This Girl Is Only Six Months Old, But Her Hair Is So Amazing It Gained Her 70,000 Instagram Followers
399Kviews
While it is absolutely normal for a baby to be born with a full head of luscious hair, they usually lose their locks in a couple of months, before starting to grow their more permanent mane. A more rare occurrence is when the adorable baby keeps their hairdo well into their first year, such as this black-haired, heart-stoppingly cute tiny human. And while some of us sink an embarrassing amount of money into expensive hair products and vitamins, others have been naturally blessed with luscious locks – well Baby Chanco is in the second group.
The six-month-old Japanese girl became Instagram famous for her exquisite hairdo, after her mom posted her cute baby pictures. Chanco was born with a full head of baby hair, and in six months her mane only continued to grow.
This adorably hairy baby is now rocking some serious Elvis Presley-style hair, and people can’t look away. She currently has over 70k following on Instagram.
Take a look at this gorgeous baby with hair named Chanco below to experience some serious hair envy! Would you like to have hair like this? Let us know.
More info: Instagram
Baby Chanco has had a full head of hair since the moment she was born
In only six months her locks grew an impressive amount
A couple of months ago Chanco’s mother shared her pictures on Instagram
And people fell in love
She now has over 70k hair admirers on her page
Scroll down for more pictures of this adorable baby
399Kviews
Share on Facebook
And my poor kids were bald until they were almost one, now I know where their hair went! The hair fairy got it and stockpiled it.
Your comment made my day, hahahaha
I was bald until I was two. My sister, on the other hand, had almost as much hair as this baby does. =P
Dark haired babies tend to have a lot of hair and light haired babies are practically bald. At least that's what I experienced with my blond and dark brown headed children
Ha interesting. I always thought its only the babys with southern (European) or similar genes. When my son was born, there was a woman from I don't know where and her girl had a mop of dark hair too. So adorable
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHH-HATS OFF TO YOUR SENSE OF HUMOR-GREAT- BLESSINGS TO YOU.
My oldest two didn't need haircuts until age 2. My youngest (the girl, of course), remained bald until almost 3. This baby is so beautiful!
:))
I was completely bald until I was nearly two.
Hahahaha :) Hilarious! Thanks for this!
Uwaaa she is so cutee..... Her hair is amazing and i fell in love with her eyes.. She's so cute..
She is SO adorable. Please tell me her parents will dress her as Elvis for Halloween!
Oohhh that would be perfect..
How creepy it is that this baby (cute baby, cute hair) right now has over 39k followers. She has no idea where her feet are. I never understood this, to be a public source of amusement, like a circus attraction. Terrible.
I disagree. It's not like she's been put into humiliating costumes, or poses. I don't see this as a 'source of amusement' but more as a 'source of admiration.' She got a unique look, one that is completely adorable, and one day, she'll be glad her Mom posted these photos. This is how we do it in the 21st century. I'm 49, and I wish there were more photos of me when I was a baby. Back in the late 60's, we didn't have digital cameras like we have now, nor an easy and free way to store them safely forever. All of the photos of me are low-quality, out of focus, or grainy. Some of the old photos are even fading, though they've been kept in huge bulky photo albums. I see nothing wrong with this baby having 39K followers. People love to see her-- she certainly puts a smile on their faces. And that is something we can ALL use on a daily basis--- MORE SMILES and HAPPINESS.
I do wonder what my kids will say in 50 years.... probably the same thing you are saying except. They will say, "I wish we had mentally integrated retina scanners back in the day. All I have are usb devices that have no interface with the global data grid, and those pictures were only 1.3 Giga pixel still shot in 2d that don't even have instanta movement replay like now days. Heck some of the usb sticks probably don't even work because I kept them to close to my quantum magnetic resonator thing-a-ma-hoo. "
I understand that babies are cute and everyone loves babies, and that I too wish there were more family photos of babies in my family album. I don't want to sound alarmist, but, I wouldn't feel confortable of compulsively sharing photos of a person that can't decide to be exposed or not (the baby); and more important, there are lots of people (more than you think, sadly) that would use those beautiful memories of your baby for their own profit (sell them, set their own accounts and use the photos as their own, etc), or let's be direct about it, pedophiles, kidnappers, freaks. I believe kids have too the right to decide to be exposed (when they are capable of and understand exposure), and as parents we have the responsiblity to keep them safe. Even from Internet.
Totally agree 100per cent with you,& i for one am Not a fan of ‘baby pictures’ in general due to~ to much over doing to present, using All fake props/ect.. just for a cute look! ... this is natural, unusual & lovely.
In the pre internet days - 1960s- a big blow-up of my 1st birthday portrait spent a couple of months in our local chemist window advertising their developing services - luckily no-one would recognise me now - lol
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
I agree. And will never understand how you can be a follower of a babies / dogs / parrots page ... maybe I am silly, but I prefer following content, something witty or at least hilarious ...
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Looks like Trumps hairdo
And my poor kids were bald until they were almost one, now I know where their hair went! The hair fairy got it and stockpiled it.
Your comment made my day, hahahaha
I was bald until I was two. My sister, on the other hand, had almost as much hair as this baby does. =P
Dark haired babies tend to have a lot of hair and light haired babies are practically bald. At least that's what I experienced with my blond and dark brown headed children
Ha interesting. I always thought its only the babys with southern (European) or similar genes. When my son was born, there was a woman from I don't know where and her girl had a mop of dark hair too. So adorable
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHH-HATS OFF TO YOUR SENSE OF HUMOR-GREAT- BLESSINGS TO YOU.
My oldest two didn't need haircuts until age 2. My youngest (the girl, of course), remained bald until almost 3. This baby is so beautiful!
:))
I was completely bald until I was nearly two.
Hahahaha :) Hilarious! Thanks for this!
Uwaaa she is so cutee..... Her hair is amazing and i fell in love with her eyes.. She's so cute..
She is SO adorable. Please tell me her parents will dress her as Elvis for Halloween!
Oohhh that would be perfect..
How creepy it is that this baby (cute baby, cute hair) right now has over 39k followers. She has no idea where her feet are. I never understood this, to be a public source of amusement, like a circus attraction. Terrible.
I disagree. It's not like she's been put into humiliating costumes, or poses. I don't see this as a 'source of amusement' but more as a 'source of admiration.' She got a unique look, one that is completely adorable, and one day, she'll be glad her Mom posted these photos. This is how we do it in the 21st century. I'm 49, and I wish there were more photos of me when I was a baby. Back in the late 60's, we didn't have digital cameras like we have now, nor an easy and free way to store them safely forever. All of the photos of me are low-quality, out of focus, or grainy. Some of the old photos are even fading, though they've been kept in huge bulky photo albums. I see nothing wrong with this baby having 39K followers. People love to see her-- she certainly puts a smile on their faces. And that is something we can ALL use on a daily basis--- MORE SMILES and HAPPINESS.
I do wonder what my kids will say in 50 years.... probably the same thing you are saying except. They will say, "I wish we had mentally integrated retina scanners back in the day. All I have are usb devices that have no interface with the global data grid, and those pictures were only 1.3 Giga pixel still shot in 2d that don't even have instanta movement replay like now days. Heck some of the usb sticks probably don't even work because I kept them to close to my quantum magnetic resonator thing-a-ma-hoo. "
I understand that babies are cute and everyone loves babies, and that I too wish there were more family photos of babies in my family album. I don't want to sound alarmist, but, I wouldn't feel confortable of compulsively sharing photos of a person that can't decide to be exposed or not (the baby); and more important, there are lots of people (more than you think, sadly) that would use those beautiful memories of your baby for their own profit (sell them, set their own accounts and use the photos as their own, etc), or let's be direct about it, pedophiles, kidnappers, freaks. I believe kids have too the right to decide to be exposed (when they are capable of and understand exposure), and as parents we have the responsiblity to keep them safe. Even from Internet.
Totally agree 100per cent with you,& i for one am Not a fan of ‘baby pictures’ in general due to~ to much over doing to present, using All fake props/ect.. just for a cute look! ... this is natural, unusual & lovely.
In the pre internet days - 1960s- a big blow-up of my 1st birthday portrait spent a couple of months in our local chemist window advertising their developing services - luckily no-one would recognise me now - lol
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
I agree. And will never understand how you can be a follower of a babies / dogs / parrots page ... maybe I am silly, but I prefer following content, something witty or at least hilarious ...
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Looks like Trumps hairdo