High School Photoshops Out All Traces Of Cleavage In The Yearbook Pics Of 80 Girls And Parents Are Not Happy
Bartram Trail High School in St. Johns County, Florida has come under the media spotlight for all the wrong reasons. It turns out, the prudish school has put a weird editing twist on its students’ yearbook photos and covered up all traces of girls’ cleavage.
The news about photoshopped photos, all of which featured girls, broke after a reporter, Ben Ryan of Action News Jax, shared his investigation of the matter on Twitter. According to the school district, girls’ yearbook photos must follow dress code guidelines and they deemed the 80 pictures inappropriate. Meanwhile, the boys’ pictures from the swim team and other sports photos were left unedited.
So let’s read Ben Ryan’s viral thread about searching for answers on how this high school made a decision that girls’ cleavage “violated student code of conduct.” Action News Jax reports that it was, sadly, a female yearbook teacher who made this controversial decision.
Reporter Ben Ryan ran an investigation on a high school in Florida that edited the cleavage out of 80 girls’ photos in its yearbook album
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
Reporter Ben Ryan from Action News Jax has investigated the controversy surrounding digitally altered yearbook photos of girl students at Bartram Trail High School. In his story for Action News Jax, Ben reported that while no officials have spoken up about the controversy, the ninth-grade students are asking for apologies after being left in shock.
So he shared his findings on the school’s controversial decision in this Twitter thread
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
One student, Riley O’Keefe, told Action News Jax that the worst part of this weird photoshop stunt was obvious double standards for photos of girls and boys. “The double standard in the yearbook is more so they looked at our body and thought just a little bit of skin showing is sexual. They looked at the boys, for the swim team photos and other sports photos and thought that was fine, and that’s really upsetting and uncomfortable.”
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
Ben also looked into the school’s dress code guidelines that were allegedly ‘violated’
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
Another student, Zoe Iannone, whose photo has also been altered to remove cleavage, commented: “I don’t know who is on the staff. I don’t know if it’s male or female, either way, it’s still not okay. They open up the yearbook, saw pictures and that was the first thing they worried about. It was unfair and I was horrified, I was disgusted.”
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
Image credits: First Coast News
Image credits: BenRyanANJax
Action News Jax also shared an official statement regarding the controversy where the school district stated:
“Bartram Trail High School’s previous procedure was to not include student pictures in the yearbook that they deemed in violation of the student code of conduct, so the digital alterations were a solution to make sure all students were included in the yearbook. At this point the school is offering refunds to any parents calling about this issue. The school is receiving feedback from parents/guardians/students on making this process better for next year.”
And this is what others had to comment in relation to this controversial case
Image credits: Nezalhualixtlan
Image credits: saucissonsec
Image credits: AidBham
Image credits: envrv1
Image credits: katiefitter
Image credits: AndyVrenditions
Image credits: kekepania71
Image credits: YourBlackTabby
Image credits: SMRiveraVasquez
Image credits: BroomstickMama
Image credits: MissLindner
Image credits: karenkawrites
Image credits: kbrettland
Image credits: home_dignity
Imagine what kind of person would make it their job to stare at a teenagers breasts to decide if it makes them horny or not. Now imagine that person works at a school and has physical access to these children. Big yikes.
The stinky level's off the charts again. ultra-cros...fbebeb.jpg 
I can't understand the people saying they'd be "thankful" for this editing. Boobs happen. None of this is in any way immodest. Do you want teenagers relegated to only wearing turtlenecks?
So, if I understand this right, then the fact that female students have visible boob curves, is an issue and has to be edited and.photoshopped and whatnot. Meanwhile, it is totally normal an acceptable to have "shooter training" in case if someone decides to go on a murder spree by chance. How f****d up are you, US?
It was Florida. Florida’s a pretty awful state and representation of the country.
Load More Replies...
The parent that tells her daughter to cover up her cleavage needs to realize that the problem is not with what her daughter wears, but with the people that are staring at her cleavage in the first place. It is not her fault that other people can't look at someone and compliment them on their appearance without sexualizing it. As far as these 80 photos, I saw nothing wrong. I work in the financial field (accounting) and office co-workers wear exactly what these girl wore for their pictures. They were dressed professionally. Anyone that thinks their attire was slutty need to examine their own mental health issues and stop policing what other people wear.
