Art history has never been so easy! Reddit user DontTacoBoutIt (now a dead account) posted a series of famous paintings and gave short but hilariously accurate explanations on how to recognize their authors. According to him, Da Vinci’s works can be recognized by the bluish mist and locations reminiscent of Lord of The Rings movies, while Rubens’paintings can be identified by the figures’ large behinds. [Read more...]
If everyone in the paintings has enormous asses, then it’s Rubens.
If all the men look like cow-eyed curly-haired women, it’s Caravaggio.
If everybody has some sort of body malfunction, then it’s Picasso.
If it’s something you saw on your acid trip last night, it’s Dali.
If the images have a dark background and everyone has tortured expressions on their faces, it’s Titian.
If the paintings have tons of little people in them but otherwise seem normal, it’s Bruegel.
If everyone – including the women – looks like Putin, then it’s van Eyck.
If the paintings have lots of little people in them but also have a ton of crazy bullshit, it’s Bosch.
If everyone looks like hobos illuminated only by a dim streetlamp, it’s Rembrandt.
If the painting could easily have a few chubby Cupids or sheep added (or already has them), it’s Boucher.
If everyone is beautiful, naked, and stacked, it’s Michelangelo.
If you see a ballerina, it’s Degas.
If everything is highly-contrasted and sharp, sort of bluish, and everyone has gaunt bearded faces, it’s El Greco.
If every painting is the face of a uni-browed woman, it’s Frida.
Dappled light but no figures, it’s Monet.
Dappled light and happy party-time people, it’s Renoir.
Dappled light and unhappy party-time people, then it’s Manet.
Lord of the Rings landscapes with weird blue mist and the same wavy-haired aristocratic-nose Madonna, it’s Da Vinci.
Excel sheet with coloured squares, it’s Mondrian.
336K viewsShare on Facebook
Click to get our top posts
Also on Bored Panda
Like what you're reading?
Subscribe to our top stories.