ADVERTISEMENT

They say it’s always best to trust your gut. But what if it tells you there’s something off with a particular person, place, situation, you name it? Today, we are diving into some hard-to-believe scenarios shared by people with very strong suspicions. The only catch is that they have zero proof of the conspiracies.

What do you strongly suspect but have no proof of?” asked u/757jsmith on the r/AskReddit subreddit and the answers started rolling in.

Let’s scroll through the most interesting ones below, and who knows… sometimes life is stranger than fiction!

#1

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove Religion was created to control the masses.

madtrippinfool , cottonbro Report

Add photo comments
POST
linusnilsson avatar
Linus Nilsson
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Maybe todays religion, but from the beginning it was simply a way to explain things we didn't understand.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#2

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove Our ancient (human) history is far more vast and impressive than we can even begin to imagine.

anonymous , maxpixel Report

#3

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove Suspect my Physically and mentally abusive ex husband was planning on offing me during our separation/divorce. He got a $75,000 life insurance policy on me during our separation. Found out 2 years after our divorce when he had overpaid the policy and the insurance sent me a refund check. Mistake on their part.

During our separation, he had invited me to join his “family” vacation at Grand Canyon, I said no. He invited me to the mountains that same summer to try to be a family again, I said no. Then he invited me to Mexico for “reconciliation, again no. ( I said no because the gut feelings I had and my mom told me not to) She had 3 dreams in a row that my soon to be ex husband would tell her I was dead.

I have no proof, just the insurance policy and my mom’s dreams. 2 years after divorce, he canceled policy. I didn’t know you could get insurance on someone without them knowing

salemonadetea , cottonbro Report

ADVERTISEMENT
#4

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove Woman's clothes have either no pockets or crumby pockets to promote handbag sales.

wags83 , Mikaela Shannon Report

Add photo comments
POST
southon avatar
Bobert Robertson
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I've heard this one so many times, but I've always wondered then why there aren't more companies that make both pants and hand bags.

freshganesh avatar
Marco Hub-Dub
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

20 conglomerates own nearly 70% of every female-branded clothing (and accessory) line. Just wiki any name brand to see which megacorp it is a subsidiary of and you’ll see. Coach is owned by Tapestry, Inc., for example. Forever 21 is owned by the same conglomerate that owns Aéropostale Brooks Brothers Nine West Prince Reebok Tapout Thomasville Vision Street Wear

Load More Replies...
zora24_1 avatar
Trillian
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

To be fair, even if my pants had regular sized pockets I would be carrying a handbag or backpack. I carry around waaay to much stuff and I find it slightly ridiculous the way my partner can barely sit down with his wallet, keys, phone etc in his pockets. And I always have to carry his sunglasses because he can't fit them

dariab_1 avatar
Daria B
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Same. I do have pockets big enough, but I like my clothes tight. I prefer bags and armbands. Even my husband switched to armbands and small handbags because he feels it's safer this way, and because he's uncomfortable with the heavyweight of his phone in the pocket.

Load More Replies...
brialabaster avatar
Deutschland Mädchen
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I agree with this one. And also there are the fake pockets that are sewn shut just so it LOOKS like you have pockets. Ugh.

joeymarlin avatar
Joey Marlin
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Some, not all, are only sewn shut so you cannot put your hands in them and stretch/damage/dirty before purchase. Some can be easily unpicked. As I said not all, but I have done this and had pockets. Fashion industry thing.

Load More Replies...
sareaesque668 avatar
Steph Harrison
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

My fiance bought a pair of biker jeans which didn't fit him but fit me perfectly. He couldn't get over how happy I looked walking around with my hands fully submerged into the pockets, and I regularly forget where my phone is because it's sat on my thigh in the pocket instead of digging into my hip. I get so frustrated now any time I put on my regular jeans, I'm determined to find more men's jeans which fit me as well.

janetch avatar
Janet C
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Nope. It's about misogyny. https://feminisminindia.com/2018/06/05/sexism-pockets-women-clothing/

martincon avatar
Connie Martin
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Pretty sure it's because lumpy pockets are not flattering, whether empty or have stuff in them.

johanna_zamora avatar
Grumble O'Pug
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Oh yes, I buy my bags because I can't fit stuff in my pockets. Please. Stop.

jevanderwerf avatar
13
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I have a bag. Because my crap does not fit in my pockets. Jokes on them. Been the same bag for the past two decades.

