Here’s How Small Changes In Women’s Fashion From 1784 To 1970 Ended Up Creating A Big Difference
Back in the days before the camera was king, fashion trends were portrayed to the masses through artfully illustrated drawings. Somebody has collected a series of these beautiful sketches, documenting the changes in western women’s fashion all the way from 1784 to 1970, when the artform finally became obsolete.
The history timeline presents the trendy clothes from each and every year, reflecting the social-economic conditions of what was sure to be the higher classes of society. Beginning with elaborate, puffy dresses with a hoop in the bottom to completely hide the legs, we slowly make our way through the 19th century where things had slimmed down considerably, before billowing out again, even bigger than before. The hat was a staple of vintage fashion all the way up to the 1950s, where it gave way to shorter skirts and finally, pants.
While the art of fashion illustration has fallen out of the mainstream, there are some dedicated specialists that keep it alive. Scroll down to see the illustrated vintage dresses for yourself, and let us know what you think in the comments!
(h/t: My Modern Met)
I'm sure women in the 1700s were happy they didn't have to be all trussed up, complete with neck ruffs, like their great-grandmothers in the 1640s. I've seen some of those videos on what went into getting dressed in those days, and crinoline came in the mid 1800s. The 1700s gowns were of two or three pieces. Underneath the skirt was stuffed hip pads/rolls tied on at the waist, then a tie on overskirt for the layered effect, and a jacket went on top of the corset that was buttoned on. Under all this was a long linen chemise, and silk stockings tied at the knees with a bit of ribbon. No bras, no knickers. Overall, much lighter-weight outfits than we'd imagine from watching movies. The Victorians were the disaster, what with massive steel hoops and whalebone-ribbed corsets AND crinolines covered with horsehair, AND then combined with huge bustles in the 1870s and 80s AND so. much. fabric! How did all the women not catch on fire? Give me Regency dresses any day. So comfy-looking!
Have you ever been laced into a real, serious corset? I've tried it. Those ladies were a LONG way from comfortable, and those dresses weighed a ton. Not to mention the smell. Some of those ladies went literally years without bathing...and bragged about it. Apparently even Queen Victoria had body odour that could knock down a horse!
Load More Replies...It's interesting how there was a brief period of comfortable clothing between about 1795 and 1818, and then just shy of 100 years of torture, before coming back to being comfortable again.
Notice how the 20th century brought shorter skirts into fashion? I imagine the first generation of knee-lenght skirts was a shocking phenomenon.
The world wars had a great influence in fashion (so I've read). Shortages and rationing of fabric - skirts got shorter and silhouettes were more streamlined. Clothing also needed less froufrou bits so that they didn't get in the way of women working. Military uniforms were also an influence. Trousers started being worn more (think women in mines wore them before that though I don't know any dates). I thought bras were around earlier - started to be mass produced around 1913/14?? Not that it means they were commonly worn of course.
Load More Replies...1795 thru about 1818 have always impressed me as comfy clothjng... no cinched waists
They were cinched underneath. The bra hadn't been invented yet so the "superstructure" of cleavage had to be created with a tight corset.
Load More Replies...These drawings are taken from various magazines of the day, but from about 1930 on, they are ALL taken from copyrighted Vogue pattern envelopes. Here's hoping Vogue doesn't pay attention to this or the OP will be in some doo doo.
Thank you Aunt Messy. I had a feeling the style reminded me of something. That's it!
Load More Replies...Mostly for casual wear though. My mom (who just passed at 80) said women were not allowed to wear pants to the office until the 1970s.
Load More Replies...Womenwore pants in the 60s too. I’m confused as to why they didn’t include this.
Load More Replies...Only up until WWI. After that, the fabrics might have been more practical, and some of the designs shown here were "Sunday best" or special event wear. But I have many photos of my great-grandmothers, grandmothers, and mother all dressed in similar 20th century styles. (My mother just passed at 80 years of age.) Both my grandfathers were carpenters and all the women worked outside the home as well. Most women sewed, so they could actually wear many styles fashionable garments.
Load More Replies...I just noticed - the early (maybe even almost all) decades here were just for rich white western women. Edit: I just read the introduction which basically says the same thing
They were fashion plates. Of COURSE they were aimed at rich women. Who else could afford them? You think it's different now?
Load More Replies...Well this would be great to see in changes of hairstyles. I love this article.
Ugh so many corsets. That's a trend that I am very happy I missed. And good lord, in the summer these women had to have suffered. So. Many. Layers. I'm quite happy in my cut-offs and t-shirt, thank you very much.
Well, looks like my body type has not been in fashion since 1794. Thank you Bored Panda, I feel much better now knowing that at least one point in time thought I was beautiful.
I bet women everywhere were over the moon when they could finally wear pants.
No one picture could possibly do that..we have CHOICE
Load More Replies...That moment when big ball gowns randomly came back in fashion in the early 1800s only to suddenly disappear in the 1870s.
There was an economic downturn about then. People couldn't afford the big dresses - and don't forget Civil War. If you thought rationing was an issue in the 20th century, it was nothing compared to that. It took years for the economy to recover.
Load More Replies...As a man: 1850, 1878, 1915, 1953, 1965. But also as a man I can't even imagine who did they wanted to appeal with most of these clothes.
Well, hopefully I was'nt born before 1970's because pant's are my life! (and existed, even for women, long before 1970)
Yes, they existed long before 70's but it took time to all woman could wear them. I've never seen my grandmother wearing pants and she died in the 90's. I also remember when it was very rare to see a medium aged woman in trousers, more and old one. At first they were all tourists coming from Sweden or Germany.
Load More Replies...Just loved reading the comments. Worthy of a book. @Aunt Messy I absolutely adore reading YOUR comments ! Such interesting facts and it seems you're living a very fascinating life. Bonus
I bet a lady from back in the 1700's or so would be absolutely scandalized by what we wear today! Picture one from back there coming face to face in a lady from today who is wearing a bikini!! *L*
I'm so glad I grew up in the 60's (1960's, lol). I think that era more than anything ed to the freedom of fashion that we have now to wear anything we want. Clothing was still pretty structured up till then, the 1950's were pretty bad with girdles and stockings and hose. At least now women aren't looked at funny for not wearing dresses, bras, and hosiery every time they go out the door. I love my jeans and they are comfy, thank you! And t shirts are da bomb!!
It's funny to see the similarities between the same periods in differ ages. Fin de siecle: minimalist and comfortable. 1815 and 1915: slightly androgynous. 1840 and 1940: stylish, classy and everything is in proportion. 1850 and 1950: wide, extravagant skirts. 1870/1970: crazy styles.
Actually looks like it just sort of cycles, with some significant differences in length, obviously, but in general it goes from skinny figure to fuller figure and back again. Nowadays of course our bustles are injected in the doctor's office from fat sectioned off elsewhere........
Shared this article with my mom who loves reading historical novels. That'd help her get a better impression of those times. I'm not much into fashion, but appreciate the historical perspective of these gowns a lot. Personally, I like the look of the 1960s the most, even though in real life I wear jeans 99% of time :D
That is funny ! Most of theses clothes are only affordable by (very) rich people, hardly representative of women or just a very few.
How is it different today ? Can you afford any dress from a Grand Couturier ? ;) And still, it does say if a trend and, sometime, even bring it to everyone. Remember Chanel ? Without Coco you will not really wear affordable tailleur.
Load More Replies...WOW SUCH A BEAUTIFUL OLD CLOTHS COLLACTIONS THANK YOU FOR THIS INFO AND I HOPE YOU WILL SHARE THIS EVASSUNDAY FASHION CLOTHS SITE . https://www.evassunday.com.au/
wow such a GOLDEN TIME dresses thank you for this amazing old fashion collections and i hope you will enjoy and buy good fashion product from here . https://www.evassunday.com.au/
I like the 50s, pin-up too. Most the time my look is classic 50s, hair style as well but with blue or purple hair. Haha.
Wow amazing post. I like it. It's very useful for me. Thanks to sharing this post............ https://www.jigno.com/women/ethnic-wears/sarees.html
I love 1787, because of this morality with fashion. this time was not hip hop ensure but its respect. I love old generation.https://spreeglee.dk/
This is really informative post. Every outfit is worth it. I have never seen such class in any other outfit collection. I saw some more at USA Leather Jackets
A fascinating look at how fashions change from year to year. The theory is that fashions go through a cycle and return after a certain period of years. Imagine the yards of fabric invested in some of these dresses compared to the miniscule amount of fabric required for mini-dresses and mini-skirts.
They didn't include the 1770s which is my favorite. I love the 1850s and 1960s as well though.
It's so funny how the dresses started off so big and flouncy then slimmed down to a slip dress and then just poofed out again in 1822. As well as how the length changes from not seeing the feet to almost seeing her bum if she dent down in 1969!
That's an evening look. It was all about glitz, glitter, sequins, and rhinestones. The shinier the better. It was incredibly extravagant. If you want a parallel, look at the nasty glitter fabrics in the '80s. Same economic conditions.
Load More Replies...I love the multi coloured dress from 1967. I had one just like it, I was 15 at the time!
Personally I really like Victorian Century's fashon, specially from 60 to 80 decades
You could probably map this to the social culture that existed around women each year. For example, I bet the change from empire line dresses to bell shaped skirts in around 1820 mirrored a corresponding social emphasis on women being domestic, fertile, docile mothers as men started colonising the new world in earnest.
