Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
User submission
11.2K
I Captured Fairytale-Like Autumn In Romania With $250 Camera To Show You Don’t Need Expensive Gear
It took me 6 years to hike all around the northern part of the Romanian Carpathian mountains to find breathtaking sceneries and capture the fairytale spirit of the Autumn.
For all of those who are asking themselves what kind of equipment I used to make this photos, the answer is actually an advice. You don’t need expensive equipment for making landscape photography. Back then, when I made these photos, I used a DSLR camera, which cost me around 250$ with the kit lens, and a telephoto lens which I bought back in the times with 150$. Also, I used some filters. It’s all about the perfect moment, the perfect spot and the sweet light of autumn evenings and mornings…
More info: alexrobciuc.wixsite.com | Facebook
RELATED:
48Kviews
Share on FacebookExplore more of these tags
What do you think ?
Karpe DM 9 years ago
For all the people bitching about him using Photoshop, Isn't that the reason why PS was created for in the first place? Making good phtographs look even better?? I think he did a great job with a few resourses, that is the point of the article.
Dwiyana Syahputri 9 years ago
Agree. Why don't complainers just enjoy the beauty of his work?
Load More Replies...
Nick Gisburne 9 years ago
Sad that there are so many people here who can't just look at beautiful images and appreciate them, however they were produced. Presumably the people who complain most are the ones who want to put as little effort as possible into everything they (don't) create. Yes, he's retouched the photos... could you do that? I couldn't right now, but someone could teach themselves to do it, if they put in the effort, and these photos give them something to aim for. Great work. Great skill. Well done.
Valentina Bovini 9 years ago
The title is kinda deceiving... alright you took beautiful pictures with no expensive gear, but you should've claimed you also used post production. However I'm not judging you for that, post production is an art as well. I see many people making the wrong use of it, I use Photoshop myself to make some adjustments, but I always try to keep it as real as possible. People bitching should know MOST famous photos are photoshopped or even staged, but photoshop is not a miracle wand people. If you take a c**p picture it won't turn into an art work. I like to say that you capture with your camera and then you paint with PS. You did a great job in my opionion.
Speranta Regasire 9 years ago
Alex, felicitari pentru imagini si mai ales pentru munca si sufletul tau care se citesc in ,,spatele" lor! Tine-o tot asa! <3
Cherry Warr 9 years ago
Am I the only person thinking $400+ ain't 'cheap' equipment? I am?? *slink away back to the poor side of the internet*
Kirsten Preston 9 years ago
How utterly wonderful, dreamlike leading you away for the worn path, into new places. Great work ;-)
Jenny Vest 9 years ago
Did you find a camera with a tilt shift or did you create the effect in post production? I'd love to find a tilt shift camera.
Jenny Vest 9 years ago
Just worked it out. I need to learn that trick with the lens some time.
Load More Replies...
Edgar Dumea 8 years ago
Those bitching about PS probably mean that's an extra resource to consider besides the 250$ camera. Plus the knowledge to use it properly.
Wedding Photography Select 9 years ago
Gorgeous. I agree you don't need an expensive camera but photoshop does help (As A Tool That Is)
Daniel Law 9 years ago
About that 'inexpensive' camera. Yeah, there are many more expensive cameras. But $250 for a camera is too much for people trying to keep a roof over their head and struggling to feed kids these days, let alone back...whenever. Those people need work and I'd bet a good number of them would make good photographers -- if they could afford whatever camera has replaced an Instamatic these days. Frame of reference should be something familiar to a photographer. So he should understand his audience a bit more. He simply has a different frame of reference to life than most of his audience. Photoshopped pictures (and nowhere in the text is Photoshop mentioned) should be designated as such as full disclosure. The article says, "...with the kit lens, and a telephoto lens which I bought back in the times with 150$. Also, I used some filters. It’s all about the perfect moment, the perfect spot and the sweet light of autumn evenings and mornings…" That's photography.
Rolland Anthony 9 years ago
low quality resolution photos are great for web, but not for printing and selling I suppose
David Verduzco 9 years ago
amazing! you don't need expensive camera but don't you still need expensive software?
Corinna Weichold 9 years ago
Same as 1, 4 and 11 - it's supposed to look like a miniature achieved with tilt–shift effect :)
Load More Replies...
