Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post Search
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

I Captured Fairytale-Like Autumn In Romania With $250 Camera To Show You Don’t Need Expensive Gear
User submission
11.2K
47.7K

I Captured Fairytale-Like Autumn In Romania With $250 Camera To Show You Don’t Need Expensive Gear

ADVERTISEMENT

It took me 6 years to hike all around the northern part of the Romanian Carpathian mountains to find breathtaking sceneries and capture the fairytale spirit of the Autumn.

For all of those who are asking themselves what kind of equipment I used to make this photos, the answer is actually an advice. You don’t need expensive equipment for making landscape photography. Back then, when I made these photos, I used a DSLR camera, which cost me around 250$ with the kit lens, and a telephoto lens which I bought back in the times with 150$. Also, I used some filters. It’s all about the perfect moment, the perfect spot and the sweet light of autumn evenings and mornings…

More info: alexrobciuc.wixsite.com | Facebook

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

48Kviews

Share on Facebook
You May Like
Popular on Bored Panda
What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
urizen699 avatar
Karpe DM
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

For all the people bitching about him using Photoshop, Isn't that the reason why PS was created for in the first place? Making good phtographs look even better?? I think he did a great job with a few resourses, that is the point of the article.

john_15 avatar
John Cyr
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

People complaining about photoshop are missing the point. This photographer didn't need expensive photo equipment to create these images. They needed a cheaper camera and a copy of Photoshop. there is nothing wrong with creating artful photographs.

post_7 avatar
Nick Gisburne
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Sad that there are so many people here who can't just look at beautiful images and appreciate them, however they were produced. Presumably the people who complain most are the ones who want to put as little effort as possible into everything they (don't) create. Yes, he's retouched the photos... could you do that? I couldn't right now, but someone could teach themselves to do it, if they put in the effort, and these photos give them something to aim for. Great work. Great skill. Well done.

heatherleecollins2012 avatar
Heather
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Oh and btw, he never said he used photoshop. He used filters. You can use Adobe Lightroom for the effects. And some Adobe apps are free.

wondervale avatar
Valentina Bovini
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The title is kinda deceiving... alright you took beautiful pictures with no expensive gear, but you should've claimed you also used post production. However I'm not judging you for that, post production is an art as well. I see many people making the wrong use of it, I use Photoshop myself to make some adjustments, but I always try to keep it as real as possible. People bitching should know MOST famous photos are photoshopped or even staged, but photoshop is not a miracle wand people. If you take a c**p picture it won't turn into an art work. I like to say that you capture with your camera and then you paint with PS. You did a great job in my opionion.

marthespoems avatar
Speranta Regasire
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Alex, felicitari pentru imagini si mai ales pentru munca si sufletul tau care se citesc in ,,spatele" lor! Tine-o tot asa! <3

newcwarr06 avatar
Cherry Warr
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Am I the only person thinking $400+ ain't 'cheap' equipment? I am?? *slink away back to the poor side of the internet*

gun2thedogz avatar
Kirsten Preston
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

How utterly wonderful, dreamlike leading you away for the worn path, into new places. Great work ;-)

jenny12386 avatar
Jenny Vest
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Did you find a camera with a tilt shift or did you create the effect in post production? I'd love to find a tilt shift camera.

jenny12386 avatar
Jenny Vest
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Just worked it out. I need to learn that trick with the lens some time.

Load More Replies...
edgar_dumea avatar
Edgar Dumea
Community Member
6 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Those bitching about PS probably mean that's an extra resource to consider besides the 250$ camera. Plus the knowledge to use it properly.

info_415 avatar
Wedding Photography Select
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Gorgeous. I agree you don't need an expensive camera but photoshop does help (As A Tool That Is)

daniel-r-law avatar
Daniel Law
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

About that 'inexpensive' camera. Yeah, there are many more expensive cameras. But $250 for a camera is too much for people trying to keep a roof over their head and struggling to feed kids these days, let alone back...whenever. Those people need work and I'd bet a good number of them would make good photographers -- if they could afford whatever camera has replaced an Instamatic these days. Frame of reference should be something familiar to a photographer. So he should understand his audience a bit more. He simply has a different frame of reference to life than most of his audience. Photoshopped pictures (and nowhere in the text is Photoshop mentioned) should be designated as such as full disclosure. The article says, "...with the kit lens, and a telephoto lens which I bought back in the times with 150$. Also, I used some filters. It’s all about the perfect moment, the perfect spot and the sweet light of autumn evenings and mornings…" That's photography.

ku6912240 avatar
뮤직이카
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

아름답다 정말 나는 이렇게 표현하고 싶다 하느님은 창조에 신이라고

rollandanthony avatar
Rolland Anthony
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

low quality resolution photos are great for web, but not for printing and selling I suppose

davidverduzco avatar
David Verduzco
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

amazing! you don't need expensive camera but don't you still need expensive software?

rana70035 avatar
corinna_weichold avatar
Corinna Weichold
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Same as 1, 4 and 11 - it's supposed to look like a miniature achieved with tilt–shift effect :)

Load More Replies...
elvazur avatar
Nizaя Bredan
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I Captured Fairytale-Like Autumn In Romania With $250 Camera To Show You Need to Know About Post-production In Order to be a Good Photographer.

iblowsheep avatar
iblowsheep
Community Member
7 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

sorry, but i think this type of Pseudo HDR type editing and tilt sift c**p is way over done and looks like money butt.

okayknow avatar
Lyn Ciampa
Community Member
7 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Yep. 50 hours spent on photoshop with a year or two of learning the 700$ program, you could get these shots with a n iPhone.

sharon_is_super avatar
Sharon Halfhill
Community Member
7 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

I don't like how heavily edited these are.

mal_smith2 avatar
Mal Smith
Community Member
7 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

What a load of bollocks. This is testimony to the retoucher's art, not a cheap camera.

urizen699 avatar
Karpe DM
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

For all the people bitching about him using Photoshop, Isn't that the reason why PS was created for in the first place? Making good phtographs look even better?? I think he did a great job with a few resourses, that is the point of the article.

john_15 avatar
John Cyr
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

People complaining about photoshop are missing the point. This photographer didn't need expensive photo equipment to create these images. They needed a cheaper camera and a copy of Photoshop. there is nothing wrong with creating artful photographs.

post_7 avatar
Nick Gisburne
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Sad that there are so many people here who can't just look at beautiful images and appreciate them, however they were produced. Presumably the people who complain most are the ones who want to put as little effort as possible into everything they (don't) create. Yes, he's retouched the photos... could you do that? I couldn't right now, but someone could teach themselves to do it, if they put in the effort, and these photos give them something to aim for. Great work. Great skill. Well done.

heatherleecollins2012 avatar
Heather
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Oh and btw, he never said he used photoshop. He used filters. You can use Adobe Lightroom for the effects. And some Adobe apps are free.

wondervale avatar
Valentina Bovini
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The title is kinda deceiving... alright you took beautiful pictures with no expensive gear, but you should've claimed you also used post production. However I'm not judging you for that, post production is an art as well. I see many people making the wrong use of it, I use Photoshop myself to make some adjustments, but I always try to keep it as real as possible. People bitching should know MOST famous photos are photoshopped or even staged, but photoshop is not a miracle wand people. If you take a c**p picture it won't turn into an art work. I like to say that you capture with your camera and then you paint with PS. You did a great job in my opionion.

marthespoems avatar
Speranta Regasire
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Alex, felicitari pentru imagini si mai ales pentru munca si sufletul tau care se citesc in ,,spatele" lor! Tine-o tot asa! <3

newcwarr06 avatar
Cherry Warr
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Am I the only person thinking $400+ ain't 'cheap' equipment? I am?? *slink away back to the poor side of the internet*

gun2thedogz avatar
Kirsten Preston
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

How utterly wonderful, dreamlike leading you away for the worn path, into new places. Great work ;-)

jenny12386 avatar
Jenny Vest
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Did you find a camera with a tilt shift or did you create the effect in post production? I'd love to find a tilt shift camera.

jenny12386 avatar
Jenny Vest
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Just worked it out. I need to learn that trick with the lens some time.

Load More Replies...
edgar_dumea avatar
Edgar Dumea
Community Member
6 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Those bitching about PS probably mean that's an extra resource to consider besides the 250$ camera. Plus the knowledge to use it properly.

info_415 avatar
Wedding Photography Select
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Gorgeous. I agree you don't need an expensive camera but photoshop does help (As A Tool That Is)

daniel-r-law avatar
Daniel Law
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

About that 'inexpensive' camera. Yeah, there are many more expensive cameras. But $250 for a camera is too much for people trying to keep a roof over their head and struggling to feed kids these days, let alone back...whenever. Those people need work and I'd bet a good number of them would make good photographers -- if they could afford whatever camera has replaced an Instamatic these days. Frame of reference should be something familiar to a photographer. So he should understand his audience a bit more. He simply has a different frame of reference to life than most of his audience. Photoshopped pictures (and nowhere in the text is Photoshop mentioned) should be designated as such as full disclosure. The article says, "...with the kit lens, and a telephoto lens which I bought back in the times with 150$. Also, I used some filters. It’s all about the perfect moment, the perfect spot and the sweet light of autumn evenings and mornings…" That's photography.

ku6912240 avatar
뮤직이카
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

아름답다 정말 나는 이렇게 표현하고 싶다 하느님은 창조에 신이라고

rollandanthony avatar
Rolland Anthony
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

low quality resolution photos are great for web, but not for printing and selling I suppose

davidverduzco avatar
David Verduzco
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

amazing! you don't need expensive camera but don't you still need expensive software?

rana70035 avatar
corinna_weichold avatar
Corinna Weichold
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Same as 1, 4 and 11 - it's supposed to look like a miniature achieved with tilt–shift effect :)

Load More Replies...
elvazur avatar
Nizaя Bredan
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I Captured Fairytale-Like Autumn In Romania With $250 Camera To Show You Need to Know About Post-production In Order to be a Good Photographer.

iblowsheep avatar
iblowsheep
Community Member
7 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

sorry, but i think this type of Pseudo HDR type editing and tilt sift c**p is way over done and looks like money butt.

okayknow avatar
Lyn Ciampa
Community Member
7 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Yep. 50 hours spent on photoshop with a year or two of learning the 700$ program, you could get these shots with a n iPhone.

sharon_is_super avatar
Sharon Halfhill
Community Member
7 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

I don't like how heavily edited these are.

mal_smith2 avatar
Mal Smith
Community Member
7 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

What a load of bollocks. This is testimony to the retoucher's art, not a cheap camera.

Popular on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda