Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but that eye can see things very differently depending on where (and when) it is. Buzzfeed’s video staff explored this beauty trends idea by creating a video with live models showing us how the concept of an ideal woman’s figure has changed throughout history.
We all probably have some idea of how women from all of the different historical periods in the video dressed, but the idea that there were different ideal body types may not have occurred to many of us. The uniform white bathing suits that all of the beautiful women in the video are wearing help accentuate the differences between those beauty standards, doing away with other potential historical elements and fashion trends that we might have focused on otherwise like clothing or jewelry.
It all just goes to show that there’s no one right way to interpret feminine beauty and ideas of ideal body. Which historical period do you think “got it right?”
More info: Youtube
Ancient Egypt (c. 1292-1069 B.C.)
– Slender
– Narrow shoulders
– High waist
– Symmetrical face
Ancient Greece (c. 500-300 B.C.)
– Plump
– Full-bodied
– Light skin
– Women were considered “disfigured” versions of men
Han Dynasty (c. 206 B.C.-220 A.D.)
– Slim waist
– Pale skin
– Large eyes
– Small feet
Italian Renaissance (c. 1400-1700)
– Ample bosom
– Rounded stomach
– Full hips
– Fair skin
Victorian England (c. 1837-1901)
– Desirably plump
– Full-figured
– Cinched waist
– Women wore corsets to achieve the ideal body shape
Roaring Twenties (c. 1920s)
– Flat-chested
– Downplayed waist
– Short bob hairstyle
– Boyish figure
Golden Age Of Hollywood (c. 1930s – 1950s)
– Curvy
– Hourglass figure
– Large breasts
– Slim waist
Swinging Sixties (c. 1960s)
– Willowy
– Thin
– Long, slim legs
– Adolescent physique
Supermodel Era (c. 1980s)
– Athletic
– Svelte, but curvy
– Tall
– Toned arms
Heroin Chic (c. 1990s)
– Waifish
– Extremely thin
– Translucent skin
– Androgynous
Postmodern Beauty (c. 2000s-Today)
– Flat stomach
– “Healthy” skinny
– Large breasts and butt
– Thigh gap
– Women regularly get plastic surgery to achieve their desired look
1.3Mviews
Share on FacebookExplore more of these tags
I should have lived during Italian Renaissance era(of course in Italy). ;))
Why is the golden age of Hollywood girl so big? No celebs looked like that in the thirties. Name me one.
You are right. It is a false hood that marilyn was a size 12. She had a 23" waist. Also, a vintage 12 is about a modern 6 to 8. This video has a lot of mistakes, including the white type over a pale background and women in terrible white swimsuits
Load More Replies...Considering my natural body shape with no plastic surgery looks like kim Kardashian I love that I'm finally accepted. Im healthy and curvy.
Load More Replies...Except that picture is not accurate. Site me one starlet during that time that was that size. They were more of a size 8 and tall.
Load More Replies...Marilyn Monroe was NOT a size 14. She was a size 8. By 1960s sizing she was a size 14, a size 8 now. A 14 then is like a 20 now.
Thank you. So many people forget how much sizing has changed over the years.
Load More Replies...Yeah, today. Just put on some rimmed glasses, shave the side of your head, wear plaid, and grow a beard.
Load More Replies...Today's standard is ridiculous: "Large breasts & butt" followed by "thigh gap". Take it from someone who knows, if you have enough fat to have large breasts and a big butt, chances are that you'll have fat thighs to go along with it. A thigh gap will be impossible to attain.
Beauty standards have always been improbable. That's why for most eras women had to wear insanely confining undergarments in order to achieve the "in" look.
Load More Replies...Interesting but not very accurate, to get the effect for Victorian the model has to be in a corset, pulled to a wasp waist.
Elizabeth Taylor - "In 1951 her vital stats were being publicised as Bra Size 36 inches, Waist 21 inches, Hips 36 inches and her weight as "
I should have lived during Italian Renaissance era(of course in Italy). ;))
Why is the golden age of Hollywood girl so big? No celebs looked like that in the thirties. Name me one.
You are right. It is a false hood that marilyn was a size 12. She had a 23" waist. Also, a vintage 12 is about a modern 6 to 8. This video has a lot of mistakes, including the white type over a pale background and women in terrible white swimsuits
Load More Replies...Considering my natural body shape with no plastic surgery looks like kim Kardashian I love that I'm finally accepted. Im healthy and curvy.
Load More Replies...Except that picture is not accurate. Site me one starlet during that time that was that size. They were more of a size 8 and tall.
Load More Replies...Marilyn Monroe was NOT a size 14. She was a size 8. By 1960s sizing she was a size 14, a size 8 now. A 14 then is like a 20 now.
Thank you. So many people forget how much sizing has changed over the years.
Load More Replies...Yeah, today. Just put on some rimmed glasses, shave the side of your head, wear plaid, and grow a beard.
Load More Replies...Today's standard is ridiculous: "Large breasts & butt" followed by "thigh gap". Take it from someone who knows, if you have enough fat to have large breasts and a big butt, chances are that you'll have fat thighs to go along with it. A thigh gap will be impossible to attain.
Beauty standards have always been improbable. That's why for most eras women had to wear insanely confining undergarments in order to achieve the "in" look.
Load More Replies...Interesting but not very accurate, to get the effect for Victorian the model has to be in a corset, pulled to a wasp waist.
Elizabeth Taylor - "In 1951 her vital stats were being publicised as Bra Size 36 inches, Waist 21 inches, Hips 36 inches and her weight as "













101
81