Artists Give The Lion King Live-Action A 'Cartoon' Edit (13 Pics)
Ask a hundred people what their favorite animated Disney movie is, and odds are that a huge chunk of them will answer that it’s The Lion King. I know it’s my personal favorite, ever since I was a small kid. I’ve got such a soft spot for the movie that almost nothing can top it — not even the live-action remake, no matter how good it was. The Lion King remake has divided audiences. Some people believe it’s a masterpiece and it shouldn’t have to look cartoonish, because it’s a live-action movie — it’s supposed to look realistic and different from the original. Others believe the remake is far too realistic and has very little personality when compared to the original.
Artists Ellejart (whose real name is Nikolay Mochkin) and Design By Feo recently drew the most amazing fan art poster of what The Lion King remake would have looked like if the movie’s creators would have made a live-action version that was faithful to the original style. Honestly, the artists’ version looks amazing, and I’d love to see it on the silver screen. Perhaps we need to ask Disney to remake the remake? So scroll down, share with your friends, and upvote your favorite fan edits of the remake.
This post may include affiliate links.
Scar
This is the best one so far. Not too real and not too cartonny... still can tell just by looking at the character's face what he's about.
I agree with you. Even though the first one is more realistic I couldn’t tell it was scar. I love how they kept the rest of the characters so realistic but scar didn’t look like him.
Load More Replies...In the original, they could have at least put a dark mane on Scar and add a more prominent scar on his face.
This was the Scar I wanted, the main problem I had with this movie was that there was so little distinction between the characters.
Bored Panda reached out to Nikolay Mochkin, also known as Ellejart, for an interview: “In my childhood, after watching the classic cartoon The Lion King, I was delighted and immediately began to draw fan art on it on paper with a pencil. And now, when I watched the modern trailer, my first reaction was: “wow! It looks cool, but where are the heroes we were used to from childhood?” I was determined to make fan art with a classic character design, because I can show people what a real film about the Lion King should be. I like all the characters, because they are perfectly accustomed to their roles, and this is a great story. As a result, I am faithful to the classic cartoon.”
Scar
No, if you prefer this, just watch the original.
Load More Replies...I must say that I really like the designs of the new lions. But Scar is just weird. Also, there is lions that have dark manes, why not giving it to him?
Because black mane lions are generally healthier and stronger than normal mane lions. Scar is obviously not. https://knowledgenuts.com/2013/12/28/the-darker-the-mane-the-more-powerful-the-lion/
Load More Replies...I like the color of the fur better, but the human-like eyes just look weird on a realistic lion.
Real Scar look like he need to be rehabilitated and released in a few months.
What they have done to Scar pissed me the most tbh. In the cartoon he was so elegant and sophisticated and sassy in his all evilness. In the movie they took it all away from him.
The lion which is above shows anger, and jealousy, just as Scar did. But the second picture with the color accents defines more evil! I love it!
Mochkin added he has been drawing since childhood. “Maybe I was born with a pencil,” Mochkin jokes. He told Bored Panda that it takes him anywhere from 3 to 11 hours to create a piece of art. However, he says that he still doesn’t “feel like a successful artist — I'm just a person who likes to draw fan art.”
The artist stated that he mostly creates art of what’s popular and ‘hyped’ up, but he also tries to stay true to his own rule of "draw what you love!”
“Now I am working on the character of Miles Morales,” Mochkin revealed to Bored Panda about his upcoming work. He also had some advice for aspiring artists: “Beginning artists are advised not to be afraid of harsh criticism, not to give in to excessive praise, to listen to your heart and strive to be first.”
Rafiki
If you're going to do this, then why even bother watching the live-action version? Just watch the damn cartoon movie.
I mean...why make a "live-action" movie in the first place.....It's just cgi.
Load More Replies...Hahahahahah!!!!! The smile!!!!! I am going to laugh at this for the rest of my life!!!!
The two artists Ellejart and Design By Feo recreated the remake’s movie poster to make Simba, Timon, and Pumbaa look a lot more like their old selves. Now, it might just be the nostalgia talking, but the inseparable trio looks a lot more likable and, ironically enough, way more natural when their appearance is closer to the cartoon version.
Simba
it looks very very cute but I prefer the realistic one. We have already the cartoon why not one thats looks very realistic?
well, i'm still perplexed to why they had to mess with something that was perfectly fine. there are so many stories out there but the entertainment machines recycle and people eat it up. Is imagination gone? (rhetorical question there)
Load More Replies...well all lion king remakes will be horable so at least ill be exited for his art
Ellejart and Design By Feo are both digital artists. Nikolay has more than 75,900 followers on Instagram, and Design By Feo has over 2,700. Both artists have stunning portfolios that are sure to catch your eye. Ellejart has also previously done a few more fan edits of The Lion King remake to show the Internet how much better the remake could have looked.
