1.9Mviews
30 Actors That Were Considered For Famous Roles Vs. Who Actually Got Them
Harry Potter wouldn’t be the same without Ron Weasley. I mean, Rupert Grint. And the lovable naif Forrest Gump wouldn’t exist without Tom Hanks.
You see, most exceptionally strong characters become almost inseparable from the actors who played them. Like, Twilight and the official heartthrob of the 2000s, Robert Pattinson, will forever stay as the pale, charming vampire with a slow voice in a movie of otherwise questionable quality.
But it turns out, our all-time favorite roles could have been played by entirely different actors. So Bored Panda has compiled a list of pics of two actors, the original one versus the current one, placed side by side for an uncanny question of “what if?”
Let your imagination run free, and just think how different it would have been if Neo was Will Smith. It’s almost like history would also have to be rewritten, but who knows, maybe it’d have been for the better?
This post may include affiliate links.
Tim Roth Turned Down The Role Of Severus Snape In "Harry Potter", Eventually Played By Alan Rickman
Will Smith Turned Down The Role Of Neo In "The Matrix", Eventually Played By Keanu Reeves
Thomas Brodie-Sangster Auditioned For The Part Of Ron Weasley In "Harry Potter", Rupert Grint Was Cast
no way Rupert way too good to be rejected he is the one and only ron for the job
There’s something about the strong characters we like that makes us feel deeply attached to them. Like, genuinely attached as we feel their pains and joys just like they were our close friends or relatives.
The topic is no stranger to academic scholars and Howard Sklar, a postdoctoral researcher in the English Philology Unit at the University of Helsinki, has his own theory. Turns out, our bond with fictional characters reflects our bond with people in the real world.
“We’d have no way of processing a character cognitively if we didn’t have experiences with people outside of the fictional world,” he explains. “The experiences with fictional characters resonate with us because of the fact that we’ve had deep experiences with people throughout our lives.”
John Travolta Turned Down The Role Of Forrest Gump, Eventually Played By Tom Hanks
Sean Connery Said No To Playing Gandalf In "The Lord Of The Rings", Ian Mckellen Took The Part
Ian Mckellen Turned Down The Part Of Albus Dumbledore In "Harry Potter", Michael Gambon Was Cast
And as we invest our attention, time, and empathy in the characters of a particularly engaging film or novel, we begin to respond to them as though they were real individuals. Even if we cannot truly connect with their circumstances, e.g. we have never been in a war, our ability to feel emotionally for fictional beings can transcend these details and make them unimportant. This is what powerful filmmaking and the art of storytelling do to us.
Tom Cruise Was Considered For The Part Of Iron Man, But Robert Downey, Jr Was Cast
Nahh....Iron Man would have been running everywhere instead of flying.
Robin Williams Wanted To Play Rubeus Hagrid In "Harry Potter" But Was Rejected, Robbie Coltrane Got The Part
Jim Carrey Was Considered To Play Edward Scissorhands, Johnny Depp Got The Part
Russell Crowe Turned Down The Role Of Aragorn In "The Lord Of The Rings", Eventually Played By Viggo Mortensen
Bette Midler Turned Down The Part Of Sister Mary Clarence In "Sister Act", Eventually Played By Whoopi Goldberg
hey whoopis Goldberg is in another movie called corrina corrina it is an amazing movie
Eddie Redmayne Auditioned For The Part Of Star-Lord In "Guardians Of The Galaxy", But Chris Pratt Was Cast
Al Pacino Turned Down The Part Of Han Solo In "Star Wars", Eventually Played By Harrison Ford
Matthew Mcconaughey Auditioned For The Role Of Jack Dawson In "Titanic", Eventually Played By Leonardo Dicaprio
Christina Applegate Was Considered For The Role Of Elle Woods In "Legally Blonde", Eventually Played By Reese Witherspoon
Ryan Gosling Was Considered For The Role Of Doctor Strange, Eventually Played By Benedict Cumberbatch
Paul Giamatt Declined The Role Of Michael Scott In "The Office", Steve Carell Got The Part
Emily Blunt Was The First Choice To Play Black Widow, But Scarlett Johansson Got The Part
Hugh Grant Was Considered For The Part Of Gilderoy Lockhart In "Harry Potter", But Kenneth Branagh Was Cast
Gwyneth Paltrow Turned Down The Role Of Rose Dewitt Bukater In "Titanic", Kate Winslet Got The Part
Emilia Clarke Turned Down The Role Of Anastasia Steele In "Fifty Shades Of Grey", Eventually Played By Dakota Johnson
Yeah poor girl didn't want to be associated with sex roles for everything.
