User submission
11.2K
47.7K
I Captured Fairytale-Like Autumn In Romania With $250 Camera To Show You Don’t Need Expensive Gear
48Kviews
It took me 6 years to hike all around the northern part of the Romanian Carpathian mountains to find breathtaking sceneries and capture the fairytale spirit of the Autumn.
For all of those who are asking themselves what kind of equipment I used to make this photos, the answer is actually an advice. You don’t need expensive equipment for making landscape photography. Back then, when I made these photos, I used a DSLR camera, which cost me around 250$ with the kit lens, and a telephoto lens which I bought back in the times with 150$. Also, I used some filters. It’s all about the perfect moment, the perfect spot and the sweet light of autumn evenings and mornings…
More info: alexrobciuc.wixsite.com | Facebook
48Kviews
Share on Facebook
You May Like 30 Animal Panorama Fails That Are So Bad They're Good These 30 Pics Won Pulitzer Prize For Photography And Not Without A Reason “History Defined”: 50 Important Photos That Shed A New Light On Our Past
Akvile Petraityte 🇺🇦
Irmante Sungailaite
Gabija Palšytė
Popular on Bored Panda 
For all the people bitching about him using Photoshop, Isn't that the reason why PS was created for in the first place? Making good phtographs look even better?? I think he did a great job with a few resourses, that is the point of the article.
Agree. Why don't complainers just enjoy the beauty of his work?
Well, Photoshop was created because Adobe wanted to make money. I don't care if photographers want to make their pictures look better. I just don't like the fact they continue to call their altered pictures 'photographs'. They are no longer photographs but 'photoart', or some other title. Fess up photoshoppers! Your creations may be beautiful, but they are NO LONGER PHOTOGRAPHS. If you haven't altered them, they're photos. If you did anything to them -- even editing colors or something -- they should be noted as 'edited'. That's the honest thing to do.
People complaining about photoshop are missing the point. This photographer didn't need expensive photo equipment to create these images. They needed a cheaper camera and a copy of Photoshop. there is nothing wrong with creating artful photographs.
Amazing!
For all the people bitching about him using Photoshop, Isn't that the reason why PS was created for in the first place? Making good phtographs look even better?? I think he did a great job with a few resourses, that is the point of the article.
Agree. Why don't complainers just enjoy the beauty of his work?
Well, Photoshop was created because Adobe wanted to make money. I don't care if photographers want to make their pictures look better. I just don't like the fact they continue to call their altered pictures 'photographs'. They are no longer photographs but 'photoart', or some other title. Fess up photoshoppers! Your creations may be beautiful, but they are NO LONGER PHOTOGRAPHS. If you haven't altered them, they're photos. If you did anything to them -- even editing colors or something -- they should be noted as 'edited'. That's the honest thing to do.
People complaining about photoshop are missing the point. This photographer didn't need expensive photo equipment to create these images. They needed a cheaper camera and a copy of Photoshop. there is nothing wrong with creating artful photographs.
Amazing!