We all love an underdog, don't we? Someone who won't be bullied, who will stand up for themselves and their rights in the face of all-powerful corporations and governments, they give us all hope that we little guys do have the power after all.
Often referred to as 'nail houses' or 'holdouts,' such as these have become high profile media sensations, particularly in China where the brave homeowners receive widespread support against the perceived bullying of the powers that be. Anyone who has seen the movie 'Up,' or Australian classic 'The Castle' will identify with this! These holdout cases most often happen when the government needs land for highway building or decides to do resident relocation of the whole village if the land that it sits on serves a purpose for mining or other heavy industries. Since selling property isn't something that can be forced, some people stand their ground, refusing to take the ridiculously small buy out cash.
Scroll down to see the astonishing examples below, and don't forget to vote for your favorite!
This post may include affiliate links.
Edith Macefield Refused To Sell Her Home Even After Being Offered More Than 1 Million Dollars For It. She Later Became The Inspiration For The Movie "Up"
Man, maybe she's lived in there all her life! Maybe that's where she has all her.memories of her beloved ones.. I wouldn't like to think that a precious place like that would turn into a souless building...
Load More Replies...
wow. So that is how they got the inspiration for Up... having a elderly person that refused to sell their house although it was going to be taken down by a big company... I wonder if she met a scout and they went on a great adventure to Paradise Falls, meeting a talking down and a giant colored bird in the process..? Good job on this because she loves her house better than the million dollars she was offered.
I love that podcast but haven't heard that episode yet. Thanks for the recommendation, and including it's title. Rock on!
Load More Replies...
Seeing how they build around her, I'd move the hell out. Ridiculous decision, but I respect it.
Same ...I would feel suffocated with all the tall lifeless buildings around me ...
Load More Replies...
I'm surprised the construction didn't kill her. That must have been living hell!
How did she survive the construction phase, I wonder? Must have been hell.
I think she did right telling them to FO, her house is nice and shaded now against winter and hurricanes as the bigger buildings will shield her house against the worst of the weather.
$1 Million really isnt that much money tbh. She should have asked for more...
She doesn't get to decide how much and they also don't move the house. None of this works that way. They tell you what they'll pay and it's up to you to relocate. You don't take your old house with you and they don't also buy you a new house on top of that. You take it or leave it. These people left it and I don't blame them. Sometimes you have to stand up for the little guy and I think it's great. It's not a ridiculous thing to do at all as some people are saying. People should learn a little more about Eminent Domain before they pass judgment. It's a nasty process.
Load More Replies...
I would have taken the offer if it included a free house. Hey, if you are gonna take my house, better give me another one. And it better be good.
that's not how it works although I realize you're being facetious. Eminent Domain is not always a very fair or nice process for the person being displaced.
Load More Replies...
What year was this? Average and nice houses where I live (Northern Virginia) easily cost $500,000 (the cheap ones) all the way up the $2.5M. And they are NOT mansions. You're lucky if you get 3 bedrooms.
Load More Replies...
I'd have held out for a bit more and then grabbed it and run. Why try to make a point and have to live with this?
This is me, relentless in the face of criminals and corruption. It is so scary, and crucial! STAND!!!
Who would want to live next to that? I would have taken the 1 mil and moved the house if it meant that much.
It looks sad, lonely and cold, and I imagine dark as there is no sun shining to the house. There is no yard, no space, just cement surrounding her. I get not wanting to move because of the memories and the life she built with her family in that house, but it is not the same anymore. To me this home is now depressing, I wouldn't want to live in it. But then maybe for her the memories are too great to just let them be torn down.
Mary Cook Had Refused To Sell Her Narrow, Handsome Home While All The Neighboring Homes Were Demolished. Today The House Sits Tightly Squeezed Between Its Giant Neighbors, Looking Much Like An Illustration From A Children’s Story Book
And the curve of the central building makes belive that he's compressed ^^
Vera Coking First Refused To Sell Her House To Bob Guccione, Who Wanted To Build His Casino Around It. Later She Refused To Sell To Donald Trump
An Owner That Refused To Sell His House In Melbourne, Australia
Its very saddening that a lot of beautiful neighborhoods are being distroyed to make enormous claustrophobic buildings.
One Resident Of A Toronto Duplex Refused To Sell, So They Cut It In Half
This is on St. Patrick Street in downtown Toronto. Its not "new" exactly, back in 1950 they split this house, the apartment complex now stands on what would have been the other half of the duplex.