Nizaя Bredan 9 years ago
I Captured Fairytale-Like Autumn In Romania With $250 Camera To Show You Need to Know About Post-production In Order to be a Good Photographer.
Karpe DM 9 years ago
For all the people bitching about him using Photoshop, Isn't that the reason why PS was created for in the first place? Making good phtographs look even better?? I think he did a great job with a few resourses, that is the point of the article.
Dwiyana Syahputri 9 years ago
Agree. Why don't complainers just enjoy the beauty of his work?
Load More Replies... Nick Gisburne 9 years ago
Sad that there are so many people here who can't just look at beautiful images and appreciate them, however they were produced. Presumably the people who complain most are the ones who want to put as little effort as possible into everything they (don't) create. Yes, he's retouched the photos... could you do that? I couldn't right now, but someone could teach themselves to do it, if they put in the effort, and these photos give them something to aim for. Great work. Great skill. Well done.
Valentina Bovini 9 years ago
The title is kinda deceiving... alright you took beautiful pictures with no expensive gear, but you should've claimed you also used post production. However I'm not judging you for that, post production is an art as well. I see many people making the wrong use of it, I use Photoshop myself to make some adjustments, but I always try to keep it as real as possible. People bitching should know MOST famous photos are photoshopped or even staged, but photoshop is not a miracle wand people. If you take a c**p picture it won't turn into an art work. I like to say that you capture with your camera and then you paint with PS. You did a great job in my opionion.
Speranta Regasire 9 years ago
Alex, felicitari pentru imagini si mai ales pentru munca si sufletul tau care se citesc in ,,spatele" lor! Tine-o tot asa! <3
Cherry Warr 9 years ago
Am I the only person thinking $400+ ain't 'cheap' equipment? I am?? *slink away back to the poor side of the internet*
Kirsten Preston 9 years ago
How utterly wonderful, dreamlike leading you away for the worn path, into new places. Great work ;-)
Jenny Vest 9 years ago
Did you find a camera with a tilt shift or did you create the effect in post production? I'd love to find a tilt shift camera.
Jenny Vest 9 years ago
Just worked it out. I need to learn that trick with the lens some time.
Load More Replies... Edgar Dumea 8 years ago
Those bitching about PS probably mean that's an extra resource to consider besides the 250$ camera. Plus the knowledge to use it properly.
Wedding Photography Select 9 years ago
Gorgeous. I agree you don't need an expensive camera but photoshop does help (As A Tool That Is)
Daniel Law 9 years ago
About that 'inexpensive' camera. Yeah, there are many more expensive cameras. But $250 for a camera is too much for people trying to keep a roof over their head and struggling to feed kids these days, let alone back...whenever. Those people need work and I'd bet a good number of them would make good photographers -- if they could afford whatever camera has replaced an Instamatic these days. Frame of reference should be something familiar to a photographer. So he should understand his audience a bit more. He simply has a different frame of reference to life than most of his audience. Photoshopped pictures (and nowhere in the text is Photoshop mentioned) should be designated as such as full disclosure. The article says, "...with the kit lens, and a telephoto lens which I bought back in the times with 150$. Also, I used some filters. It’s all about the perfect moment, the perfect spot and the sweet light of autumn evenings and mornings…" That's photography.
Rolland Anthony 9 years ago
low quality resolution photos are great for web, but not for printing and selling I suppose
David Verduzco 9 years ago
amazing! you don't need expensive camera but don't you still need expensive software?
Corinna Weichold 9 years ago
Same as 1, 4 and 11 - it's supposed to look like a miniature achieved with tilt–shift effect :)
Load More Replies... Nizaя Bredan 9 years ago
I Captured Fairytale-Like Autumn In Romania With $250 Camera To Show You Need to Know About Post-production In Order to be a Good Photographer.
You May Like “Fox With A McDonald’s Takeaway?”: Once-In-A-Lifetime Photos Taken At The Exact Perfect Moment 30 Animal Panorama Fails That Are So Bad They're Good The Inspiring Beauty Of Van Life
Gabija Palšytė
Akvile Petraityte 🇺🇦
Akvile Petraityte 🇺🇦
Related on Bored Panda
541
47