Load More Replies...
inesolabarria avatar
Ines Olabarria-Smith
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I don’t think so. Big pockets “ruin” the shape of the garnet unless is a wide skirt. Of course, is my opinion.

vmthill avatar
Vicki Thill
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I once read in a fashion magazine that women's clothing have no pockets because they lay better on our hips and in turn, we look better in the mirror, so we'd be more inclined to buy the clothing. However, I did just recently buy a pair of jeans that had full length pockets, but were stitched up high giving me the typical two inch pocket. So, I don't know what to believe anymore.

vera-roshchina avatar
Elmie Pumpkinbush
Community Member
2 years ago

This comment has been deleted.

Load More Replies...
kevincampphoto avatar
Kevin Camp
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Untrue. Ask any fashion designer. Loose fitting women's clothes have pockets, form fitting women's clothes have none or faux pockets. This is to avoid unsightly lines in the clothing. Fashion conscious women are not going to wear clothing that makes them look lumpy.

rose_4 avatar
Fried Green Frijolès
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Loose fitting women's clothing do not have pockets comparable to the pockets on men's clothing. The pockets on women's sweat pants still are shallow/small, rarely large enough to fit a woman sized hand into completely. If men bought pants with pockets that they couldn't fit their hand in to they would surely complain.

Load More Replies...
shayda avatar
Shayda
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I mean, even if I had deep enough pockets, I always carry a book with me so I'm gonna need a bag anyway, but that's me lol

ohxrkqra avatar
Kira Okah
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

From my time in clothing retail - sales figures showed that women's trousers with usable pockets moved dismally. People didn't buy them. Don't have a clue why.

eucritta avatar
Eucritta
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Possibly we've been trained to look elsewhere for them? I gave up hoping for decent pockets in anything other than men's jeans a very long time ago.

Load More Replies...
drummerkramer avatar
Bob Belcher
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's not a myth, it's 100% true. It's been stated and proven that this is in fact real and has been since the early 20th century. Pockets on women is considered to be "masculine" and "unbecoming of a lady". Early fashion magazines showed women in clothes with no pockets.

shaynameidela avatar
Dorothy Parker
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Women's clothes, particularly as pants have gotten more figure hugging, don't have bigger pockets because they add bulk and items in pockets will distort the line. It started with removing the pockets on the side seam. Men's suits have breast pockets outside as well as an inner pocket. Women's often have a fake outer breast pocket on the left, just a one inch by four inch line of fabric. No inside pocket. Putting something in those pockets would make a woman appear lopsided.

bumblebee_4 avatar
bumble bee
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It is NOT for handbag sales. It is the simple fact that large pocket on most clothing would change the line of the style. You cannot get a clean line when you have a garbage bag of stuff in your pockets. Women's clothing is designed for a sleek form fitting design for the most part and having that changed because you have a box of tissues, your keys, wallet and what not in you pocket.

cedahinea avatar
Cee Mor
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

true story and now we all wear hoodies with big pockets in the front (don't always look great but it works!)

always2bfaithful avatar
DDmaybeandor
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I would carry my phone and my keys, that's it. Now I'm trying to figure out how I can shove things safely, comfortably and unnoticeably in my brahalf the time. Or just carry it in my hand.

mark_wkelly avatar
Mark Kelly
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

or it's probably considered more feminine to have smaller pockets.

christine_brand avatar
Chris B
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

So... Man-bags didn't take off because clothing companies continued to make clothes with pockets?

stephanie_hanville1 avatar
Stephanie Hanville
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The pockets were made smaller to retain the jean look withour compromising a smooth fit!

ashleysovig avatar
Ashley Wright
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Or, perhaps women’s hands are smaller than men’s…. 👋🏻

mandydelaforcepcgirl avatar
Mandy Delaforce (PC Girl)
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

No. Pockets have never really been on womens clothing, as it detracts from the shape of the garment. It's got nothing to do with handbags. That assumes a world wide agreement between all bag makers and garment designers, which is impossible.

jawpoo avatar
Jane W.
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Women's clothes have no pockets so that we won't have "lumps" that are not attractive to men.

atlmainiac avatar
Martha Higgins
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Crumby pockets? Don't put cookies in them. Oh, you meant crummy pockets?

kelly_hartle avatar
Kelly Hartle
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The real reason we carry big purses is because men are always saying, “Could you put this in your purse?”

kitforrestall avatar
Katherine Forrestall
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Is that why ? Had this notion it was because front pockets make your hips look bigger.

3rainbow avatar
EJN
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Crumby pockets? I've never had one! Where can I find them?

peppersergent avatar
Pepper Sergent
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think it's because designers want the clothes to really enhance the figure of the women. And because it is assumed that you will put whatever you need in your purse. I don't think there's a commercial behind that choice.

typeyourtexthere avatar
Twodogsandapicnictable
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is ridiculous. It's entirely aesthetic. If you want pockets more than a smooth silhouette, buy BDUs or cargo pants. And you still won't be able to jam a whole purse worth of stuff in the pockets without looking ridiculous.

miriamemendelson avatar
Mimi M
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Nah, it's so the clothing will have a smoother line. Also it's assumed that b/c women have handbags, large pockets are less needed.

zachmarshall avatar
zach marshall
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's actually because of tarifs imposed on imported products but ok

chabot0310 avatar
Miguel justino C
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Another point. If my wife had pockets would she carry a backpack for all of her crap? Or has she been trained by society to have a purse with everything ever needed?

mamp avatar
Ma Mp
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Dudo que a los fabricantes de ropa (solo ropa) les importe un bledo la venta de bolsos. La razón es otra: evitar volumen en cadera, nalgas o vientre. Los bolsillos son incompatibles con la ropa estilizada.

tato33uk avatar
Nicess
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The reason female pants have small pockets or nothing at all, has to do with fitting. No woman will wear tight fitting trousers showcasing their curve just to spoil that with the outline of a cumbersome phone or what-have-you.

willowsweet_1 avatar
HooowlAtTheMoon
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Which is why I wear the cargo pants with like a million of pockets. Because pockets.

judim_novak avatar
Judi Michelle
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is factual and has been confirmed by the fashion industry

wendyjwhalen avatar
Snekky/Snek (She/they is fine)
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yes! Especially women’s running shorts. It’s so frustrating when I don’t have pockets what’s worse is I have this pair of jeans that are really comfortable, soft but not too soft, comfortable waistband etc., except for one thing. IT HAS POCKETS THAT ARE SEWN CLOSED. There are pocket bag things on the inside, pretty sizable ones too, but they are flipping sewn closed this makes me so flipping angry.

robin_childers avatar
Robin Childers
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Women ususally have fuller thighs, therefore less room for actually carrying anything.

dundun avatar
DUN DUN
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

About all such traps in women's apparel industries, one guy makes MARVELLOUS videos in youtube. This is just one of them.

blasphemousriots avatar
Rick
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Sort of. Back in the 17th century pockets were non-existent or small for both sexes and both carried their stuff around in bags. After that time clothes were designed with pockets for men, but not for women.

biene avatar
Lila Launehase
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

No, men's coats had lots of pockets while women used the tie around pockets. Please read: The pocket : a hidden history of women's lives, 1660-1900 / Barbara Burman, Ariane Fennetaux. Great book.

Load More Replies...
View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#5

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove The Kardashians usually wear solid colored clothing because it’s easier for them to photoshop

spazmcgee1 , Eva Rinaldi Report

#6

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove That the universe is teeming with life. Earth just can't be that special.

refreshing_username , Yuting Gao Report

Add photo comments
POST
kraackjonas avatar
Johnny Rodriguez
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Ooor, there have been lots of planets like the earth before, maybe with higher developed civilisations like us, but their galaxy exploded in a supernova billions of years ago like it will happen to our galaxy. Maybe some of the black holes only exist because some alien experiment went horribly wrong. The universe is so big and so old and so crazy-for me, everything is possible..

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#7

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove That the developed world would function just fine if people were paid the same salaries, but worked only 3 days a week instead of 5. I strongly suspect the elite and governments want us working as much as possible so we don't have enough free time to cause unrest and improve society in a way that would negatively affect them. After all, since machines and factories have automated most forms of manufacturing, so why are we working as many (or more) hours as people from 150 years ago?

aartadventure , Damir Kopezhanov Report

Add photo comments
POST
always2bfaithful avatar
DDmaybeandor
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

For those saying it's unrealistic, this sort of mass shift; please let me draw your attention to history. There were people who were certain the economy couldn't stand paying former slaves, allowing women into the work force, cutting back from 80 hour work weeks to 40 hour work weeks, not allowing children to work, and I'm sure there's more. The proposed idea would be a major shift but it's not unrealistic or outright impossible. I'd love to hear some economists debate the feasibility.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#8

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove All those “questionnaires” and “create your X name” things on Facebook are created by people hoping to data mine secret question answers to steal your identity or bank info.

Your stripper name is the first car you owned + The street you grew up on.

Yo dummy, those are the secret questions to your bank account!

missllil , Solen Feyissa Report

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
#9

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove Cats can understand our words, but do not care. They are waiting for a moment to speak, but since we are so far beneath them it hasn't happened yet.

JeremyMo88 , Cats Coming Report

#10

There’s no sales on Black Friday. It’s just hyped up and people don’t do the research. Something could have been on “sale” earlier in the year for the same price, but people flock to the stores on Black Friday and buy it immediately because in their mind... it’s the cheapest it has ever been.

thr0wAwayZone365 Report

Add photo comments
POST
jmscargill avatar
Scagsy
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is true. A study confirmed it. But people are so dumb that they fall for it every single year. Fighting each other in the aisles. Sometimes it's embarrassing to be a human.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#11

That the "unsubscribe" method in spam emails, calls or texts are really just a way of confirming the number is attached to a real person.

Ryutso Report

#12

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove That a lot of businesses in my hometown are just money laundering operations. 25 nail salons in a town of 70,000? 3000 square foot DVD rental shop in the best block of downtown where commercial rents are very high? Dozens of $10 barber shops sitting empty all day but remaining open? Red flags all around.

anonymousjohnson , Peter O'Connor aka anemoneprojectors Report

Add photo comments
POST
skwatandost avatar
Aski Markup
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yes! I always think this, like how can they make a profit, and afford to pay all of their overheads?

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
#13

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove That my oldest brother is actually my bio father.

It just makes no sense to me otherwise. I have a butt chin and no one else in my family does. This older brother was(is?) an alcoholic, drug addict, and just a big mess all around. He brought different women to my parent's house every day and we would hear them f**k. It makes no sense to me that he came out of that with zero children. Makes less sense since he's ~20 years older than me, which means my parents would have had me at a dangerously (for my mom) old age. I know it's not impossible, but it just makes a lot more sense this way. Plus my parents always covered up for his wrongdoings so it honestly wouldn't surprise me.

I once asked my mom and she got visibility upset. Didn't even ask her outright, I just said I had a dream that they told me my brother was really my father. She got super mad and refused to even discuss or acknowledge my dream. Weird as hell.

I would still consider my mom, my mom. Wouldn't consider my brother my dad if he were because he's an ass. It's just something I think is highly probable.

alienblooded , Anthony Shkraba Report

#14

Every episode of every reality show is either tightly scripted, or at least framed and re-shot so the producers can get the right amount of drama on the screen.

Fluxxed0 Report

Add photo comments
POST
blasphemousriots avatar
Rick
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Literally says before or after most of those shows: “Some scenes have been created for entertainment purposes only”.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
#15

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove In my city something bad is about to happen.

I see a lot of mansions on sale, and houses with good location too. I think rich people know something that the rest of the people don't.

Pretty paranoid, sorry.

ElCiscador Report

Add photo comments
POST
bp_10 avatar
WilvanderHeijden
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Not that paranoid. It's called "insider knowledge" and rich people hold often the position where they are informed about plans that could affect their properties. So it could be that soon you'll find that some very polluting industry is building a new plant right across the street because it suddenly has been designated as "industrial area".

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#16

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove Queen Elizabeth will probably live up to 120 years and longer. She is one of the best fed and most cared person on Earth.

If we invented something for immortality, she likely took it already.

umotex12 , WikiImages Report

#17

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove That only about 20% of people actually do any work. The rest just get by looking busy.

Limp_Distribution , Marcus Aurelius Report

#18

I believe that many animal rescues self-perpetuate their own problem. Some rescues have VERY picky requirements - like salary minimums, yard size minimums, prior experience, age minimums, required seminars, required volunteer work, etc. Meanwhile you can just go to a breeder or a store, and be able to get a pet that day.

I understand wanting to make sure the animals go to a home equipped to care for the animal, but if it's so hard to get a rescuee pet that it drives people to stores, then those shelters will only ever become more crowded. A parrot rescue near me requires 6 months of volunteering for 3 hours every week before you can adopt... and there's a store nearby that just breeds and sells parrots. Which one would most people pick?

echoskybound Report

Add photo comments
POST
emberstonepierce avatar
Ember
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I couldn’t agree more with this! Plenty of people would love to adopt a cat or dog but live in a flat/apartment and are discounted immediately. I’ve never understood why having access to a garden is deemed more important than a loving home with people who care. Here in the UK many people would love to take on a rescue pet but are stumped at this first hurdle. It would be ok for me to have a baby in that environment but not a dog/cat?!? How does that make sense to anyone?

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
#19

I believe my grand mother was a serial killer. She was married 7 times; each ending in a sudden death. She died in the 1980’s but everything is still suspicious and no one seems to know anything. I did find an article about her when she came to the US where her first husband died defending her after her ex-boyfriend climbed in her window in New York City. I also found evidence of her having been in prison before coming to the US.

Reloaded9mm Report

#20

That a relative is a CIA agent. She was in the Peace Corps, Vietnam era. Ever since she's been a "world traveler," somehow able to drop her work and "go hiking the Spanish version of the Appalachian Trail" or otherwise go to exotic locales. Sometimes she came back with injuries, "I fell as we were climbing some rocks." Her son is in the agency as an employee, not a spy, and he's married to a CIA translator.

Earguy Report

#21

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove Prince Charles will never sit on the throne. I believe he made a deal with Queen Elizabeth that in exchange for being allowed to marry Camilla he gave up his right to sit on the throne. Prince William will sit on the throne when Queen Elizabeth dies.

CrabFarts , Dan Marsh Report

#22

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove That Bath and Body Works has like, 13 unique scents. Every couple of months they just rotate the scents in and call them something else.

Arcticshade , m01229 Report

#23

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove Starbucks baristas intentionally spell your name wrong so you take a picture of it and post it on social media to give the company free advertising.

antialias_blaster , Coastal Elite Report

#25

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove Historians +200 years from now will be able to look at all of all of the private messages and data of people who have been long dead.

Similar to how we can read private letters of people from 1700’s.

mikenasty , Karolina Grabowska Report

Add photo comments
POST
culmone10 avatar
Giovanni
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Historians +200 will have an hard time getting useful informations, they'll have to dig through terabytes of shitposts and memes

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#26

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove Some zoos have empty exhibits and just claim the animal is in there, you just never see them.

sakura_wayne , BrokenSphere Report

#27

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove I think my great great uncle was gay, but lived in a time where he had to hide that part of himself. He never had a wife or kids. He traveled a lot and was very into art. I asked my grandma a while back if she thought he was gay and she said he just wasn't interested in having girlfriends.

thirty-seven37 , Mykyta Martynenko Report

Add photo comments
POST
alexk_1 avatar
Alex K
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

because he was interested in having boyfriends, wink wink nudge nudge say no more say no more

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#28

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove That my five month old knows exactly when I’m about to fall asleep and starts crying just to screw with me.

ZyuMammoth , Laura Garcia Report

See Also on Bored Panda
#29

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove I believe that apple never actually intended for anyone to buy their $999 monitor stand. It was just an excuse so they could invalidate all warranty claims for the Pro monitor.

"We can't approve your claim due to the use of improper 3rd party equipment".

Joeysaurrr , The Default Project Report

Add photo comments
POST
lyuboiv avatar
Vorknkx
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Apple products are horrendously overpriced, but usually don't provide any extra functionality over non-Apple products (and sometimes they're actually less functional).

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#30

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove That your phone and laptop mics are hot and sending data to certain groups.

JimmyL2014 , Karolina Grabowska Report

#31

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove That my English teacher didn't read essays, and based grades on how we were in class.

MaterialImportance , Anna Shvets Report

Add photo comments
POST
lyuboiv avatar
Vorknkx
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

One of my professors used the so-called "stair system". He would pick up all the papers, stand at the top of a staircase, then toss them forward into the air. The step that a paper lands on determines the grade :D

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#32

35 People Share Things They Are Really Suspicious Of But Can't Actually Prove Mattress stores are a money laundering scheme. No one buys that many mattresses.

One_dank_orange , pxhere Report

#33

That every single person who has submitted their DNA to their ancestor sites has officially damned themselves. That’s like giving away all the passwords to your devices. Our DNA is our coding, it is what builds us. If someone for some reason wanted that information for any reason that would likely ignore the integrity of bioethics, they could get to it. Rich person will die within 2 days without a kidney transplant? They could easily pay someone to check the database to find an individual who could potentially be the closest match. That person would have also submitted where they live. It would be pretty convenient for that person to randomly get terribly injured and be taken to the hospital where the rich person happens to be at. I know it sounds crazy, and there are 100 less crazy things people can do with out data. But with body autonomy rights starting to be taken away by some states, it’s essentially the government saying they own the rights to your body, it’s just not that obvious...for now. Y’all wait. Y’all mark my words.

Cmen6636 Report

Add photo comments
POST
mysteryegg avatar
Mystery Egg
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yep! I will never willingly give away my DNA and I think it's utterly crazy that anyone does. Those ancestry sites make it all look so fun and interesting but there is something sinister about them. I just know it! In the same vain, I'd never have one of those Alexa (or similar) spybots in my house.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#34

That companies (such as smartphones companies) are holding back their best technologies waiting their competitors to release something new so they release something a bit better but not the best they can do

HypertoastR Report

#35

That Earth has been visited by one or more advanced civilizations, and may even be watching us stealthily.

DarthContinent Report

Add photo comments
POST
dariab_1 avatar
Daria B
Community Member
2 years ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Maybe the whole Christianity thing is records of aliens walking on our planet. Think about it. The kingdom in the skies, Jesus' miracles and his superior knowledge, his resurrection -> ascending to the sky -> not reappearing for ages.... It sounds like this ruler of a kingdom called Heaven sent his son to go explore planet Earth, he had bad experiences with our rather barbarian ancestors, went back home and doesn't want to come back.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

Note: this post originally had 72 images. It’s been shortened to the top 35 images based on user votes.