ADVERTISEMENT

With people being constantly busy, things changing every day, and various events happening all the time, time flies super fast. So sometimes it might seem that some of the things that we just witnessed or experienced happened a long time ago. And it turns out that the same logic can be applied to some of the greatest inventions and concepts that we know today.

This TikTok account called @idea.soup decided to share some of the things that only were discovered recently even though we might think that they are quite old and have been here for ages. 

Idea Soup is where people can find interesting educational content on various topics. Its creator Michael R McBride is the one who makes and shares this content with people on various social media platforms. 

More Info: TikTok

Image source: idea.soup

#1

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

We didn’t know how mountains formed until 1966. And not just mountains, earthquakes and volcanoes too. Like we were putting men into space and yet every time there was an earthquake, we were just like “What the hell is going on?”

TheMuuj Report

Bored Panda contacted the creator of Idea Soup Michael McBride to find out more about the project and his love for science. McBride shared that the idea to create videos about some of the things that were discovered only recently was born out of curiosity and interest in science. “I'm fascinated by how science is not an institution, but rather an organic, ever-evolving body of knowledge. The fact that we discovered these things recently is evidence that science is working! The beauty of the field is that it is constantly questioning itself”, shared the creator.

#2

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

Most women in America couldn’t open a credit card until 1974. But if you think that’s bad, women didn’t get the right to vote in Switzerland until 1991.
 
Women in Switzerland fought for their right to vote for decades. The first time it was seriously considered was in 1959 when a referendum was held to conclude the matter and the voters, who were only men at the time, decided against giving the right of vote to women by 654,939 votes (66.9%) to 323,727 (33%).
 
Women continued their protests and after another referendum women got the right to vote in 1971 and Switzerland became one of the last countries in Europe to recognize women as equal members to men in the political sphere.
 
However, Switzerland consists of 26 cantons and the last canton to give the right to vote was that of Appenzell Innerrhoden and it happened in 1991. This fact means that the whole country of Switzerland provided women with the right to vote only in that year.

Håkan Dahlström Report

Add photo comments
POST
tobiasulrich_1 avatar
T.
Community Member
2 years ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Thats not fully correct: It was only the state of Appenzell Innerrhoden that didn't allow women to vote until 1991. The canton was then overruled by the constitutional court after women filed a lawsuit. But we still were freaking late to the party by only introducing it in 1971 - It even had to pass a peoples (men's) voting.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
#3

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

It took us until 2002 to confirm what was at the center of the Milky Way. We are rotating around a supermassive black hole, but we didn’t know that until after Britney Spears had released her first album.

John Fowler Report

#4

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

We didn’t (fully) sequence the human genome until four months ago. We had not mapped one human’s full DNA until May 2021. The Human Genome Project which completed in 2003? Yeah, they were missing 15% of DNA base pairs. Very bold of them to call that complete. That’s like a frat guy in a group project’s version of complete.

Petra B. Fritz Report

Add photo comments
POST
valentinokitchen avatar
Chef Latte
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Well i mean DNA is insanely complex, so although it is the 2020’s, I’m glad we got this now rather than later

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

If you’re curious to know the process of making these videos, McBride revealed that it might take from 15 minutes to 10 hours depending on the research that has to be done and the time used for editing. He also added a simple yet effective take on how he creates videos: “I don't really have any process for finding facts—I'm just an incredibly curious person and I love learning. As I come across things, I share them.”

#5

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

The Heimlich maneuver wasn’t invented until 1974. I mean, this was so recent that Dr. Heimlich was alive until 2016. He could have played Minecraft.

ocean yamaha Report

Add photo comments
POST
betakrankusov avatar
snipergun
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

He also used first time his own maneuver only when he was 96 in practice, when he saved female resident in retirement home where he was.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
#6

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

America’s first seatbelt laws were only in 1984 and New Hampshire still doesn’t even have them.

Mechanic Base Report

#7

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

Smoking wasn’t banned on all US flights until the year 2000 and pilots were actually exempt. They can still legally smoke on airplanes today.

Amaury Laporte Report

#8

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

We didn’t know why the ocean was salty until 1979. We were just like: “Yup, whole planet’s covered in this stuff. No idea where it comes from.”

Chris Dodds Report

ADVERTISEMENT

McBride also revealed what is one recently discovered thing that shocked him the most: “The theory of tectonic plates—it blows my mind that we weren't sure how mountains formed or earthquakes occurred until the '60s!”

Which one of these recent discoveries do you find most shocking? Leave your thoughts in the comments down below!

#9

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

We didn’t know that a meteor killed the dinosaurs until 1991. That’s the same year that Home Alone came out.

Sadie Hart Report

Add photo comments
POST
liddlecatpaws avatar
Jo Johannsen
Community Member
2 years ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Technically, since no humans witnessed it, no dinosaurs left autobiographical records of their own, and the aliens refuse to share their footage, we still don't KNOW.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#10

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

We didn’t have wheeled luggage until 1970. Which means that astronauts that went to the moon had to carry their own suitcases.

Elizabeth Masek Report

#11

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

We didn’t know that babies could feel pain until 1987. When Back to the Future came out, we were not using anesthesia on babies.

Tamaki Sono Report

Add photo comments
POST
laurelleddy avatar
Laurel Eddy
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

we knew. babies cry when they're hurt. apparently we didn't care

wianjama avatar
Rissie
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Well by your standards babies were not feeling pain because they did use muscle relaxants. No crying there. No, but seriously, dosing and monitoring is hard and was harder then and kept the myth alive that babies wouldn't feel or remember or have any measurable effects of the stress. Just like today. We do a lot of things that cause unnecessary stress while performing medical procedures. Huck the whole US health system is one big stress inducing system. People don't seek help because they will become bankrupt.

Load More Replies...
davenyc88 avatar
Dave P
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Actually this is 100% False, they knew babies could feel pain hundreds of years ago. The reason why they did not use anesthesia on babies is they didnt know how to properly administer it without killing the baby (With adults it is very tricky with a high error rate, this isnt an exact science). It was in 1987 they finally figured out how to give it to babies WITHOUT KILLING THEM. THe myth about pain came around later, but is not based in any fact

an-gu avatar
Anna Banana
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I choose to believe your version, because the other one doesn't make sense. Why would somebody even posit it as a theory randomly? We all know that humans can feel pain, what sort of mental gymnastics would you even have to engage in to decide that there is a certain age when that might not be true anymore, even though it is true for all the other ages?

Load More Replies...
liddlecatpaws avatar
Jo Johannsen
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

"We" (the Establishment) might not have admitted to knowing, but every mother in history knew her baby felt pain. However, as today, she was considered a silly, hysterical female.

rhodabike6 avatar
Seabeast
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Well, there are still doctors who mistakenly believe that a woman's cervix has no nerve endings and can't feel pain, so I'm surprised that they relented on babies.

c3arbar393 avatar
Jess Thompson
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think the actual premise was “they won’t remember the pain”. Now, however, we know past trauma can show up later in life in a variety of different manifestations, whether the trauma is Remembered or not. Scary s**t.

bubs623 avatar
Beth Arriaga
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

And THIS is why I did not get my two sons circumcised. Doctor said 'babies don't feel pain like we do' and also that it would only take a few moments. Ugh, you do it to yourself first, then circle back Doc.

poojasan avatar
Pooja San
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Well circumcision is just unnecessary 🙄 for anyone, except when having medical issues like gangrene etc which can't be treated with medication. I didn't circumcise my daughter. People don't do that nowadays right? I really hope so...

Load More Replies...
earloflincoln avatar
Martha Meyer
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Why on earth would anyone even assume that babies can't feel pain? It makes absolutely no sense.

blue1steven avatar
Donkey boi
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

No.... It would be more accurate to say 'For a short time we believed babies couldn't feel pain.' People largely believed that infants were more sensitive to pain than adults, for centuries! The change of opinion was all the fault of one woman, Myrtle McGraw! After the development of anaesthesia it was readily given to children and infants in the 1940's. The problem was that the risk to the patient was VERY high and death or brain damage was extremely common. Most surgeons did not want to risk the patients life for simple procedures, so searched for an answer. Along comes Dr McGraw, she stuck pins in babies and because some didn't cry, that meant that babies didn't feel pain (and the shocked/surprised look apparently wasn't related either). Everyone was happy to accept her answer because she was a renowned child psychologist.

ohjojo62 avatar
Joanna Werman
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

That is nuts. If you pinch a baby they cry. Not that I've done it. Would slicing into them without anesthesia, no problem. Nuts

micheldurinx avatar
Marcellus II
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It is nuts, it is a made-up item. Just this week it appeared (correctly) in another BP list: In 1987, the US college of surgeons forbade operating on babies without anaesthetics... Up to then, many surgeons assessed the balance of risk/reward to not using anaesthetics, because of the significant chance of overdosing and killing the baby (low chance of reviving when anything goes wrong).

Load More Replies...
izzymcare avatar
Isabel Care
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Women still don't feel pain, according to doctors and nurses who do gynie stuff without numbing anything

notyourmothersbarbie avatar
Jo Iverson
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

That's absurd. What nobody accidentally poked a baby with a diaper pin back in the day? My kids always got what was needed for the circumstances.

rileyhquinn avatar
Riley Quinn
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Oh, many women knew this; we witnessed cause and effect. Male doctors didn't know. But then, they still lack reasonable understanding of female medical issues, so it stands to reason they're slow.

backatya7 avatar
backatya
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think a clue would have been crying when the gave them a shot, dumb doctors

kim_lorton avatar
Kim Lorton
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Sad and its like white men thinking black men bled black, snd were jot intelligent

jackieporter avatar
Poppy
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Some doctors still believe that women's cervix's don't have nerve endings and so women don't need anesthesia whilst having surgery on the cervix despite women for years screaming the place down and saying they were in pain.

angeldrac avatar
Stoopham McFernybabes
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We WERE using anaesthesia on babies, just not as widely and thoroughly as we are now.

lsilviu24 avatar
Silviu Leibovici
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think they were more afraid of what anesthesia could damage than pain ... And babies forget ... For sure ..

rick_desper avatar
Rick Desper
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

"We didn't know that babies could feel pain until 1987." I'm pretty sure this figure is off by several thousand years. Reluctance to use anesthesia has more to do with safety concerns than some bizarre fantasy that the ability to feel pain comes some time _after_ birth.

leekirsten_mack avatar
Lee MacKenzie
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

That seems rampantly stupid. How could they think that babies don’t experience pain?!

harryholloway_holloway avatar
Harry Holloway
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

we did not use Anesthesia earlier, because it might very well have killed them....

mark_wkelly avatar
Mark Kelly
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Probably also because doctors were worried about anesthetizing a baby and it might die

poojasan avatar
Pooja San
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Bonnie, your husband had a medical problem connected to sexual performance. He could have done the procedure to cut a bit for the foreskin to slide. But he chose cutting off the whole erogenous zone. His choice. Newborns shouldn't have it done until they are sexually active and it poses a problem. The whole world are managing great without cutting piece of their sexual organs.

debsburto avatar
Debbie Burton
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is BS.... my son had an operation in Jan 84 and they used anesthesia on him :/

paulamarowsky avatar
Paula Marowsky
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We are STILL not using anesthesia on certain painfull WOMEN'S procedures, like uterine's biopsies among others... So most certain we KNOW and DON'T give a fu%# about it.

tsweda avatar
Thomas Sweda
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

That, is a terrible crime! What was missing in the education of medical doctors?

melayahm avatar
Caroline Driver
Community Member
2 years ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Any moron could see that babies feel pain, I don't know why the idea that they don't came about.

tahadata avatar
Lara Verne
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Who came with this? Anyone could see that babies react badly to painful stimulus. And when were humans supposed to start feel pain?

krystalzombiegirladams avatar
ZombieGirl
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

omg...I was born in 1986 with a hernia and had to have surgery. I wonder if I wasn't under anesthesia during the procedure. I also wonder if that is where my extreme fear of doctors and hospitals comes from. I haven't been to the doctor since 1995 because I just cant do it.

littlesaresare avatar
littlesaresare
Community Member
2 years ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I was born and underwent multiple surgeries only a couple of years after infant anesthesia become mandatory. My surgeons had earlier done these same surgeries to inadequately anaesthetised patients. It was a horrifying thing to learn.

babzzz1 avatar
nikkiphilton avatar
Nikki Hilton
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Just watch a newborn being circumcised and there will be no doubt.

babzzz1 avatar
WildBerry
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

True that babies were not given anesthesia for circumcision but they most certainly were given anesthesia for other surgery, especially for major surgery.

Load More Replies...
mark_wkelly avatar
Mark Kelly
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

And probably because doctors knew babies wouldn't; remember,

sidrabadar248 avatar
Sidra Badar
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Babies weren't given anesthesia because it was dangerous for babies

suzannehaigh avatar
Tee Witt
Community Member
2 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

We?, you mean the Americans not the rest of us

valentinokitchen avatar
Chef Latte
Community Member
2 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

This comment has been deleted.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#12

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

We didn’t know how anesthesia worked until 2020. We were just ragdolling people into unconsciousness with no idea how it actually worked.

Thirteen Of Clubs Report

Add photo comments
POST
coreysmith_2 avatar
Corey Smith
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Well, that's just not true. Maybe mechanisms for some few general anesthetics remain to be fully described, but we certainly knew how many of them work and we also knew very well how most of the locals work.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu