Dogs Are Not Allowed On NYC Subway Unless They’re In A Carrier…So This Happened
Some rules are meant to be followed, and some are expected to be broken. The regulations, in this case, are clear when it comes to carrying animals on the NYC subway. “No person may bring any animal on or into any conveyance or facility unless enclosed in a container.” It looks like there’s no room for interpretation, right? But the New York subway rules say nothing about the size of the animal or the form of the dog carrier, and as you can see from this picture, some people are quick to exploit that fact to avoid a fine for not following the rules of public transport use.
This guy and his husky were recently captured riding the subway by CBS news producer Alex Romano, and it’s hard not to smile when you look at it. Perhaps it’s the not-so-covert nature of the operation. Perhaps it’s the casual pose. Or perhaps it’s simply the fact that the guy is carrying a large dog in a tote bag. Whatever the reason, we love it.
Scroll down below to check the genius solution for large dog breed specimens to travel in the NYC subway; it may give you a hint if you are experiencing a similar situation with your pet dog and public transportation, too.
This guy avoided a fine on the New York subway by putting his huge husky into a tote bag
Image credits: Alex Romano
He’s not the first person to sneak an over-sized commuting canine onto a subway however…
Image credits: emilNYC
Image credits: Michiko Fuller
Image credits: hansyandbrush
Image credits: Clare Toeniskoetter
557Kviews
Share on FacebookExplore more of these tags
We cannot be responsible for what others understand... only for what they read. I say HOORAY for them if they can safely transport their loved animal to where it needs to go. A lot of New Yorkers don't have cars and this IS their only mode of transport. I'm glad to see it works, beats leaving the dog where it isn't safe. :D
Actually a good rule... Lessen the chance of fecal matter and urine being everywhere.
Load More Replies...I live in Bombay and I can easily understand why metro city dwellers do these sort of things. In fact its heartening to see people caring for their loved ones and still managing to follow rules.
If that's the rule, then surely all you need is a container that just has a couple of handles on the back (it's a carrier then) and lets them stick their legs out so they can walk, after all, there's nothing in that quote above that states they have to actually be carried.
Hey Duncan, I like your idea. That would be something to see and support. Kudos for all who are thinking out of the box...Awesome day to you..
Load More Replies...Brilliant. Some people shouldn't be allowed on trains and still they are on trains. This is perfect.
I think the people are ingenious. Also, what about service or emotional support animals. Many of these are a larger breed. I'm an animal lover and don't think it's a reasonable law.
There are exemptions for service animals. I don't know about emotional support animals. You could not ask a blind man to carry his seeing eye dog.
Load More Replies...They are following the rules. I don't mind dogs travelling with me on public transit but don't want legs lifting on the poles or arguments. If they happily ride in a tote bag, I'm all for it. Mine hates being left alone.
There are also homeless dogs in NYC that also know how to take the train. Now they can't even sneak in a ride.
Aaaw. Made me sad. However, it would be hard to fine them, no?
Load More Replies...We cannot be responsible for what others understand... only for what they read. I say HOORAY for them if they can safely transport their loved animal to where it needs to go. A lot of New Yorkers don't have cars and this IS their only mode of transport. I'm glad to see it works, beats leaving the dog where it isn't safe. :D
Actually a good rule... Lessen the chance of fecal matter and urine being everywhere.
Load More Replies...I live in Bombay and I can easily understand why metro city dwellers do these sort of things. In fact its heartening to see people caring for their loved ones and still managing to follow rules.
If that's the rule, then surely all you need is a container that just has a couple of handles on the back (it's a carrier then) and lets them stick their legs out so they can walk, after all, there's nothing in that quote above that states they have to actually be carried.
Hey Duncan, I like your idea. That would be something to see and support. Kudos for all who are thinking out of the box...Awesome day to you..
Load More Replies...Brilliant. Some people shouldn't be allowed on trains and still they are on trains. This is perfect.
I think the people are ingenious. Also, what about service or emotional support animals. Many of these are a larger breed. I'm an animal lover and don't think it's a reasonable law.
There are exemptions for service animals. I don't know about emotional support animals. You could not ask a blind man to carry his seeing eye dog.
Load More Replies...They are following the rules. I don't mind dogs travelling with me on public transit but don't want legs lifting on the poles or arguments. If they happily ride in a tote bag, I'm all for it. Mine hates being left alone.
There are also homeless dogs in NYC that also know how to take the train. Now they can't even sneak in a ride.
Aaaw. Made me sad. However, it would be hard to fine them, no?
Load More Replies...






608
76