Guns are fine in school! We need more guns in school! But not the faintest hint of breast; edit it out. Bodies are terrible guns are great FLORIDA.
This is actually the first time I've heard of this happening here and I live in Florida.
Load More Replies...
This is disgusting. Whoever was behind this act needs to be dismissed and never allowed to work with or near children again. This kind of misogyny and sexual discrimination bullshit needs to end!
Let me just apologise for my anatomy! They are breasts. Like I have two arms, two legs, two eyes & I have two breasts. It’s a body part. The only people making it an issue are adults that find themselves aroused at children’s breasts & blaming the girls for something they exist with. I’m sick of seeing girls getting pulled out of school because a man can see their shape & it makes them have sick thoughts. Maybe question the adults looking at underage girls breasts instead of the kids.
Asides from the bizarre nature of this story, the editing of the photos are horrible, especially the girl in the light purple top.
I know. I could do a better job and I have 0 photoshop experience.
Load More Replies...
Per the dress code (for girls): tops and shirts must be "modest". Who decides? What _objective_ reference is there? I call BS.
I noticed that kind of vague language in a few places, like "extreme" hair styles and general references to concepts like "vulgar" or "revealing". The thing about hair being "well combed or brushed" also got me because that seems like some bigot could easily interpret that as a ban on some natural black hair styles. At minimum, it displays a lack of thoughtfulness. If an institution is going to make policies like this, they have to be very specific and minimize interpretation, otherwise they're likely to cause uneven/unfair enforcement and be subject to people's prejudices.
Load More Replies...
I've heard many Americans say the burka oppresses women.... Pot meet kettle. Religion, patriarchy & irony walk in to a bar & not a damn thing is funny.
They'd loved burka if they could say it's an american thing.
Load More Replies...
Seriously, what the heck? The school photoshopped the girl's bodies, their natural bodies, because they thought it would disrupt the school? So having a natural female body violates the code? Perfect, our school system is f*cked.
I find this to be sad, I've seen several posts about girls being in trouble because men/boys can't deal with "normal" female clothes. It amazes me that don't have school uniforms when you can't accept a small cleavage. From the pictures I've seen I see no problems. The problem are not the girls, the problem is the uptight people working at the school administration. Why should you teach girls to cover up their bodies? We live in a society where there are so many twisted body images and it's so important to teach our girls to love themselves and love their body the way it is, and this school is not doing that.
They choose not to see that they're telling that world that men are too stupid and weak to control themselves, and that they're too stupid to keep it in their pants.
Load More Replies...
That is just awful. I bet we find out the person who actually did that crime is nasty old male evangelical.
This is why women have constant hatred for their bodies. Girls and women have breasts ffs. They are attached to our bodies and sometimes they are big. We cannot help it and how are breasts sexual on a child!! Stop looking at children's bodies and saying they are sexual to a grown up! Breasts aren't inherently sexual unless you sexualize them in your mind. These people are gross and should get in trouble for sexual harassment of a minor the parents should sue. Florida deems corporal punishment and guns in school are standard though. Omg were going backwards bc of the trumper conservatives.
14 is a rough age for a girl to be told she can't wear a normal shirt because her boobs stick out too much.
There is a difference between "appropriate attire" and "ultra-conservative modesty doctrine." The pictures I have seen here are all job-interview levels of appropriate. It might not be a good idea for a girl to wear a dress with a keyhole that goes down to her navel, just as it might not be a good idea for a male student to wear a mesh tank top and bicycle shorts. Both of those outfit ideas violate the dress code, the outfits shown here do NOT.
So....breasts are evil & must be stopped? Some inhabitants of this planet need to be sterilized. Put in a wood chipper. Whatever.
I find it odd and disturbing there are parents who are telling their daughters that they should cover up to their necks so they look "nice" and "protected. Unless they are not opposed to having them bind their breasts flat, there's no hiding that they are developing into women. Teenaged girls don't become women overnight when they hit 18. And that was hardly "cleavage". I agree there is a double standard. I've seen it in my old high school during talent week. There was a group of boys who got the go-ahead to do a Full Monty routine and stripped down to their skivvies in front of the whole school, I kid you not. They were not disqualified. But a group who wanted to do an Offspring cover with one of my female mates doing a back up dance to 'Pretty Fly For a White Guy', she was playful dancing close to one of the bandmates with a little hip action and BOOM they were instantly disqualified for indecency.
