NSFW Photo Series Explores The Beauty Of Female Body From A Never-Seen-Before Perspective
Photographer Roger Weiss was finding himself increasingly disassociating with the photographs depicting women, so he set out to capture the female form in a different way.
Inspired by Kintsugi, a Japanese method for repairing broken things by filling gold in the cracks, Weiss' series called “Human Dilatations” features 250 unifying photographs that show how the female body is fragmented and then reassembled. Each photo in the series captures a body that is slightly dilated and distorted, resulting in a detailed analysis of every part of the female body. The whole series explores new perspectives of female beauty.
More info: Human Dilatations (h/t: dazeddigital)
This post may include affiliate links.
This "Never-Seen-Before Perspective" is somewhat old hat. Bill Brandt did it 60-70 years ago and Mann Ray before that.
It seems like most of these are distorted to make them appear taller. I wonder why...
Using an extremely wide lense, is certainly a less than flattering way to depict a woman. I think I will pass. :(
I dont know how to feel about seeing women like this. Was very disempowering to see being a female. Awkward uncomfortable. Made the female species look ugly in such a beauty defined world. Thanks for the betrayal.
It's unnatural, even more unnatural than a heavily edited fashion shoot. I wonder if the choice to shoot nude was for taboo only
Why would you want to have clothes on them? Only dilutes the message.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
similarly as Martin clarified I am flabbergasted that a man ready to benefit $9540 in 4 weeks on the PC . go to this web-site............. / www.99homejobs . c o mᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵ
Teaching people about the beauty of a thing by *distorting* it and making it grotesque is neither artistic nor intelligent. It's an exercise in getting the politically correct to agree that the king does indeed have clothes.
Using an extremely wide lense, is certainly a less than flattering way to depict a woman. I think I will pass. :(
I dont know how to feel about seeing women like this. Was very disempowering to see being a female. Awkward uncomfortable. Made the female species look ugly in such a beauty defined world. Thanks for the betrayal.
It's unnatural, even more unnatural than a heavily edited fashion shoot. I wonder if the choice to shoot nude was for taboo only
Why would you want to have clothes on them? Only dilutes the message.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
similarly as Martin clarified I am flabbergasted that a man ready to benefit $9540 in 4 weeks on the PC . go to this web-site............. / www.99homejobs . c o mᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵ
Teaching people about the beauty of a thing by *distorting* it and making it grotesque is neither artistic nor intelligent. It's an exercise in getting the politically correct to agree that the king does indeed have clothes.