This Slender Gothic-Inspired Townhouse, Flanked By Massive Prewar Apartment Buildings Up And Down The Block
China’s Government Paved A Highway Around These Stubborn Homeowners. The Residents Eventually Moved Out But The House Had Become A Symbol Of Resistance Against Developers
Randal Acker Refused To Sell His Small Queen Anne Victorian Home In Downtown Portland, So They Built A Huge Portland State University Residence Hall Around It
In Guangzhou, The Authorities Have Had To Build A Ring Road Around This Block Of Flats Because Three Families Would Not Budge
These are termed in China as "nail houses", as in stubbon nails. Quite often the people in nail houses are not compensated or undercompensated for the loss of their homes and have nowhere else to go. Be stubbon or lose house, so therefore lose job and starve on the streets.
The House Of Austin Spriggs, Washington D.c. The Owner Was Offered $3 Million, Said No, And Later Sold It For $4 Million
Although His Is The Only Standing Building In What Used To Be An Old Neighborhood Of Roubaix, In Northern France, Salah Oudjani Refuses To Sell The Coffee House He Has Worked In For The Last 46 Years
I think that picture is from 2011. It's still there but a road runs past and there's a sports complex opposite. I hope that brings Monsieur Oudjani plenty of trade! If you want to take a look on something like Google Maps, the address is 126 Rue de Tourcoing.
Now A Church, This Queen Anne House Prevented Yet Another Apartment Building From Being Constructed
A Lone Resident Holds Out Against Luxury Villas In Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, In July 2013
Developers Were Forced Into Building Around These Holdouts In Washington DC
Living Under A Bridge
The Founders Of This Hotel Couldn't Buy These Houses Due To The High Asking Price. So The Hotel Was Built Around The Two Buildings Instead, And They Are Now Souvenir Shops
One Chinese Family Refused To Move Their Relatives Ancient Graves. The Small, Bizarre Column Stood 10 Meters Above The Foundation Floor For Months, Until They Finally Accepted Compensation
sad that these new 'better' buildings are taking precedence over the ancient graves of our ancestors.
Farmers Live Stuck In Between Three Highways. Hundreds Of Households Were Relocated But The Government Wasn't Able To Reach A Consensus With This Family
Mrs Wu Ping Was The Only Person From 241 Properties Who Refused To Leave. She Battled With Contractors And Bids For Almost 3 Years Before Caving In April Of 2007 For Quite A Pretty Penny
This Saloon Refused To Sell Their Property To An Apartment Company And Now The Apartment Has To Build Around Them
No, they absolutely shouldn't sell! Especially with all those new potential customers moving in all around them!
This "Nail House" Is Blocking Traffic In Shanghai
The Spiegelhalter Family Refused To Sell Their Shop To The Expanding Wickhams Department Store
The Entire Rockefeller Plaza Complex Was Moved, Due To These Two Buildings Whose Owners Refused To Sell
The Tenant Of This Apartment Building In Kunming, China, Has To Cross A Moat After The Contractors Dug A Ditch To Force The Last Family Out.
A Nail House Sits In The Middle Of A Road Under Construction In Nanning, China, In April 2015. The Owner Of The House Didn’t Reach An Agreement With The Local Authority About Compensation For The Demolition
Residents Of The Guangfuli Area Of Shanghai Have Collectively Decided Not To Leave Their Homes, Creating An Entire "Nail Neighborhood." Tao Weiren Sits In Front Of His Two-Story House, Which Is Now Surrounded By High-End Condominium Buildings
Zheng Meiju Outside Her Nail House In Rui’an, Zhejiang Province, In July 2013. She Has Been Living In The Partially Demolished Home For Nearly A Year, Even Though The Water And Electricity Supply Were Cut
The Farm In The Middle Of Narita Airport. Farmers Are Refusing To Give Up Their Land In The Middle Of This Airport In Japan. The Runway Is Only Half Usable Because Of Their Refusal To Relocate. They Are Currently A Literal Stones Throw Away From The Flight Path And Must Be Living An Earth Shaking Experience.
Hard-Line Developers In China Diverted A River To Encircle Householders Who Refused To Move From Their 900-Year-Old Village
The 'Million Dollar Corner' That Macy's Had To Build Around, And Then Hide Behind A Billboard
"A Million Dollar Hotel", anyone? With Milla Jovovich, by Wim Wenders movie...