I don't get the amercian (or anybody who has this point of view) way of hiding NORMAL HUMAN BODYS. The f**k is wrong?! People who are offended by such normal, biological things should work on their heads. It is not offending. If they get the desire to do something they shouldn't, as mentioned by so much people 'yYou asked for it! Boys will get thoughts...' etc. (Because your clothes and your body) and can't control themselves, THOSE are the problem. Nobody else! You know you can choose and you should have the willpower to handle yourself right, if you can't do that simple thing... Thats weakness.
If the girls attire didn't violate the dress code the day the photos were taken (presumably at the school), how can they violate it after the fact? The school administrators created a problem that didn't exist... probably due to the input one, influential and puritanical board member. From what I can see in the unaltered pics, these girls attire is no more revealing that that of girls I graduated with in the 1970s. More and more it appears that those running schools today have the "morality" of clergy from the dark ages.
Who the f**k is looking at high school girls' chest, in a tiny little rectangle, in a school yearbook? Or who is looking at their chest at all? I only noticed their happy smiles, until I read the headline. I wish that bodies were not sexualized. They're natural and there is nothing to be ashamed of or cover up.
It is not just the covering of the neckline though, the faces have been distorted and basically, ruined
This occurred the next county over from where I live in Florida, and I work on a yearbook staff at my high school. We would never do such a thing, its ridiculous.
This is f*****g horrible. I hate this so much. You know who needs to be fixed? The creepy old men that sexualize them at any sign of cleavage. F*****g bastards.
If I had attended this school, I would have been photoshopped into a turtleneck, for sure. When I was growing up, I went from being a B cup at 13 to a DD cup by 14. I pretty much always have cleavage and took to wearing hoodies/sweatshirts a majority of the time because I was so embarrassed and awkward. If I had worn any of the tops that these girls had worn, I would have had MAJOR cleavage, but that's not a bad thing. It just means that our bodies are shaped differently to one another, and that's a beautiful thing. These girls didn't deserve to be punished for having bodies that developed how they were supposed to. Their outfits passed the dress code, and therefore there is no reason to poorly photoshop and ruin perfectly fine yearbook photos.
these rules are crazy anyways... no shoulders visible and no tanktops, no bandanas
Disgusting sexist pigs. And shame on anyone who thinks these girls are showing too much, you creepy weirdos.
I do believe in protecting our children from creeps- however, the actions here imo are doing the opposite. I believe the way they handled it only encourages creeps and shames people about the natural human body when they're most vulnerable. Rather than (very poor quality) photoshop just ask them to go change? Personally I don't think their teensy amount of cleavage is anything to worry about, and the ones gawking at it are the pervs here. But regardless of my opinion, the school failed to be consistent. If they wore those outfits before and never heard anything, why suddenly change the rules on picture day? Why tell women to cover their shoulders but not men? All that aside: Boobs are difficult. Sometimes no matter how hard you try to cover up, the cleavage is just there. Also they're teenagers, they've simply never had boobs before, and now they're tasked with trying to deal with them. It's not that easy! Sometimes the cleavage isn't even visible until you're told to pose.
I'm sure that next year on picture day the girls will have come up with a creative solution that voices their personal opinion .
It's always about 'distracting the boys'. This is wrong on so many levels.
I did photo shoots for many a case, and the only alterations I agreed to make, was for blemishes or medical issues, but never to alter stuff like this.
The article left out that the boy's swim team was pictured wearing nothing but their Speedos.
Whoever came up with the thought that all trace of cleavage had to be photoshopped is the one who sexualizes teenagers' bodies to begin with. Come on, is it the US or Saudi Arabia ? What do you mean to tell these girls exactly, that their curves are a threat to themselves and to society and it is their own concern to fix it ? That their body is a shame or nothing else than a sexual object ? Leave the kids alone ffs
While I completely agree that the photoshopping of the yearbook is completely insane, it appears that the biggest problem with this school is the lack of consistency on a daily basis and following through with all rules equally, regardless of gender.I find no fault per se' with the dress code in general as all three of my children had the very same type of dress code throughout school as well. Two of my children being girls and they didn't complain about the dress code, as it was a signed contract between the school and students. The same dress code is used nationwide.
Am I the only one concerned that it's not even good photoshop?!
Grow up parents, are you sending your daughters to school to be educated or to show off their cleavages? You dress for the occasion. This is not "penalizing girls for the ordinary shapes of their ordinary bodies." !!! There were times when girls at this age didn't feel the need to show off their "ordinary" bodies, just the opposite. Nobody else can sexualize women, only they can do that themselves. - Some time ago, there was a post here on BP, the father of a two-year old daughter complained that cloths for girls that young are made to sexualize them; Bored pandas agreed. Give me a break - dress for success and women should not use there sexuality to get ahead - that will NOT buy them respect as professionals. By the way, the photoshopping is bad - the only thing to be upset about.
You are very wrong here. How are women wearing "sexually" or "too relieving" clothes "asking for it"? The teens weren't even wearing any of that or " too much skin". It's all in the mindset, how people think about it? It's so wrong that someone was staring at their photos and thinking " it's inappropriate". They aren't asking for sex by wearing those tops? Clearly you need consent before asking someone for sex or anything like touching, etc. Sure, it's true that men have more sexual instincts but that doesn't mean they can't control themselves or control what others wear or even sexually harass or rape. It's all in the mindset and what you teach to boys and men. THAT'S what needs to CHANGE.
Load More Replies...
What was acceptable? The censure, or the outfits?
Load More Replies...
People are complaining because these girls are being taught at a young age to essentially hate themselves because they have an anatomy they cannot control. It's not petty at all.
Load More Replies... Imagine what kind of person would make it their job to stare at a teenagers breasts to decide if it makes them horny or not. Now imagine that person works at a school and has physical access to these children. Big yikes.
The stinky level's off the charts again. ultra-cros...fbebeb.jpg
I can't understand the people saying they'd be "thankful" for this editing. Boobs happen. None of this is in any way immodest. Do you want teenagers relegated to only wearing turtlenecks?
So, if I understand this right, then the fact that female students have visible boob curves, is an issue and has to be edited and.photoshopped and whatnot. Meanwhile, it is totally normal an acceptable to have "shooter training" in case if someone decides to go on a murder spree by chance. How f****d up are you, US?
It was Florida. Florida’s a pretty awful state and representation of the country.
Load More Replies... The parent that tells her daughter to cover up her cleavage needs to realize that the problem is not with what her daughter wears, but with the people that are staring at her cleavage in the first place. It is not her fault that other people can't look at someone and compliment them on their appearance without sexualizing it. As far as these 80 photos, I saw nothing wrong. I work in the financial field (accounting) and office co-workers wear exactly what these girl wore for their pictures. They were dressed professionally. Anyone that thinks their attire was slutty need to examine their own mental health issues and stop policing what other people wear.
Guns are fine in school! We need more guns in school! But not the faintest hint of breast; edit it out. Bodies are terrible guns are great FLORIDA.
This is actually the first time I've heard of this happening here and I live in Florida.
Load More Replies... This is disgusting. Whoever was behind this act needs to be dismissed and never allowed to work with or near children again. This kind of misogyny and sexual discrimination bullshit needs to end!
Let me just apologise for my anatomy! They are breasts. Like I have two arms, two legs, two eyes & I have two breasts. It’s a body part. The only people making it an issue are adults that find themselves aroused at children’s breasts & blaming the girls for something they exist with. I’m sick of seeing girls getting pulled out of school because a man can see their shape & it makes them have sick thoughts. Maybe question the adults looking at underage girls breasts instead of the kids.
Asides from the bizarre nature of this story, the editing of the photos are horrible, especially the girl in the light purple top.
I know. I could do a better job and I have 0 photoshop experience.
Load More Replies... Per the dress code (for girls): tops and shirts must be "modest". Who decides? What _objective_ reference is there? I call BS.
I noticed that kind of vague language in a few places, like "extreme" hair styles and general references to concepts like "vulgar" or "revealing". The thing about hair being "well combed or brushed" also got me because that seems like some bigot could easily interpret that as a ban on some natural black hair styles. At minimum, it displays a lack of thoughtfulness. If an institution is going to make policies like this, they have to be very specific and minimize interpretation, otherwise they're likely to cause uneven/unfair enforcement and be subject to people's prejudices.
