In a way, this post is basically the movie version of shower thoughts. Bear with me. After Twitter user @jazz_inmypants asked people to share bothering movie details that aren't common knowledge, his thread received quite a few interesting insights. For example, Grease (1978) might be described as a story that teaches you to change yourself until other people like you. And Belle's (Beuty and the Beast (1991)) neighbors are probably doing something shady if the village can support such an extensive bookstore when she's the only reader and doesn't even pay. The tweet by @jazz_inmypants has already received over 30K likes and 1K comments, many of which filmmaking students could definitely rework into term papers.
Image credits: jazz_inmypantsThis post may include affiliate links.
OMG This is so mine.... and the fact that Charlie PREFERRED to take Grandpa Joe rather than his Mum whose life was a depressing painful prison.... It just made me want to smack that kid.
Altogether, a film can seem incredibly complicated, but the reasoning behind every decision nearly always comes down to how it is working with the story and how it is affecting the viewer. With that in mind, the New York Film Academy has prepared some tips for reviewing a film and coming up with your own insights.
Watch it. "Once is necessary twice is preferable," the academy wrote. "Taking notes is also a good idea and will help the writing process by making it easy to refer to your in-the-moment thoughts and reactions."
Because he wanted to look deferent than his foster apes. He shave his beard with his deceased father's knife every day.
Express your initial thoughts and support your criticism. "Professional reviewers do not shy away from telling their readers whether they thought the movie was good bad or indifferent, and in fact readers come to rely on those reviewers whose tastes reflect their own when deciding whether or not to spend their time and money. Professional reviewers also have watched a lot of movies and can express why and how they came to their criticism. Be sure to back up your thoughts with specifics–a disappointing performance, a ridiculous plot, beautiful cinematography, difficult material that leaves you thinking, and so on."
Evaluate the acting. "Many casual filmgoers will be inspired to see a movie if a favorite actor is in it, so you should probably spend a little space talking about the performances: seasoned actor in a new kind of role, brilliant performance from a rising star, excellence despite a lackluster script, dynamics in an ensemble, and so much more can be said about the actors in any given film."
Directing, cinematography, special effects... This is where your inner film geek can really shine. Consider the highlights or missteps of directors, cinematographers, costume designers and CGI magicians. What worked, what surprised, what fell short of expectations, are all great questions to address.
It's also important to look at a film’s story from a structural viewpoint. Try to to keep in mind that the vast majority of films fall into the three-act structure: a beginning, middle, and end. It's not because the screenwriters are lazy, but because the formula simply works. In screenplays, the first thing you should look out for is the inciting incident. Generally, about 10 minutes into the film, there will be a moment that forces the protagonist to exit their comfort zone and start their journey towards a new goal. Around the thirty-minute mark, there is usually a major turning point. At this moment, the hero can't go back, that signals the beginning of the second act where the majority of the film will take place. Finally, around the ninety-minute mark, the second turning point will signal the film’s drive towards both its conclusion and resolution.
Of course, some films don’t fit perfectly into the three-act structure, but the vast majority of films do and you can start to get a sense of when important moments or changes will occur when you know the general format.
Did you know that this movie is based on the German book "Das doppelte Lottchen" from Erich Kästner? The girls are Luise and Lotte from Vienna and Munich respectively. The book was written around 1945 so the story makes much more sense regarding the timeframe. Today its stupid of course but back then it wasn't that easy to keep in contact when miles apart.
They also don't tell you that Hera drove Hercules insane so that he kills his wife Megara and his 5 children
Yeah, but he is supposed to be only 18 I think. Swayze is not 18, but neither is Jennifer Gray. 18 and 16 is not too bad.
And no one ever has a password on their phone. Anyone can just pick it up and see what they've been texting.
To be fair, the size of houses in most American movies and TV series' is ridiculous. A teacher and a nurse living in a massive house? No wonder immigrants think it's the place to be.
Well everyone knows men can't be raped... Yes, that is sarcasm...
It was to keep his mind relaxed and clear so he wouldn’t be in a panic when they arrived and instead could go full send on the booby traps
Jenny was broken from childhood. This may bother you but it happens a lot in real life so it's not unrealistic.
Disagree. The point of the whole movie was Bueller getting Frye to live beyond his fears.
I still can't handle how so many of the retired Bella's could afford to just jet off to Denmark
There are actually a few good reasons why the eagle plan would have been a lot riskier. 1) The Ring has a will of its own and often drops from the grasp of whomever holds it. If, during flight, the Ring fell, the heroes would most likely never find it again before Sauron did -- especially if it fell over Mordor or the Dead Marshes. 2) While maybe not as strong as the Eagles in the air, the Ringwraiths are quite comfortable in the skies and I'm certain the Ringbearer would be less safe aloft than on the ground, where there are hiding places and escape routes. 3) As an intelligent race of Middle-Earth, the Eagles are as susceptible to the corrupting influence of the One Ring as any other. Discord would have been sown in the ranks of the Eagles and the Heroes, and that is another complication that Gandalf probably wouldn't have risked.
And..in the books, they said that the Eagles were a neutral race that did not get involved in the affairs of other groups in Middle Earth. They wouldn't have gotten themselves involved until after the battles were over.
Load More Replies...The Eagles were not just some animals that Gandalf could do whatever he wanted with. They are their own race and while Gandalf was their friend he was not their master. Saving Frodo and Sam was a favour. It would have been a great risk to fly to Mordor, because Sauron would have seen them and sent the Nazguls after them. Going by ground gave Frodo and Sam cover they wouldn't have had in the air. All of this is better explained in the book. It would have been good if the script had done a bit more to explain the logic behind it.
Do they actually mention the possibility in the books? Been a while since I've read them, I don't remember that part.
Load More Replies...I’m so sick of hearing this ridiculous argument. First of all, why would you think the eagles would agree to fly into Mordor on a possible suicide mission? Second, the risk is too high. Sauron would undoubtedly see them coming and send the Nazgul after them. What if in the ensuing battle they dropped the Ring in Mordor? Would Frodo willingly give the Ring to them? A halfling is the one to stand - the prophecy matters. Jesus, get a grip with the eagles. Stop relying on the silly movies and read the books, the history, the languages, before you, a regular dumbass, start to believe you’ve discovered some massive loophole that a genius like Tolkien would overlook. F**k.
THIS! I get to annoyed when people bring up the Eagle thing, because Sauron wouldn't definitely just let them fly in??
Load More Replies...It does discus this in The Hobbit. The eagles where a proud race that strictly preferred not to much about in the afairs of other races. They could not be looked to for help. Now TOM BOMBADIL ... ;0) LOTR FANS ...
Super nerd comment from me, they do consider Tom Bombadil in the council but say he doesnt recognise the importance of the ring and would most likely lose it as it has no power over him...although Tom doesnt really fit into LOTR much in tone and purpose, Tolkien probably only put him in as his character was one of the first stories he wrote and appears in a few shorts and poems before he wrote hobbit etc.. For reference he was originally envisioned as a spirt of the (english) countryside, one of the few actual analogies Tolkien intended. He was pretty clear that LOTR was not a metaphor for war or facisim or anything else, just a story and the reader could read into it whatever they wished. Unlike his mate CS Lewis and his heavy jesus banter...
Load More Replies...The point was to stay undetected from Sauron. That's why a creature so petite and insignificant had to do this task without the too obvious huge flying eagles. The eagles would ruin the element of surprise whilst Aragorn was attacking the hordes of Sauron in the Black Gates.
So my comment was deleted because it made sense. Perhaps people need to read the books to understand why the movies went in the direction they did..because the book explains why they couldn't take the Rocs (not eagles.)
This WAS brought up in the books. The reason is that the eagles said NO! They wouldn't take them any closer to Mordor than they did.
Thank you Natasha! Ppl always complain about the eagles but it's bn dealt with! Also, they already rescued them from the burning trees, the book is the hobbit not the eagles lol
Load More Replies...I believe that the most common explanation for this one is that the Gandalf doesn't really have the ability to call on/summon the Eagles. They just kinda show up when they feel like helping. Another theory is that Gandalf had a plan in place that would have involved meeting up with the Eagles at some point, but didn't tell anyone else because Wizard logic. Then he got killed by the Balrog and no one else knew about this plan so they just continued on in whatever way they could.
Because Sauron's eye would have seen them making the trip by air and strike them down before they reached their destination. The idea was for them to travel under the radar. And they're Rocs...not Eagles.
I believe they are described in multiple books as 'Great Eagles'
Load More Replies...This is such an old question, and there are actually legitimate reasons.
Thank you all of you!!! This is not a "big plot hole" it has several very reasonable explanations!
The Big Bang Theory ask this question first. They also compared it to Wizard of Oz.
Clint Eastwood in The Mule was a LILY aficionado. The whole reason he became a drug mule was because he lost his business where he grew LILIES. All he did was grow prize-winning LILIES, to the extent that he bailed on his only child's wedding.The daughter he named IRIS. (NB: I know irises are a type of lily, but come on...!)
Ah, so Lily should have carried the ring to Iris. Its all clear now ;-)
Load More Replies...Nope. The Nazgul did not mount the flying creatures till Glorfindel (Arwen in the movies) drowned their horses, which was way after Frodo left the Shire.
Load More Replies...Biggest thing that annoys me about LOTR is the journey they make. All through the first 2 1/2 films you can see Mount Doom some way off in the distance and they never seem to get any closer to it. Then suddenly towards the end of the third film they are there.
You never have had to walk a long distance, and never have lived in an area which wasn't fairly polluted. You can see tall mountains on a clear day at least 150 Mi. A normal person walks, of a good day, about 15-20 miles. If the ground is broken, no roads or trails, it's more like 10 or less. That's two weeks or more, and that's without all the issues of dodging orcs, and other hostile forces, and they weren't walking directly to Mt Doom. Furthermore, they weren't seeing Mt Doom, they were seeing the mountains surrounding Mordor. They only saw Mt Doom after they crossed those mountains (all the Shelob scenes). Also, Frodo wasn't seeing Mt Doom, he was having visions of Mt Doom. Finally, the Middle Earth may have been flat. meaning that you could see a lot farther than on earth. So they could have seen Mt Doom for hundreds of miles.
Load More Replies...Yes. In the LOTR Gandalf can set up major fires just saying aloud few commanding words. . What excactly would you expect to happen those feathered fire-ball candidates when flying valiantly in airspace controlled by all-seeing eye of an even more powerful entity..
*deep breath* I could go on and on about this, but this video by Film Theory explains it better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMXX2YsrxsE (not counting the intro of course)
It's amazing me how thin skinned people are when you post something that explains their stupidity and instead of saying "Oh...now I see" and deleting the post..they delete your comment. Mikey..if you posted this and you're the one that keeps deleting my explanations of why they never took the Eagles (actually Rocs) to Mordor..then you need to get a life dude.
Supernatural so many problems but the one that constantly annoys me Is that every single time they finally find a monster the monster kicks their asses ....is there no growth
doesn' Gandalf tell them to fly you fools when he falls with the balrog
Going on a quest is character building. The Whitest Kids you Know did a very funny skit on this..that would be very politically incorrect today(look it up)
Silly question, 'cuz there would have been no way Gollum would've been able to follow an eagle in flight. . . unless of course he'd been able to grab a tail feather. . .
Silly question, 'cuz that would only have been a 10 minute movie instead of 3 hours. . .
I mean, obviously this was an oversight on Tolkien's behalf, but I can imagine three scenarios that would account for it. 1) Gandalf plain forgot about the eagles. 2) Gandalf worried some of the eagles might betray the ring bearer. 3) Sauron keeps a close eye on the eagles (they are old foes after all) and it was only the fight with Aragorn that let them leave their roosts without being intercepted.
I was inspired to get geeky and read up on this. There is a fourth possible scenario. Canonically the Great Eagles were sent by the gods to observe evil, not directly intervene. Like Gandalf, they cannot use their full power to simply make evil disappear, they can only offer minor help so the mortals save themselves.
Load More Replies...First..not Eagles, they're Rocs. Second...why would you obviously fly into a dangerous area where you can seen by everyone..including an all seeing evil eye? Wouldn't you rather stay under the radar? After all..Navy Seals and special forces teams could be dropped off at the front door of dictators and ruthless war criminals, but they wouldn't be so stupid because they open themselves to get taken out before completing their mission. Nothing nerdy about that.
Load More Replies...Note: this post originally had 52 images. It’s been shortened to the top 30 images based on user votes.
It bothers me that we don't have a grasp on the fact that flawed characters are what make good fiction......or that human beings ARE "problematic" sometimes.....or that we are now expecting fictional characters to only represent the best, most 100% socially acceptable versions of mankind to the point where it borders on limiting creative freedom because we have a meltdown when someone makes a deeply flawed character.....or that we are living in a society where we are no longer able to appreciate true depth of character because we have drawn such hard lines of social acceptability......
