
Guy Shares Examples Of Medieval Painters’ Attempts To Paint Animals Without Having Seen Them, And It’s Hilarious (17 Pics) Interview
Medieval art is a treasure trove of weirdness. And we’re not the only ones to think so. Daniel Holland created a Twitter thread about medieval animals in paintings that look nothing like real animals because the artist hadn’t actually seen them. The thread went viral and loads of people are now experiencing the joys of drawings in bestiaries based on hearsay, unbridled imagination, and interesting stylistic choices.
Upvote your fave peculiar medieval beats, dear Pandas, and let us know which illustrations you loved the most and why. When you’re done enjoying these paintings, check out our posts about unexpected and creative medieval art right here, here, and here.
Daniel told Bored Panda that he was inspired to create the thread after seeing a segment in the TV show ‘Horrible Histories’ about inaccurate medieval art. This got him thinking what other examples were out there. Daniel was pleasantly surprised by the amount of attention the pictures got. Read on for the rest of his insights.
More info: Twitter | Instagram | DannyDutch.com
This post may include affiliate links.
How can he have never seen a snail? His name is Dutch or Flemish, i.e. rain.
While it’s easy to scoff at artists for not knowing how crocodiles, elephants, and tigers look, imagine having to draw them from memory. Better yet, try describing the animal to someone else and have them draw it! Or imagine how well we’d do if we had to draw an alien species when we only had overexaggerated tales from adventurers to go by.
However, there might be other reasons why medieval artists drew animals this way and it might not just be because of bad descriptions—it could have been a stylistic decision.
“I’ve been educated by a lot of replies I’ve had that these pictures were often painted in this style for a myriad of reasons, not necessarily because of poor descriptions received by the artists,” Daniel pointed out. “I’d assume if artists were given descriptions today without seeing animals and asked to paint them the only difference would be technical ability and materials used, they’d likely look just as inaccurate.”
Bored Panda previously spoke about medieval illustrations with Dr. Catherine Harding from the University of Victoria and Professor Claire LaBrecque from the University of Winnipeg. According to them, medieval scribes and artists enjoyed creating rich and deep networks of meaning for their audiences with their paintings, sometimes with hidden meanings for their audiences to puzzle out. Also, they weren’t strangers to playfulness in their art.
How long each illustration took varied wildly depending on a lot of factors: from the size of the book to how complex the drawings were. Simple pen-and-wash illustrations could be done in minutes while more serious drawings required gold and precious pigments.
"So...you´re telling me that there is this elephasomething animal that grows size of a house?" "Yes, my liege, we saw them many." "Nah, it can´t be. Johnson, draw it half a horse and look like a mix of a wolf, a boar and a trombone." "Like this, sir?" "Righte."
“But fast, thou claimst that there art a gargantuan beast, yea, one that groweth to the likeness of a cottage?” “Verily, lord, it is even so. The natives shewed them unto us, many of said beasts.” “Nay, it canst be. Drawest thou this beast like unto a horse, yet a portion of the size, and mixest its appearance with that of the wild dog, and the pig also, and yet, addest thou a horn.” “A horn, sire?” “Yea, verily.” “As such?” “Yea, Johnson. Forsooth, thou shalt be remembered e’en to the end of days, for thou wert the one to first put to parchment the picture of the fearsome eleaph-ent.” “My liege, the natives did call it a...” “Nay, bold squire. Forsooth, as I have called it, so shall it be known forever more as the fearsome Eleaph-ent.”
Load More Replies...For some reason it made me think of a crumple-horned snorkack
That might have been the only animal with tusks the artist had ever seen. Whomever wrote the description for them failed to record that elephant's tusks point down and away.
Load More Replies...“We have all these stereotyped ideas about how religious medieval people were. But the research shows over and over again how creative, playful and resilient they were,” Dr. Harding told Bored Panda. “There is strong evidence for people who thought outside of the box as in the case of a medieval heretic, who created their own mental world that runs counter to the culture. I love their mental agility and their passion for questioning. They made medieval Christianity over and over again in so many ways. That is the creative part.”
Professor LaBrecque said that, in her opinion, we’re living in a world that’s strange but not stranger than it was in medieval times. “It was just different, and unexpected, and super creative.”
This is not a beaver, it's a weaselfish. Trust me, they do not make good pets.
"And his balls, man... his balls were big!" - "And you say he was wearing a trenchcoat?" - "Yeah, totally."
I remember from my history class that much of this was created with word of mouth. The artists were never near any of these creatures and only heard stories (usually second or third hand) of them.
Yes because it was uneasy to travel and nearly impossible to travel far enough to get a chance to see most of these animals in wild.
Maybe with the lack of travel again our art will return to this...
Gemjoybug follower
Like snails?
That makes perfect sense for the 13th C. illustrations, but not the ridiculous 17th. C. crocodile.
I have 2 books with pictures like this. One is full with birds that look like they are drawn by someone on crack.
Would you give the names of the books, please? I would like to check them out, they sound like fun. :D
Frau Baumstumpf like
Frau Baumstumpf good
Frau Baumstumpf what
Dark Pigeon follower
cpo109 like
Dark Pigeon Good response!
There seems to be a problem with the crocodiles.
They're living in de-Nile.
I love that all of these animals have human-like expressions.
There is so much more of this out there, I wish this was longer. Depiction of cats were hilarious
Yes! This is one of my favorites: ugly-medie...b515d2.jpg
Ms. M., looks like a kangaroo with a derpy face! xD 🦘(。々°)
Rainbow Panda +
Ms.M. easy
nccmrm97 -
I wonder if some were intended to be something other than what we think, ex. Snails could've been pangolins or armadillos, an animal that curls up like a snail
Ooh bless their hearts x
Cat love
I absolutely love these.
These are creatures that never got accepted to bring into life by god. 😂
pretty sure I have vision loss
Laila Hernandez love
Well to be fair most of them didn’t seem to have ever seen people.
Imagine if they saw the monsters from the Cambrian Explosion.
I'ma give them full props for doing the best they could with just people's descriptions. They didn't have photography, much less Google, and just had to go by how people described the beasts. Can you imagine trying to draw something you'd never seen before, completely outside the realm of your experience, based on someone telling you what it looked like? You'd draw on what you already knew (pun partially intended), and just do the best you could. Silly to make fun of them.
I want tattoos of some of them
Lisa T no
jim-kerry9876 follower
How we take television and internet for granted.
David Gripon Good response!
mm78 follower
Interesting to look at.
Medieval people were... um wierd
Live this post bored panda! Very interesting!!
This comment has been deleted.
I've heard that people in medieval times knew to draw cats but intentionally drew them ugly. Cats were worshipped in majority of religions as gods and thus Christianity demonised cats in order to over power them with their only true God? Or something along those lines...
Cordi Schmidt like
pbppbp haha
I think they just were bad at drawing back then maybe
Dang, laudanum was a helluva drug
Jillian B. ?
prash-wadkar9 +
I remember from my history class that much of this was created with word of mouth. The artists were never near any of these creatures and only heard stories (usually second or third hand) of them.
Yes because it was uneasy to travel and nearly impossible to travel far enough to get a chance to see most of these animals in wild.
Maybe with the lack of travel again our art will return to this...
Gemjoybug follower
Like snails?
That makes perfect sense for the 13th C. illustrations, but not the ridiculous 17th. C. crocodile.
I have 2 books with pictures like this. One is full with birds that look like they are drawn by someone on crack.
Would you give the names of the books, please? I would like to check them out, they sound like fun. :D
Frau Baumstumpf like
Frau Baumstumpf good
Frau Baumstumpf what
Dark Pigeon follower
cpo109 like
Dark Pigeon Good response!
There seems to be a problem with the crocodiles.
They're living in de-Nile.
I love that all of these animals have human-like expressions.
There is so much more of this out there, I wish this was longer. Depiction of cats were hilarious
Yes! This is one of my favorites: ugly-medie...b515d2.jpg
Ms. M., looks like a kangaroo with a derpy face! xD 🦘(。々°)
Rainbow Panda +
Ms.M. easy
nccmrm97 -
I wonder if some were intended to be something other than what we think, ex. Snails could've been pangolins or armadillos, an animal that curls up like a snail
Ooh bless their hearts x
Cat love
I absolutely love these.
These are creatures that never got accepted to bring into life by god. 😂
pretty sure I have vision loss
Laila Hernandez love
Well to be fair most of them didn’t seem to have ever seen people.
Imagine if they saw the monsters from the Cambrian Explosion.
I'ma give them full props for doing the best they could with just people's descriptions. They didn't have photography, much less Google, and just had to go by how people described the beasts. Can you imagine trying to draw something you'd never seen before, completely outside the realm of your experience, based on someone telling you what it looked like? You'd draw on what you already knew (pun partially intended), and just do the best you could. Silly to make fun of them.
I want tattoos of some of them
Lisa T no
jim-kerry9876 follower
How we take television and internet for granted.
David Gripon Good response!
mm78 follower
Interesting to look at.
Medieval people were... um wierd
Live this post bored panda! Very interesting!!
This comment has been deleted.
I've heard that people in medieval times knew to draw cats but intentionally drew them ugly. Cats were worshipped in majority of religions as gods and thus Christianity demonised cats in order to over power them with their only true God? Or something along those lines...
Cordi Schmidt like
pbppbp haha
I think they just were bad at drawing back then maybe
Dang, laudanum was a helluva drug
Jillian B. ?
prash-wadkar9 +