Load More Replies... I've heard many Americans say the burka oppresses women.... Pot meet kettle. Religion, patriarchy & irony walk in to a bar & not a damn thing is funny.
They'd loved burka if they could say it's an american thing.
Load More Replies... Seriously, what the heck? The school photoshopped the girl's bodies, their natural bodies, because they thought it would disrupt the school? So having a natural female body violates the code? Perfect, our school system is f*cked.
I find this to be sad, I've seen several posts about girls being in trouble because men/boys can't deal with "normal" female clothes. It amazes me that don't have school uniforms when you can't accept a small cleavage. From the pictures I've seen I see no problems. The problem are not the girls, the problem is the uptight people working at the school administration. Why should you teach girls to cover up their bodies? We live in a society where there are so many twisted body images and it's so important to teach our girls to love themselves and love their body the way it is, and this school is not doing that.
They choose not to see that they're telling that world that men are too stupid and weak to control themselves, and that they're too stupid to keep it in their pants.
Load More Replies... That is just awful. I bet we find out the person who actually did that crime is nasty old male evangelical.
This is why women have constant hatred for their bodies. Girls and women have breasts ffs. They are attached to our bodies and sometimes they are big. We cannot help it and how are breasts sexual on a child!! Stop looking at children's bodies and saying they are sexual to a grown up! Breasts aren't inherently sexual unless you sexualize them in your mind. These people are gross and should get in trouble for sexual harassment of a minor the parents should sue. Florida deems corporal punishment and guns in school are standard though. Omg were going backwards bc of the trumper conservatives.
14 is a rough age for a girl to be told she can't wear a normal shirt because her boobs stick out too much.
There is a difference between "appropriate attire" and "ultra-conservative modesty doctrine." The pictures I have seen here are all job-interview levels of appropriate. It might not be a good idea for a girl to wear a dress with a keyhole that goes down to her navel, just as it might not be a good idea for a male student to wear a mesh tank top and bicycle shorts. Both of those outfit ideas violate the dress code, the outfits shown here do NOT.
So....breasts are evil & must be stopped? Some inhabitants of this planet need to be sterilized. Put in a wood chipper. Whatever.
I find it odd and disturbing there are parents who are telling their daughters that they should cover up to their necks so they look "nice" and "protected. Unless they are not opposed to having them bind their breasts flat, there's no hiding that they are developing into women. Teenaged girls don't become women overnight when they hit 18. And that was hardly "cleavage". I agree there is a double standard. I've seen it in my old high school during talent week. There was a group of boys who got the go-ahead to do a Full Monty routine and stripped down to their skivvies in front of the whole school, I kid you not. They were not disqualified. But a group who wanted to do an Offspring cover with one of my female mates doing a back up dance to 'Pretty Fly For a White Guy', she was playful dancing close to one of the bandmates with a little hip action and BOOM they were instantly disqualified for indecency.
I don't get the amercian (or anybody who has this point of view) way of hiding NORMAL HUMAN BODYS. The f**k is wrong?! People who are offended by such normal, biological things should work on their heads. It is not offending. If they get the desire to do something they shouldn't, as mentioned by so much people 'yYou asked for it! Boys will get thoughts...' etc. (Because your clothes and your body) and can't control themselves, THOSE are the problem. Nobody else! You know you can choose and you should have the willpower to handle yourself right, if you can't do that simple thing... Thats weakness.
If the girls attire didn't violate the dress code the day the photos were taken (presumably at the school), how can they violate it after the fact? The school administrators created a problem that didn't exist... probably due to the input one, influential and puritanical board member. From what I can see in the unaltered pics, these girls attire is no more revealing that that of girls I graduated with in the 1970s. More and more it appears that those running schools today have the "morality" of clergy from the dark ages.
Who the f**k is looking at high school girls' chest, in a tiny little rectangle, in a school yearbook? Or who is looking at their chest at all? I only noticed their happy smiles, until I read the headline. I wish that bodies were not sexualized. They're natural and there is nothing to be ashamed of or cover up.
It is not just the covering of the neckline though, the faces have been distorted and basically, ruined
This occurred the next county over from where I live in Florida, and I work on a yearbook staff at my high school. We would never do such a thing, its ridiculous.
This is f*****g horrible. I hate this so much. You know who needs to be fixed? The creepy old men that sexualize them at any sign of cleavage. F*****g bastards.
If I had attended this school, I would have been photoshopped into a turtleneck, for sure. When I was growing up, I went from being a B cup at 13 to a DD cup by 14. I pretty much always have cleavage and took to wearing hoodies/sweatshirts a majority of the time because I was so embarrassed and awkward. If I had worn any of the tops that these girls had worn, I would have had MAJOR cleavage, but that's not a bad thing. It just means that our bodies are shaped differently to one another, and that's a beautiful thing. These girls didn't deserve to be punished for having bodies that developed how they were supposed to. Their outfits passed the dress code, and therefore there is no reason to poorly photoshop and ruin perfectly fine yearbook photos.
these rules are crazy anyways... no shoulders visible and no tanktops, no bandanas
Disgusting sexist pigs. And shame on anyone who thinks these girls are showing too much, you creepy weirdos.
I do believe in protecting our children from creeps- however, the actions here imo are doing the opposite. I believe the way they handled it only encourages creeps and shames people about the natural human body when they're most vulnerable. Rather than (very poor quality) photoshop just ask them to go change? Personally I don't think their teensy amount of cleavage is anything to worry about, and the ones gawking at it are the pervs here. But regardless of my opinion, the school failed to be consistent. If they wore those outfits before and never heard anything, why suddenly change the rules on picture day? Why tell women to cover their shoulders but not men? All that aside: Boobs are difficult. Sometimes no matter how hard you try to cover up, the cleavage is just there. Also they're teenagers, they've simply never had boobs before, and now they're tasked with trying to deal with them. It's not that easy! Sometimes the cleavage isn't even visible until you're told to pose.
I'm sure that next year on picture day the girls will have come up with a creative solution that voices their personal opinion .
It's always about 'distracting the boys'. This is wrong on so many levels.
I did photo shoots for many a case, and the only alterations I agreed to make, was for blemishes or medical issues, but never to alter stuff like this.
The article left out that the boy's swim team was pictured wearing nothing but their Speedos.
Whoever came up with the thought that all trace of cleavage had to be photoshopped is the one who sexualizes teenagers' bodies to begin with. Come on, is it the US or Saudi Arabia ? What do you mean to tell these girls exactly, that their curves are a threat to themselves and to society and it is their own concern to fix it ? That their body is a shame or nothing else than a sexual object ? Leave the kids alone ffs
While I completely agree that the photoshopping of the yearbook is completely insane, it appears that the biggest problem with this school is the lack of consistency on a daily basis and following through with all rules equally, regardless of gender.I find no fault per se' with the dress code in general as all three of my children had the very same type of dress code throughout school as well. Two of my children being girls and they didn't complain about the dress code, as it was a signed contract between the school and students. The same dress code is used nationwide.
Am I the only one concerned that it's not even good photoshop?!
Grow up parents, are you sending your daughters to school to be educated or to show off their cleavages? You dress for the occasion. This is not "penalizing girls for the ordinary shapes of their ordinary bodies." !!! There were times when girls at this age didn't feel the need to show off their "ordinary" bodies, just the opposite. Nobody else can sexualize women, only they can do that themselves. - Some time ago, there was a post here on BP, the father of a two-year old daughter complained that cloths for girls that young are made to sexualize them; Bored pandas agreed. Give me a break - dress for success and women should not use there sexuality to get ahead - that will NOT buy them respect as professionals. By the way, the photoshopping is bad - the only thing to be upset about.
You are very wrong here. How are women wearing "sexually" or "too relieving" clothes "asking for it"? The teens weren't even wearing any of that or " too much skin". It's all in the mindset, how people think about it? It's so wrong that someone was staring at their photos and thinking " it's inappropriate". They aren't asking for sex by wearing those tops? Clearly you need consent before asking someone for sex or anything like touching, etc. Sure, it's true that men have more sexual instincts but that doesn't mean they can't control themselves or control what others wear or even sexually harass or rape. It's all in the mindset and what you teach to boys and men. THAT'S what needs to CHANGE.
Load More Replies... What was acceptable? The censure, or the outfits?
Load More Replies... People are complaining because these girls are being taught at a young age to essentially hate themselves because they have an anatomy they cannot control. It's not petty at all.
Load More Replies...
159
116