Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
Woman Calls CPS After Colleague Advertises Her Adopted Kid Online, Is Shocked When The Truth Emerges
Adopting a child is a very serious commitment and not one to be taken lightly. You can’t simply “return to sender” if things don’t work out, or if you suddenly have a change of heart. That’s why the legal adoption process isn’t straightforward. It’s thorough, tedious, time-consuming and filled with checks and balances.
A woman has told how her “super religious” co-worker has been adopting kids like she’s starting a football team. The latest (eighth) child is a boy from Ukraine but his adoptive parents have decided he’s too “awful” for them. The “mom” is desperate to “re-home” him. She’s not only advertised the child on Facebook, but has also sent out an email to her entire company, asking if anyone wants to take him.
RELATED:
Adopting a child is meant to be a loving and lifelong commitment – you can’t simply “return to sender”
Image credits:Anna Tolipova / freepik (not the actual photo)
But one woman has advertised her 8th adopted child for “re-homing,” and is also offering him to her colleagues
Image credits: user24252071 / freepik (not the actual photo)
Image credits: yanalya / freepik (not the actual photo)
Image credits: anon
People advised the woman to call CPS immediately and to take it even further if needs be
Commenter link: travel.state.gov
Commenter link: abcnews.go.com
Commenter link: reuters
Things took a dramatic turn after the woman called CPS, and Tony’s “re-homing” was just the tip of the iceberg
Image credits: The Yuri Arcurs Collection / freepik (not the actual photo)
Image credits: garetsvisual / freepik (not the actual photo)
“Shuffled around like unwanted puppies”: netizens were relieved to read that the kids were safe
“An Update On Our Family”: remembering the child re-homing case that stunned the world
In 2020, Ohio-based vloggers Myka and James Stauffer stunned the world when they announced that they’d be “re-homing” their adopted son. The couple brought Huxley home from China in 2017 when he was 2 years old. 2 and a half years later, they decided they no longer wanted him.
According to Time magazine, the Stauffers ran a YouTube channel called “The Stauffer Life,” and had 700,000 subscribers. But the media outlet adds that their total subscribers were roughly a million when you factor in their other channels.
In a video, which was later deleted, the Stauffers said that Huxley’s special needs “exceeded their ability to properly care for him.” They blamed Huxley’s autism diagnosis, which they were reportedly aware of before adopting him. But the couple claims that not everything was revealed to them.
Image credits: Igordoon Primus / Unsplash (not the actual photo)
“Once Huxley came home, there was a lot more special needs that we weren’t aware of, and that we were not told,” James Stauffer family/” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>said in the video. While his wife added that “There’s not an ounce of our body that doesn’t love Huxley with all of our being.”
“There wasn’t a minute that I didn’t try our hardest and I think what Jim is trying to say is that after multiple assessments, after multiple evaluations, numerous medical professionals have felt that he needed a different fit and that his medical needs, he needed more,” Myka Stauffer announced to the world.
The backlash came in thick and fast, prompting Myka to apologize and admit that she had been “naive” in the adoption process.
“I can’t say I wish this never happened because I’m still so glad Huxley is here and getting all of the help he needs,” she wrote on Instagram. “I also know that even though he is happier in his new home and doing better that he still experienced trauma and I’m sorry, no adoptee deserves any more trauma.”
Many netizens noted that such cases are “disturbingly common”
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
Explore more of these tags
What do you think ?
Lyoness 1 week ago
For anyone wondering the original post is nine years old, the user deleted their Reddit account and there were no further updates. I'd love to know what happened to those kids.
LakotaWolf (she/her) 1 week ago
I hope they found some peace, and homes where they could feel safe. I feel a little sad because, depending on how long they were together in Mary's home, they could have started to really view each other as true siblings and it'd be sad if they were all separated (probably necessary, just sad.) As an adopted child myself, I actually first came to terms with finding out about being adopted by equating it to how we had "adopted" our family dog, Split, and that she was a part of the family even though she had been "adopted" too (I was 6 when I found out, lol.) But hearing about people who want to "re-home" an adopted child really gets my blood extra-boiling (as one can imagine.) I hope the kids are okay.
Load More Replies...
Kelly Scott 1 week ago
I remember when people were adopting the kids from Romania and Russia and those kids came with a ton of untold problems. Even small children aged 2 to 5 were very impacted by not having been nurtured and they did everything from attacking the other kids with hammers and bricks to trying to set the house on fire. Many of them were psychotic and I still remember the parents crying because they had tried every avenue to get help and no one would help them. Many of them returned their kids back to their native countries, which resulted in those countries having a "no return" placed on any child taken out of the country or not allowing anyone outside the country to adopt. Many of those parents had other children they were trying to protect and those adopted kids were way beyond the scope of what they could handle. Most of them needed constant and lifelong professional help. I'd like to see more of what happened here before I condemn either the child or the parents.
tameson 5 days ago
FYI, in the US when an employee is fired for cause the employer does have a say in whether or not they get unemployment benefits. In all except three states the employer pays a tax to the Federal and State governments which funds unemployment claims. No one else contributes. So the employer can decide that someone who was fired for just cause cannot claim that benefit. I don't think they do it often but it certainly can be done.
tameson 5 days ago
Also, every state in the US is an "at will" state except for Montana. Employers can fire you at any time and are not required to give you a reason. The only things that protect you are 1) a union 2) an employment contract that specifically says you can only be fired for cause, or 3) if you are a professor with tenure.
Load More Replies... Lyoness 1 week ago
For anyone wondering the original post is nine years old, the user deleted their Reddit account and there were no further updates. I'd love to know what happened to those kids.
LakotaWolf (she/her) 1 week ago
I hope they found some peace, and homes where they could feel safe. I feel a little sad because, depending on how long they were together in Mary's home, they could have started to really view each other as true siblings and it'd be sad if they were all separated (probably necessary, just sad.) As an adopted child myself, I actually first came to terms with finding out about being adopted by equating it to how we had "adopted" our family dog, Split, and that she was a part of the family even though she had been "adopted" too (I was 6 when I found out, lol.) But hearing about people who want to "re-home" an adopted child really gets my blood extra-boiling (as one can imagine.) I hope the kids are okay.
Load More Replies... Kelly Scott 1 week ago
I remember when people were adopting the kids from Romania and Russia and those kids came with a ton of untold problems. Even small children aged 2 to 5 were very impacted by not having been nurtured and they did everything from attacking the other kids with hammers and bricks to trying to set the house on fire. Many of them were psychotic and I still remember the parents crying because they had tried every avenue to get help and no one would help them. Many of them returned their kids back to their native countries, which resulted in those countries having a "no return" placed on any child taken out of the country or not allowing anyone outside the country to adopt. Many of those parents had other children they were trying to protect and those adopted kids were way beyond the scope of what they could handle. Most of them needed constant and lifelong professional help. I'd like to see more of what happened here before I condemn either the child or the parents.
tameson 5 days ago
FYI, in the US when an employee is fired for cause the employer does have a say in whether or not they get unemployment benefits. In all except three states the employer pays a tax to the Federal and State governments which funds unemployment claims. No one else contributes. So the employer can decide that someone who was fired for just cause cannot claim that benefit. I don't think they do it often but it certainly can be done.
tameson 5 days ago
Also, every state in the US is an "at will" state except for Montana. Employers can fire you at any time and are not required to give you a reason. The only things that protect you are 1) a union 2) an employment contract that specifically says you can only be fired for cause, or 3) if you are a professor with tenure.
Load More Replies...
Related on Bored Panda
52
13