19 Hidden Ways Companies Tricked Their Customers
In economics, the term shrinkflation could be characterized as a process in which a product shrinks in size or quantity or even gets its quality lowered, while the price of that product remains the same. In other words, it's making a certain product cost more without changing its actual price. Sounds unfair? Well, it does for a lot of people. Despite that, various well-known food and beverage companies have been using this strategy for years.
The trickiest thing about this practice is that the change is usually barely noticeable, so only the most attentive customers tend to notice it. And in the long run, even the smallest change ends up saving the company millions of dollars.
Without further ado, Bored Panda invites you to look through a few examples of products that at some point were affected by shrinkflation.
This post may include affiliate links.
Last year, someone on Reddit noticed how a "Bigger Bag, More To Share" pack of Doritos actually had the same amount of chips as the regular size pack. "More air to share," someone joked in the comments.
In 2016, fans of Pringles started noticing how their beloved chips are now smaller. In addition, some noticed that the tube itself also shrunk, making it harder for some people to reach in. Despite that, the price stayed the same. “Is this Pringles can getting smaller or my arm getting fatter?” a consumer went on Twitter to express their concern. The company explained that the reason behind these changes was that manufacturing shifted from the USA to Malaysia. “The equipment we use in Malaysia is a bit different to our sister factory in the US … you’ll notice that both the chip and the can are a little smaller to fit with the production facility,” the company explained.
But what about the weight per package? No information on that here. Nobody cares the chips/crisps get smaller if there are more in there and the weight stays the same...
Right? This is comparing apples to oranges essentially if we don't know if the net weight or price changed as well...
Load More Replies...
And who set up the production facility in Malaysia? Why wouldn't you set it up to fit your product specs? I don't work in manufacturing or production, but this seems like horseshit, no?
Agreed. I doubt there was just a spare Pringle factory laying around in Malaysia.
Load More Replies...
You can not say they made customers pay more, cause we can not see how many chips are in a can. Yes it could be ripping customers off, but this photo does not prove it.
Pretty sure these are the 'malaysian' pringles they sell to the Australian market. The US still gets US pringles. As someone who has lived in the US and Australia, they are different-- the packs are smaller, the chips are a different texture and they definitely charge the same as before for a smaller and inferior product.
Load More Replies...
This is fine when the weights/volumes are shown. It was good when they started putting £/gm or £/litre on labels so you can at least compare like for like. But we all know that Wagon Wheels and Curly Wurlies are a tiny fraction of the size they used to be.
Many products have shrunk and price remains the same or slightly higher, i.e chocolate bars The shifting production to Malaysia from USA is a sad excuse for companies taking employment outside of the U.S.A. or Canada to satisfy their shareholders enjoy higher profits. Bet workers in Malaysia are not making half the salary the U.S. workers did, Shame on those companies..
In other words, we saved a s**t ton of money by outsourcing the labor and reducing what the customer receives while at the same time keeping the price the same. Therefore; all our stock options go up 10% this year after we fired everyone in the US.
They don't taste the same either. I don't like the new ones made in Malaysia.
Yeah, you're full of s**t. You know exactly what you're doing and why. You're charging us the same amount for a smaller product and you DAMN WELL KNOW IT.
Just say, "Less chips and the ones you do get are smaller BUT the flavor is priceless!" (and I want 10% of that commerical ditty,)
Did the price go down along with the chips and can? If not, screw Pringles.
This is what really annoys me the cutting corners reducing sizes and weights that are really obvious and escalating prices.
This is true. They did that here in Aus, the problem is that the malaysian pringles taste completely different. They taste just like Mr Potato (malaysian pringle brand) etc. The biggest taste difference is with sour cream. I dont buy pringles anymore (prob a good thing) because I dont like them any more. I actually have a sneaking suspicion that it IS the mister potato malaysian factory.
Also, I think they only did this in Australia and NZ like 5 years ago. I believe the US market still gets US pringles-- I was in the US last year and I am pretty sure yours are still made in the US, (possibly Mexico?) Check where its made. This only applies to Aus and some other places. I can tell you they ARE different, and they do give you less. Apart from them being smaller, they are harder and greasier somehow, saltier and just not as nice. They also charge the same amount despite shipping being cheaper from malaysia to Australia, and the labor being cheaper. So I would say definitely dodgy.
Load More Replies...
Back in 2016, Toblerone announced they were altering the iconic design of their UK bars by adding bigger gaps between the mounds, which meant that the bars were about to have 10% less chocolate for the same price. Apparently, the unfortunate change was due to an increase in the price of the ingredients. People weren't too happy about it, to say the least.
Two years later, the company decided to bring back the original shape. Sadly, the price of the bar had to be raised as well.
For a long time, the clear glass cookware brand Pyrex was known for making fireproof glassware. Ironically, a few years ago, the pans started exploding when they got too hot. Apparently, the manufacturer switched to a cheaper ingredient that strengthened the glass against being dropped but weakened it against thermal shock.
According to Metro, last year, a man named William Knight happened across a "vintage" 1996 Mars bar in the bottom of an old box in his loft. After measuring the old bar against a modern-day one, the man was surprised how much bigger the "vintage" one was. Despite that, the price of the bar has more than doubled since then.
Throughout the years, a Double Stuf Oreo pack has changed from being 16.6 oz to 15.35 oz and is still being sold for the same price.
For quite a while now, the length of toilet paper rolls has been shrinking. Apparently, once upon a time, the standard size of a toilet paper roll was 4.5 inches by 4.5 inches. Fast forward to now, most rolls are a half-inch shorter than they used to be. Despite that, consumers are still paying the same price.
Look at it this way- 1)you probably consume tp on the basis of length not square area and 2) the paper company can get more rolls out of the same raw materials. The environment wins.
Many well-known chocolate bars have been shrunken down over time, but their prices haven't changed. For instance, a Twix bar is now about 14% smaller than it was back in the day. Apparently, in 2012 Mars, Inc. (who make Twix) announced a 250 calorie cap on all single-serve chocolate bars, and because of that, many of their products have been downsized.
Customers have been noticing that throughout the years many cereal brands have been reducing the amount of cereal they’re selling in a box while keeping the price the same. Many brands have been making the boxes thinner, so from first sight, it appears to be the same size as it used to be.
It's actually kind of a miracle that they can use thinner cardboard and film liner. When I was working servicing cereal manufacturers the machines used to make the package "bag in box" were not capable of using thinner materials. The cereal guys are saving significant money with reducing thickness and it's mean less consumption and waste of trees and plastics.
Turns out, some bags of Lay’s potato chips contain fewer chips than others. Lay’s regular "Family Size" packs are 10 oz., but the company’s bags of flavored chips are 9.5 oz, yet both sell for the same price. According to the Associated Press, the difference is equivalent to approximately 5-6 chips.
As you may know, a standard US pint is 16 oz. Apparently, some bars in US practice “short pouring” their customers by using glasses that are only 14 oz. Since these glasses are the same size as the real ones, though, most customers tend to not notice it. These glasses are usually called “falsies” or “cheater pints.”
Short pouring is illegal. Most of a bars profit comes from beer sales. Once word got around that they were doing this, they would lose all their customers.
Turns out, some brands replace cotton in their "tissue tees" with cheaper and much thinner synthetic fabric. Because of that, these t-shirts appear almost see-through.
I HATE these! Then when you finally find a 100% cotton tee, they often use short staple cotton which is crap. Long-staple cotton frays less, pills less and wrinkles less than short staple. You can feel the difference as well - long staple feels smooth and short staple feels somewhat rough. This is also why high count thread sheets are not necessarily better than lower count - it depends on what type of cotton they use.
Back in 2017, consumers started noticing that the size of family-size cartons of Tropicana downsized by almost 9 percent. Despite the change, the price remained the same.
Companies know that price increases cause people not to buy. When the cost to make the product goes up, they downsize the container to be able to sell at the same price.
A month ago, a user on Reddit shared how they've noticed that Hefty bag cartons went from containing 90 bags to containing 80. Despite that, the price stayed exactly the same.
Yes--everything costs more. Consumers notice when a price goes up. They don't necessarily check other parts of the label. We need to become more intelligent shoppers. And we need to understand that the price of everything goes up.
At the beginning of this year, someone on Reddit noticed that Powerade was also affected by shrinkflation. Apparently, the original 32 oz bottles were downsized to 28 oz, but the price remained exactly the same.
In 2014, Coca-Cola reduced the size of their large bottle from 2 liters to 1.75 liters. However, the price remained the same.
Speaking of coke I was selling soda at school and I ran out after 32 cans snd made 32 bucks and this Sneedy jerk went up to buy one but I informed him it was sold out he ran to the teachers I was selling COKE but forgot to include it was soda they thought it was COCAINE shortly after that I had to serve 3 weeks in In-School suspension it's now on the police record so YAY( sarcasm)
Cadbury announced that by the end of 2021, they're going to reduce the calorie count of bars that are sold in multipacks. According to BBC, the four-packs packs of these popular sweets are about to contain no more than 200 calories each. "We must play our part in tackling obesity and are committed to doing so without compromising on consumer choice," said Louise Stigant, UK managing director at Mondelez International, according to BBC. However, they're not planning on changing the price.
Just causes people to eat an extra one - hence, calorie intake goes up higher!
A few years ago, the New York-based yogurt company Chobani decided to downsize some of its yogurts from 6 oz to 5.3 oz. Despite that, the price of the yogurt hadn’t changed. Customers weren’t too happy about it. The company explained that the change was to improve consistency with its newly launched products as well as competitors who favored the 5.3-ounce pots, so it could be easier for consumers to compare nutritionals.
Last year, bottles of Heinz Salad Cream shrunk by approximately 9 percent, and the product became more expensive.
Wow, it's almost like there could be an economic phenomenon called inflation.
Except inflation is very low. So, maybe greed and profiteering?
It’s not inflation when a food company (in particular) changes the size and/or potion of a product but not the price per... So when I worked as a graphic artist for Brown & Haley the makers of Almond ROCA over the course of 2 years they changed the size of the container that’s found in the grocery stores from 15.4oz, to 13.3oz, to 11.7oz to finally what it is today 10.2oz. (over 10 years after I work for them). They eventually had to make the container shorter bc of the customer complaints of too much air/space in the container not being fulled with candy. BUT THEY NEVER CHANGED THE PRICE PER CONTAINER.
Read the title. It jokingly says just that.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Not the same. Inflation is an economic phenomenon for everything. I know now why you are a Trump believer. It all makes sense.
bro wth
The price of everything goes up. Production and manufacturing prices go up and companies cant just keep the prices the same forever. None of us like it, but it is the way it goes. It only really pisses me off when things say "now larger" when they are actually giving you less, like the doritos. It is straight up lying and creating more waste and more pollution. Just raise the price or reduce the amount. Plus, it is probably better for all of us if candy bars are getting smaller! :'D
My father use to pay 5 cents for a candy bar and I demand the same treatment 60 years later! How dare they raise their prices so they can afford to pay their employees. Sickens me you hear, sickens.
$15 an hour for a living wage
Like it's about paying employees. It's about paying stockholders. If people were concerned about paying employees they would have raised the minimum wage from $7.25 an hour since the 80s.
Wait until they have to pay 15 an hour to employees
Ice cream in Canada. Started out 2 L, then 1.89 L, now 1.66 L. Same price of course.
I just checked in my freezer, Coaticook chocolate ice cream is 2 L.
@ cassiushumanmother, no weight 🙂. Just 2L of deliciousness lol.
2 L and..... they must say the other weight? or just in europe? net weight. ?
ebonyruffles easy
Ice cream are the worst: you buy air. Check the weight from all packs, sometimes you buy air.
Just give us the same amount and raise the price! Nobody expects prices to stay the same forever. We do expect that companies refrain from attempting to deceive us.
This has actually been shown through market research to lower consumer loyalty and sharply drop sales.
At some point, won't this become impossible? 5 lb sugar is now 4 lb sugar. 1 pound coffee is now 12 ounce coffee. How small can they go? Conversely, a dozen eggs is still 12 eggs. A pound of butter is still a pound of butter. A gallon of milk is a gallon of milk (yes??)
Yep. People love a lie. (Note: I didn't refer directly to any politics, but yeah, that too.) However, if I buy a dozen eggs, yes, it's more than a dozen eggs would cost five years ago. Gallon of milk is still a gallon, but more expensive.
I do expect the cost of living to more accurately reflect the rate of inflation in the U.S. People in Hell want ice water but that doesn't mean they'll get it. :o(
Lauren Ringel like
1. no one should expect the price of nearly everything to remain the same price forever. prices increase. 2. I think shoppers have noticed the sizes changing. we are not stupid.
Mad Magazine, in the 50's had an "article" showing how things will change. The one I remember the best, was a Hershey chocolate candy bar that, then, came in a little dark brown tray, wrapped in white paper and then wrapped around with the Iconic brown Hershey paper. It showed that now [then] the chocolate bar would fill the tray, then later, the article said, that the tray would stay the same size, the price would stay the same size, but the bar would be about 25% smaller and would continue until you got one square of chocolate and the same size tray and wrapper.
Garnier Hair Dye ! The boxes are exactly the same, no quantities printed on the box. They removed about 20% of the product, ended up missing product in the middle, had to redo it and buy 2 more boxes. Thank you Garnier
Standardization would help with all these issues, but the government has to enact it :)
I have another one! KitKat Chunky. Those were sooo good fifteen years ago, I was addicted to the white ones... I can't recall any numbers anymore (I did, though, I actually compared them a couple of years ago), but the bottomline is that you used to get a pack of four that was about 250 grams together, and now you get a pack of five that is just 235 grams together. That number is probably wrong, but you get the idea. Where did that thick, massive layer of chocolate go!? Really, now it's just a wafer, with a thin chocolate layer. I hardly ever buy them anymore, when I do, it's just for nostalgia's sake.
We consistently demand higher wages and low prices; the only way to satisfy this is by downsizing and cheaper ingredients. How else do we think manufacturers are going to accomplish this?
The most obvious of all is a POUND of coffee. Can't believe that isn't here. If you get 12 oz in your pound bag or can now you're doing well.
I really don't understand the idea of this post. There is no "hidden trick" in the middle. As someone else mentioned, if you want the size of the candy bar to be the same over 60 years, expect to pay more. If you want to pay the same, then something's got to give, in this case, the size of the bar got smaller. This thing is obvious for everything, you can't keep the same price for a product for ever or you will either run out of people to make that product or go bankrupt.
Buyer beware; I don't see a problem here. If the product is labeled properly, you, as the customer, have the final decision as to whether to buy it or not. If a product used to be 16 oz, and is now 15 oz, no matter the price, as a consumer, only you can determine if it is worth the price.
Regardless of reasoning or excuses, lowering the quantity or quality of a product while charging the same amount is sleazy. If a company wants to extract more money from customers, they should be more conspicuously honest about it.
Just about all of these are junk food. So consuming less junk food is bad. Got it. ;)
100 years later we still pay $20 for a pair of jeans.
Unless one is trying to keep up with the Jones’ and buy those designer jeans for $150-$300 a pair... 😳😳🤷🏻♀️
If only everything stayed the same... 😢
Well, I cannot do anything about the inflation of all things, I can only do what I can. To consume less.
It's probably better for our health. I still eat one bag of crisps or one bar of chocolate at a time (so eating fewer crisps and chocolate)
OK now fun story. In SA we started having "sugar tax" a few years ago. So then a 500ml regular coke was more expensive than a 500ml diet coke, because sugar tax. Obviously people weren't happy with that. So coca-cola's solution? They changed the regular coke bottles to 350ml, and the diet coke to 350ml "plus an extra 150ml free!" (i.e. 500ml), but both cost the same. Everyone's happy now. 🤷🏻♀️
The infamous "grocery shrink ray". It started with coffee & ice cream. Remember that half gallon, that shrunk to 1.75 qt and then to 1.5 qts. That 5 pound bag of sugar is now 3 pounds. Companies usually use the "new package design" as a way to shrink the product without people noticing. Google search "grocery shrink ray".
The eyebrow pencil I always buy is half the size it used to be, and the price is always going up. It seriously p*sses me off that manufacturers do this. When will it end?? When will chocolates and snacks go back to normal sizes, or will they keep shrinking until they are doll's house sizes??
Since most of these products sre junk food, maybe it's better the portions are smaller, regardless of the cost.
I'm just wondering of some of these weigh changes was due to marketing for metric-using consumers and making the metric number a whole number or easier to read. Maybe? I wish I knew if there was a similar list where products gained weight.
Check Costco... all their items they sell are LARGER SIZES.
This isn't 19 ways. At all. Items becoming smaller but the price staying the same was listed on this one repeatedly. It's not a new way, it's just inflation. We don't need to see it so much on the same list.
This practice really angers me because manufacturers are degrading their products for short-term gains. Just raise prices, for crying out loud, and leave my favorite products alone!
looking at this was not good for my diet lol
For some of these it would be interesting to know if the comparison of "smaller but same price" takes into account inflation. Or any of a lot of other possible factors. (Though admittedly the company "explanations" when such are given, sound pretty lame.)
I think most of us have noticed the downsizing and the price upsizing. Not a thing we can do about it.....
Buying a bag of individual serving bags of Doritos ... it use to be 12 individual servings bags but is now only 10 ... remember when coffee was 5 cents with free refills ... now is $2.50 to $3.00 with NO refills ...
I noticed it with C&H Cane Sugar several years ago (US). The bag used to be 5 pounds, and it is now 4. Same with ice cream. We were all used to "half gallon" containers. Now they're 1.5 quarts.
Americans stick together and buy less of these products. Make them change the prices.
None of this is new. It's been going on for decades. Manufacturers just think consumers are too stupid to notice. I'm here to tell you we are NOT.
All the junk food SHOULD BE a higher price! All those empty calories - weight gain and teeth rot. Who needs most of these products anyway?
New list of "nops" - time to look for substitutes?
Companies know people get more upset over price increase than size decrease, this is well documented, so they do what is keeps customers buying and happy.
Going out to eat... That's a rip off
The failure of folks to grasp the most basic of economic functions is frightening. Here's one for all you "Biden will raise taxes only on big corporations" folks...corporations pay ZERO taxes. Never have. Every expense they have is passed on to consumers without whom the evil corporations have not a penny. So YOU are paying for Biden's tax hike. But Orange Man Bad, amiright?
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Have you seen the average American? These companies should be applauded for proactively tackling the obesity epidemic
Ok, come on. This comment shouldn't be on this article; obesity is NOT THE POINT OF THE ARTICLE! Plus, I have a sweet tooth (a massive one) and I'm not obese.
Messing around with the size of packaging is NOT going to help 'tackle obesity' and as several Pandas have mentioned, not everyone who regularly scoffs more than the recommended portion size is obese.
Wow, it's almost like there could be an economic phenomenon called inflation.
Except inflation is very low. So, maybe greed and profiteering?
It’s not inflation when a food company (in particular) changes the size and/or potion of a product but not the price per... So when I worked as a graphic artist for Brown & Haley the makers of Almond ROCA over the course of 2 years they changed the size of the container that’s found in the grocery stores from 15.4oz, to 13.3oz, to 11.7oz to finally what it is today 10.2oz. (over 10 years after I work for them). They eventually had to make the container shorter bc of the customer complaints of too much air/space in the container not being fulled with candy. BUT THEY NEVER CHANGED THE PRICE PER CONTAINER.
Read the title. It jokingly says just that.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Not the same. Inflation is an economic phenomenon for everything. I know now why you are a Trump believer. It all makes sense.
bro wth
The price of everything goes up. Production and manufacturing prices go up and companies cant just keep the prices the same forever. None of us like it, but it is the way it goes. It only really pisses me off when things say "now larger" when they are actually giving you less, like the doritos. It is straight up lying and creating more waste and more pollution. Just raise the price or reduce the amount. Plus, it is probably better for all of us if candy bars are getting smaller! :'D
My father use to pay 5 cents for a candy bar and I demand the same treatment 60 years later! How dare they raise their prices so they can afford to pay their employees. Sickens me you hear, sickens.
