30 Things Taught In School That Raise The Question “What Was The Point?” As Shared By People In This Online Group
School is all about learning things, and the more you learn, the smarter you’ll be, right? Well, some don’t really agree that everything taught in schools is actually useful in life.
Folks on AskReddit have been listing and discussing things and topics that are taught in schools that are actually pretty, if not completely, useless given what you actually end up using in real life.
Reddit user u/highnrgy asked the lovely people of Reddit what’s the most useless thing they teach in school?, getting over 17,700 responses with nearly 35,000 upvotes on the post.
Bored Panda has gathered the best responses and turned it into a neat curated list below, so be sure to scroll through it and give your two cents on the topic in the comment section.
More Info: Reddit
This post may include affiliate links.
In my experience, the way gym and PE were taught were pretty useless because they never taught us how to train or improve our athletic abilities. It was just weeks of half heartedly playing basketball with minimal adult supervision, and then one day we had to run a mile and the coaches would go out of their way to humiliate anyone who couldn't just get up and run a mile under 10 minutes with no training or preparation. It put me off running and exercise in general for a long time.
That your entire self worth is based off of a letter and score.
“Cheaters never prosper.” Yeah cheating is bad, but trust me, they prosper.
That classical literature is the end all be all of reading. I get some books have cultural significance, but that doesn't warrant a 6 week in depth analysis of a book kids can't relate to, with most being about challenges they will never face, culminating in an essay that's basically "I understood it" repeated over and over backed up by quotes.
If you want your kids to never touch a book in their lives ever again, THAT is how you do it.
And the only "correct" interpretation of a classical work is the one the teacher has the most interest in. Regardless of whether the author has anything to say on the matter (modern classics here obviously).
Omg yes, that! Teachers often disapprove of students having their own opinion about the book or characters, or the plot, if it's different from that of the teacher. Ugh made me stay away from any classical literature all my life.
Load More Replies...
Teaching a book is how to kill any love of reading, IMO. Had I not read the classics for fun ---- not knowing they were classics ----- I'd have loathed being taught "literature".
Idk. I always enjoyed when the teacher explained the book. Especially in my college lit class. It was cool learning what these dense, hard-to-read books actually meant. Then again, I’ve always loved reading. (Not a dig. Just my take on myself:)
Load More Replies...
I love reading but I hate how schools force you to analyse and it takes so long you never finish the book
I was that kid that would read in between classes. My American Lierature Survey teacher in high school used to make fun of my choices (mysteries and adventure thrillers) in front of the entire class. You would think he would be happy to have a student that actually read for pleasure.
Reading is reading, as long as you weren’t reading, say, Mein Kampf for pleasure, who cares? Especially the teacher! Ugh, sorry you had a mean teacher, they shouldn’t be making fun of anyone in front of the class period.
Load More Replies...
I'm an avid reader and a fast one at that, so I'd finish the books for English class quickly. Then I got to endure weeks of the book being beaten to death, being forced to read out loud in class and the endless busy work quizzes that boiled down to "did you read this chapter? Did you memorize every mundane detail? What color were Miss Haversham's curtains? You obviously didn't read it if you didn't pick up on every tiny detail and memorized it! " and when it came to actual discussion over the book, woe betide you if you developed a different opinion than your English teacher! Classes taught this way are guaranteed to make kids hate books.
Same. But that lead to me not reading the books anymore as I was always belittled for "reading ahead"
Load More Replies...
I like it, but I went to a pretty good prep school and the teachers really loved what they taught. I am also surprised some rando teenager's opinion of a work is somehow super valid compared to those who have literally studied it their whole lives. Most people can barely get through Milton or Chaucer without help. Heck most people barely understand something as easy to read as Plutarch. And there are modern translations of Homer and Herodotus out pretty recently that are accessible. It's just that people spend more time stuck in the weeds and can't get out into the higher ideas. Most kids in high school and college in the US are ill prepared for rigorous coursework in the classics.
Oh this is so true! My kid loves to read because her private school encouraged them to read everything!
Is this an American thing? Does any other countries do this? We certainly don't (Norway)
It's a british empire thing. We do it here as well. Tortured with shakespeare etc for years.
Load More Replies...
Word is how we communicate. Some say ignorance is bliss but we are on a cellular level alone, so step one is knowing how the best overcame it and you learn the most important thing. Fear is only ever the unknown.
Foshizzle! In high school I had an American Lit teacher who thought I’d be bored by American literature (what?!!?) and assigned me, and me only, to read Great Expectations. It put me off Dickens for decades. Since he decided to stray from the stated curriculum, it’s a shame he didn’t choose Anthony Trollope, who’s a real hoot!
Personally, I love reading. If I were given a month and a book log of how many pages I read, the number would be exceptionally high. But if a teacher handed me a book I loved, Harry Potter, and told me to read it and analyze it and write an essay on it, I would hate that.
My ELA teacher made us annotate To Kill A Mockingbird with sticky notes and only gave us two weeks to do it. It threw me off of reading for the rest of the year.
I love books and always have, but being forced to read something I don't necessarily want to read is a guaranteed way to make me hate the book. EspEcially if I have to annotate the damn thing.
I had a couple f teachers that actually read to us, but books that were interesting, and then we’d discuss what she’d read to us. It mesmerized me, and I loved to be read to, and to find books like that to read on my own. Growing up, without a lot of money for extras, with 4 girls, my mom would take us to the book nook, the library, and make the rounds of the many used book stores in town! We all fell in love with reading, and at our older years, still read! A book for me, is window or a door, or a road to somewhere or something special!
My reading teacher did that, she made us read Esperanza Rising, in which the poor Mexican girl’s father dies and their house burns down and they have to move to another country and they also face nationalist discrimination and also they are in poverty. Apparently this is based on a true story, which I (don’t) believe 100%.
The classics can be taught in ways that connect to our lives today, but most teaching is done in such a wrong way...it sucks the joy out of learning.
I loved when we "reviewed " parts of books, so we would be familiar with them. I LOVE to read, and even took extra literature classes in HS and college. But I actually dropped the class where the instructor MADE us read Beowolf. Half the class quit. Just, why? Forcing kids/students to read books no one likes or understands simply turns them away. There's always something kids like. Got my son to read using Captains Underpants.
That sounds reeeally pointless. Here in Finland, we were given genre, and then we could pick a book that interested us, read that, and made a book report. Thats it. Reading is still one of my favourite things to do.
My English teacher for 9th and 10th grade was amazing. He seemed more open to our individual interpretations rather than like, “this is me reiterating exactly what you told us the book means”. I went on a tangent in an essay about talking pigs in literature and still got an A.
There's so much fantasy with incredible depth and relevance. Did we read any of it in school? Of course not. I, a supposed adult, recently finished a book classified as middle grade (Minor Mage by T. Kingfisher) and loved it - a classic coming of age adventure packaging a startlingly mature examination of the nature of mob violence. It doesn't have to be all big novels.
I agree. However, these books DO teach important principles. But public schools are doing it wrong.
Lord of the Flies, my 11th grade teacher invoked comparisons to everything we would read after it, and 20+ years later I still feel disgust when hearing it mentioned. And I didn't really care for the book because the nature of the violence bothered me. I want to homeschool/unschool my daughter, so long as I can provide lots of social opportunities, because the classroom structure made me hate school. I was an honor roll student until highschool, took mostly higher level classes. But the utter boredom, on top of the depression that set in at puberty made me miserable.
Wtf get you taught by your teachers? I really enjoyed the discussions at Analysis of books. Our teacher showed us how to read between the lines. But have to agree, some classic literature is booooooring. ~.~
Also all of the "classical" literature mainly being from the same place/culture/type of writer (exceptions for the mandatory black history month book being on there) It's ok that books by white American (and/or English) males were the standard before because we didn't know any better, but the world has changed so much and we do know better now. More female writers, more books by African writers, more books telling ancient Asian tales etc. C'mon now, that's long overdue
I'm a compulsive, quick reader and enjoy most classics. However we had to read Catcher in the Rye. Hated it and had to have my nose rubbed in it for the next three weeks.Most overrated book ever and worth about three minutes of discussion. No wonder students were turned off by English lit. No wonder Salinger was a recluse, he was afraid someone would ask him what the damn thing was supposed to be about.
I was an 'advanced reader' at age 11. The teacher was a Steinbeck fan. We were assigned The Grapes of Wrath, Of Mice and Men and The Pearl. We were 11, WTF? I hate Steinbeck, and will forever believe that the Grapes of Wrath is over-rated, as the first third of it was the most boring thing 11 year old me ever read.
The Mill on the Floss.......boring, pointless unless you are an adult reading it.
Throw away all Asian, Middle Eastern, African, and Western European classics so you can repeat mistakes. Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
My entire eighth grade English class thought that John Knowles' 'A Separate Peace' was gay. My teacher went along with it. Then again, we all theorized so often that I don't know if she had any other choice. :)
I loved literature at school and loved reading the classics and discovering what all the fuss was about. Except for Dickens, I always found him so long winded that I lost interest. Literature isn’t for everyone and that’s ok.
"It is old, so it is necessarily a masterpiece full of hidden symbols!!!!!" /s
I promised myself when I left school that I would never again read a book that I could put down
I discovered through being tortured by shakespeare and chaucer that actually what I liked was linguistics, not the melodramatic 'deeper meaning' in things.
Yes, that's where I discovered Afrikaans helps with Chaucer
Load More Replies...
I would rather read books I actually enjoy than have them ruined by teachers making me read them again as soon as I finish them
I always enjoyed “Summer Reading” assignments. (USA high school thing) We got to (well, had-to, Lol!) pick three books from a list which had some descriptions. So, off to the bookstore I went, got my books, and devoured them. Lol. Hey, not trying to look cool. I simply love reading. So I’d read them and like them. But when we got the tests on them, they wanted specifics. 😂 “Hey I read it. I liked it. I don’t remember the name of the main character’s husband. Sorry.” 🤣🤷🏻♀️
There have been some absolutely fantastic suggestions I’ve read for specific modern (likely to be classics) books that could replace less-relevant (boring and outdated) books presently on the required reading “classics list”. (On The Road I’m looking at you lol.) But I DO think this is a fabulous idea. I don’t know if it’s been tried anywhere. Maybe some readers do?
We were made to read some books that we were not mature enough to read, so we didn't 'get' the book. I've read some as an adult and they're great.
Like what? Genuinely curious. Wondering if I’ve read some and had the same experience but none come to mind right now. Thx!
Load More Replies...
ditto, but i'd read almost all the classics they went over in class, way before the class. Not knowing they were going to be assigned. It was the only reason those kind of classes didn't kill my love of reading.
Load More Replies...
Yep, tried to tell my teacher I couldn't relate to Jane Austen novels as everything was so far removed from my own life. I also stated I'd rather read literature that doesn't focus solely on a woman's obsession with finding a husband who won't abuse her. Teacher was not appreciative.
The point of studying a text is not to study that text. It's to learn how to study a text. The reason those texts are chosen is because they're well known, and a great body of work exists around and about them.
That learning how to pass tests is more important than actually gaining knowledge.
Ok…unpopular opinion, sometimes this one is needed. Like if you are good at X, but freeze during tests but need to pass a certification test for X, sometimes test taking skills are necessary, briefly.
That you have to "ignore" bullies and/or forgive them. In real outside world if you bully someone you will:
- Get slapped across the face
- Get kicked in your butt
- Fired from work Or
- Shunned and made fun of.
This is going to sound stupid, but history the way it's taught is basically meaningless.
A long category of dates and events without context or real discussion. The vast majority of history is trivia, because the real story is the cyclical nature of events, the rise and fall of empires, the periods of enlightenment and advance and the reactionary times that bookend them.
You learn that there used to be this thing called "yellow journalism" but you don't learn that what kicked it off was the sudden availability and popularity of newspapers, and nobody draws the EXTREMELY OBVIOUS parallel to our modern blog driven media. If I told you that in the mid to late 1800s (when newsprint was blowing up) that it was extremely common for papers to blatantly copy each others stories with added editorial bias tailored to their viewers...Sounds a little familiar, doesn't it?
Drawing parallels between the robber barons of the late 1800s and the current ones. Drawing parallels between the labor movements of that era, and the ones that are growing again today. S!@#s relevant, and important to realize in context.
But no. Just memorize some f!@#$%g dates and names, so you'll have some s!@t to spout at trivia night later.
So totally true. The book that turned me on to history was William Manchester’s brilliant *The Glory and the Dream* which came out in 1974 and covered American history from 1932 to 1972. Those years encompassed the Great Depression, the Dust Bowl, the rise of the industrial state, and was written as a series of events presented in chronological order, showing how one inexorably led to the other. And here and there a person, place, or thing would be highlighted in a small portrait...the Studebaker sticks in my brain as one of these portraits. I think the rise of unions might be in there. I think I’ve read everything he’s written. A World Lit Only By Fire is another great one. If you want to learn history as a series of stories, William Manchester is your go-to author.
"The bell doesn't dismiss you; I do."
Of course the bell dismisses you. What you're being prepared for, however, is a lifetime of bosses telling you that coming in 15 minutes before your shift, and staying 10 minutes after, doesn't count as overtime and doesn't need to be paid. That it's okay to violate that safety rule on-site because OSHA isn't paying you, I am, and the customer is waiting on you.
Basically, anytime an authority figure isn't following the rules they themselves set for everyone, you are being trained to accept that behavior in your adult life.
I graduated in 1991 for context and, while living in Phoenix, they taught us square dancing in gym class. I must say though that the most useful skill that I was taught at that school that I use every single day is typing.
Sex and drug education. The entire lesson plan is:
"Just don't do it."
F!@#$%g bulls!@t.
I feel like almost everything has some value, but I really really wished that they taught highschool classes on Operating Systems, Excel, and an introduction to programming and logic.
I learned it all in college, but Excel saved me a ton of time on homework. Programming played a much greater role than I could have imagined, and highschool left me unprepared for that.
Well I did a course when I was 15-16 to learn Word Processing, Spreadsheets and simple Databases, simply to play with the computers. Don't laugh, but I got an 'F'! Mainly because it was assessed on typing accuracy and not my understanding of what I was using. I also didn't take the 3rd module, so the highest I could get was a 'D'. From 17-18 I did a Computing qualification which did actually involve programming, but sadly back in the 1980s, it was a case of teach-the-teacher - my programming skills were already way above what the course was teaching - but at least I got a piece of paper to say that I could do it. I then went on to do a degree in Computer Science. So much better for kids now, learning to program with Raspberry Pi's and the like.
In the U.S., probably the Pledge of Allegiance.
We did that every day from first grade through 12th grade. Let's say it took a minute per day. That's five minutes a week. Every 12 weeks, that's an hour. You're in school roughly 36 weeks a year, so that's 3 hours a year. Multiplied by 12 years and that's about 36 hours of your youth academic career spent talking to a flag.
Everyone in my class just straight up refuses to do it, we just keep doing the warm up.
‘You won’t have a calculator in your pocket in the real world!’
Yes, I know how do do math, I’m an engineer and I like math theory, I promise I’m not a brain dead mobile addict.
Yes you will. People don't calculate the trajectories of rockets on paper lol.
The way the US public school system teaches it, Spanish. You learn it maybe half a year then forget it over the summer. You’d think with years of education we’d be better Spanish speakers but it’s essentially useless the way it’s taught.
American history. For gawd's sake most americans can't find one other country on the map so why keep navel gazing, why not teach students about other countries, culture, and language? Met some guy in grad school who was doing his thesis on General Hooker's buttons. Why, just why?
They mostly taught us to ask permission in order to use the bathroom.
I was taught that Columbus knew that the world was round, but everyone else thought it was flat. So, yeah... That.
The amount they teach shakespeare. Like, sure once is probably good, not every year grade 9 to 12.
hizzoze said:
That hiding under your desk will keep you safe from bombs and tornadoes. (Yes I know what it's actually for, it's just always been a silly visual.)
vegdeg responded:
That wasn't the lesson you could have learned.
The real lesson was that people tend to panic, and panicking causes unpredictable and dangerous behavior. When you drill an action that makes a population feel like they have self control over a situation, they will tend to follow that.
Same as with patients and a disease - so often there is conflict between clinician and patient because the clinician will see it as the patient not being able to do anything (medically proven at least) - whereas the patient is looking for some agency, some self control over a situation, even if that is drinking carrot juice or whatever. This helps explain the multitude of holistic medicines and why they are popular - because there is always something you can do (or feel like there is) to have agency in a difficult situation.
As others have said - the lesson wasn't always literally the subject matter/what was being taught.
That conduct grades matter. I have a friend whose child got a "needs improvement" conduct grade. WTF is that about? If her 8 year old is causing problems, address it then. Why wait 9 weeks and slip it onto the report card? My friend is also a teacher and completely agreed with me. I got plenty of "unsatisfactory" conduct grades in school and yet I still managed to get a college degree and have a career. Screw that nonsense.
I was graded on "friendliness." I got " unsatisfactory" for several years. Well excuse me for being bullied every day and having major trust issues and social anxiety because of it. Damn positivity project.
They don't do it anymore, but back around 2000 in health class we all had to plan a wedding. Like, pair up and budget out a rental space, food, rings, etc.
Looking back: What. The. F@#k?
Maybe the subject matter (a wedding) is a bit skewed, especially if it's repeated, but event planning such as this is a hugely important skill. We did a cookie business - come up with a recipe, work out prices, including overheads and advertising, put forward a business case for a loan (even though in reality it was our parents providing the materials). Then bake and sell and report back how successful we were. To be honest, I would have preferred the wedding planning as I was partnered with someone who could burn water!
My biology teacher was supposed to teach us evolution, but had us memorize a bunch of birds in the process?
A pop quiz would be him walking into the classroom with a boombox, hitting play, and he'd play some chirping noises that he recorded himself. He'd ask us to write down the scientific name of the bird. Or he'd show us a drawing of a bird and tell us to write down the common name of it. It was a mix.
But that's it. There wasn't any question about evolution on the quiz at all. It was entirely about memorizing birds.
This was the class that broke me. When we studied the cell, I got a 97 for the semester. When we studied evolution, I felt like a dog jumping through a hoop on command and decided I wasn't going to memorize birds. F@#k you, flunk me.
I would leave the quizzes blank on purpose.
I grew up in Massachusetts, so maybe this is skewed because of the proximity to early settler and revolutionary war sites, but EVERY year in history, from like 1st grade to 12th, we learned the same stuff on the early settlers to revolutionary war. That would be the majority of all history classes. Yes, it’s very important history (and I do thoroughly enjoy history and that time period in particular) but when it’s all that’s covered and everything else is glossed over, it doesn’t feel like we learned as much as we should have. It was also always taught through rose colored glasses.
I didn't learn about the "Spanish American War" until I was out of school and an adult. CT schools.
They taught competitive cup stacking in my elementary school. Still have no idea why. This was in central Canada, but clearly it was widespread across a lot of North America.
Hi, language teacher in the uk.
This is more what they don't teach but....
They often teach the rise of the British empire but seldom about the fall. Which leads students with a very British centric approach to a lot of their studies. I'm aware of this in languages but I've seen this in history, RE and even English language. I'm not blaming the teachers or the students, the curriculum is f!@#$d. But as a result from this I hear way too often "learning X language is pointless, everyone speaks English!"
For me it was social studies, specifically politics that only really focuses on the 50s-70s and ignores everything else and tries to use the period of time where people literally couldn't lose money on anything and use it to justify trickle down economics of today's society as a good blueprint for running a country.
I'm too old for this, but I can totally see how this would work. "Oh, see that nice way it worked that we totally skewed for our trickle-down economic fantasy?"
How to say and spell antidisestablishmentarianism.
My 1st grade teacher told us if you go outside and stand really still, you can feel the earth rotating...
Three simple words... "Five paragraph essays."
English being the only class that is/was required during all four years of high school, we had it constantly drilled into our heads that it was the only way to submit short papers and that we would need to perfect the application if we wanted to succeed in collage.
First day of Comm 101 in collage while the professor was going over the syllabus, and that everything needed to be submitted in MLS format, someone asked what MLS was. The professor stopped, "Let me say this to all of you that graduated high school last year and are just starting your collegiate lives... if ANYONE turns in a paper in five paragraph format you will fail the assignment."
Found out from everyone I knew that was taking other professors for English or Communication classes that they got told the same thing.
Note: this post originally had 39 images. It’s been shortened to the top 30 images based on user votes.
Why aren't financial literacy and self defence on the curriculum? Much more useful than trigonometry or hockey.
But trig applies to so many fields! Astronomy, geography, satellite navigation, computer music, chemistry, medical imaging, electronics, electrical engineering, civil engineering, architecture, mechanical engineering, oceanography, seismology, phonetics, image compression, game development, the list goes on. I used it in both of the tech jobs I had.
Load More Replies...
One thing I've understood about schooling in hindsight is a LOT of it is just teaching you how to pass exams. The emphasis seems to be on learning chucks of information that can be parroted back based in an established testing curriculum rather than imparting the knowledge AND methods for problem solving in a real application of learned information. Does that make sense (just read it back myself and I'm not sure but I hope you're getting what I mean)
We may never use some of the things we learned in school but having the knowledge expands our minds.
When I was a kid we had to learn the capital cities of almost every country because it might come up on the common entrance exam. Not only have I happily forgotten most of them but also most of them are now obsolete. Capital of East Germany anyone? East Berlin by the way, west Germany was Bonn. Now only useful in TV game shows.
I remember having to learn all the European capitals too, and also noticed how many no longer exist.
Load More Replies...
A good portion of schooling is making you figure out HOW to learn, HOW to memorize, HOW to think. Unfortunately, they do a crappy job of explaining that to you. But memorizing capital cities isn't important because you need to know the capitals, it is important because you will need to memorize things in life (for your job or whatever), and learning HOW to memorize things is a skill you will need. Also learning forces you to think (in theory), and practicing thinking makes your brain more efficient in general.
They didn't TEACH HOW to learn the capitals just that we needed to KNOW them for THE TEST.
Load More Replies...
Wait, i got stuck in the reddit thing. There are people out there, that have to DANCE to graduate? Maybe i got something wrong, because it is 3am here and i should sleep.
I actually read a story about that, apparently it was started by some dud who didn’t like jazz and had a lot of influence in schools, so he had them all teach square dancing so kids wouldn’t get into jazz. Dumb idea, I know. I do like square dancing, though.
Load More Replies...
I don't know about other countries, but here in the USA each state's governing body decides the curriculum and what students need to be taught. Schools are TOLD what to teach, we are TOLD to give standardized tests, we HAVE to do these things because the government tells us to. To the person who angrily says "I wasn't taught x subject in school, I got ripped off": yeah, you were. You were too busy scrolling through your phone or talking.
This is less about what people learned, and more about what they didn't.
Kids aren't even taught how to deal with minor medical emergencies because schools are brainwashed into thinking that they'll get sued for doling out medical advice without a license. But the worst offender is the (Gaussian) Bell Curve:, as in, ''If you're in the top percentile, you've got to be good''. I had a student from China break down in tears because she had studied English pronunciation back home for ten years only to discover that none of her Canadian co-workers had any idea what she was talking about.
What about diagramming sentences? All those crazy lines. What was that about?
Learning parts of speech. The diagrams are kinda worthless but knowing what is a noun, verb, adverb, adjective etc and their place in sentences is useful
Load More Replies...
Algebra calculus and all other maths that use letters and symbols. And then there are the imaginary numbers. I am in my 40s and I have NEVER used any of these since I have left school.
We do but don't realize it's algebra. But yeah on the imaginary numbers.
Load More Replies...
I would love to enroll my child in a private school became of all the nonsense above, and my poor personal experiences. I don't want him trained to be a factory worker that is brainwashed to never question anything and just repeat empty facts so he would get a "good" digit on a piece of paper. Now if only it didn't cost my annual income per semester...
Private schools have their own set of problems, though. Plenty of private school students are so sheltered they basically don’t understand how the world works and are taught even dumber stuff.
Load More Replies...
I could not read this. It just makes me angry, the amount of unessecert s**t I had to put up with from lazy deppresed teachers who just dont care about anyone!
I'm sorry you had that experience and that every teacher you came across was lazy and depressed. Too bad you didn't attend the school where I teach--we actually care about students and what they're learning. Of course, I'm SURE you were a model student and joy to have in class.
Load More Replies... Usually the people who make that type of comment are the ones who flaunted the rules and spent all of high school in trouble, or didn't even graduate.
Load More Replies... Why aren't financial literacy and self defence on the curriculum? Much more useful than trigonometry or hockey.
But trig applies to so many fields! Astronomy, geography, satellite navigation, computer music, chemistry, medical imaging, electronics, electrical engineering, civil engineering, architecture, mechanical engineering, oceanography, seismology, phonetics, image compression, game development, the list goes on. I used it in both of the tech jobs I had.
Load More Replies... One thing I've understood about schooling in hindsight is a LOT of it is just teaching you how to pass exams. The emphasis seems to be on learning chucks of information that can be parroted back based in an established testing curriculum rather than imparting the knowledge AND methods for problem solving in a real application of learned information. Does that make sense (just read it back myself and I'm not sure but I hope you're getting what I mean)
We may never use some of the things we learned in school but having the knowledge expands our minds.
When I was a kid we had to learn the capital cities of almost every country because it might come up on the common entrance exam. Not only have I happily forgotten most of them but also most of them are now obsolete. Capital of East Germany anyone? East Berlin by the way, west Germany was Bonn. Now only useful in TV game shows.
I remember having to learn all the European capitals too, and also noticed how many no longer exist.
Load More Replies... A good portion of schooling is making you figure out HOW to learn, HOW to memorize, HOW to think. Unfortunately, they do a crappy job of explaining that to you. But memorizing capital cities isn't important because you need to know the capitals, it is important because you will need to memorize things in life (for your job or whatever), and learning HOW to memorize things is a skill you will need. Also learning forces you to think (in theory), and practicing thinking makes your brain more efficient in general.
They didn't TEACH HOW to learn the capitals just that we needed to KNOW them for THE TEST.
Load More Replies... Wait, i got stuck in the reddit thing. There are people out there, that have to DANCE to graduate? Maybe i got something wrong, because it is 3am here and i should sleep.
I actually read a story about that, apparently it was started by some dud who didn’t like jazz and had a lot of influence in schools, so he had them all teach square dancing so kids wouldn’t get into jazz. Dumb idea, I know. I do like square dancing, though.
Load More Replies... I don't know about other countries, but here in the USA each state's governing body decides the curriculum and what students need to be taught. Schools are TOLD what to teach, we are TOLD to give standardized tests, we HAVE to do these things because the government tells us to. To the person who angrily says "I wasn't taught x subject in school, I got ripped off": yeah, you were. You were too busy scrolling through your phone or talking.
This is less about what people learned, and more about what they didn't.
Kids aren't even taught how to deal with minor medical emergencies because schools are brainwashed into thinking that they'll get sued for doling out medical advice without a license. But the worst offender is the (Gaussian) Bell Curve:, as in, ''If you're in the top percentile, you've got to be good''. I had a student from China break down in tears because she had studied English pronunciation back home for ten years only to discover that none of her Canadian co-workers had any idea what she was talking about.
What about diagramming sentences? All those crazy lines. What was that about?
Learning parts of speech. The diagrams are kinda worthless but knowing what is a noun, verb, adverb, adjective etc and their place in sentences is useful
Load More Replies... Algebra calculus and all other maths that use letters and symbols. And then there are the imaginary numbers. I am in my 40s and I have NEVER used any of these since I have left school.
We do but don't realize it's algebra. But yeah on the imaginary numbers.
Load More Replies... I would love to enroll my child in a private school became of all the nonsense above, and my poor personal experiences. I don't want him trained to be a factory worker that is brainwashed to never question anything and just repeat empty facts so he would get a "good" digit on a piece of paper. Now if only it didn't cost my annual income per semester...
Private schools have their own set of problems, though. Plenty of private school students are so sheltered they basically don’t understand how the world works and are taught even dumber stuff.
Load More Replies... I could not read this. It just makes me angry, the amount of unessecert s**t I had to put up with from lazy deppresed teachers who just dont care about anyone!
I'm sorry you had that experience and that every teacher you came across was lazy and depressed. Too bad you didn't attend the school where I teach--we actually care about students and what they're learning. Of course, I'm SURE you were a model student and joy to have in class.
Load More Replies... Usually the people who make that type of comment are the ones who flaunted the rules and spent all of high school in trouble, or didn't even graduate.
Load More Replies...