Simba
my opinion is - they wanted it to make realistic and not like a cartoon and I have to say I like it.
How is it realistic? A babboon holding up a lion cub.... But his eyes being too big and bright is what makes it unrealistic?
Load More Replies...This is weird it’s like they made it realistic only to have it turned into a cartoon again. Is this logical?
Pumbaa And Timon
Oh my god...that is amazing!!! That's how the movie should have looked!
the whole point of the movie was to make it look real. this is just ridiculous. as are most of these.
Disney released the original The Lion King movie in 1994. Development started back in 1988, while production started in 1991. With an initial worldwide gross of $766 million, The Lion King finished its theatrical run as the highest-grossing release of 1994 and the second-highest-grossing film of all time. It is also the highest-grossing traditionally animated film of all time, as well as the best-selling film on home video, having sold over 30 million VHS tapes.
Simba
Simba anxious about his first day of clown school, "did I get my make up right" 😂
Eyes are still a bit to much, though I like the ears on the second pic.
Lions go through a lot in their lives without having exaggerated looks on their faces
You forgot that these are the same lions who bear the concept of 'murder', 'throne', 'coup d e tat' and 'romantic love'
Load More Replies...Fan edit looks like a dog. And what's with the big nose, it looks swollen and not healthy. Hes supposed to have a cute little kitten face!
Nala
I like this style of animation, it would look so good as a movie.
Give the first pic the seconds fur color and you could have had a decent one
I like the original better except I think they shouldn't have made her coat as smooth looking. The anime eyes are too cartoon like and human.
The remake, released in the United States on July 19, 2019, has grossed $543 million worldwide. It received mixed reviews with praise for its visual effects, musical score, and vocal performances, but criticism for the lack of originality and facial emotion on the characters. The Lion King has a rating of 8.5 on IMDb, while the live-action remake has a rating of 7.2.
Simba
Have the first pics ears turned back like worried Simba and it would have been perfect.
Oh look, another Lion King cartoon version superimposed into the live action version. How dull.
OMW Keep it life-like? Because animals can talk? We like the cartoon because of the people-like qualities. The new movies lost the cute people-like expressions which is too bad. A good effort though. I love these artist remakes.
I think the live action remake is so dumb. it’s not live action, it’s cgi, and there’s no expressions
Simba
I've heard the complaint that the new movie is less emotional than the original. I haven't seen it, but I suppose it makes sense - animals don't portray emotion in a way that humans are used to reading. So I suppose by making it this hybrid of real & cartoon, it would have been more real than the original but still been able to get across the emotions of the characters.
Load More Replies...That's how the movie should have looked.... so much better! You can actually recognize the characters now!
How did this go viral lol… He just made it look like the original cartoon version… SMH no originality
If they could have done some mild shading on the first pic mane it would have been epic.
Lion King Promo Poster
Yes, heh looks like a wuss in the second picture.
Load More Replies...I prefer the realistic on most of the photos but especially on the one
the first one is way more powerful. i don't understand the point of this whole experiment
The Scar revision of the "live-action" ( because I don't think they used real animals) is definitely the best one. Not these guys.
Lightly shade the first posters colors and it would have been perfect.
The first one, look at Lady and the tramp, that movie sucked because they failed on making the realistic animaks talk good and seeing this movie you'll start to appreciate how hard it is to make realistic animals look good when talking. Lady and the tramp missed that big time.
If I wanted to watch the damn cartoon version, I would. These "artists" are stupid and full of themselves.
Lion King Promo Poster
Because lions tract their claws in when not in need and the original cartoon version also hides this.
Load More Replies...Cartoony happy expression does NOT go with the gravity of the moment depicted. Fail.
Neither was looking at the paw print. Have the first pic look at the pawprint and it would be fine.
This person went for the Disney look with our understanding expression.
Tell the artist to go back to the drawing board and come up with something actually original. Stop trying to fix what doesn't need fixing.
Simba
There is more emotion in that image for sure- but he also looks f*ing crazy. Like he got waaayyy too high and is suddenly afraid of his closet.
EMOTION! Why is this not getting MORE thumbs up? People shouldn't prefer the vacant eyes of the lion but the true teary-eyed lion.
The object of the movie was to present a more realistic portrayal of the physicality of the animals. It was not to continue with the cartoonish look. Perhaps you should view pictures of real lions and other animals to more readily understand this.
Load More Replies...The cartooning is meant to give emotional depth to a subject that doesn’t normally project it. With that said, if that was what you wanted to see, then they should have pushed for a standard cartoon CGI film. This movie is what it would actually look like. Personally I Dig The Original Cartoon Better! It isn’t to say that I don’t believe the new crew didn’t do a spectacular job in doing just what they set out to do; I believe it looks amazing! It is just that it is a remake, period. Most movies don’t need a remake. There was nothing to socially update. Tom Sawyer;...? That is another can of worms...!!
everything fan did just make them more cartoon :) why we need it? when we have a full movie cartoon already ? sr if i wrong somewhere my language not good very much
Apparently, this person has never seen any of these animals in real life. Also, the object of the film was to be a bit more realistic and not so cartoonish.
