15Kviews
When AI Meets Magic: I Gave Harry Potter Characters A Shrek-Tastic Makeover (14 Pics)
15Kviews
Have you ever wondered what the Harry Potter series would look like if it was an animation? If so, you've come to the right place! I asked AI image generator Midjourney to reimagine a selection of the most popular characters in Harry Potter in the animation style of DreamWorks, specifically as characters from Shrek.
A cartoon version of the Harry Potter movies would be absolutely incredible, and this mash-up of styles works perfectly. Scroll down to see the results of a Harry Potter and DreamWorks Shrek animation style mash-up!
More info: tiktok.com
This post may include affiliate links.
Hermione Granger
Severus Snape
Draco Malfoy
He looks too innocent but it's alright...EXCEPT WHY DOES HE HAVE HARRY'S EYES?!
Rubeus Hagrid
Luna Lovegood
apparently Luna was a succubus/demon or something the whole time. huh.
Little Harry Potter
No. Hair should be BLACK. He was UNDER FED. NEVER round or chubby faced.
Minerva Mcgonagall
Voldemort (Who Got His Nose Back!)
!["Karen Complains To HR About My Body, I Uno-Reverse Her Complaint, [And Now] Everyone Hates Her"](https://www.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/coworker-complains-to-hr-about-womans-body-revenge-latest.jpg "\"Karen Complains To HR About My Body, I Uno-Reverse Her Complaint, [And Now] Everyone Hates Her\"")
Don't use this s**t. It works on stolen Art.
Stolen work fed into a program isn't art.
There is no "I" in "AI". It's just elaborate copy/paste algorithms. It's isn't capable of originality, and its "knowledge" was stolen by vacuuming up copyrighted items - frequently over the direct objections of the sites hosting those items. Do better.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
There is, acutally, but it stands for iniquity
You didn’t think much on what Sand meant, which is that there’s no intelligence in AI. (And that’s what the “I” stands for.) It’s nothing but code coming up with these unimaginative, uninspiring, unenchanting pieces of “art,” which, in this case, is even more artificial than usual.
Damn, dudes. He was agreeing with me and reenforcing my point. How about retracting the downvotes.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Still better than 99% of so called artists these days
You couldn't be more incorrect, Filip. At least artists have to have some degree of forethought, and talent to actually draw. AI "artists", and I struggle very hard to use that word to describe people who vomit out pics with AI, have 0 talent behind them, and the pictures always look ugly.
How can it be better if it steals from them?
(Replying to Filip Zigo) Actually, The tiny bit of skill you see in AI "art" is taken from the "so called artists" you are talking about.
Don't use this s**t. It works on stolen Art.
Stolen work fed into a program isn't art.
There is no "I" in "AI". It's just elaborate copy/paste algorithms. It's isn't capable of originality, and its "knowledge" was stolen by vacuuming up copyrighted items - frequently over the direct objections of the sites hosting those items. Do better.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
There is, acutally, but it stands for iniquity
You didn’t think much on what Sand meant, which is that there’s no intelligence in AI. (And that’s what the “I” stands for.) It’s nothing but code coming up with these unimaginative, uninspiring, unenchanting pieces of “art,” which, in this case, is even more artificial than usual.
Damn, dudes. He was agreeing with me and reenforcing my point. How about retracting the downvotes.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Still better than 99% of so called artists these days
You couldn't be more incorrect, Filip. At least artists have to have some degree of forethought, and talent to actually draw. AI "artists", and I struggle very hard to use that word to describe people who vomit out pics with AI, have 0 talent behind them, and the pictures always look ugly.
How can it be better if it steals from them?
(Replying to Filip Zigo) Actually, The tiny bit of skill you see in AI "art" is taken from the "so called artists" you are talking about.