I recently shared a photo I'm proud of on Instagram. Reactions ranged from very positive to those denying my work the title of “a photograph,” calling it “computer graphics,” or “photo-graphics.” This got me thinking. Do people really understand the concept of photography art and why are they so adamantly against photo manipulation?

I became passionate about creative photography after the birth of my twin daughters Annabella and Juliette; my little kids inspire me every day in my work. Through photography, I strive to enter the world of my two children, to grasp all the childhood whimsies, and to recreate these magical moments that we all look back on and smile. This means using whatever photographic tools will get me closest to that vision. Photo editing is just one of those tools.

Photography was invented over 180 years ago, but it's only with the relatively recent invention of digital editing software that creative photo manipulation has become the subject of popular controversy. Really though, this just shows our lack of awareness of the history of photography: image manipulation didn't start with Photoshop. In fact, it's always been an essential part of what photographers do.

As I dug a little deeper, I came to realize that art and news photographers have been manipulating their photographs since the very first days of photography. So the argument that a particular image is less of a photograph because it has been retouched didn't seem at all convincing to me. If we started ruling out retouched and photoshopped images from the category of photographs, we would be left with not a single photograph in the world.

Since the invention of photography, image manipulation has been a key part of it. The 19th-century photographers liked to call it “removing imperfections” from the shot, and they did it by painting directly onto the glass-plate negatives. Sometimes, an entire person would be “painted out”. Moreover, they would combine multiple frames in the darkroom to add dramatic elements to their stunning pictures.

Similarly, most new photographs, made over the course of the last century, will have been cropped, dodged, burned, and even painted to some degree. The photographer does this in order to better illustrate the story in the paper. Even the snaps in the family photo album vary, depending on the film, the chemicals, and the color settings used. Most photos are certainly not simply neutral, un-manipulated snatches of the real world. They are rather a real-world story told in a beautiful way.

Sure, I can see why heavy use of Photoshop might be worrying in the area of photojournalism, but I do not consider myself a documentary photographer. Far from it. In fact, I think my work is a little like making a still movie. Image manipulation has always been a part of filmmaking too, but nobody ever suggested that a movie using a blue - screen or CGI is not a movie (cinematography?). There is art in applying these techniques as well. Thus, I will use whatever photographic tools will get me closest to my photo ideas.

The word photography literally means writing or drawing with light. The process of making an entirely computer-generated image - such as a digital illustration or animation - couldn't really be described as "writing with light." This contrasts sharply with my way of working: in simple terms, I make images using a box with a hole that lets light in - so they can definitely be considered "photo-graphs". The fact that I edit these images afterward using software doesn't change this. In any case, it's not fundamentally different from what people were doing in the darkroom over a century ago.

Now that I have tried to raise awareness about the history of and about photography in general, I would like to hear your opinion. How would you define photography? Please share your thoughts on when a photograph stops being a photograph. How much manipulation is too much manipulation?

More info: Instagram

#1

Happiness Is...

Happiness Is...

Report

Bobbi Newell
Community Member
3 years ago

This one, for me, has the most dramatic change in mood. It goes from enjoying small moments despite adversity, to the sweet, pure innocence of childhood.

View more comments
#2

Spring Breeze

Spring Breeze

Report

Rebekah
Community Member
3 years ago

This one is magical. Fairy-esque.

View more comments
#3

Softness

Softness

Report

Neb
Community Member
3 years ago

The kitten is sooooo lovely!

View More Replies...
View more comments
#4

Happiness Is... A Warm Puppy

Happiness Is... A Warm Puppy

Report

Lisa Champion
Community Member
3 years ago

These are simply gorgeous

View More Replies...
View more comments
#5

Breathe In The Ocean

Breathe In The Ocean

Report

Sarah Cleaver
Community Member
3 years ago

I actually prefer the original on this one

Xiaolaohu
Community Member
3 years ago

Me too, the first reminds me of actual time spent at the shore, the light quality, the second is a movie shot in front of a green screen

Load More Replies...
Laugh Fan
Community Member
3 years ago

I like them both - you see different things in each one. They inspire different feelings.

Lyndsey
Community Member
3 years ago

YES, I agree. Personally, I do feel the first one could have been polished a bit more, and if that's her definition of fixing up a picture, who am I to correct her? The two pictures communicate different moods; perhaps she simply did not want to communicate the mood of the first image. You can not compare the two pictures. They aren't meant to look alike.

Load More Replies...
Cuitlahuac Guerra
Community Member
3 years ago

again to much red :(

Cuitlahuac Guerra
Community Member
3 years ago

*too much*

Load More Replies...
Joan Rogers
Community Member
3 years ago

I like the untouched photo much more. She looks very contemplative and the entire shot takes on a more mysterious quality.

Morgen Stern
Community Member
3 years ago

The unaltered one is so much better.

Rebekah
Community Member
3 years ago

Great reflection.

Phoebes
Community Member
3 years ago

I love them both...

Carol Roeder
Community Member
3 years ago

I'm so torn on this one. I love them both!

Sharon Madsen
Community Member
3 years ago

I like the original better.

Merilyn Horton
Community Member
3 years ago

Magical

Ildiko Okido
Community Member
3 years ago

This time I like the original one more, because I love those pinkish colours. But that’s just my personal humble opinion. It’s a matter of taste.

Sharon Halfhill
Community Member
3 years ago

They are too photoshopped

Pamela Scott
Community Member
3 years ago

I like the mood you captured in the original better with this one, but like the edited version too!

DJ Rez
Community Member
2 years ago

I think the color is my only problem with this pic. nothing so far screams PHOTOSHOP. These all say lightroom adjustments. Which is no big deal. It's when someone takes a photo and adds things like if you had put an animal there like she was looking at it. That's where I personally draw the line. Nothing is wrong with adding or taking things from a photo, it's art all the same. It's just not MY style.

DJ Rez
Community Member
2 years ago

The color retouch doesn't look quite right. It's still good but it has an off look to it.

Dave Harrington
Community Member
2 years ago

Original is better.

Tanya Kysel'ova
Community Member
3 years ago

like the first one too

Barry Toney
Community Member
3 years ago

Love the edit.

Liz Sahlin Johansson
Community Member
3 years ago

Over the hill - again. In my - humble (?) - opinion you overwork the original beautiful pics into something made by a plastic surgeon with botox!

View More Replies...
View more comments
#6

Spring Is Here

Spring Is Here

Report

Mimis Nachbarin
Community Member
3 years ago

You did not just "remove imperfections from the shot"... This is a whole lot more of changing. It still is very beautiful work.

View more comments
#7

Can You Keep A Secret?

Can You Keep A Secret?

Report

Kim Lorton
Community Member
3 years ago

Lilia, these are all beautiful photographs! The different tonal qualities you show make each one so different! They are amazing! Most people don’t understand the definition of the word photograph or photographer. A picture does not a photographer make! But you, are a true photographer! Thank you, for these amazing sweet pictures!

View More Replies...
View more comments
#8

Boy And A Girl

Boy And A Girl

Report

Neb
Community Member
3 years ago

While the crop of second photo is better, I like the green of trees in the first one more.

View More Replies...
View more comments
#9

What Does The Tide Bring

What Does The Tide Bring

Report

Alex K
Community Member
3 years ago

when post processing goes too far

View More Replies...
View more comments
#10

Sister's Kiss

Sister's Kiss

Report

Chicago Kitty
Community Member
3 years ago

I actually much prefer the unaltered photo on this entry. There's authentic, cheerful fall crispness about it that quite draws me in. I think this is lost in all the red tones applied in the altered photo and the rain effect comes off as very false. For some reason it reminds me of those rather tacky Sears Family Photo pics circa 1970's & '80's where the subject was placed in a champagne glass or something with a loved one in profile looming them. Again, just my opinion and the original photo is lovely in its own right.

View More Replies...
View more comments
See Also on Bored Panda
#11

Dawning

Dawning

Report

HellCat
Community Member
3 years ago

I actually prefer the original photo here. It's much more ethereal and pleasant to my eye than the second one, which changes to an almost hellish, bizarre feel. I mean no offense, it's just my opinion. From all the shots, this one with the girl on the beach is the one that I think it's been worked a bit too much. Very beautiful photos, though.

View More Replies...
View more comments