421Kviews
These Pairs Of Photos Become Very Dirty Only When You Combine Them In Your Head (NSFW)
421Kviews
French photographer Sacha Goldberger is raising a lot more than just eyebrows with his latest photo series. Secret Eden is a set of photo pairs that, when put together in one's imagination, reveal salacious scenes. A deeper meaning, however, lies behind them.
Each pair of photos is set in its own era and political climate, with some depicting historic times, and others visualizing the future. One even stages a ménage à trois involving Snow White and 2 dwarves. The photos of Secret Eden deal with taboos of sexuality, such as public affection, interracial love, and the supposed sanctity of our ancestors. An air of emotional detachment also falls over the subjects, which could be a commentary on how the modern world is coming to view physical relationships.
Scroll through the suggestive series below, and try to spot each hidden tryst. Also, tell us what you think about Secret Eden in the comments.
More info: Sacha Goldberger (h/t: DesignYouTrust | Dangerous Minds)
This post may include affiliate links.
A Dog’s Life
I wish I knew why it's night time in the 2nd and day time in the 1st...
Apple Is The B*tch
Marilyn
Working Hours
Nearly Private
Oh no, you can see two half nipples. Must hide... Must hide... Nipples are evil and will bring doom and despair to our world...
Ape’s Patrol
Hight
Why are they floating, why are the guns floating? Why are they at different times of the day? Wesley Snipes should've paid his taxes.
A lot of effort went in and a big nothingburger came out...
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Absolutely right! The girls are....ok, but being 100% heterosexual, I see nothing sexually interesting with some guys having their trousers dropped. Colour me unimpressed.
I'm gay and they may have their pants dropped, but they look lifeless so it's not exactly appealing :D
I'm an hetero woman and trust me, there's ZERO sexiness in men with dropped trousers.
90% of these photos are of naked people in sexual poses. No need to combine them to be dirty
Stupid
You're better than this, Bored Panda.
No, they actually aren't. Not anymore.
Were they ever? It seems to vary greatly.
Senseless stupid art that focuses on people having sex....that's novel... All gratuitous shots of women parts but the men have long shirts.....that's novel
Underwhelming, and really...not that creative to be honest.
"Very dirty". What are we? 12?
Can we stop calling every stupid thing an "art"?! There are actually people who work their ass off to contribute to art, this is just bs!
Hmmm, I don't know. But I really like all the set decorations and settings.
This is honestly probably the dumbest thing I've seen on Bored Panda. Hopefully this isn't an indication of the direction they are going. I like to come here to be inspired or to laugh at silly pictures. You're supposed to be different than the rest of the interwebs!!! Like others have said, "You're better than this, BP!"
Well, that was a minute of my life I'll never get back. (NO) thanks, BP!
A for effort. D for execution.
Agreed. The concept could be interesting, but the pieces themselves aren't.
So boring
I dont get it
Already Dirty but still confused.
Does it really combine? please photoshop? *poke poke* lol
Erm... why? :/
I am amazed to see how your Photos are not in eyes of Photo Editors. They can misuse your Photos. and you know how.
the sets are beautiful, but the photos are cold and sterile... is that the point? Disjointing the couples makes the sex puerile (and wouldn't the 70s guy in the disco bar with his pants down be noticed by anyone else?) and humiliating.
The most annoying thing about this series is that its actually a really cool concept. But they had to cheapen it with gratuitous vulgarity instead of just coming up with something clever.
It personally think they are pretty amazing ... they are something different and special in there own way. I enjoyed each and every one together and separately....
HATERS GONNA HATE... Most of the comments here seem to be made by those that do not get anything better done and then have to be insulting and underwhelm the effort and thought that went into making these pictures, only because they did not manage to do anything thoughtful themselves. I say great stuff...
Photographer: "I've got this great idea. First, I'm going to take a photo of a woman posing like she's doing it with an invisible dude. Then I'm going to, like, take a picture of a dude looking like he's doing it with an invisible chic. After that, I'm going to just, like, put the invisible dude photo above the invisible chic photo, and have people stare at it, trying to imagine that the two photos are actually just one photo of people doing it." Bad friend: "Go for it, bro. It sounds awesome."
Umm, literally ALL of these run the gamut of risqué to flagrantly sexual on their own, BEFORE getting added together. So yeah...
I mean it's kinda interesting to look at but I don't really get it
It would have been way more interesting if the single shots/poses were not sexual, but became sexual when combined. As is, it's just mhé
Lol...
If the single photos alone weren't wired by themselves this might not have had been rubbish.
I feel like I'd like the pictures better if they "put together". Not because I'm a huge pervert (though I am) but because men standing with their pants down is VERY boring to look at. The women got more of the "good poses". I was initially intrigued, but them being almost entirely heterosexual couples in the same poses was dull. The artist couldn't mix it up? Get some with multiple partners, homosexuality, or even just a larger variety of sexual positions? Also, and maybe it's just me, but the vastness of some of the spaces seemed too distracting when the people miming sex was the apparent focus of the whole project (i.e. the one where we're looking into a house, the house on the lake).
ALSO, also, none of the pictures look like any fun, even the "casual" ones. Almost everyone's got blank expressions like they're just waiting for the sex to be done with.
*if they WERE put together.
A couple photos were hot on their own, most pairings were titillating at best. What gets me is the inconsistent "Mature Content" labeling. It's ALL mature content, why not let us acknowledge it one time by clicking on the disclaimer to enter the post? Wait, sorry, I'm being logical, aren't I?
There were some bush shots....
Different...
The most French art project ever.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
I think, that this is genius idea. Why it should be stupid? Because we cant publicly admit that erotic pictures are okey? This is not porn. My opinion on this is that is god dam genius. Two pictures, seperatly they dont make sense, but toghether.... It is just on the viewer, how long he will be putting these two pictures toghether, in their mind. The pair are incredibly precisely shot. My favourite is number 6. It spoke to me, it made me feel. And that is exactly what a good piece of art should do. Great work, please continue.
"two pictures, separately they don't make sense" really? Each one's counterpart was so predictable it failed to be interesting in any way
A lot of effort went in and a big nothingburger came out...
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Absolutely right! The girls are....ok, but being 100% heterosexual, I see nothing sexually interesting with some guys having their trousers dropped. Colour me unimpressed.
I'm gay and they may have their pants dropped, but they look lifeless so it's not exactly appealing :D
I'm an hetero woman and trust me, there's ZERO sexiness in men with dropped trousers.
90% of these photos are of naked people in sexual poses. No need to combine them to be dirty
Stupid
You're better than this, Bored Panda.
No, they actually aren't. Not anymore.
Were they ever? It seems to vary greatly.
Senseless stupid art that focuses on people having sex....that's novel... All gratuitous shots of women parts but the men have long shirts.....that's novel
Underwhelming, and really...not that creative to be honest.
"Very dirty". What are we? 12?
Can we stop calling every stupid thing an "art"?! There are actually people who work their ass off to contribute to art, this is just bs!
Hmmm, I don't know. But I really like all the set decorations and settings.
This is honestly probably the dumbest thing I've seen on Bored Panda. Hopefully this isn't an indication of the direction they are going. I like to come here to be inspired or to laugh at silly pictures. You're supposed to be different than the rest of the interwebs!!! Like others have said, "You're better than this, BP!"
Well, that was a minute of my life I'll never get back. (NO) thanks, BP!
A for effort. D for execution.
Agreed. The concept could be interesting, but the pieces themselves aren't.
So boring
I dont get it
Already Dirty but still confused.
Does it really combine? please photoshop? *poke poke* lol
Erm... why? :/
I am amazed to see how your Photos are not in eyes of Photo Editors. They can misuse your Photos. and you know how.
the sets are beautiful, but the photos are cold and sterile... is that the point? Disjointing the couples makes the sex puerile (and wouldn't the 70s guy in the disco bar with his pants down be noticed by anyone else?) and humiliating.
The most annoying thing about this series is that its actually a really cool concept. But they had to cheapen it with gratuitous vulgarity instead of just coming up with something clever.
It personally think they are pretty amazing ... they are something different and special in there own way. I enjoyed each and every one together and separately....
HATERS GONNA HATE... Most of the comments here seem to be made by those that do not get anything better done and then have to be insulting and underwhelm the effort and thought that went into making these pictures, only because they did not manage to do anything thoughtful themselves. I say great stuff...
Photographer: "I've got this great idea. First, I'm going to take a photo of a woman posing like she's doing it with an invisible dude. Then I'm going to, like, take a picture of a dude looking like he's doing it with an invisible chic. After that, I'm going to just, like, put the invisible dude photo above the invisible chic photo, and have people stare at it, trying to imagine that the two photos are actually just one photo of people doing it." Bad friend: "Go for it, bro. It sounds awesome."
Umm, literally ALL of these run the gamut of risqué to flagrantly sexual on their own, BEFORE getting added together. So yeah...
I mean it's kinda interesting to look at but I don't really get it
It would have been way more interesting if the single shots/poses were not sexual, but became sexual when combined. As is, it's just mhé
Lol...
If the single photos alone weren't wired by themselves this might not have had been rubbish.
I feel like I'd like the pictures better if they "put together". Not because I'm a huge pervert (though I am) but because men standing with their pants down is VERY boring to look at. The women got more of the "good poses". I was initially intrigued, but them being almost entirely heterosexual couples in the same poses was dull. The artist couldn't mix it up? Get some with multiple partners, homosexuality, or even just a larger variety of sexual positions? Also, and maybe it's just me, but the vastness of some of the spaces seemed too distracting when the people miming sex was the apparent focus of the whole project (i.e. the one where we're looking into a house, the house on the lake).
ALSO, also, none of the pictures look like any fun, even the "casual" ones. Almost everyone's got blank expressions like they're just waiting for the sex to be done with.
*if they WERE put together.
A couple photos were hot on their own, most pairings were titillating at best. What gets me is the inconsistent "Mature Content" labeling. It's ALL mature content, why not let us acknowledge it one time by clicking on the disclaimer to enter the post? Wait, sorry, I'm being logical, aren't I?
There were some bush shots....
Different...
The most French art project ever.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
I think, that this is genius idea. Why it should be stupid? Because we cant publicly admit that erotic pictures are okey? This is not porn. My opinion on this is that is god dam genius. Two pictures, seperatly they dont make sense, but toghether.... It is just on the viewer, how long he will be putting these two pictures toghether, in their mind. The pair are incredibly precisely shot. My favourite is number 6. It spoke to me, it made me feel. And that is exactly what a good piece of art should do. Great work, please continue.
"two pictures, separately they don't make sense" really? Each one's counterpart was so predictable it failed to be interesting in any way