This is a good point. On the other hand, writers slot charts with hyper-annoying traits to satisfy formulae. Consider Matt Groenig whose formula requires a Bender. Outrageous and in your face, doing outrageous and implausible things just to satisfy plot points and comedy beats... and nobody would tolerate his presence if it were real. One could make the argument you just made about soap opera characters too. But I knew a couple of girls who were soap opera addicts, and they acted exactly like the characters on TV, neither better nor worse, and in real life no one could stand being around them.
Load More Replies...In Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them - The Wizarding Community were absolutely fine with sending Newt and Tina to their deaths for almost outing them, but when they catch Grindelwald whose sole purpose was to expose the wizards and witches they just send him back to Azkaban?!
Well, it was Grindelwald (pretending to be Percival Graves) who ordered them to be killed...
Load More Replies...How about 'Revenge of the nerds' where a guy pretends to be someone else to have sex with a girl (rape), or even 'Sixteen candles' where Jake "gives away" his almost-passed-out-drunk girlfriend to another guy, who then sleeps with her. Really. The 80's were awful.
What is wrong with sleeping with someone? It's the sexual intercourse that can be problematic.
Load More Replies...Any movie where the main character's family works too much and never has time for family annoy me because the family in question are always well-off and it never seems to occur to them that the REASON they are well-off is because the main character is always working. If said character lost their job and they lost their standard of living, they'd still end up blaming main character.
and the second part of what you said being 'Mrs Doubtfire'
Load More Replies...Does anyone remember that movie "Christmas with the Kranks"? Good LORD, all the Kranks wanted to do was go on a freaking cruise and the whole neighborhood turned against them.
At the same time, it always bothered me that he couldn't buy a calendar or donate to the church because he wasn't going to celebrate Christmas.
Load More Replies...I get super rage everytime I think about Independance Day the first movie....the Dad that was treated like c**p by people, gives his life to save the world leaving three kids behind and the President does NOTHING. One line at the end of it of him saying "you kids come live with us at the White House" would have wrapped up a great movie, but nope they ruined it.
The White House was destroyed. Maybe they should have invited the president to live with them in their trailer😉
Load More Replies...It used to really annoy me that in American films,people talking on the phone never said "Goodbye" ,they just said wheatever they had to say and hung up.
Lol I just commented that on the one about the text messages.
Load More Replies...#027 Mel Brooks played in Lethal Weapon? I guess you mean Mel Gibson :-)
Ok, I've always taken a huge issue with how absurdly nonchalant EVERYONE in the weirdo pastel neighborhood in Edward Scissorhands was about inviting essentially a handsome mutant into their lives and homes. Seriously, it BARELY gets addressed, and then yeah sure, let's get him drunk, let him hang with our children and cut our hair... what the honest hell??
I believe it's a genre called "magical realisim". (Someone correct me if I'm wrong.) A magical thing happens, but no one really takes it as being magical. Very popular in Spanish literature of some countries, to my limited knowledge.
Load More Replies...The number one thing that bothers me about many films is that a character will use the excuse “I had no choice” (or some varriation of it)as an excuse for what they did. Once you notice it you’ll hear it in most films.
In The School of rock when the kids didn't win and the crowd boo-ed the winners, when the winners song was a lot better.
You know what bothers me? That david yates directed the second four Harry Potter movies. I can only pray they will be remade within my lifetime.
They should remake them starting with movie 3, imo. The first two movies might not have been as flashy as the rest, but they were much closer to the spirit and atmosphere of the books. Also Ron wasn't a comic relief moron.
Load More Replies...That's why i don't watch American films....they are sooooo unrealistic!
Great information!!! Thanks for your wonderful informative blog. Village Talkies a top-quality professional corporate video production company in Bangalore and also best explainer video company in Bangalore & animation video makers in Bangalore, Chennai, India & Maryland, Baltimore, USA provides Corporate & Brand films, Promotional, Marketing videos & Training videos, Product demo videos, Employee videos, Product video explainers, eLearning videos, 2d Animation, 3d Animation, Motion Graphics, Whiteboard Explainer videos Client Testimonial Videos, Video Presentation and more for all start-ups, industries, and corporate companies. From scripting to corporate video production services, explainer & 3d, 2d animation video production , our solutions are customized to your budget, timeline, and to meet the company goals and objectives. As a best video production company in Bangalore, we produce quality and creative videos to our clients.
Just saw Uncharted. Fun movie. But the first time the cat's sex is referenced, it's called 'her' and then in the end credits scene, 'she' is called 'Mister Whiskers'. Did the writers just not give a damn about continuity? Also, any movie that refers to a calico cat as male (Big Hero Six, Home)
I don't like the responses of "That's what you found wrong with a movie with etc.?" It's the small things, guys.
In general any movie in a midieval/history/fantasy setting: there are often a lack of agricultural areas around towns, castles etcetera. Cause people in towns yesteryear got their food from trucks? And somehow, armour are absolutley useless against swords. Oh... and there are a lot of arrows that goes thru plate armour like it were paper. Etcetera etcetera.
As a little kid, I asked; "Why does there always have to be a witch?" (somebody to mess things up) I was told "If there wasn't a witch thee wouldn't be any story"
I am bothered by Disney's Little Mermaid. When she has to give up her voice and still get the Prince to love her-what is left? Just her looks and body? What?!
And we know Ariel can write because she signed a contract with Ursula. So, why didn't she just write Prince Eric a note to explain what happened?
Load More Replies...Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Arc..... Indy did nothing. He was supposed to stop the Nazi's from getting and opening the Arc..... he fails and the Nazi's get the Arc and open it. They could have eliminated Indy from the movie and it would have had the same ending.
Apparently he didn't stop the Nazi's from getting their apostrophe.
Load More Replies...In the Incredibles 2 then they need to do all this work to turn the ship when Void could have easily made a portal and turned it. I know it's just a kids movie but it still bothers me.
Right, everybody here, go on Youtube and search for CinemaSins. You're welcome.
What I don't understand is in Avenger's: End Game...Thor is a recluse whose fat and depressed from drinking beer all the time. But he's a god..so would he really look fat from drinking too much beer? And if he's fat because he wants to be because of his depression..then wouldn't he go back to being trim and fit when he gets his mojo back?
I just notice that people doesn't know how to use their imagination, its entertainment, relax and enjoy!
Little Women is supposed to be a feminist movie but its really about sisters who are not fulfilled until they meet or marry men. But the one who doesn't dies. What does this tell us?
...you do know that this was a book written during the American Civil War, right?
Load More Replies...Little Women - all the girls are unhappy until they get men and the one who doesn't dies. How is that feminist?
Any movie where the end titles credit somebody with Costume Design but the entire cast wore only jeans and Tshirts or other mass produced garments.
In Pixar's Inside Out - the little girl has blue eyes.....both her parents have brown eyes.....either she is super recessive, or adopted.
It also matters what color eyes the grandparents have. Both my parents are brown eyed, I have blue and my brother - green eyes. Nearly all our grandparents have light-colored eyes.
Load More Replies...I always thought "Unfaithful" is horrible movie with horrible message. How can ever in any universe be justified to kill someone as "revenge" because your wife had an affair. And not only that psycho husband got away with murder but he also practically enslaved his wife, trapped her in that horrible marriage with killer, and you can see at the end how miserable and horrified she is. And we are supposed to feel "good" because she is "punished"? On the other hand, maybe I missed the point, maybe the movie point is "don't marry a psycho, they can look normal and cute too". If this is not the message, movie is mysogynistic pease of c**p.
My main problems with Disney movies is the sexual assault that just casually happens. Believe it or not, but you are not supposed to break into a girl's house and kiss her while she's sleeping. If she has actually been sleeping for years, go in and shake her awake or carry her out to a doctor. You do not need to kiss her!
In the original story she literally gets raped and impregnated while sleeping. She wakes up in labour IIRC. Disney definitely toned it down.
Load More Replies...In Deep Throat, are we *really* to believe her clitoris is in her throat? She would have had to absorb her twin in the uterus, and even then the clit isn't what would likely get left over and it's even more doubtful it would be located in her throat. Also, she would have known about it being there simply by eating something and swallowing, as she would have had to her entire life.
Think vitamins -- it's an old story and people had different health kicks back then. Something like 'cod-liver oil' was loaded with healthy vitamins but tasted awful. So, a spoonful of sugar would have helped...
Load More Replies...It bothers me that we don't have a grasp on the fact that flawed characters are what make good fiction......or that human beings ARE "problematic" sometimes.....or that we are now expecting fictional characters to only represent the best, most 100% socially acceptable versions of mankind to the point where it borders on limiting creative freedom because we have a meltdown when someone makes a deeply flawed character.....or that we are living in a society where we are no longer able to appreciate true depth of character because we have drawn such hard lines of social acceptability......
This is a good point. On the other hand, writers slot charts with hyper-annoying traits to satisfy formulae. Consider Matt Groenig whose formula requires a Bender. Outrageous and in your face, doing outrageous and implausible things just to satisfy plot points and comedy beats... and nobody would tolerate his presence if it were real. One could make the argument you just made about soap opera characters too. But I knew a couple of girls who were soap opera addicts, and they acted exactly like the characters on TV, neither better nor worse, and in real life no one could stand being around them.
Load More Replies...In Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them - The Wizarding Community were absolutely fine with sending Newt and Tina to their deaths for almost outing them, but when they catch Grindelwald whose sole purpose was to expose the wizards and witches they just send him back to Azkaban?!
Well, it was Grindelwald (pretending to be Percival Graves) who ordered them to be killed...
Load More Replies...How about 'Revenge of the nerds' where a guy pretends to be someone else to have sex with a girl (rape), or even 'Sixteen candles' where Jake "gives away" his almost-passed-out-drunk girlfriend to another guy, who then sleeps with her. Really. The 80's were awful.
What is wrong with sleeping with someone? It's the sexual intercourse that can be problematic.
Load More Replies...Any movie where the main character's family works too much and never has time for family annoy me because the family in question are always well-off and it never seems to occur to them that the REASON they are well-off is because the main character is always working. If said character lost their job and they lost their standard of living, they'd still end up blaming main character.
and the second part of what you said being 'Mrs Doubtfire'
Load More Replies...Does anyone remember that movie "Christmas with the Kranks"? Good LORD, all the Kranks wanted to do was go on a freaking cruise and the whole neighborhood turned against them.
At the same time, it always bothered me that he couldn't buy a calendar or donate to the church because he wasn't going to celebrate Christmas.
Load More Replies...I get super rage everytime I think about Independance Day the first movie....the Dad that was treated like c**p by people, gives his life to save the world leaving three kids behind and the President does NOTHING. One line at the end of it of him saying "you kids come live with us at the White House" would have wrapped up a great movie, but nope they ruined it.
The White House was destroyed. Maybe they should have invited the president to live with them in their trailer😉
Load More Replies...It used to really annoy me that in American films,people talking on the phone never said "Goodbye" ,they just said wheatever they had to say and hung up.
Lol I just commented that on the one about the text messages.
Load More Replies...#027 Mel Brooks played in Lethal Weapon? I guess you mean Mel Gibson :-)
Ok, I've always taken a huge issue with how absurdly nonchalant EVERYONE in the weirdo pastel neighborhood in Edward Scissorhands was about inviting essentially a handsome mutant into their lives and homes. Seriously, it BARELY gets addressed, and then yeah sure, let's get him drunk, let him hang with our children and cut our hair... what the honest hell??
I believe it's a genre called "magical realisim". (Someone correct me if I'm wrong.) A magical thing happens, but no one really takes it as being magical. Very popular in Spanish literature of some countries, to my limited knowledge.
Load More Replies...The number one thing that bothers me about many films is that a character will use the excuse “I had no choice” (or some varriation of it)as an excuse for what they did. Once you notice it you’ll hear it in most films.
In The School of rock when the kids didn't win and the crowd boo-ed the winners, when the winners song was a lot better.
You know what bothers me? That david yates directed the second four Harry Potter movies. I can only pray they will be remade within my lifetime.
They should remake them starting with movie 3, imo. The first two movies might not have been as flashy as the rest, but they were much closer to the spirit and atmosphere of the books. Also Ron wasn't a comic relief moron.
Load More Replies...That's why i don't watch American films....they are sooooo unrealistic!
Great information!!! Thanks for your wonderful informative blog. Village Talkies a top-quality professional corporate video production company in Bangalore and also best explainer video company in Bangalore & animation video makers in Bangalore, Chennai, India & Maryland, Baltimore, USA provides Corporate & Brand films, Promotional, Marketing videos & Training videos, Product demo videos, Employee videos, Product video explainers, eLearning videos, 2d Animation, 3d Animation, Motion Graphics, Whiteboard Explainer videos Client Testimonial Videos, Video Presentation and more for all start-ups, industries, and corporate companies. From scripting to corporate video production services, explainer & 3d, 2d animation video production , our solutions are customized to your budget, timeline, and to meet the company goals and objectives. As a best video production company in Bangalore, we produce quality and creative videos to our clients.
