Can You Spot The Difference? Chicago Tribune VS. Sun-Times Covers After The Cubs’ World Series Win
After a long 108 years, the Chicago Cubs finally won the World Series on Wednesday! But that’s not the only thing that got people talking lately… What has shocked a lot of people is the difference between the cover photos published by two huge Chicago newspapers – the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Sun-Times.
Back in 2013, the Chicago Sun-Times dumped its entire staff of full-time photographers to work with freelancers instead. The Chicago Tribune, on the other hand, still has its own staff of photographers. Feasibly, these different views on photography may be the reason why the cover photos of these two newspapers are so shockingly different. People are going to Twitter to discuss the differences. See for yourselves below!
(h/t: petapixel)
Chicago Sun-Times fired ALL their photographers and the image below is worth more than 1000 words
Take a closer look at Chicago Tribune’s front page by their staff photographer Brian Cassella
And now see Chicago Sun-Times (who fired ALL their photographers) front page by an uncredited person
Notice the difference?
3Kviews
Share on Facebook
well the Chicago tribune shot may be more dynamic , but the color is s**t
That may be due whoever re-photographed the printed paper. The image is on their site http://store.chicagotribune.com/history-made-the-cubs-historic-2016-season.html
Load More Replies...
well the Chicago tribune shot may be more dynamic , but the color is s**t
That may be due whoever re-photographed the printed paper. The image is on their site http://store.chicagotribune.com/history-made-the-cubs-historic-2016-season.html
Load More Replies...
16
7