GF Won’t Commit $100K To BF’s Home Without A Ring First, Sparks Relationship Drama
Relationships are often a balance between love and practical decisions, and sometimes the lines between romance and responsibility can become complicated. In fact, for couples thinking about marriage, family, or shared investments, financial decisions, especially large ones, can bring underlying tensions to the surface.
Today’s Original Poster (OP) was looking forward to renovating the home she shared with her boyfriend. However, she began to feel uneasy about going ahead with it especially without them being engaged. So when she brought it up, her boyfriend’s response left her feeling as though she ruined the relationship.
More info: Reddit
Before diving into life-changing expenses, especially ones tied to property or shared assets, many experts agree that a solid commitment is essential
Image credits: Vitaly Gariev / Unsplash (not the actual photo)
The author and her boyfriend have been living together for a year, with him owning the house and her covering utilities, groceries, and maintenance
Image credits: Independent_Stage741
Image credits: Vitaly Gariev / Unsplash (not the actual photo)
They discussed future plans, including marriage and children, and considered a $100k renovation as her “buy-in” to the house, although she began to feel uneasy about it
Image credits: Independent_Stage741
Image credits: Freepik / Freepik (not the actual photo)
She then requested that they get engaged before she invests in the renovations, seeking commitment before making a major financial decision
Image credits: Independent_Stage741
Her boyfriend insisted that it made the process transactional, leading to a cold morning after, and uncertainty about the state of their relationship
For nearly two years, the OP and her boyfriend had been building a life together, and for the past year they had also been living together in a house he owned. To keep things fair, he handled the mortgage while she took on utilities, maintenance, and groceries.
They both knew they wanted to get married and start a family, however for that to happen, the house would need major renovations. Their long-standing idea had been that her financial contribution which would be roughly $100k would be her “buy-in” to the home.
As the renovations grew closer to reality, the OP started feeling uneasy. Not about their life together, but about the logic of putting life-changing money into a property that legally belongs only to her boyfriend. Due to this feeling, she mentioned to him that she would be more comfortable going ahead with the process if they were at least engaged.
Her boyfriend didn’t take it well, though. He told her that adding such a condition to an engagement made the whole thing feel transactional. When she tried to explain her stance better, he was still upset, and the next morning was cold and tense that she’s now left wondering if she has juts blown up her relationship.
Image credits: Getty Images / Unsplash (not the actual photo)
Financial experts and relationship advisors consistently emphasize the importance of aligning major financial decisions with marital commitment. According to ReachLink, linking significant financial choices to marriage helps partners feel secure and provides clarity about their shared future.
However, caution is advised when combining finances before formal commitments. BBC reports that without clear dedication to the future, financial entanglement can create complications if the relationship ends.
For example, differences in spending habits or financial priorities may lead to conflict, and dividing assets can become legally and emotionally complex. They emphasize that transparency, trust, and communication are essential when money is involved, and being deliberate about financial arrangements can prevent misunderstandings while protecting both partners’ interests.
For unmarried couples planning significant financial investments, formal agreements are often recommended. Progeny explains that a cohabitation agreement is a written contract outlining each partner’s rights, responsibilities, and financial contributions, including property ownership and shared expenses. These agreements clarify how assets are owned and what happens if the relationship ends.
Netizens strongly advised the OP to exercise caution, emphasizing that investing large sums of money into a property you don’t legally own is risky. They also noted that she wasn’t wrong to request engagement before committing financially.
What do you think about this situation? Do you think it’s reasonable to ask for a proposal before making a major financial investment in a relationship? We would love to know your thoughts!
Netizens warned that that the boyfriend would benefit from building his wealth while she might have to assume the financial burden
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Whether OP was going to be on the hook for $50,000 or the whole $100,000, she shouldn’t pay a dime until they see a lawyer and get her name on the deed. She’s essentially paying the equivalent of a down payment on her own house to renovate his. She should just buy her own house and tell her boyfriend to go f**k himself.
I have a relative whose boyfriend put her on the deed. They're not married, but he knows that if she outlives him, she'll take good care of the property (unlike his siblings, who borrowed money and never paid it back - luckily a much cheaper lesson than a $50,000).
Load More Replies...You'd have to sign a prenup anyway to keep the house from being jointly owned. Even if you aren't married the investment in the house has legal weight and can give you a stake in ownership. but the bottom line is that if you are incapable of discussing finances , you shouldn't even be living together, let alone married
It shouldn’t be the marriage so much, as joint ownership of the house. The fact that he didn’t offer joint ownership in return says a lot. Time for her to move on.
I will never understand how couples separate planning to be engaged and being engaged if you've agreed that you're going to get married, you're engaged. So already I think the relationship is in trouble. But if practical things like housing and investment are going to take the romance out of your marriage, don't get married. Marriage is a legal and financial agreement, as much as it's anything else and if sharing your life with someone, and building a home isn't s**y/romantic enough, to get excited about you aren't really excited for marriage - you just want to throw a big party. And in that case just throw a big party, but one without legal ramifications.
