50 Women Who Called Out Sexist Things That Are Still Blatantly Accepted (New Pics)

This statement is spot on.

Better to unload the gun than try to block the target.

Nope, didn't make me even the slightest bit uncomfortable. Free vasectomies all around, particularly if mandatory, would solve a lot of issues and hurt no one. But, as long as we're at it, we might as well extend it to women as well. Doing both would drastically reduce the number of babies murdered (both before and after birth) and the number of children abused or abandoned. I also believe the procedure should be free but the reversal should not.

This sort of makes sense. I've never understood why men have such a hard time assuming responsibility when it comes to birth control. No excuses. Using a condom is so simple even a man can do it.

I don't see a problem with this. Spay and neuter your humans, they are a dangerous invasive species!

Upvote, upvote upvote.

Damn I love this

100% behind this

Excellent idea

Illogical. Somehow having sex without any natural consequences has become an assumed right at the expense of everything else, including the basic right of a child which has been conceived to continue to exist.

Um, vasectomies are reversible , but you're still likely to not have a high enough sperm count to conceive naturally. Women's bodies should only be regulated by themselves, but we also shouldn't spout bs like it's facts, just to fit our narrative

One is banning a medical procedure and one is forcing a medical procedure.

I'd be happy, Do it on the national health like any other medical treatment.

Much nicer than my previous ideas... lol

I wish I could upvote this.

I agree with this. It will also save the boy tons of stress, heart break, financially and inevitably his mental well being. It’s definitely better then murdering an unborn child.

no, that would mean an extinction of human kind. Your retirement fund depends on people having children

I've shared and reshared this meme on Fb many many times. You don't have a uterus then shut TFU! These supposed law makers, esp that idiot in Texas, that really don't know squat about reproductive anything spouting a bunch of hooey about all life being precious. Well there is another meme that was released and a religious historian cobbled together a bunch of passages from the Bible that supposedly came from God on high refuting that notion. Made my day because as a gay man I thought I knew allot about the bible as I've had to too defend myself at times when folks were coming for me on line or in real life but never thought there would be any mentioning of abortion in the bible but there are many passages about if the fetus wasn't born of love get rid of it and much more.

I had my snip when I was in my 20's. I knew I wouldn't make a good Dad, and I was very well aware, even back then in the early 90's that overpopulation was destroying the planet. So rather than risk an unwanted pregnancy, and risk my wife's health to contraceptive side-effects, I just got on and did what needed doing. It's not a very dignified procedure, and there was some prolonged discomfort, but not a big deal. I think most men are complete cowards. It should be on record however that not all reversals work. The longer you've been vasectomised, the higher the chance that you will be permanently sterile.

Been saying this for years!

Men in government should not have any say about women's reproductive rights. Guess who crafted the new abortion laws in Texas?

Reversal involves major surgery. Every woman should get an iud which lasts 10 years

It made me uncomfortable and I'm pro choice......just like it makes my uncomfortable to have so called pro-lifers...

This sure would fix the problem!

Birth control. Men have a right to choose what to do with their body just like women. Women talk about getting abortions and it's their body. But you're saying men don't have that choice? Talk about double standards

dis stoopid a vasectomy cost 1k and a receral cost 70000

First of all: a vasectomy is not always reversible. Second: if the issue was controlling women‘s bodies and reproductive rights, then the discussion would be about birth control. The abortion discussion is about protecting the human life of the unborn child people intend to kill. And don’t tell me now that why then not protect that child after it is born also, because I AM in favor of protecting and assisting the child and parents after it is born as well.

Something isn't right with that statement. Why are we suddenly talking about money ?

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

So, your solution to this is a procedure that easily reversed if you are wealthy, but out of reach if you arent 'of means', and easily denied by withholding medical access in areas that are 'less favourable'. Oh, and you'd apply it to all people seeking asylum in USA too. It may surprise you, but you'd probably get a lot of support for this idea from both sides.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

If you don't know different between sperm, egg and fertilized egg/fetus, go back to school. Seriously, no, that is SO wrong. Abortion is NOT anticonception method because it happens after conception. Therefore abortion is not the same as vasectomies (which prevents conception because there is no sperm). Female "version" od vasectomies is tubal ligation. There is no male "version" of abortion because conception and pregnancy only happens in women. You cannot compare that, that's illogical

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Men are only 50% of the source though. What about the women who are financially & emotionally fit to be mothers yet demand they be "mothers" all the same?

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

I'm pro-choice, but a shitty argument is a shitty argument... When you propose and then argument the point all by yourself, it makes all of it seem a bit less valid. If we're now considering the male "the source," then doesn't that mean that he should have control over the decision to abort? If one's argument is that they're protecting the baby from a procedure over which it has no control, wouldn't being against the forced vasectomies go along with their belief? Wouldn't forced sterilization of a male until he is financially fit lead to forced sterilization of mothers, too? What a dumbass argument.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Oh is a child part of your body... not analogous

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

This one doesnt make sense. It's forced sterilization and eugenics...I think thats been tried before, with unfavorable results.

A fetus isn't even a fetus until the end of the 8th week of pregnancy. Until then, it is still an embryo. And "cardiac activity" isn't a heartbeat.