Plus... several mistresses of the French nobility popularized Empire waists because they wanted to go out in public when they were pregnant. It was a status symbol to have babies that weren't your husband's. It was VERY unfashionable to actually live with one's husband.
Load More Replies...I liked the maxi dresses they wore around the beginning of the 19th century. What's old is new!
In 1966? That dress could just as easily be worn today.
Load More Replies...Would it make you happy to dress that way? Tell ya what. Try navigating a day in stilletto heels, then get back to us.
Load More Replies...I'm sure women in the 1700s were happy they didn't have to be all trussed up, complete with neck ruffs, like their great-grandmothers in the 1640s. I've seen some of those videos on what went into getting dressed in those days, and crinoline came in the mid 1800s. The 1700s gowns were of two or three pieces. Underneath the skirt was stuffed hip pads/rolls tied on at the waist, then a tie on overskirt for the layered effect, and a jacket went on top of the corset that was buttoned on. Under all this was a long linen chemise, and silk stockings tied at the knees with a bit of ribbon. No bras, no knickers. Overall, much lighter-weight outfits than we'd imagine from watching movies. The Victorians were the disaster, what with massive steel hoops and whalebone-ribbed corsets AND crinolines covered with horsehair, AND then combined with huge bustles in the 1870s and 80s AND so. much. fabric! How did all the women not catch on fire? Give me Regency dresses any day. So comfy-looking!
Have you ever been laced into a real, serious corset? I've tried it. Those ladies were a LONG way from comfortable, and those dresses weighed a ton. Not to mention the smell. Some of those ladies went literally years without bathing...and bragged about it. Apparently even Queen Victoria had body odour that could knock down a horse!
Load More Replies...It's interesting how there was a brief period of comfortable clothing between about 1795 and 1818, and then just shy of 100 years of torture, before coming back to being comfortable again.
Notice how the 20th century brought shorter skirts into fashion? I imagine the first generation of knee-lenght skirts was a shocking phenomenon.
The world wars had a great influence in fashion (so I've read). Shortages and rationing of fabric - skirts got shorter and silhouettes were more streamlined. Clothing also needed less froufrou bits so that they didn't get in the way of women working. Military uniforms were also an influence. Trousers started being worn more (think women in mines wore them before that though I don't know any dates). I thought bras were around earlier - started to be mass produced around 1913/14?? Not that it means they were commonly worn of course.
Load More Replies...1795 thru about 1818 have always impressed me as comfy clothjng... no cinched waists
They were cinched underneath. The bra hadn't been invented yet so the "superstructure" of cleavage had to be created with a tight corset.
Load More Replies...These drawings are taken from various magazines of the day, but from about 1930 on, they are ALL taken from copyrighted Vogue pattern envelopes. Here's hoping Vogue doesn't pay attention to this or the OP will be in some doo doo.
Thank you Aunt Messy. I had a feeling the style reminded me of something. That's it!
Load More Replies...Mostly for casual wear though. My mom (who just passed at 80) said women were not allowed to wear pants to the office until the 1970s.
Load More Replies...Womenwore pants in the 60s too. I’m confused as to why they didn’t include this.
Load More Replies...Only up until WWI. After that, the fabrics might have been more practical, and some of the designs shown here were "Sunday best" or special event wear. But I have many photos of my great-grandmothers, grandmothers, and mother all dressed in similar 20th century styles. (My mother just passed at 80 years of age.) Both my grandfathers were carpenters and all the women worked outside the home as well. Most women sewed, so they could actually wear many styles fashionable garments.
Load More Replies...I just noticed - the early (maybe even almost all) decades here were just for rich white western women. Edit: I just read the introduction which basically says the same thing
They were fashion plates. Of COURSE they were aimed at rich women. Who else could afford them? You think it's different now?
Load More Replies...Well this would be great to see in changes of hairstyles. I love this article.
Ugh so many corsets. That's a trend that I am very happy I missed. And good lord, in the summer these women had to have suffered. So. Many. Layers. I'm quite happy in my cut-offs and t-shirt, thank you very much.
Well, looks like my body type has not been in fashion since 1794. Thank you Bored Panda, I feel much better now knowing that at least one point in time thought I was beautiful.
I bet women everywhere were over the moon when they could finally wear pants.
No one picture could possibly do that..we have CHOICE
Load More Replies...That moment when big ball gowns randomly came back in fashion in the early 1800s only to suddenly disappear in the 1870s.
There was an economic downturn about then. People couldn't afford the big dresses - and don't forget Civil War. If you thought rationing was an issue in the 20th century, it was nothing compared to that. It took years for the economy to recover.
Load More Replies...As a man: 1850, 1878, 1915, 1953, 1965. But also as a man I can't even imagine who did they wanted to appeal with most of these clothes.
