail for all the Grenfell deaths? And that's just things I've witnessed since I've moved here.
Load More Replies...What, like in the USA where regularly innocent people are killed for crimes they didn't commit? Especially people who are not white? Like that? F**k that s**t.
Load More Replies...I don't care who you are or where you're from, if you do this to anyone else, an actual human being? The whole damn book should be thrown at you. Go rot in jail. For Life.
Jail seems like too good a sentence compared to what she’s forced to live for the rest of her life. Bring back the firing squad
Load More Replies...The poor woman is brain dead. Take out the feeding tube, give her the last chance for peace her soul can know.
Agreed, and give her some comfort measures. How sad this case is.
Load More Replies...So, for those curious, the 'evidential difficulties' mentioned come from how the UK court system works. There's a couple things that this points to, but the two main factors here are lack of supporting witness testimony, and a victim's unwillingness... or inability to testify, making it difficult to prove a case beyond a reasonable doubt. It basically means that the police or prosecution cannot build a strong enough case to move forward with the criminal proceedings due to issues with the available evidence. That doesn't mean there won't be justice, but just that more investigation must take place. It's not unlike how in the US, a person could have charges dismissed for a crime, and later if new evidence surfaces, be charged and tried for the crime the charges were dismissed from, at a later date.
If one moves to another nation, though one can keep ones own cultural practices, if that culture includes beating up and trying to kill your daughter in law, maybe you should be removed from that nation. For not "meeting expectations". I guess they thought they bought her. They did believe that, that she wasn't a person in her own right. The UK doesn't believe women are bought as brides. I say this as an immigrant.
No, they should be punished severely. I don’t care what part of the world people like this are from, they shouldn’t be freed, even to be deported so they can hurt ANYONE else
Load More Replies...In the UK, The Human Rights Act states that a person is innocent until proven guilty. In court, the prosecution has the burden of proving guilt, with the accused having no burden to prove innocence. Also, it must be proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of the offence; if reasonable doubt exists, then the accused must be acquitted. Whilst some people don't like this, it helps to prevent innocent people from being convicted. However, due to the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt, some people who have committed serious crimes have walked away from court.
What all the complainers don't understand is that courts don't laugh and slap such criminals on the back. The courts follow certain security protocols that are in place in order to prevent the legal system of being abused - often these safety measures are put in because of things we learned of fascist govenrments and how they operated. Think of it like speed limits. Yes, YOU know the street and are a good driver and dont' need them, but we have learned that they are necessary, even if sometimes they're a hindrance.
I don't think these people should be walking around free among law abiding people.
I need more context. Why were they released? This doesn't make any sense. Did the police fabricate evidence or something like that, or was it that some form was misplaced?























23
41