ADVERTISEMENT

There are nearly 8 billion people on this planet, and everybody constantly wants to know things. Whether you're into astronomy and the whole chicken or egg thing, or you're simply a curious person – all the answers that humankind can give you would probably be not enough, and it's absolutely understandable. We're floating God-knows-where around a bunch of fairly similar and large astronomical bodies while having to get up and go to work every single day – how could you not wonder about things? 

However, sometimes looking for answers can do no good. An existential crisis can seriously mess up your whole nervous system, which is we have multiple options that can help us get away from reality whenever we need to. But from time to time, it gets rather samey and watching a show or scrolling through your feed doesn't keep you entertained anymore:

This is when a Twitter page with over 1.3M followers dedicated to "quite interesting" facts comes to the rescue: nearly 50K tweets worth of lightweight and educational posts that'll keep you occupied for hours. We've gathered a few of the best ones, but don't hesitate to use the comment section to add your "quite interesting" fact.

More info: Twitter | Instagram | BBC

Image source: Ben+Sam (not the actual photo)

Besides, the “Quite Interesting” Twitter page is actually a game show that currently broadcasts on the BBC Two channel. It started out in 2003 and already has 19 seasons. However, the quiz show has more of a comedic twist where well-known British personalities compete and score points not necessarily based on the correctness of their answers but the funniness. And as for the plot of the show, it focuses on the participants answering obscure questions, making it almost impossible to give a correct answer, which is why humor remains the main focus.

#6

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

ADVERTISEMENT
#8

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
funkybluegirl avatar
funkybluegirl
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Definition of imposter syndrome: "Imposter syndrome is loosely defined as doubting your abilities and feeling like a fraud. It disproportionately affects high-achieving people, who find it difficult to accept their accomplishments. Many question whether they're deserving of accolades."

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
#19

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
andreavilarmelego avatar
Ozacoter
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Luckily if they even taller it would be very uncomfortable for them

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#20

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
henryrussell avatar
Henry Russell
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

there obviously preparing for the international peanut butter famine of 2024

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#22

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
robert-thornburrow avatar
Robert T
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It takes 10 times longer when there is a BP tab open in your browser...

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#27

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
juliaa1960 avatar
Julia Atkinson
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Absolute nonsense, and when I tell my cats about this they'll come and beat you up

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#28

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
andreavilarmelego avatar
Ozacoter
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I guess that this decade the skirts will be as long as a wedding dress

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#34

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
troux avatar
Troux
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Ooooh you're having an anxiety attack, too? This is going great!! 🥰🥰🥰

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#35

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
naesil avatar
Naesil
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I would say it depends what you consider to be rocket scientist, someone who is part of designing the rockets then nah not smarter, I could be part of that, but then the people who figured out how you can get that chunk of metal safely to space, using earths gravitational pull, managing to attach it safely to the space station that is moving 8km/s (5 miles per second) in orbit, and then plummeting it back to earth safely without burning everyone on board to crisp, dont feel like average people could do that.

vera-c-vanandel avatar
Vera1
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

They studied aerospace engineers for this. It's quite an interesting study, I've linked it if you'd like to have a look: https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/375/bmj-2021-067883.full.pdf

Load More Replies...
marneederider40 avatar
Marnie
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This doesn't even make sense. The "general population" does not have a level of intelligence. Only individual people do. If you're talking about statistics, then a better way to phrase might be "Rocket scientists do not have above-average intelligence" (which I personally find hard to believe) or "Rocket scientists are only in the top 40 percentile of intelligence, not top 1 as one would think," or something like that.

ifyasaiso avatar
Marianne Saiso
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think it's technically that the distributions of intelligence of the 'general population' and 'aerospace engineers' overlap significantly, so there is no statistically relevant difference in the averages. A certain percentile would still be seen statistically as a shift in the entire population. But that statement is very difficult to interpret for people that have not studied statistics.

Load More Replies...
ignaciocuadra avatar
otplus
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

define general population, because there are soaps that come with directions, and i cannot fanthom someone not understanding how someone can read before figuring out how soap works

stevensedwards avatar
Hannah Edwards
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I suppose it’s the sort of job that weeds out and explodes the less intelligent ones.

pauldavis avatar
Paul Davis
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

If you run into one it's best to bring a brain surgeon with you and let them duke it out.

ealizabethane avatar
Lisa Shaw
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is true, they are typically just better educated than the general population.

blbrightonoswin_1 avatar
Brian Bennett
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Not smarter than the average bear! (Just showed my age again!)

arshadhussainkhan77 avatar
Bobby
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Rocket Science is not general and common study. Smarter one go through it.

collin_lyle avatar
Collin Lyle
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

My brother is a rocket scientist. He has a PhD from Stanford in mechanical engineering. He's an absolute genius. But, he lost the keys to his rental car inside a restaurant. Had to wait 2 hours for the company to bring another key. As far as I know, the key was never found. Definitely absent minded.

mstohr-z avatar
Mtownmick
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It didn't take a rocket scientist to come up with this fact.

philblanque avatar
phil blanque
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

OK...You have to exclude a LARGE proportion of the general population...maybe they are not fully human...you know Make America Grate Again ...no spelling errors there. They are all about friction.

View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#38

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
olgadremina avatar
Olga Dremina
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I'm pretty sure plumbers installed less known saxopipes in our house.

View more commentsArrow down menu
#40

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
nikkisevven avatar
Nikki Sevven
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

System of a Down's album entitled "Toxicity" was released two years before Britney Spears' song "Toxic." Just saying.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#45

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
maylin_martinsen avatar
May
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

So much of that is during December - so many traditions involving candles!

View more commentsArrow down menu
#46

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
luthervonwolfen avatar
Luther von Wolfen
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

"Only"? Human beings have been around for 150,000 years and 1/15 of the total are alive now.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda