30 Interesting Maps That Might Change Your Perspective, As Shared On This Instagram Account

I remember this exact picture too!

same lol

Same :D

By room you class I hope

Her Room??? 🤔🤔🤔🤭

Or billabong ;)

I realized as soon as I saw the "lets you make fun of florida" at the end

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

This comment has been deleted.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

No one likes a short off.

Yes.

Right?? 😭😭😭 For me, it’s my cats!

You are quite right, but what I find most upsetting is that some fisherman are removing the fin and just dropping the still very much alive shark back into the water. It sinks and dies a long and painful death. It's just horrific. All for some third rate soup.

What's the difference between sharks and cows, though? I am not in favor of killing sharks at all but it does bring up an interesting question...why am I ok with killing and eating chicken, pig, and cow but not shark or dog? I just think we need to kill for food only and do it as quickly and humanely possible. But still, what's the difference, you know?

As far as I'm aware it *is* illegal everywhere to kill sharks, except perhaps for some Inuit communities. Illegal shark fishermen (sharkermen?) They lop off the fin and throw the shark back, it's utterly barbaric. China's to blame for a lot of the illegal killing of animals, especially endangered/protected species as they use parts of them in their traditional Chinese "medicine". It's beyond revolting. In fact, China's responsible for a ton of disgusting acts. Bunch o' commies :-(

and there is one solution to that

It's cool but I thought this was maps and graphs?

Neither should the losing party.

Tell that to a Florida court

Elections shouldn't be based on the vote from each district, it should just be "people who voted ____" and "people who voted ____". Here's a map showing how you can win the US election with 22% of votes (Blue states voted 100% for candidate A, red voted 51% for B and 49% for A, so A gets 78% of votes and B gets 22% but candidate B still wins, also the colors don't mean anything) download-1...e8bc43.png

I say redistricting is half the problem in the first place it creates a tie between area and politicians that is only negative and gives an illusion that you voted for someone to represent your small area when they usually have nothing to do with that area but politics or business which will always benefit the richer which is always going to disproportionately section low income high population areas as these areas tend to be closet together but as long as you are still doing districts you have to or you end up with a 1m section and 100k section and have to value thier vote in the state the same.

I agree. I don't think either party should because they'll almost always have bias. It should always be done by a third party

Seams as if someone can change districts w***y nilly to suit their needs.

In democratic systems where you elect a local representative, rather than vote for a party as a whole, the representatives you can vote for are governed by the area that you live in (sometimes called a seat). The area boundaries are perdiodically redrawn, usually to make them contain an even number of voters, but as geographical areas tend to have an allegence to one party or another, by moving the boundaries they can get more votes in their favour. A lot of people are assuming this is a US only thing, but this is exactly how the UK system works as well.

Oh, it’s not. Hasn’t been for a while.