Well, hopefully I was'nt born before 1970's because pant's are my life! (and existed, even for women, long before 1970)
Yes, they existed long before 70's but it took time to all woman could wear them. I've never seen my grandmother wearing pants and she died in the 90's. I also remember when it was very rare to see a medium aged woman in trousers, more and old one. At first they were all tourists coming from Sweden or Germany.
Load More Replies...Just loved reading the comments. Worthy of a book. @Aunt Messy I absolutely adore reading YOUR comments ! Such interesting facts and it seems you're living a very fascinating life. Bonus
I bet a lady from back in the 1700's or so would be absolutely scandalized by what we wear today! Picture one from back there coming face to face in a lady from today who is wearing a bikini!! *L*
I'm so glad I grew up in the 60's (1960's, lol). I think that era more than anything ed to the freedom of fashion that we have now to wear anything we want. Clothing was still pretty structured up till then, the 1950's were pretty bad with girdles and stockings and hose. At least now women aren't looked at funny for not wearing dresses, bras, and hosiery every time they go out the door. I love my jeans and they are comfy, thank you! And t shirts are da bomb!!
It's funny to see the similarities between the same periods in differ ages. Fin de siecle: minimalist and comfortable. 1815 and 1915: slightly androgynous. 1840 and 1940: stylish, classy and everything is in proportion. 1850 and 1950: wide, extravagant skirts. 1870/1970: crazy styles.
Actually looks like it just sort of cycles, with some significant differences in length, obviously, but in general it goes from skinny figure to fuller figure and back again. Nowadays of course our bustles are injected in the doctor's office from fat sectioned off elsewhere........
Shared this article with my mom who loves reading historical novels. That'd help her get a better impression of those times. I'm not much into fashion, but appreciate the historical perspective of these gowns a lot. Personally, I like the look of the 1960s the most, even though in real life I wear jeans 99% of time :D
That is funny ! Most of theses clothes are only affordable by (very) rich people, hardly representative of women or just a very few.
How is it different today ? Can you afford any dress from a Grand Couturier ? ;) And still, it does say if a trend and, sometime, even bring it to everyone. Remember Chanel ? Without Coco you will not really wear affordable tailleur.
Load More Replies...WOW SUCH A BEAUTIFUL OLD CLOTHS COLLACTIONS THANK YOU FOR THIS INFO AND I HOPE YOU WILL SHARE THIS EVASSUNDAY FASHION CLOTHS SITE . https://www.evassunday.com.au/
wow such a GOLDEN TIME dresses thank you for this amazing old fashion collections and i hope you will enjoy and buy good fashion product from here . https://www.evassunday.com.au/
I like the 50s, pin-up too. Most the time my look is classic 50s, hair style as well but with blue or purple hair. Haha.
Wow amazing post. I like it. It's very useful for me. Thanks to sharing this post............ https://www.jigno.com/women/ethnic-wears/sarees.html
I love 1787, because of this morality with fashion. this time was not hip hop ensure but its respect. I love old generation.https://spreeglee.dk/
This is really informative post. Every outfit is worth it. I have never seen such class in any other outfit collection. I saw some more at USA Leather Jackets
A fascinating look at how fashions change from year to year. The theory is that fashions go through a cycle and return after a certain period of years. Imagine the yards of fabric invested in some of these dresses compared to the miniscule amount of fabric required for mini-dresses and mini-skirts.
They didn't include the 1770s which is my favorite. I love the 1850s and 1960s as well though.
It's so funny how the dresses started off so big and flouncy then slimmed down to a slip dress and then just poofed out again in 1822. As well as how the length changes from not seeing the feet to almost seeing her bum if she dent down in 1969!
That's an evening look. It was all about glitz, glitter, sequins, and rhinestones. The shinier the better. It was incredibly extravagant. If you want a parallel, look at the nasty glitter fabrics in the '80s. Same economic conditions.
Load More Replies...I love the multi coloured dress from 1967. I had one just like it, I was 15 at the time!
Personally I really like Victorian Century's fashon, specially from 60 to 80 decades
You could probably map this to the social culture that existed around women each year. For example, I bet the change from empire line dresses to bell shaped skirts in around 1820 mirrored a corresponding social emphasis on women being domestic, fertile, docile mothers as men started colonising the new world in earnest.
Plus... several mistresses of the French nobility popularized Empire waists because they wanted to go out in public when they were pregnant. It was a status symbol to have babies that weren't your husband's. It was VERY unfashionable to actually live with one's husband.
Load More Replies...I liked the maxi dresses they wore around the beginning of the 19th century. What's old is new!
In 1966? That dress could just as easily be worn today.
Load More Replies...Would it make you happy to dress that way? Tell ya what. Try navigating a day in stilletto heels, then get back to us.
Load More Replies...
589
171