Woman Has Been Brother’s “Spare” Since Her Birth, Refuses To Donate Kidney To Him Decades Later
In his controversial bestseller “The Spare,” released several years ago, Prince Harry claimed that the British royal family allegedly expected him to become the actual savior sibling for his elder brother. Yes, a blood donor, organ donor, and everything related.
This sparked a wave of public outrage after the book’s release, but as it turns out, similar cases also occur in ordinary families, far removed from the thrones. As, for example, happened to the user u/Zestyclose-Second440, the author of the story we’ll tell you today.
More info: Reddit
We often say that any person is unique and comes into this world with their distinct goal – but the fact is that this is nothing but a lie
Image credits: senivpetro / Freepik (not the actual photo)
The author of the post is now 32 years old, and she has two elder brothers, 34 and 37 years old, but she only maintains relationships with the middle bro
Image credits: Zestyclose-Second440
Image credits: wavebreakmedia_micro / Freepik (not the actual photo)
Both the author’s and her middle brother’s purpose of coming into this world was to be a spare for their sick elder sibling
Image credits: Zestyclose-Second440
Image credits: Wavebreak Media / Freepik (not the actual photo)
Since her very first day, the author became the regular blood and bone marrow donor for her brother ill with cancer – until he finally got well at 14
Image credits: Zestyclose-Second440
Image credits: Drazen Zigic / Freepik (not the actual photo)
However, both the parents and the elder brother kept mistreating the younger kids badly, so they both left home after coming of age
Image credits: Zestyclose-Second440
Recently, the mom demanded that the author donate her kidney to the eldest bro – but this time the woman firmly said No
So, the Original poster (OP) explains that she is originally from South America and is the third child of her parents, after older brothers “Drew” and “Mark.” Both the author and Mark were essentially born with the sole purpose of saving their older sibling when he was diagnosed with cancer at age two.
Mark turned out to be unsuitable due to his own health issues, so our heroine was born – and literally from the first days of her life, she was Drew’s donor. Blood, bone marrow, stem cells – the little girl was in pain and scared, but her mother always told her to just endure. And she endured – she simply had no choice.
Meanwhile, Mark and the OP were essentially left on their own – their parents’ undivided attention was focused on the hospital room where Drew lived. There were procedures, doctors – but also the best gifts, gaming consoles, and whatnot. When Drew finally recovered at 14, his parents’ attitude didn’t change. He was a typical golden child, and his treatment of his younger siblings, alas, was just bullying.
Both the author and Mark moved to Europe, and now, in their 30s, they maintain relationships only with each other. So when the OP’s mother recently called in the middle of her workday (she works for the police), she knew something extraordinary had happened. And so it was. It turned out that Drew, who had taken to the bottle in recent years, urgently needed a kidney donor.
Yes, you read that correctly – even decades later, the mother expected the OP to fly right over and meekly donate her kidney to her bro. And when our heroine said No, she was immediately met with a barrage of insults. The climax came when the mother frankly admitted that “this is what she was made for.” The OP had had enough of it. She just hung up and decided to pour out her feelings online.
Image credits: freepik / Freepik (not the actual photo)
In fact, the issue of savior siblings is highly debated worldwide – after all, the procedure essentially involves genetic selection of embryos based on illness and compatibility with the older child. The medical effectiveness of this approach is undeniable, but its ethical implications are highly questionable. For example, in some European countries, this approach is permitted, while in others, it is prohibited.
The story of Adam Nash, the first savior sibling in human history, is quite well known. He was born to donate cord blood for his sister, Molly, who had Fanconi anemia. It was also crucial that Adam avoid becoming ill himself.
The process was medically successful – both siblings survived – but its ethics remain questionable even a quarter of a century later. And yes, in South America today, there are no specialized regulations governing such processes, as, for example, is noted in this paper. However, in the story we describe, the situation is somewhat different.
Firstly, based on the siblings’ ages (they are all quite older than Adam Nash), their parents were likely simply trying to conceive saviors for their eldest child – but their behavior subsequently appears completely outrageous and unreasonable. Incidentally, this was also noted by numerous commenters on the original post.
According to the responders, our heroine did the right thing by refusing to donate – after all, she had already suffered so much to ensure her brother was alive and well. Almost all commenters firmly believed the author has already given her bro everything she could, and now she owes nothing to anyone. So do you, our dear readers, also share this view?
Most people in the comments claimed that the author did the right thing, and that she actually owes nothing to anyone
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
Absolutely horrific! To raise children as spare parts! Humanity never ceases to emphasize the fact that it shouldn't exist. The end of our species can't come quickly enough.
Agree Horrific but commonplace. How many people have kids so "someone will take care of them in their old age"? Or they want a child to take over the family business or to save their marriage or because they are lonely This is no more or less selfish or cruel, but the other reasons are things people actually say out loud
Load More Replies...Drew and the parents played FAFO and learned it has hard fast consequences. Drew thought he could party and get away with anything and everything and the parents thought OP would just do as she's told. Nope. OP is well within her rights to say no. No is a complete sentence, end of discussion. It's mind boggling that the parents had not one but TWO children to save the Golden Child and now it's blown up in their faces. Somewhere a tiny violin plays for them.
I don't know the ins and outs of the medical system in OP's home country, but the last 10 years of my working life was in medical transportation. We had MANY hemo-dialysis clients who lived for many years while undergoing the treatments. If they took care of themselves, it was often just an unpleasant chore every couple of days. We had one lady who was a mess, O², a walker, in her late 60s and fairly frail, she hung in for YEARS while undergoing dialysis 3x per week. Unless he is just off the chain he could potentially do well, without a transplant, just doing dialysis.
Load More Replies...The whole concept of "savior sibling" has got to be one of the darkest, cruelest, most inhumane inventions of the 20th / 21st centuries. I remember watching "My Sister's Keeper" and being absolutely appalled that any parent would subject their own child to all that emotional and physical a***e.
And the number of people who thought that was ~just a story~... ugh
Load More Replies...Apparently he didn't have one to begin with so there's no need to donate one. 🫤
Load More Replies...What kind of monstrous hospital administration would be okay sacrificing a toddler for spare parts? At least OP now is of adult age to inform everyone that she does NOT give her consent.
From the hospitals perspective, parents made an informed decision and both children were healthy enough for the procedure. That's their duty of care. They had no grounds to refuse the procedure or take the kids off the parents. Sadly the bar for officially stepping in and overruling parents is very high That's to protect families. If every time a doctor disagree with a guardian's demeanor or decision, they could take the kids, the result is racial and religious minorities and low income families get their kids taken. It has been shown time and again while individuals are helped, more are harmed. The way to safeguard against that is that the bar for taking over care of a child from their guardian is high. This isn't on the hospital.
Load More Replies...I have chronic kidney disease. I’m currently at 26% function so a transplant is definitely in my future. If I ask my sister to donate and she says no then I will respect her decision. I have no rights to her organs! The parents and the brother are being incredibly selfish and cruel
She was “made” to help cure her brothers cancer. She did that. Job done. Her parents are disgusting people on so many levels
The CPS comment was weird. It's not an organization, it's just a generic term, even in the US. I guess her country doesn't have an equivalent. 😢
So glad she lives in another country. Makes it much easier to permanently cut contact with this toxic family. I'd change my phone number and forget they exist.
Drs should not allow parents to "have" a savior child to help the unhealthy child. It's just wrong. What about the rights of the "savior" child? Why are they even still mentioning this idea to parents of sick children? They need to make this idea illegal. Human beings aren't meant to be bred for this reason at all.
Just no. F**k that. F**k Drew and f**k those piece of s**t parents.
You're assigning the technology of today to the experience of someone in their thirties - that happened when they were four. And apparently you have no idea what a glass child is, nor how a spoiled child can go from being hospitalized and spoiled to being home and healthy and spoiled. The ignorance and the emotional lack of intelligence is yours and yours alone.
Load More Replies...Absolutely horrific! To raise children as spare parts! Humanity never ceases to emphasize the fact that it shouldn't exist. The end of our species can't come quickly enough.
Agree Horrific but commonplace. How many people have kids so "someone will take care of them in their old age"? Or they want a child to take over the family business or to save their marriage or because they are lonely This is no more or less selfish or cruel, but the other reasons are things people actually say out loud
Load More Replies...Drew and the parents played FAFO and learned it has hard fast consequences. Drew thought he could party and get away with anything and everything and the parents thought OP would just do as she's told. Nope. OP is well within her rights to say no. No is a complete sentence, end of discussion. It's mind boggling that the parents had not one but TWO children to save the Golden Child and now it's blown up in their faces. Somewhere a tiny violin plays for them.
I don't know the ins and outs of the medical system in OP's home country, but the last 10 years of my working life was in medical transportation. We had MANY hemo-dialysis clients who lived for many years while undergoing the treatments. If they took care of themselves, it was often just an unpleasant chore every couple of days. We had one lady who was a mess, O², a walker, in her late 60s and fairly frail, she hung in for YEARS while undergoing dialysis 3x per week. Unless he is just off the chain he could potentially do well, without a transplant, just doing dialysis.
Load More Replies...The whole concept of "savior sibling" has got to be one of the darkest, cruelest, most inhumane inventions of the 20th / 21st centuries. I remember watching "My Sister's Keeper" and being absolutely appalled that any parent would subject their own child to all that emotional and physical a***e.
And the number of people who thought that was ~just a story~... ugh
Load More Replies...Apparently he didn't have one to begin with so there's no need to donate one. 🫤
Load More Replies...What kind of monstrous hospital administration would be okay sacrificing a toddler for spare parts? At least OP now is of adult age to inform everyone that she does NOT give her consent.
From the hospitals perspective, parents made an informed decision and both children were healthy enough for the procedure. That's their duty of care. They had no grounds to refuse the procedure or take the kids off the parents. Sadly the bar for officially stepping in and overruling parents is very high That's to protect families. If every time a doctor disagree with a guardian's demeanor or decision, they could take the kids, the result is racial and religious minorities and low income families get their kids taken. It has been shown time and again while individuals are helped, more are harmed. The way to safeguard against that is that the bar for taking over care of a child from their guardian is high. This isn't on the hospital.
Load More Replies...I have chronic kidney disease. I’m currently at 26% function so a transplant is definitely in my future. If I ask my sister to donate and she says no then I will respect her decision. I have no rights to her organs! The parents and the brother are being incredibly selfish and cruel
She was “made” to help cure her brothers cancer. She did that. Job done. Her parents are disgusting people on so many levels
The CPS comment was weird. It's not an organization, it's just a generic term, even in the US. I guess her country doesn't have an equivalent. 😢
So glad she lives in another country. Makes it much easier to permanently cut contact with this toxic family. I'd change my phone number and forget they exist.
Drs should not allow parents to "have" a savior child to help the unhealthy child. It's just wrong. What about the rights of the "savior" child? Why are they even still mentioning this idea to parents of sick children? They need to make this idea illegal. Human beings aren't meant to be bred for this reason at all.
Just no. F**k that. F**k Drew and f**k those piece of s**t parents.
You're assigning the technology of today to the experience of someone in their thirties - that happened when they were four. And apparently you have no idea what a glass child is, nor how a spoiled child can go from being hospitalized and spoiled to being home and healthy and spoiled. The ignorance and the emotional lack of intelligence is yours and yours alone.
Load More Replies...







































52
37