
“Fired? Are You Sure?”: New Management Fires The Best Employee In The Company, Regrets It Almost Immediately
702Kviews
A change in a company’s ownership can transform it into an entirely different business. And not always for the better.
One recent post on the popular r/ProRevenge subreddit by user Vonadler is a perfect example that forcing policy on employees you know very little about can seriously backfire.
It begins by introducing the hero of the story. An elderly engineer who had become an integral part of the organization.
The man was the star of the show. He produced results, trained his colleagues, and made sure everything was running smoothly.
However, after the company was sold and new managers came in, they wanted to steer the ship in a new direction and began to make some of the crew uneasy. Including their most important engineer.
The conflict grew and the managers made up their minds to fire him as soon as an opportunity presented itself. But what the bosses didn’t expect was that they would beg him to come back after just a few days.
Image credits: Field Engineer (not that actual photo)
Sadly, there’s no shortage of bosses mismanaging their teams. And one doesn’t have to look far for proof. 2018 research from Gallup, for example, revealed a series of alarming stats.
78 percent of employees, for example, don’t believe their leaders have a clear direction for the organization. Yes, there might be extensive communication plans, presentations, and memos, but in reality, few employees think their leaders know where their organization is headed, and only 15% of employees strongly agree the leadership of their organization makes them feel enthusiastic about the future.
Researchers think one reason may be that most leaders do not include a significant number of people in shaping the vision of their company. When people feel like they aren’t a part of the process, they are less enthusiastic about the outcome.
Also, only 14% of employees strongly agree that the performance reviews they receive inspire them to improve.
One cause is that performance conversations happen so infrequently and modern businesses change so quickly. So when managers and employees finally sit down to talk, few of the goals or measurements make sense anymore.
Then there’s the workload. 67% of employees say they are sometimes, very often, or always burned out. And that’s a problem. Employees who are very often or always burned out are 63% more likely to take a sick day and 23% more likely to visit the emergency room.
It also affects employee performance, retention, career growth, and even family life. So kudos to our engineer who fought overtime. “Work” or whatever you want to call this culture, it’s not something to be celebrated.
Managers should be very aware of these numbers because according to Joblist’s 2022 Job Market Trends Report:
- 3 out of 4 full-time employees are planning to quit their job this year;
- 79% of employed job seekers believe that they can make more money by switching jobs than staying put in the current market.
Plus, our elderly gentleman isn’t a standalone example. A few days ago, The Washington Post reported that, “Goldman Sachs estimated last fall that more than half of those who had left the workforce during the Covid era’s Great Resignation were over 55.”
Robert Kelley, who is a professor of management at Carnegie Mellon University’s Tepper School of Business, told Forbes that, “The Covid pandemic is producing a once in several generations seismic shift in the work world—from what work do we focus on, to who does that work, to where is the work performed, to how much life purpose do workers derive from their work”
Kelley prefers to see The Great Resignation as the first shock-wave of what he called the ‘Big Sort’ that will have trailing aftershocks. “All echelons—from CEOs to front-line workers—are sorting out their relationship with work and how work fits into their overall life-work balance, as well as how much they want to get paid for their work.”
Sounds like our engineer was ahead of the game and had already had his answers. The managers were just playing catch-up.
People thought the man handled the situation beautifully
702Kviews
Share on Facebook
Unions, people. You want better? Group of labor vs management has been shown to work quite well throughout the world and recent history. If you pay $100/year to a union that helps you get an extra $1600 a month at your job, and better safety, and health care.... Seriously, what's the problem? .... I will never understand how people got conned into thinking unions cost more than this absurdity we call "working conditions" in America. Rant over. peace out.
Well said! I can tell you how people got conned: by being given propaganda by powerful people who stand to lose from workers having protection.
GOOD Unions are a good thing. Bad unions are a waste. Back when I worked in retail, I was a member of the Retail Workers and Food Service union. The dues were equal to a couple hours pay per pay period. We barely saw a union rep unless it was "election time" for union officers. If you worked there 2 years you received COMPLETELY FREE Health insurance...in an industry where the average stint of employment was 90 days. IBEW on the other hand was a strong union. They had teeth, any pay and benefits were excellent
Because my first job the union took $5 a week and I didn't get a damn thing back
We in the US can thank "Saint Reagan" for tearing down the unions here. They're slowly making a comeback, thankfully, but don't have the power they once did.
You rather find a good employer than pay to work for bad one.
It is nice to read an anecdote of a union working the way they should. If this is the first story involving a union that you heard, your default position on unions should be positive. However, don't make the mistake of assuming there is no other side to the story or that all unions are run as well as depicted in this example. Just because your default position may be that "X is good" does not mean that it is good in every situation at any cost or that there are not any possible alternatives that could be superior.
You can thank Republicans for that. They've been trying to bust unions since they were organized.
Hey BP writer, Rokas L., 55 years old is not "elderly" lol
I was going to say the same thing! 55 is elderly? Given life expectancy in the US, for example, that would mean that for about 30% of a person's lived live, they would be identified as elderly.;
In short: Unions work, Labor laws work. In normal societies employees are protected against idiotic employers. Which contradicts the believe that unions are only out to destroy the economy by demanding absurd working conditions and extravagant wages.
Yeah...but unions aren't always that great. For example, auto unions historically haven't given one tiny crap about the environment. They have never demanded automakers create EVs or any sort of environmentally friendly vehicles. Also, many unions don't even work that well or even care that much. Just look a when Ford announced the Mustang Mach E would be made in another country rather than in America. The union complained a bit, and that's it! lol No strikes, no hardball, nothing!
Then new union leaders need to be elected
Read CONGRESS AND CAPITALISTS, every time you see labor, unions, workers ..
You're one of "those" employers aren't you?
No he is right. I was completely screwed over by our union when I was teaching in Vt. The special ed laws had just been changed and 2 of us were hired because they needed more cosulting teachers to meet the new requirements. But parents were extremely upset by the change in how services were delivered as a result and were up in arms with the school because they didnt think thier child was getting as much one on one help - they werent it was a full inclusion with consultation and a 1 hour one on one session every other day., when the previous year it had been a selfcontained class. We each now had 15 students in multiple classrooms - the upset parents' kids had been in a room with 5 kids and 3 adults previously. It was not the same (or as good) but we didnt cause it or have any control over it and the school offered to remove us and transfer the kids back to the old teacher - but she would now have 20 students in multiple rooms. Instead of standing up for us and helping us the union...
Told both of us to resign to make the parents happy before the school could come up with a reason to fire us. The school said that they would be happy with that and give us glowing recommendations because they thought we were doing a great job with the majority of our students. The union protected the school over the people they were supposed to help and joining was mandatory so we had no choice but to have the dues taken from our paycheck. I have never and will never trust a union again after that.
The employers are not idiotic, just predatory.
Unions, people. You want better? Group of labor vs management has been shown to work quite well throughout the world and recent history. If you pay $100/year to a union that helps you get an extra $1600 a month at your job, and better safety, and health care.... Seriously, what's the problem? .... I will never understand how people got conned into thinking unions cost more than this absurdity we call "working conditions" in America. Rant over. peace out.
Well said! I can tell you how people got conned: by being given propaganda by powerful people who stand to lose from workers having protection.
GOOD Unions are a good thing. Bad unions are a waste. Back when I worked in retail, I was a member of the Retail Workers and Food Service union. The dues were equal to a couple hours pay per pay period. We barely saw a union rep unless it was "election time" for union officers. If you worked there 2 years you received COMPLETELY FREE Health insurance...in an industry where the average stint of employment was 90 days. IBEW on the other hand was a strong union. They had teeth, any pay and benefits were excellent
Because my first job the union took $5 a week and I didn't get a damn thing back
We in the US can thank "Saint Reagan" for tearing down the unions here. They're slowly making a comeback, thankfully, but don't have the power they once did.
You rather find a good employer than pay to work for bad one.
It is nice to read an anecdote of a union working the way they should. If this is the first story involving a union that you heard, your default position on unions should be positive. However, don't make the mistake of assuming there is no other side to the story or that all unions are run as well as depicted in this example. Just because your default position may be that "X is good" does not mean that it is good in every situation at any cost or that there are not any possible alternatives that could be superior.
You can thank Republicans for that. They've been trying to bust unions since they were organized.
Hey BP writer, Rokas L., 55 years old is not "elderly" lol
I was going to say the same thing! 55 is elderly? Given life expectancy in the US, for example, that would mean that for about 30% of a person's lived live, they would be identified as elderly.;
In short: Unions work, Labor laws work. In normal societies employees are protected against idiotic employers. Which contradicts the believe that unions are only out to destroy the economy by demanding absurd working conditions and extravagant wages.
Yeah...but unions aren't always that great. For example, auto unions historically haven't given one tiny crap about the environment. They have never demanded automakers create EVs or any sort of environmentally friendly vehicles. Also, many unions don't even work that well or even care that much. Just look a when Ford announced the Mustang Mach E would be made in another country rather than in America. The union complained a bit, and that's it! lol No strikes, no hardball, nothing!
Then new union leaders need to be elected
Read CONGRESS AND CAPITALISTS, every time you see labor, unions, workers ..
You're one of "those" employers aren't you?
No he is right. I was completely screwed over by our union when I was teaching in Vt. The special ed laws had just been changed and 2 of us were hired because they needed more cosulting teachers to meet the new requirements. But parents were extremely upset by the change in how services were delivered as a result and were up in arms with the school because they didnt think thier child was getting as much one on one help - they werent it was a full inclusion with consultation and a 1 hour one on one session every other day., when the previous year it had been a selfcontained class. We each now had 15 students in multiple classrooms - the upset parents' kids had been in a room with 5 kids and 3 adults previously. It was not the same (or as good) but we didnt cause it or have any control over it and the school offered to remove us and transfer the kids back to the old teacher - but she would now have 20 students in multiple rooms. Instead of standing up for us and helping us the union...
Told both of us to resign to make the parents happy before the school could come up with a reason to fire us. The school said that they would be happy with that and give us glowing recommendations because they thought we were doing a great job with the majority of our students. The union protected the school over the people they were supposed to help and joining was mandatory so we had no choice but to have the dues taken from our paycheck. I have never and will never trust a union again after that.
The employers are not idiotic, just predatory.