Delusional Conservative Says Families Should Just Eat Plain Pasta, Poverty Activist Destroys Him With Her Answer
According to Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s 2022 UK Poverty report, more than a fifth of its population (22%) are in poverty. That’s 14.5 million people.
Of these, 8.1 million are working-age adults, 4.3 million are children and 2.1 million are pensioners.
Of the working-age adults, the report noted that lone parents are by far the most likely of any family type to be struggling with poverty.
To illustrate the issue, the BBC recently did a piece on one of them, Rebeccah, who works as a nurse in Leicester. In it, the woman explained that she simply cannot afford enough food for her three children and herself, so she sometimes goes without.
Rebeccah said the rising cost of living has pushed her close to breaking point, but she is trying to find ways to cope, including accepting donated groceries from neighbors.
But Kevin Edger, a man from London, who calls himself a conservative and a political enthusiast, thinks Rebeccah and those alike can solve everything with smarter budgeting.
A few days ago, a conservative political enthusiast from London, England, said struggling families should just live smarter
Image credits: KEdge23
When Bored Panda reached out to Edger, he replied that our initial headline for this piece (Delusional Conservative Says Families Should Just Eat Plain Pasta, Poverty Activist Destroys Him With Her Answer) wasn’t the best representation of what he meant. “Never in my tweet did I say people should just eat plain pasta,” he told us.
So we edited it for clarity.
“It was an example of something that is cheap to buy. If you actually read past my first sentence … I said if you shop and cook properly, you can do healthy cheap meals. Therefore, I made clear you would buy other ingredients and cook them to make a full meal.”
But writer Jack Monroe, who is also known for campaigning against poverty, broke down this claim to show how absurd it actually is
Image credits: BootstrapCook
Image credits: BootstrapCook
Image credits: BootstrapCook
Image credits: BootstrapCook
Image credits: BootstrapCook
Image credits: BootstrapCook
Image credits: BootstrapCook
The before-mentioned Joseph Rowntree Foundation report also noted that families with 3 or more children are almost twice as likely to be poor as one- or two-child families (47% compared with 24%).
This means around 1 in 4 children in one- or two-children families are in poverty, compared with almost 1 in 2 children in families like Rebeccah’s, with 3 or more children.
However, when analyzing the big picture, poverty rates vary greatly depending on the age of children in the family—having younger children affects their parents’ ability to work, the hours they can work, and their pay. 36% of children in poverty live in families with a youngest child aged under five, 28% in families with a child aged between five and ten, 26% in families where the youngest child is aged 11 to 15, and 25% in families where the youngest child is 16 to 18 years old.
Monroe finished with strong words
Image credits: BootstrapCook
So far, it’s likely that the poverty rates for larger families will continue to increase. These households have a higher proportion of their incomes made up of benefits (despite increasing employment rates for such families in recent years), so are disproportionately more sensitive to political decisions, such as the past benefits freeze or the recent cut in Universal Credit for workless families.
Such families are also disproportionately affected by the benefits cap. Beyond this, though, looking at the latest data, the report concluded there’s no visible effect of the two-child limit policy which explicitly targets these families. This has withdrawn means-tested support from third and subsequent children born since April 2017. The data also reveals that over half of families containing three or more children have their youngest child born before this date, so are unaffected. As time goes on, more and more families will be affected.
And people couldn’t agree with her more
Image credits: StuartsVoices
Image credits: BootstrapCook
Image credits: RandomKentGuy
Another very concerning thing is that 2.9 million individuals in poverty in the UK have a low or very low food security status, meaning they are unable to access enough, varied, and/or nutritious quality food. So basically, 1 in 5 (20%) individuals living in poverty are eating plain pasta. Or an equivalent of it.
To get a better understanding of this 20%, consider this: only 4% of individuals who are not in poverty have a low or very low food security status, highlighting the strong relationship between food insecurity and poverty.
Image credits: JimMFelton
Image credits: BillyVacant
Image credits: BillboBagginsX
Image credits: RebeccaJJules
Image credits: jsy11997807
Image credits: villa4life4
Image credits: diva_political
The key takeaway from these numbers is that unless people receive sufficient income, they will simply continue to struggle to have access to good quality and quantity of food.
According to Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the Covid-19 pandemic has recently threatened the food security of millions of people even further. “Reduced incomes, increased unemployment and higher food prices have greatly reduced access to food for those affected,” it said. “There are actually key design features of the social security system that directly lead to higher food insecurity and have contributed to the rise in food bank use. Having to wait five weeks for the first Universal Credit (UC) payment, low Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates and LHA caps relative to housing costs, the ‘bedroom tax’, and the structure and process of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessment are all factors.”
Now that the £20 uplift has been withdrawn, many more people will be struggling to buy food for their families, especially if they live in workless households. As the economic fallout following Covid-19 takes time to resolve and people’s resources continue to be eroded by the high cost of living, greater numbers are likely to be food insecure and end up needing to use food banks to survive.
Image credits: 1957AJB
Image credits: GeorgeHotchki14
Image credits: KeatLiz
Image credits: yip_kevin
Image credits: cinzywincy
Image credits: mat8iou
Some even shared their own personal struggles
Image credits: HirwenHera
Image credits: GaryPau72646490
Image credits: Blumblo
Image credits: AlexNorthrop1
The title and text of this article have been changed after Bored Panda received Kevin Edger’s comment on the situation.
Jack Monroe is a badass doing amazing work. People with hot takes about things they've never experienced (like food poverty) should take all the seats and listen to the experts.
It's even worse when you have dietary restrictions due to allergies or autoimmune diseases like Celiac/Coeliac. That cheap pasta is deadly to a lot of the poor
I can imagine, like you could not eat the cheap pastas, cant make your own cheap bread (which tastes awesome when its freshly baked) etc.
Load More Replies...
Feed your kids only pasta. Sure. I lived from 50 a week. Kids got good meals. I ate bread with cheese. I can see he's not a mom.
I have a penis, and still manage to put three meals on the table for my kids. It's not so large that it gets in the way of the stove.
Load More Replies...
Jack Monroe is a badass doing amazing work. People with hot takes about things they've never experienced (like food poverty) should take all the seats and listen to the experts.
It's even worse when you have dietary restrictions due to allergies or autoimmune diseases like Celiac/Coeliac. That cheap pasta is deadly to a lot of the poor
I can imagine, like you could not eat the cheap pastas, cant make your own cheap bread (which tastes awesome when its freshly baked) etc.
Load More Replies... Feed your kids only pasta. Sure. I lived from 50 a week. Kids got good meals. I ate bread with cheese. I can see he's not a mom.
I have a penis, and still manage to put three meals on the table for my kids. It's not so large that it gets in the way of the stove.
Load More Replies...
164
90