$15 an hour for a living wage
Like it's about paying employees. It's about paying stockholders. If people were concerned about paying employees they would have raised the minimum wage from $7.25 an hour since the 80s.
Wait until they have to pay 15 an hour to employees
Ice cream in Canada. Started out 2 L, then 1.89 L, now 1.66 L. Same price of course.
I just checked in my freezer, Coaticook chocolate ice cream is 2 L.
@ cassiushumanmother, no weight 🙂. Just 2L of deliciousness lol.
2 L and..... they must say the other weight? or just in europe? net weight. ?
ebonyruffles easy
Ice cream are the worst: you buy air. Check the weight from all packs, sometimes you buy air.
Just give us the same amount and raise the price! Nobody expects prices to stay the same forever. We do expect that companies refrain from attempting to deceive us.
This has actually been shown through market research to lower consumer loyalty and sharply drop sales.
At some point, won't this become impossible? 5 lb sugar is now 4 lb sugar. 1 pound coffee is now 12 ounce coffee. How small can they go? Conversely, a dozen eggs is still 12 eggs. A pound of butter is still a pound of butter. A gallon of milk is a gallon of milk (yes??)
Yep. People love a lie. (Note: I didn't refer directly to any politics, but yeah, that too.) However, if I buy a dozen eggs, yes, it's more than a dozen eggs would cost five years ago. Gallon of milk is still a gallon, but more expensive.
I do expect the cost of living to more accurately reflect the rate of inflation in the U.S. People in Hell want ice water but that doesn't mean they'll get it. :o(
Lauren Ringel like
1. no one should expect the price of nearly everything to remain the same price forever. prices increase. 2. I think shoppers have noticed the sizes changing. we are not stupid.
Mad Magazine, in the 50's had an "article" showing how things will change. The one I remember the best, was a Hershey chocolate candy bar that, then, came in a little dark brown tray, wrapped in white paper and then wrapped around with the Iconic brown Hershey paper. It showed that now [then] the chocolate bar would fill the tray, then later, the article said, that the tray would stay the same size, the price would stay the same size, but the bar would be about 25% smaller and would continue until you got one square of chocolate and the same size tray and wrapper.
Garnier Hair Dye ! The boxes are exactly the same, no quantities printed on the box. They removed about 20% of the product, ended up missing product in the middle, had to redo it and buy 2 more boxes. Thank you Garnier
Standardization would help with all these issues, but the government has to enact it :)
I have another one! KitKat Chunky. Those were sooo good fifteen years ago, I was addicted to the white ones... I can't recall any numbers anymore (I did, though, I actually compared them a couple of years ago), but the bottomline is that you used to get a pack of four that was about 250 grams together, and now you get a pack of five that is just 235 grams together. That number is probably wrong, but you get the idea. Where did that thick, massive layer of chocolate go!? Really, now it's just a wafer, with a thin chocolate layer. I hardly ever buy them anymore, when I do, it's just for nostalgia's sake.
We consistently demand higher wages and low prices; the only way to satisfy this is by downsizing and cheaper ingredients. How else do we think manufacturers are going to accomplish this?
The most obvious of all is a POUND of coffee. Can't believe that isn't here. If you get 12 oz in your pound bag or can now you're doing well.
I really don't understand the idea of this post. There is no "hidden trick" in the middle. As someone else mentioned, if you want the size of the candy bar to be the same over 60 years, expect to pay more. If you want to pay the same, then something's got to give, in this case, the size of the bar got smaller. This thing is obvious for everything, you can't keep the same price for a product for ever or you will either run out of people to make that product or go bankrupt.
Buyer beware; I don't see a problem here. If the product is labeled properly, you, as the customer, have the final decision as to whether to buy it or not. If a product used to be 16 oz, and is now 15 oz, no matter the price, as a consumer, only you can determine if it is worth the price.
Regardless of reasoning or excuses, lowering the quantity or quality of a product while charging the same amount is sleazy. If a company wants to extract more money from customers, they should be more conspicuously honest about it.
