Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
User submission
The Flag And Banner Of The History Of The Earth. The Real History Of The Earth.
198views
Share on Facebook
What do you think ?
mulk 2 years ago
Mass b********y. Pseudo science at its finest: academic dismissals, plagiarism controversies, discredited artifact (rust-free iron pillar in India: Däniken admitted in an interview that the pillar was man-made ). So NO: it's not and never was the "real history of the earth". A funny inspiration for science-fiction and entertainment (i.e.: The Eternals, Marvel)... or funny meme like this: giphy.gif 
Петр Роднин (Post author) 2 years ago (edited)
This is not pseudoscience, but a historical fact that the so-called official science used to hide and keep silent. To a certain extent, official science is pseudoscience, everything is relative. I'm sorry, I'm sorry. So calm down, all this official history that you believe is false, and these artifacts show the true history of the Earth. I absolutely don't care what Daniken once said. My goal is to show artifacts that are related to the true history of the Earth. Nobody makes you believe that. About the fact that you're yelling that this is not a real story, it's debatable. Perhaps this story is much more real than the official story that was invented in the 19th century along with the dates.
Load More Replies... mulk 2 years ago
"Chariots of the Gods, while fascinating, is admittedly a work of fiction that should not be taken at face value. The author, Erich von Däniken, is a convicted criminal who has no academic or professional experience in his professed area of expertise. The book itself contains all of the characteristics of cult archaeology, which can be dangerous to the minds of the public if it is blindly accepted. The importance of the author’s criminal background can be determined by the individual reader; however one thing is certain: every reader should read and accept this novel for what it is-a fictional story. While Erich von Däniken attempts to make his theories plausible, his rhetoric shows that Chariots of the Gods is merely a pseudo-scholar’s use of cult archaeology to make money off of an easily manipulated public", here: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1196&context=aujh
Петр Роднин (Post author) 2 years ago (edited)
History is written by the winners and sometimes the wrong "winners" write to her, and that is why there are continuous inconsistencies and contradictions in the "official" history. If a person has a criminal record, it does not mean that he is wrong in certain topics and areas, maybe on the contrary he is right. No one forces you to read this book, much less believe in it. But, after reading this book, I had a lot of complaints and a question about the official history. The fact is that some so-called official historians also have no experience, they say what they are told, they hide a lot and put forward such versions that they do not stand up to any criticism. You have a choice, either to study history yourself, or to blindly believe in the official history.
Load More Replies... mulk 2 years ago
Mass b********y. Pseudo science at its finest: academic dismissals, plagiarism controversies, discredited artifact (rust-free iron pillar in India: Däniken admitted in an interview that the pillar was man-made ). So NO: it's not and never was the "real history of the earth". A funny inspiration for science-fiction and entertainment (i.e.: The Eternals, Marvel)... or funny meme like this: giphy.gif
Петр Роднин (Post author) 2 years ago (edited)
This is not pseudoscience, but a historical fact that the so-called official science used to hide and keep silent. To a certain extent, official science is pseudoscience, everything is relative. I'm sorry, I'm sorry. So calm down, all this official history that you believe is false, and these artifacts show the true history of the Earth. I absolutely don't care what Daniken once said. My goal is to show artifacts that are related to the true history of the Earth. Nobody makes you believe that. About the fact that you're yelling that this is not a real story, it's debatable. Perhaps this story is much more real than the official story that was invented in the 19th century along with the dates.
Load More Replies... mulk 2 years ago
"Chariots of the Gods, while fascinating, is admittedly a work of fiction that should not be taken at face value. The author, Erich von Däniken, is a convicted criminal who has no academic or professional experience in his professed area of expertise. The book itself contains all of the characteristics of cult archaeology, which can be dangerous to the minds of the public if it is blindly accepted. The importance of the author’s criminal background can be determined by the individual reader; however one thing is certain: every reader should read and accept this novel for what it is-a fictional story. While Erich von Däniken attempts to make his theories plausible, his rhetoric shows that Chariots of the Gods is merely a pseudo-scholar’s use of cult archaeology to make money off of an easily manipulated public", here: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1196&context=aujh
Петр Роднин (Post author) 2 years ago (edited)
History is written by the winners and sometimes the wrong "winners" write to her, and that is why there are continuous inconsistencies and contradictions in the "official" history. If a person has a criminal record, it does not mean that he is wrong in certain topics and areas, maybe on the contrary he is right. No one forces you to read this book, much less believe in it. But, after reading this book, I had a lot of complaints and a question about the official history. The fact is that some so-called official historians also have no experience, they say what they are told, they hide a lot and put forward such versions that they do not stand up to any criticism. You have a choice, either to study history yourself, or to blindly believe in the official history.
Load More Replies... Related on Bored Panda
1
31