Liam Aiken Was Offered The Role Of Harry Potter, But Daniel Radcliffe Got The Part
Joanne Rowling Was Asked To Play Lily Potter In "Harry Potter", But She Declined, Geraldine Somerville Got The Part
Hugh Jackman Turned Down The Role Of James Bond, Eventually Played By Daniel Craig
Henry Cavill Was The First Pick To Play Edward Cullen In "Twilight", Robert Pattinson Was Cast For The Role
David Thewlis Was Considered For The Role Of Quirinus Quirrell In "Harry Potter", Eventually Played By Ian Hart
Britney Spears Auditioned For The Part Of Allie In "The Notebook", Eventually Played By Rachel Mcadams
In spite of her attempts, Britney Spears can not be categorised as "actress".
Jennifer Lawrence Auditioned For The Role Of Bella Swan In "Twilight", But Kristen Stewart Was Cast Instead
Just couple of hours ago I read an article about how she's one of the best actress nowadays. It was in relation to her new role as Princess Diana. It made me do that confused meme face.
Load More Replies...
Kristen Stewart is the worst actress I've ever seen. At first, I wanted to give her a chance, because I've only seen her in Twilight and no one should be judged by their performance in Twilight. But since then I've seen Snow White and the Huntsman too, and I will forever avoid any movie she's cast in because she managed to ruin a fairly okay story with her non-expressions and s**t acting.
twilight series and snow white were trash movies with trash writing and janky directing. Go watch her indy stuff
Load More Replies...
Actors who haven't had their breakthroughs are all pretty desperate. Olivia Colman did commercials for a car-whatever. Now she has an Oscar. Because she deserves it, but there are probably plenty of people who are amazing and will never be seen on the big screen.
Load More Replies...
There was one movie that I have seen with Kristen Stewart in it that I liked. She was frozen for the majority of the movie.
honestly fr. but that could also be because bella was written as a trash character.
Load More Replies...
But would we have Katness Everdeen? I'd be cool with Lawrence doing both, I thought Stewart was pretty bland in Twilight.
Her whole acting boils down to ‘let me whip out my resting bitch face’.
And Jennifer Lawrence's career is blooming. Kristen Stewart found her calling as an action movie actress (Charlie's Angels, Underwater), not so much for drama (and yes the Twilight script was beyond aweful so not a great reflection of her acting ability but she's similarly flat in The Huntsman/Snow White)
I'm glad Jennifer didn't do Twilight. She was perfect for The Hunger Games. And Kristen Steward did well as Bella and further in her career too.
Nearly everything I have watched with Kristen Stewart has me telling myself, why can't this girl smile more? She has a lovely smile and would make her more believable. Jennifer Lawrence would have been wasted in the part.
Although Jennifer is a more skilled and believable actress, I think this was a fine role for Kristen. She’s not a top-notch actress, but she played the part and won the hearts of countless teens. I am pleased with Jennifer’s role in The Hunger Games anyway.
Jennifer Lawrence would have been excellent in the role of Bella. Kristen Stewart is such a bad actress but thank God there were great actors & actresses in the Twilight movies that everyone overlooked her deadpan emotionless acting.
Although I'm used to seeing Kristen Stewart as Bella Swan, I could see Jennifer Lawrence actually doing a better job at it.
Kristen is the only American actress to win a French Oscar, just cause you don't understand her brilliance doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Everything I’ve seen her in she has the exact same style! No versatility. That thing she dies when she’s shocked & tongue-tied is so predictable.
I preferred Kirsten Stewart, she was much better suited to that role.
Now imagine if Jennifer Lawrence played Bella and kristen Stewart has played Katniss.... that could have been very interesting... just saying
I remember when fans were pushing for Emily Browning — I think she would have been great
Kristen is an amazing actor, in my opinion, sure, her acting in the first Twilight wasn't so great, but eventually, she learned and got better. Not trying to start an internet fight btw
I've seen her in some movies where she's been amazing, I don't think she should be judged just for Twilight. None of the acting was great in that!