Just about all of these are junk food. So consuming less junk food is bad. Got it. ;)
100 years later we still pay $20 for a pair of jeans.
Unless one is trying to keep up with the Jones’ and buy those designer jeans for $150-$300 a pair... 😳😳🤷🏻♀️
If only everything stayed the same... 😢
Well, I cannot do anything about the inflation of all things, I can only do what I can. To consume less.
It's probably better for our health. I still eat one bag of crisps or one bar of chocolate at a time (so eating fewer crisps and chocolate)
OK now fun story. In SA we started having "sugar tax" a few years ago. So then a 500ml regular coke was more expensive than a 500ml diet coke, because sugar tax. Obviously people weren't happy with that. So coca-cola's solution? They changed the regular coke bottles to 350ml, and the diet coke to 350ml "plus an extra 150ml free!" (i.e. 500ml), but both cost the same. Everyone's happy now. 🤷🏻♀️
The infamous "grocery shrink ray". It started with coffee & ice cream. Remember that half gallon, that shrunk to 1.75 qt and then to 1.5 qts. That 5 pound bag of sugar is now 3 pounds. Companies usually use the "new package design" as a way to shrink the product without people noticing. Google search "grocery shrink ray".
The eyebrow pencil I always buy is half the size it used to be, and the price is always going up. It seriously p*sses me off that manufacturers do this. When will it end?? When will chocolates and snacks go back to normal sizes, or will they keep shrinking until they are doll's house sizes??
Since most of these products sre junk food, maybe it's better the portions are smaller, regardless of the cost.
I'm just wondering of some of these weigh changes was due to marketing for metric-using consumers and making the metric number a whole number or easier to read. Maybe? I wish I knew if there was a similar list where products gained weight.
Check Costco... all their items they sell are LARGER SIZES.
This isn't 19 ways. At all. Items becoming smaller but the price staying the same was listed on this one repeatedly. It's not a new way, it's just inflation. We don't need to see it so much on the same list.
This practice really angers me because manufacturers are degrading their products for short-term gains. Just raise prices, for crying out loud, and leave my favorite products alone!
looking at this was not good for my diet lol
For some of these it would be interesting to know if the comparison of "smaller but same price" takes into account inflation. Or any of a lot of other possible factors. (Though admittedly the company "explanations" when such are given, sound pretty lame.)
I think most of us have noticed the downsizing and the price upsizing. Not a thing we can do about it.....
Buying a bag of individual serving bags of Doritos ... it use to be 12 individual servings bags but is now only 10 ... remember when coffee was 5 cents with free refills ... now is $2.50 to $3.00 with NO refills ...
I noticed it with C&H Cane Sugar several years ago (US). The bag used to be 5 pounds, and it is now 4. Same with ice cream. We were all used to "half gallon" containers. Now they're 1.5 quarts.
Americans stick together and buy less of these products. Make them change the prices.
None of this is new. It's been going on for decades. Manufacturers just think consumers are too stupid to notice. I'm here to tell you we are NOT.
All the junk food SHOULD BE a higher price! All those empty calories - weight gain and teeth rot. Who needs most of these products anyway?
New list of "nops" - time to look for substitutes?
Companies know people get more upset over price increase than size decrease, this is well documented, so they do what is keeps customers buying and happy.
Going out to eat... That's a rip off
The failure of folks to grasp the most basic of economic functions is frightening. Here's one for all you "Biden will raise taxes only on big corporations" folks...corporations pay ZERO taxes. Never have. Every expense they have is passed on to consumers without whom the evil corporations have not a penny. So YOU are paying for Biden's tax hike. But Orange Man Bad, amiright?
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Have you seen the average American? These companies should be applauded for proactively tackling the obesity epidemic
Ok, come on. This comment shouldn't be on this article; obesity is NOT THE POINT OF THE ARTICLE! Plus, I have a sweet tooth (a massive one) and I'm not obese.
Messing around with the size of packaging is NOT going to help 'tackle obesity' and as several Pandas have mentioned, not everyone who regularly scoffs more than the recommended portion size is obese.