First of all, being engaged doesn't guarantee that the marriage will happen. Second of all, there are not-married couples who have paperwork done to share assets. Third of all, not every proposal has to be romantic. Mine wasn't: he simply said "I might have to move to another country to get work in my field. I want you to be able to come with me." If he had gotten down on bended knee with a ring... "I would have kicked you in the teeth," I told him decades later.
Load More Replies...It isn't just the investing in a property without being engaged. It is also investing in a property to which she has a very questionable legal claim -- in the event of a split he will say it was a pre-existing asset and her financial contributions were just part of her 'rent'. ALSO! they want to do the renos so that they can have KIDS! He wants kids and her money but thinks engagement (not even marriage yet) will take away the 'sparkle'? Guy wants the benefits of commitment without the actual commitment.
Hell no, as loads said throwing 100k on a house you don’t own ,is a recipe for disaster , he could propose ,op happy , she hands over money ,or loans in her name but on the hook for it , then house gets finished n bang he kicks her out penniless n homeless n no comeback in the money either !! the Renos can wait till your married and your names in the deeds so should you split you will get some money back might seem harsh ,but it’s the reality of life !!
Yeah, the "not necessary if there's trust" poll - got me rid of 40k with an ex.. Trust is baseline in relationships and friendships, any financial commitment, get an officially signed document. I don't even deliver WORK without payment up front anymore. Conditions and signature is key for commitment from my side in any aspect. I learned the hard way. It's stuff they don't teach you, how to keep yourself safe in situations in which you could be exploited. Sign contracts, say NO without over explaining, know your boundaries, etc. We always assume we're meeting people who are just like us on the inside, but millions of people live on survival as a reflect - and they have really no heart. And we keep feeling shame and guilt, can hardly rely on others for support. It's becomes a downwards spiral. My ex had the audacity to look into my face and tell me he didn't know me when I went to confront him about the debt.. Ok then, have my lawyer handle it. Romance is NOT part of the equation here.
Whether OP was going to be on the hook for $50,000 or the whole $100,000, she shouldn’t pay a dime until they see a lawyer and get her name on the deed. She’s essentially paying the equivalent of a down payment on her own house to renovate his. She should just buy her own house and tell her boyfriend to go f**k himself.
I have a relative whose boyfriend put her on the deed. They're not married, but he knows that if she outlives him, she'll take good care of the property (unlike his siblings, who borrowed money and never paid it back - luckily a much cheaper lesson than a $50,000).
Load More Replies...You'd have to sign a prenup anyway to keep the house from being jointly owned. Even if you aren't married the investment in the house has legal weight and can give you a stake in ownership. but the bottom line is that if you are incapable of discussing finances , you shouldn't even be living together, let alone married
It shouldn’t be the marriage so much, as joint ownership of the house. The fact that he didn’t offer joint ownership in return says a lot. Time for her to move on.
I will never understand how couples separate planning to be engaged and being engaged if you've agreed that you're going to get married, you're engaged. So already I think the relationship is in trouble. But if practical things like housing and investment are going to take the romance out of your marriage, don't get married. Marriage is a legal and financial agreement, as much as it's anything else and if sharing your life with someone, and building a home isn't s**y/romantic enough, to get excited about you aren't really excited for marriage - you just want to throw a big party. And in that case just throw a big party, but one without legal ramifications.
First of all, being engaged doesn't guarantee that the marriage will happen. Second of all, there are not-married couples who have paperwork done to share assets. Third of all, not every proposal has to be romantic. Mine wasn't: he simply said "I might have to move to another country to get work in my field. I want you to be able to come with me." If he had gotten down on bended knee with a ring... "I would have kicked you in the teeth," I told him decades later.
Load More Replies...It isn't just the investing in a property without being engaged. It is also investing in a property to which she has a very questionable legal claim -- in the event of a split he will say it was a pre-existing asset and her financial contributions were just part of her 'rent'. ALSO! they want to do the renos so that they can have KIDS! He wants kids and her money but thinks engagement (not even marriage yet) will take away the 'sparkle'? Guy wants the benefits of commitment without the actual commitment.
Hell no, as loads said throwing 100k on a house you don’t own ,is a recipe for disaster , he could propose ,op happy , she hands over money ,or loans in her name but on the hook for it , then house gets finished n bang he kicks her out penniless n homeless n no comeback in the money either !! the Renos can wait till your married and your names in the deeds so should you split you will get some money back might seem harsh ,but it’s the reality of life !!
Yeah, the "not necessary if there's trust" poll - got me rid of 40k with an ex.. Trust is baseline in relationships and friendships, any financial commitment, get an officially signed document. I don't even deliver WORK without payment up front anymore. Conditions and signature is key for commitment from my side in any aspect. I learned the hard way. It's stuff they don't teach you, how to keep yourself safe in situations in which you could be exploited. Sign contracts, say NO without over explaining, know your boundaries, etc. We always assume we're meeting people who are just like us on the inside, but millions of people live on survival as a reflect - and they have really no heart. And we keep feeling shame and guilt, can hardly rely on others for support. It's becomes a downwards spiral. My ex had the audacity to look into my face and tell me he didn't know me when I went to confront him about the debt.. Ok then, have my lawyer handle it. Romance is NOT part of the equation here.






































38
15