Load More Replies...Emma Watson Turned Down The Part Of Mia In "La La Land", Emma Stone Was Cast
Jack Nicholson Passed On The Role Of Michael Corleone In "The Godfather", Eventually Played By Al Pacino
Nope. the vibe would have been SUPER different and the movie wouldn't be the same without Al Pacino.
Note: this post originally had 65 images. It’s been shortened to the top 30 images based on user votes.
It seems like Harry Potter movies would have been very different, nearly every role was potentially another actor.
Here's an even crazier story: The Beatles were going to make a Lord of the Rings film in the mid- 1960's with *drumroll* Stanley Kubrick. The film would have featured original Beatles songs. Paul McCartney would portray Frodo Baggins, Ringo Starr as Sam Gamgee, George Harrison as Gandalf and John Lennon would appear as Gollum. Stanley Kubrick didn't like the idea and neither did J.R.R. Tolkien. Tolkien didn't want his work to be turned into an LSD trip and I have to say I think it would have been a disaster if he had let it happen.
All the could-have-been had good carrers without those roles, many of the actual cast wouldnt have done without it. Anyway, if they had accepted the job, and they would appear in this post whith other actors (or the actual cast) as the could-have-beens, nothing would change and people would say exactly the same things "thank god, he/she was the perfect election for the role, it wouldnt be the same without him/her "
You know, I always wondered who the ones were that were turned down...
Tom Selleck was to play Indiana Jones from the start, but he was contracted to film Magnum P.I and couldn't get out of it, so the role went to Harrison Ford. Selleck is good, but can you imagine him as Indy? I can't.
I'm eternally thankful that Gregory Peck was Ahab in Moby D**k! (the good one, the '56 film) Charlton Heston? aw hell no!
Probably one person with several users. Maybe it's one of those people that tend to impersonate BP staff? Someone having a grudge on BP perhaps?
Load More Replies...
Would have been nice if every photo of the actor that didnt play the part was from the same year as the photo from the film/series
The layout of the actors' photos throughout thus piece is inconsistent -- the could-have-beens on the left suddenly switch to the right, then back again. A bit frustrating.
I find all of these really interesting. You can so clearly picture how a film would be dramatically changed, an entirely different mood, with alternate casting.
In Reservoir Dogs the part of Mr Orange was originally offered to James Woods, but his agent didn't let him know and was subsequently fired because of this. I like Tim Roth, but I genuinely believe that James Woods would've been a better choice.
It seems like Harry Potter movies would have been very different, nearly every role was potentially another actor.
Here's an even crazier story: The Beatles were going to make a Lord of the Rings film in the mid- 1960's with *drumroll* Stanley Kubrick. The film would have featured original Beatles songs. Paul McCartney would portray Frodo Baggins, Ringo Starr as Sam Gamgee, George Harrison as Gandalf and John Lennon would appear as Gollum. Stanley Kubrick didn't like the idea and neither did J.R.R. Tolkien. Tolkien didn't want his work to be turned into an LSD trip and I have to say I think it would have been a disaster if he had let it happen.
All the could-have-been had good carrers without those roles, many of the actual cast wouldnt have done without it. Anyway, if they had accepted the job, and they would appear in this post whith other actors (or the actual cast) as the could-have-beens, nothing would change and people would say exactly the same things "thank god, he/she was the perfect election for the role, it wouldnt be the same without him/her "
You know, I always wondered who the ones were that were turned down...
Tom Selleck was to play Indiana Jones from the start, but he was contracted to film Magnum P.I and couldn't get out of it, so the role went to Harrison Ford. Selleck is good, but can you imagine him as Indy? I can't.
I'm eternally thankful that Gregory Peck was Ahab in Moby D**k! (the good one, the '56 film) Charlton Heston? aw hell no!
Probably one person with several users. Maybe it's one of those people that tend to impersonate BP staff? Someone having a grudge on BP perhaps?
Load More Replies... Would have been nice if every photo of the actor that didnt play the part was from the same year as the photo from the film/series
The layout of the actors' photos throughout thus piece is inconsistent -- the could-have-beens on the left suddenly switch to the right, then back again. A bit frustrating.
I find all of these really interesting. You can so clearly picture how a film would be dramatically changed, an entirely different mood, with alternate casting.
In Reservoir Dogs the part of Mr Orange was originally offered to James Woods, but his agent didn't let him know and was subsequently fired because of this. I like Tim Roth, but I genuinely believe that James Woods would've been a better choice.