The Last House In This Area Stands In Front Of A Shopping Mall In Central China's Hunan Province
The Last House Of An Old Neighborhood Stands Alone In A Future Shanghai World Expo 2010 Parking Lot, Under Nanpu Bridge On April 6, 2010, In Shanghai, China. The Holdout Owner Of The House Was Shi Yuji. The House Was Destroyed Days Later, And The Owner Moved Into A Workers' Dormitory
This "Nail House" House Sits On A Mound Above Ground Level Because The Developer Dug Out The Land Around It
Nail Houses Whose Owners Refused To Relocate, At The Construction Field In Taiyuan, Shanxi Province Of China
A lot of these cities look really grubby and dirty. Like nobody is trying to upkeep them.
A New Motorway In China Has Been Cut In Two After A Homeowner Refused To Sell Their House To Developers. The Homeowner Has Been Considering Whether To Move Or Not For Years Now
Why do developers go ahead and build when they don't have all of the land yet. It is useless this way!
On one hand I agree with house owners in fight against the expanding developers. On the other hand, I'd take those few millions offered and built a house in a green space instead of being closed on three sides by scyscrapers. Or being in a middle of a road. I get that some cases involved families with nowwhere to go, but others, just stubbornly refusing I can't understand. I'd rather have peace and confort instead of constant roadtraffic noise/other people staring at me from windows.
Sometime ago there was an airport to be built. Some neighbours refused to move, despite a good compensation. Three month after the airport was open they had to move, and couldn't sell their houses, cause nobody wants to live next to an airport.
Load More Replies...
I like this, but I'm wondering how they manage this when they construct around the house, so noisy and disturbing, especially when I saw those house squeezed just in between tose new big tall buildings
I wonder how this is legally possible. Municipalities have plans in how building may be placed, and normally there are also laws. Simply building wall-to-wall is not normally possible, and shading can be a very delicate subject,
Load More Replies...
In some countries, the government forces people to sell whatever their property is at the lowest possible price.
If the homeowners knowingly refused to move, then why would consequences be unexpected?
Hey EveBenson, does that EVER work? I mean really? Like does any idiot EVER go to your stupid a*s website after reading your stupid spam and say, "wow, I read what you wrote and golly, I'd love to make that much money! Tell me more swami!" F**k off idiot.
Load More Replies... One thing i noticed, when these things happened in China, the developers did horrible things to the nail houses, ie build moats, destroy the walls on sides, cut water and electricity.. but when it happened in another country like US, the nail houses look protected.. and new buildings were designed to accomodate those nail houses.. says alot about China..
I'm amazed how goverments and coumtries respect there people.... in mine , if they need the land you are kicked out without any consltation..
China is clearly a place where people are offered very little when expected to give up their homes - otherwise why would they end up with so many nail houses? They're probably also expected to relocate to some out-of-the-way apartment block slum far from their employment and everything else they know.
There's a pub in Birkenhead, England that wouldn't sell up to the developers... 72919_9207...a2c4bc.jpg 
How do you not mention the original classic film 🎥 ‘BATTERIES NOT INCLUDED’
In India, the government passed a law to acquire the land from the owner at a price offered only by the government. There is no negotiation, the owner should leave the place with that money only. Worst Government
So they don't have compulsory purchase orders like in the uk? I think I'd sell if the price was was right and rebuild somewhere new
It seems like a lot of these pictures are from China. I feel bad for people that would be so poorly compensated were they to leave that they have to stay in an unpleasant or unsafe location so that they will at least have a roof over their heads.
For some person own built asset is more precious than money. But capitalistic market do not care about it.
Interesting to see how private property is respected in good countries! In our country (Ukraine) all these houses would catch fire, very quickly and unexpectedly and police would state that it was an accident. Also, some very bad things could happen to their owners and nobody would be punished for that.
I think in a world where land for housing becomes more scarce and population rises in a fast rate apartments and larger infrastructure are necessary. So its being selfish to block the development of these projects. I mean we all are going to get our six feet plot in the end.
I used to stay in a little - maybe 14 unit - on the west side of Waikiki in Hawaiii. The last time we were in Oahu, the Trump Tower had been built in the interim, and this little complex was still there while all the other hotels around it were sold to build the Trump Tower. I'm surprised it isn't included here!
There is one in Amsterdam integrated in the Victoria hotel, there is even a movie about it called 'publieke werken'
I think it's sad when the home owners are not given proper compensation for their houses and land, but then you really can't stop progress in some of these cases. A lot of these houses look like they are falling down anyways, so you might as well collect the money and move. The ones that arnt given money for their homes should be criminal!
You missed the house in the middle of the motorway (M62) in Yorkshire, England
The thing is, the homeowner always wins in the end. The government idea is that they'll make it so miserable that the people will want to leave (build a road around it), but they still have to pay for it. When you build infrastructure, it increases the value of the home! These "stubborn" homeowners are crazy like foxes!
What a bunch of stubborn morons. They're going to build around you regardless. Take the piles of cash and live easy the rest of your lives instead of being stressed out until you die due to all the noise and other s**t. Just stupid.
In China, I'm surprised the government doesn't just kill the homeowners.
On one hand I agree with house owners in fight against the expanding developers. On the other hand, I'd take those few millions offered and built a house in a green space instead of being closed on three sides by scyscrapers. Or being in a middle of a road. I get that some cases involved families with nowwhere to go, but others, just stubbornly refusing I can't understand. I'd rather have peace and confort instead of constant roadtraffic noise/other people staring at me from windows.
Sometime ago there was an airport to be built. Some neighbours refused to move, despite a good compensation. Three month after the airport was open they had to move, and couldn't sell their houses, cause nobody wants to live next to an airport.
Load More Replies... I like this, but I'm wondering how they manage this when they construct around the house, so noisy and disturbing, especially when I saw those house squeezed just in between tose new big tall buildings
I wonder how this is legally possible. Municipalities have plans in how building may be placed, and normally there are also laws. Simply building wall-to-wall is not normally possible, and shading can be a very delicate subject,
Load More Replies... In some countries, the government forces people to sell whatever their property is at the lowest possible price.
If the homeowners knowingly refused to move, then why would consequences be unexpected?
Hey EveBenson, does that EVER work? I mean really? Like does any idiot EVER go to your stupid a*s website after reading your stupid spam and say, "wow, I read what you wrote and golly, I'd love to make that much money! Tell me more swami!" F**k off idiot.
Load More Replies... One thing i noticed, when these things happened in China, the developers did horrible things to the nail houses, ie build moats, destroy the walls on sides, cut water and electricity.. but when it happened in another country like US, the nail houses look protected.. and new buildings were designed to accomodate those nail houses.. says alot about China..
I'm amazed how goverments and coumtries respect there people.... in mine , if they need the land you are kicked out without any consltation..
China is clearly a place where people are offered very little when expected to give up their homes - otherwise why would they end up with so many nail houses? They're probably also expected to relocate to some out-of-the-way apartment block slum far from their employment and everything else they know.
There's a pub in Birkenhead, England that wouldn't sell up to the developers... 72919_9207...a2c4bc.jpg
How do you not mention the original classic film 🎥 ‘BATTERIES NOT INCLUDED’
In India, the government passed a law to acquire the land from the owner at a price offered only by the government. There is no negotiation, the owner should leave the place with that money only. Worst Government
So they don't have compulsory purchase orders like in the uk? I think I'd sell if the price was was right and rebuild somewhere new
It seems like a lot of these pictures are from China. I feel bad for people that would be so poorly compensated were they to leave that they have to stay in an unpleasant or unsafe location so that they will at least have a roof over their heads.
For some person own built asset is more precious than money. But capitalistic market do not care about it.
Interesting to see how private property is respected in good countries! In our country (Ukraine) all these houses would catch fire, very quickly and unexpectedly and police would state that it was an accident. Also, some very bad things could happen to their owners and nobody would be punished for that.
I think in a world where land for housing becomes more scarce and population rises in a fast rate apartments and larger infrastructure are necessary. So its being selfish to block the development of these projects. I mean we all are going to get our six feet plot in the end.
I used to stay in a little - maybe 14 unit - on the west side of Waikiki in Hawaiii. The last time we were in Oahu, the Trump Tower had been built in the interim, and this little complex was still there while all the other hotels around it were sold to build the Trump Tower. I'm surprised it isn't included here!
There is one in Amsterdam integrated in the Victoria hotel, there is even a movie about it called 'publieke werken'
I think it's sad when the home owners are not given proper compensation for their houses and land, but then you really can't stop progress in some of these cases. A lot of these houses look like they are falling down anyways, so you might as well collect the money and move. The ones that arnt given money for their homes should be criminal!
You missed the house in the middle of the motorway (M62) in Yorkshire, England
The thing is, the homeowner always wins in the end. The government idea is that they'll make it so miserable that the people will want to leave (build a road around it), but they still have to pay for it. When you build infrastructure, it increases the value of the home! These "stubborn" homeowners are crazy like foxes!
What a bunch of stubborn morons. They're going to build around you regardless. Take the piles of cash and live easy the rest of your lives instead of being stressed out until you die due to all the noise and other s**t. Just stupid.
In China, I'm surprised the government doesn't just kill the homeowners.