Just saw Uncharted. Fun movie. But the first time the cat's sex is referenced, it's called 'her' and then in the end credits scene, 'she' is called 'Mister Whiskers'. Did the writers just not give a damn about continuity? Also, any movie that refers to a calico cat as male (Big Hero Six, Home)
I don't like the responses of "That's what you found wrong with a movie with etc.?" It's the small things, guys.
In general any movie in a midieval/history/fantasy setting: there are often a lack of agricultural areas around towns, castles etcetera. Cause people in towns yesteryear got their food from trucks? And somehow, armour are absolutley useless against swords. Oh... and there are a lot of arrows that goes thru plate armour like it were paper. Etcetera etcetera.
As a little kid, I asked; "Why does there always have to be a witch?" (somebody to mess things up) I was told "If there wasn't a witch thee wouldn't be any story"
I am bothered by Disney's Little Mermaid. When she has to give up her voice and still get the Prince to love her-what is left? Just her looks and body? What?!
And we know Ariel can write because she signed a contract with Ursula. So, why didn't she just write Prince Eric a note to explain what happened?
Load More Replies...Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Arc..... Indy did nothing. He was supposed to stop the Nazi's from getting and opening the Arc..... he fails and the Nazi's get the Arc and open it. They could have eliminated Indy from the movie and it would have had the same ending.
Apparently he didn't stop the Nazi's from getting their apostrophe.
Load More Replies...In the Incredibles 2 then they need to do all this work to turn the ship when Void could have easily made a portal and turned it. I know it's just a kids movie but it still bothers me.
Right, everybody here, go on Youtube and search for CinemaSins. You're welcome.
What I don't understand is in Avenger's: End Game...Thor is a recluse whose fat and depressed from drinking beer all the time. But he's a god..so would he really look fat from drinking too much beer? And if he's fat because he wants to be because of his depression..then wouldn't he go back to being trim and fit when he gets his mojo back?
I just notice that people doesn't know how to use their imagination, its entertainment, relax and enjoy!
Little Women is supposed to be a feminist movie but its really about sisters who are not fulfilled until they meet or marry men. But the one who doesn't dies. What does this tell us?
...you do know that this was a book written during the American Civil War, right?
Load More Replies...Little Women - all the girls are unhappy until they get men and the one who doesn't dies. How is that feminist?
Any movie where the end titles credit somebody with Costume Design but the entire cast wore only jeans and Tshirts or other mass produced garments.
In Pixar's Inside Out - the little girl has blue eyes.....both her parents have brown eyes.....either she is super recessive, or adopted.
It also matters what color eyes the grandparents have. Both my parents are brown eyed, I have blue and my brother - green eyes. Nearly all our grandparents have light-colored eyes.
Load More Replies...I always thought "Unfaithful" is horrible movie with horrible message. How can ever in any universe be justified to kill someone as "revenge" because your wife had an affair. And not only that psycho husband got away with murder but he also practically enslaved his wife, trapped her in that horrible marriage with killer, and you can see at the end how miserable and horrified she is. And we are supposed to feel "good" because she is "punished"? On the other hand, maybe I missed the point, maybe the movie point is "don't marry a psycho, they can look normal and cute too". If this is not the message, movie is mysogynistic pease of c**p.
My main problems with Disney movies is the sexual assault that just casually happens. Believe it or not, but you are not supposed to break into a girl's house and kiss her while she's sleeping. If she has actually been sleeping for years, go in and shake her awake or carry her out to a doctor. You do not need to kiss her!
In the original story she literally gets raped and impregnated while sleeping. She wakes up in labour IIRC. Disney definitely toned it down.
Load More Replies...In Deep Throat, are we *really* to believe her clitoris is in her throat? She would have had to absorb her twin in the uterus, and even then the clit isn't what would likely get left over and it's even more doubtful it would be located in her throat. Also, she would have known about it being there simply by eating something and swallowing, as she would have had to her entire life.
Think vitamins -- it's an old story and people had different health kicks back then. Something like 'cod-liver oil' was loaded with healthy vitamins but tasted awful. So, a spoonful of sugar would have helped...
Load More Replies...