So they take a cartoon and make it real, and you take the real and make it a cartoon and it’s “ art” Does Mathew Broderick voice the roars?
Yes, they are well done but I definitely am excited to see the movie (I’m behind on my movies okay! Marvel has taken a lot out of me so I haven’t been to see much else)
Load More Replies...Maybe it means "live-action looking" as compared to a cartoon. But yeah, I agree. Live means live.
Load More Replies...Well, i missed the expressions on the animals faces. The voice-acting was solid, but never really got to me because of the 'stale' animal faces. I didn't want to see 3D models of the originals as seen in this post (because this would make remaking the Lion King even less sense). But i would have liked an artstyle that was different but also used more expressions.
Not trying to bring you down, but maybe it's got something to do with empathy for animals? I'm sincerely interested. Do you love cats, dogs? Are you generally an animal lover? How about babies? I wonder what zoo keepers say about the new version? (not this well-crafted, but silly, cartoonized version)
Load More Replies...Any way you slice it this is more free advertising for Disney...............Thanks Bored Panda!!!!!
TLK is my favourite Disney movie of all time and I have zero interest in any kind of "live-action" remake. A huge part of the movie's charm are the character design, the bright colours and fantastic backgrounds paired with amazing musical numbers. A realistic version just can't match that. What these re-imaginings of the realistic TLK do show is how little effort was put into making the characters actually emote. Animals are very expressive and it should be easy to convey the emotions of CGI ones. But in all the footage I have seen of the remake the animals look absolutely blank, emotionless and that's just boring. I have no idea what the appeal of this movie is for moviegoers. I can't see even a blink of the original's charm in this cash-grab.
I think it's better to consider them different movies. I loved the original Lion King, but I do really want to see the remake. To me, though they tell the same story, they aren't the same movie. I love the realism aspect, it brings a different sense of emotion to the characters. It's more... gritty, I suppose. I can still see their emotion, it's just displayed more realistically, with more subtlety. The same with the Jungle Book. The story feels different, but it's not bad, as long as you don't conflate the two. I'm also a fan of movie Aslan though, so I may be a little biased.
Load More Replies...Doesn't work for me very well, to be honest. The realistic approach of fur, lightning, environment and all the other stuff just don't fit with the comic look (in my eyes). The edited eyes, mouth and expressions just don't appeal to me. It's almost like an uncanny valley effect. Good job, no question, but just not my cup of tea.
Yes, they are well done but I definitely am excited to see the movie (I’m behind on my movies okay! Marvel has taken a lot out of me so I haven’t been to see much else)
Load More Replies...Maybe it means "live-action looking" as compared to a cartoon. But yeah, I agree. Live means live.
Load More Replies...Well, i missed the expressions on the animals faces. The voice-acting was solid, but never really got to me because of the 'stale' animal faces. I didn't want to see 3D models of the originals as seen in this post (because this would make remaking the Lion King even less sense). But i would have liked an artstyle that was different but also used more expressions.
Not trying to bring you down, but maybe it's got something to do with empathy for animals? I'm sincerely interested. Do you love cats, dogs? Are you generally an animal lover? How about babies? I wonder what zoo keepers say about the new version? (not this well-crafted, but silly, cartoonized version)
Load More Replies...Any way you slice it this is more free advertising for Disney...............Thanks Bored Panda!!!!!
TLK is my favourite Disney movie of all time and I have zero interest in any kind of "live-action" remake. A huge part of the movie's charm are the character design, the bright colours and fantastic backgrounds paired with amazing musical numbers. A realistic version just can't match that. What these re-imaginings of the realistic TLK do show is how little effort was put into making the characters actually emote. Animals are very expressive and it should be easy to convey the emotions of CGI ones. But in all the footage I have seen of the remake the animals look absolutely blank, emotionless and that's just boring. I have no idea what the appeal of this movie is for moviegoers. I can't see even a blink of the original's charm in this cash-grab.
I think it's better to consider them different movies. I loved the original Lion King, but I do really want to see the remake. To me, though they tell the same story, they aren't the same movie. I love the realism aspect, it brings a different sense of emotion to the characters. It's more... gritty, I suppose. I can still see their emotion, it's just displayed more realistically, with more subtlety. The same with the Jungle Book. The story feels different, but it's not bad, as long as you don't conflate the two. I'm also a fan of movie Aslan though, so I may be a little biased.
Load More Replies...Doesn't work for me very well, to be honest. The realistic approach of fur, lightning, environment and all the other stuff just don't fit with the comic look (in my eyes). The edited eyes, mouth and expressions just don't appeal to me. It's almost like an uncanny valley effect. Good job, no question, but just not my cup of tea.
